Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 07:08:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Unmoderated XC thread  (Read 57169 times)
Polycoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:16:27 PM
 #21

X11coin aka XC was made by loljosh. Some of you may know him, some of you may not. Anyway, he's paid to make alt coins(see his thread)

Some coins he has made are: Synccoin, Cinni, Whitecoin, and X11coin.

Those coins have been made by 1 person, loljosh, as the devs themselves(claim to be devs) dont have any understanding of the actual coding, check their history posts as well, they never answer direct questions about anything technical..

I'm sorry for stakeholders/bagholders on those coins, but x11coin is just another coingen coin if you mean, with just advanced features. (coingen is a website that creates alt coins for 0.1 btc, loljosh makes better alt coins for 0.4 btc)

Polycoin Troopers, Assemble!
sin242
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:17:20 PM
 #22

WHERE is the peer review for Darksend?


What code do you suspect Evan of copying?



Are you implying something?  Where is the peer review for Darksend? I OWN xc and drk. Fair is fair.


Whats fair? dark didn't demand a review of xc's code. The xc community did.

Dark:  Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z
BTC:  1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 8013



View Profile WWW
May 29, 2014, 11:17:58 PM
 #23


Keyword

Months vs Weeks Wink

Simple thinking is the best thinking.

You should have ramped up your thinking in this instance because you missed the point entirely. DRK has had much more time to fall, and if it were truly a scamcoin then it would have, much closer to the degree that XC has.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:18:14 PM
 #24

Good idea.

However, XC people only post in the main DRK thread because they want to draw in suckers into their fucking scam.

It is the most outrageous scam I've seen for a while. Everything is a complete rip-off from darkcoin, even using names similar to darkcoin, the algo, the original name. The project was given air off the darkcoin efforts and community spread over several months of dedication.

The darkcoin thread gets plenty of visitors. So where best to promote a fucking scam? yeah, that's right, in the darkcoin thread. How do you keep the scam going, longer and longer, keep posting scam thread posts.

When things go wrong, what do you do? Tell everyone its all the fault of darkcoin thread and darkcoin spreading FUD. Yeah right.

Next, lock the XC thread and start a new self-moderated thread to keep the message on point and extend the scam a bit longer.

If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I have been known to be wrong.

But from everything  I have read and seen, its a fucking scam.

Please, please, please prove me wrong. If its legitimate, I'll dump a few thousand dark and buy a few thousand xc.

OPEN SOURCE, BUDDY! Check Linux-->Google-->Cyanogen

If its so fucking innovative and has so many useful security features why copy everything from darkcoin from the X11coin first used to the x11 algo?

fucking scam. hope the feds catch-up with the culprits.
Grifftech
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:18:21 PM
 #25

HOW ABOUT DARKSEND REVIEW???
sin242
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:19:10 PM
 #26

HOW ABOUT DARKSEND REVIEW???


Dark community doesn't need it.  Unlike others... *cough*

Dark:  Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z
BTC:  1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
solid12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:19:15 PM
 #27



Its not at the moment because of fucking scams like XC. Everything else is a complete fucking rip-off from darkcoin, DarkSend will be too.


Darksend is at heart a basic coin mixer, I thought coin mixers were shit so what's the problem of releasing the source?

Also if there is one ultimate reason to audit the code...is to know that BOTH Evan or Dan aren't fed honey pots
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:19:29 PM
 #28

WHERE is the peer review for Darksend?
What code do you suspect Evan of copying?
EXACTLY... He could have copied everything or even have hidden mining code for himself.   Who would know without a PEER REVIEW??

Copied everything? From who? DarkSend was the first decentralized implementation. There was no other. That's precisely how you would know.
ReRunRod
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:19:46 PM
 #29

X11coin aka XC was made by loljosh. Some of you may know him, some of you may not. Anyway, he's paid to make alt coins(see his thread)

Some coins he has made are: Synccoin, Cinni, Whitecoin, and X11coin.

Those coins have been made by 1 person, loljosh, as the devs themselves(claim to be devs) dont have any understanding of the actual coding, check their history posts as well, they never answer direct questions about anything technical..

I'm sorry for stakeholders/bagholders on those coins, but x11coin is just another coingen coin if you mean, with just advanced features. (coingen is a website that creates alt coins for 0.1 btc, loljosh makes better alt coins for 0.4 btc)


Sent him a PM to verify this.
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:20:24 PM
 #30



Its not at the moment because of fucking scams like XC. Everything else is a complete fucking rip-off from darkcoin, DarkSend will be too.


Darksend is at heart a basic coin mixer, I thought coin mixers were shit so what's the problem of releasing the source?

because of fucking scammers waiting for it.

they will get a chance when it is open sourced. then watch the scams coming out of every orifice.
Teka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:20:52 PM
 #31

WHERE is the peer review for Darksend?

Someone was willing to pay for an independent audit of xc. they were completely ignored. You could have said, yeah when its ready you will get a chance.

Instead he was ignored and some random guy gave it the thumbs up. Why not let several people check it.

As for DarkSend. Well that is going to be made open source.

Its not at the moment because of fucking scams like XC. Everything else is a complete fucking rip-off from darkcoin, DarkSend will be too.

You'll just have to reinvest what you made so far off innocent people in another scam further down the line when the code is open sourced.

mindfox has also checeked it, oh and there is a bounty for rat4 if he takes it.
solid12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:21:30 PM
 #32



because of fucking scammers waiting for it.


Truecrypt proved at the time the best product always wins in the end no matter how many copy it and it was fully open source. I thought the point of crypto was to change the world, not obscenely profit off your creation?
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:21:49 PM
 #33

WHERE is the peer review for Darksend?

Someone was willing to pay for an independent audit of xc. they were completely ignored. You could have said, yeah when its ready you will get a chance.

Instead he was ignored and some random guy gave it the thumbs up. Why not let several people check it.

As for DarkSend. Well that is going to be made open source.

Its not at the moment because of fucking scams like XC. Everything else is a complete fucking rip-off from darkcoin, DarkSend will be too.

You'll just have to reinvest what you made so far off innocent people in another scam further down the line when the code is open sourced.

mindfox has also checeked it, oh and there is a bounty for rat4 if he takes it.

why lock the thread? too many searching questions?
Brilliantrocket
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:22:18 PM
 #34

XC is a shitcoin, plain and simple. The dev made a useless centralized coin mixer, threw in the word "paradigm" a few times, and now he gets to cash in his premine.
tat123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 261
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
May 29, 2014, 11:22:44 PM
 #35

WHERE is the peer review for Darksend?


What code do you suspect Evan of copying?



Are you implying something?  Where is the peer review for Darksend? I OWN xc and drk. Fair is fair.


Whats fair? dark didn't demand a review of xc's code. The xc community did.

Well as a holder of drk... i would like a peer review.
tr8kr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:23:01 PM
 #36

Darkcoin dev must peer review darksend code to see if it's not a copycat of Fedora...

AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:23:35 PM
 #37



Its not at the moment because of fucking scams like XC. Everything else is a complete fucking rip-off from darkcoin, DarkSend will be too.


Darksend is at heart a basic coin mixer, I thought coin mixers were shit so what's the problem of releasing the source?

Also if there is one ultimate reason to audit the code...is to know that BOTH Evan or Dan aren't fed honey pots

To make something like coinjoin work is problematic for various reasons as it has many weaknesses and requires multiple work-arounds or tradeoffs.

There is a reason why coins that try to do what DRK has done, fail. Libertycoin hired a dev with a bounty and failed. They are assigning it to "chinese software company". XC is just a centralized mixer a la fedoracoin. Who has decentralized mixer? Oh, yes, noone except Darksend.

DarkSend will be opensourced after RC4 + bugfixes. That's the public development plan.
coinzcoinzcoinz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 530
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:23:40 PM
 #38

Lol xc 'devs' are marketing geniuses. Theyve been exposed now, but Im sure their scam made them millions.
sin242
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:24:04 PM
 #39

WHERE is the peer review for Darksend?


What code do you suspect Evan of copying?



Are you implying something?  Where is the peer review for Darksend? I OWN xc and drk. Fair is fair.


Whats fair? dark didn't demand a review of xc's code. The xc community did.

Well as a holder of drk... i would like a peer review.

You represent the entire community?

Dark:  Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z
BTC:  1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:24:18 PM
 #40



because of fucking scammers waiting for it.


Truecrypt proved at the time the best product always wins in the end no matter how many copy it and it was fully open source. I thought the point of crypto was to change the world, not obscenely profit off your creation?


well what do you know. reason. good idea.

if XC hadn't gone out to be so closely linked to Darkcoin, I  might have figured, let them go for it. who knows. I haven't hardly said a word about MRO, i actually bought some.

this was so fucking blatant. and you all know it. go and sell your story to the sheep.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!