[ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner

[GamingBro]

Is the R9 Fury X currently the best mining card available for AMD?
Though price wise, would be better to get 2 290X or 2 390X correct?(or 295x2 if they still sold them)

If you can get second hand 7950/7970/280/280x these would be the best price wise. Otherwise, if you can afford, go with AMD Nano. Stay away from Hawaii (290x, 390x) due to high power consumption and overheating issues.

Concerning overheating and power consumption - absolute truth, just forget about it. I have bought 4 of them and it was a foolish waste of money, it would be much more profitable to buy a few 280X second hand.

[CommanderVenus]

https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison

Im sure probably everyone has seen this page before. Is there anything like this out there for any other algorithms?

CRYPTOMINING BLOG--

Visit "cryptomining-blog.com" .  They have today (5 JAN 2016) posted a fresh comparison hash rate chart.  They have many older versions if you search the site.       --scryptr

Thank you, if only they had some articles on my r9 380! Oh well heh.

[Fredomago]

Is the R9 Fury X currently the best mining card available for AMD?
Though price wise, would be better to get 2 290X or 2 390X correct?(or 295x2 if they still sold them)

If you can get second hand 7950/7970/280/280x these would be the best price wise. Otherwise, if you can afford, go with AMD Nano. Stay away from Hawaii (290x, 390x) due to high power consumption and overheating issues.

Concerning overheating and power consumption - absolute truth, just forget about it. I have bought 4 of them and it was a foolish waste of money, it would be much more profitable to buy a few 280X second hand.

In my mining rigs, I only have 7970 or 7990, they are even cheaper than 280x, but are essentially the same.

[z0n0]

Is the R9 Fury X currently the best mining card available for AMD?
Though price wise, would be better to get 2 290X or 2 390X correct?(or 295x2 if they still sold them)

If you can get second hand 7950/7970/280/280x these would be the best price wise. Otherwise, if you can afford, go with AMD Nano. Stay away from Hawaii (290x, 390x) due to high power consumption and overheating issues.

Concerning overheating and power consumption - absolute truth, just forget about it. I have bought 4 of them and it was a foolish waste of money, it would be much more profitable to buy a few 280X second hand.

In my mining rigs, I only have 7970 or 7990, they are even cheaper than 280x, but are essentially the same.

How is 7990 cheaper than 280x?? 

[z0n0]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

[platinum4]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

Edit:  Windows 10x64; Crimson 15.12

[z0n0]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

ty
So if I'm not wrong, 7990 can go to almost 50MH, which means is way far most profitable with ETH?

[ldw-com]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

ty
So if I'm not wrong, 7990 can go to almost 50MH, which means is way far most profitable with ETH?

There's not a single card that can reach 50Mh

a 7990 will hit 25Mhz.

[pallas]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

ty
So if I'm not wrong, 7990 can go to almost 50MH, which means is way far most profitable with ETH?

There's not a single card that can reach 50Mh

a 7990 will hit 25Mhz.

Mh/s

x 2 (it has 2 chips in it) = 50

[z0n0]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

ty
So if I'm not wrong, 7990 can go to almost 50MH, which means is way far most profitable with ETH?

There's not a single card that can reach 50Mh

a 7990 will hit 25Mhz.

From ETH forum:

Code:

dont12
dont12 Posts: 19Member ✭
November 2015
7990 getting 52 Mh/s cores at 1.2V Fans at 100% temps about 85 to 90 Wattage at wall 550W

Cant tell if ment with 2 GPUs or just one

[z0n0]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

ty
So if I'm not wrong, 7990 can go to almost 50MH, which means is way far most profitable with ETH?

There's not a single card that can reach 50Mh

a 7990 will hit 25Mhz.

From ETH forum:

Code:

dont12
dont12 Posts: 19Member ✭
November 2015
7990 getting 52 Mh/s cores at 1.2V Fans at 100% temps about 85 to 90 Wattage at wall 550W

Cant tell if ment with 2 GPUs or just one

Another post from ETH forum:

Code:

o0ragman0o Posts: 265Member ✭✭
October 2015

    Daface said:


    The 7990's is running at 59mh/s and the R9390 at 32.5 mh/s

Man I really need to pull my finger out on my 7990. It's only doing 45... One core seems wound back for some reason.

[pallas]

guys the 7990 is just two 7970, so double the speed and almost double power usage.
and much more than double cost to purchase.

[go6ooo1212]

Which is the power - consumption with 7990 on ETH

[ldw-com]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

ty
So if I'm not wrong, 7990 can go to almost 50MH, which means is way far most profitable with ETH?

There's not a single card that can reach 50Mh

a 7990 will hit 25Mhz.

Mh/s

x 2 (it has 2 chips in it) = 50

I miss-read that. Thx for correcting me

[RyanX]

Which is the power - consumption with 7990 on ETH

It is about the double of 7970. For 50 MH/s, the power consumption is about 180W X2 = 360W. You can have up to 4 7990 in a system.

[rednoW]

For Eth, I found no difference between 14.6, 14.7, 15.x catalyst drivers. Do you find any difference? If any, what is the difference?

Sorry, I didn't make in-depth tests comparing different latest drivers. It was recommended somewhere for ethminer-opencl-0.9.41 and for kachur optimized sgminer too. I installed them and was satisfied with results.

[platinum4]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

Edit:  Windows 10x64; Crimson 15.12

Update: 16.1 Crimson Hotfix (Jan. 7) has no discernible increase/decrease on ETH mining hashrate.

[Simpan]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

Edit:  Windows 10x64; Crimson 15.12

Update: 16.1 Crimson Hotfix (Jan. 7) has no discernible increase/decrease on ETH mining hashrate.

I also find no difference between 14.6, 14.7, 15.2 and 15.7.

[Eliovp]

Can someone share hash speed with HD7990 and R9290X on mining ETH.

Thanks.

ETH R9 290X: 26.33MH/s @ 1040/1300/-25%/-25mV; 26.67MH/s @ 1040/1300/-10%; 30MH/s @ 1150/1500/+50%/+25mV

Edit:  Windows 10x64; Crimson 15.12

Update: 16.1 Crimson Hotfix (Jan. 7) has no discernible increase/decrease on ETH mining hashrate.

I also find no difference between 14.6, 14.7, 15.2 and 15.7.

Not with R9 2** series.

Fury however, a little increase with the newest Crimson drivers. But not "that" much.

[ayayay]

I will buy a card to mine dash/darkcoin- what is the most powerful card to do so--


thanks