tomewok
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 03, 2014, 04:26:48 PM |
|
Hi, i don't know why but i can't get more than 100 hash/s on my i5-4670k clocked at 4.4Ghz and if i go with stock clock i can't get more than 80 hash/s :/
|
|
|
|
greatwolf
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 03, 2014, 08:35:14 PM |
|
This crashes on my intel Q6600 4 core processor.
|
|
|
|
greatwolf
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 03, 2014, 09:06:05 PM |
|
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI. How do you know if you have it? If the binary crashes, you don't. ...
Were you referring to that? Did you mean for that to be interpreted as "only a Win64 AES-NI binary is available" because when I first read it, it sounded like there was a non AES-NI build available somewhere. And you also mentioned some optimizations done to the legacy part as well so I'm a bit confused.
|
|
|
|
tersagun
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 03, 2014, 09:58:37 PM |
|
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool. Hey mate, are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.
|
|
|
|
tersagun
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 03, 2014, 10:13:26 PM |
|
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool. Hey mate, are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate. The hashrate represents something near the real value on every other pool. If only Minergate is different, that would indicate something is wrong with them, not the miner. Thanks for the reply Wolf. I'll make some more tests tomorrow to compare actual mined coins on different scenarios.
|
|
|
|
ajeef
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 03, 2014, 11:29:38 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FBpM7prWCAAAPrIf.jpg%3Alarge&t=665&c=rLp0kgDa7aWprw) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FBpM7pQrCcAEgPZC.jpg%3Alarge&t=665&c=0ufgXgfsKmmqJQ) 4 threads easy get shares what's your cpu? e3 1230
|
|
|
|
tequillaquagga
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 04, 2014, 10:26:04 AM |
|
OSX 10.9.3 brew install automake autoconf curl then git clone repo, run autogen, run no macro.pl When exec ./configure, I got error:
./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,' ./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'
I have fresh install of OSX. What wrong?
Thanks.
|
The Camel Marches On
|
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 02:07:13 AM |
|
good job man!
|
|
|
|
Quicken
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 12:59:48 PM |
|
Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.
Hi Wolf0. Can you explain why linux is quicker than Windows for this task? I'm running on Windows, and this PC isn't just for mining so I can't easily switch. Thanks, Q
|
|
|
|
ROBERTO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1421
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 06:19:46 PM |
|
Hello, I have this on my openssl engine jimmy1@localhost:~$ openssl engine (rsax) RSAX engine support (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support How to add aesni to openssl engine? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Please Thanks
|
|
|
|
ROBERTO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1421
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 06:59:55 PM |
|
Thanks for your reply wolf0
Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s
Thanks
|
|
|
|
GreekBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
getmonero.org
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 07:16:25 PM |
|
Thanks for your reply wolf0
Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s
Thanks
Configure with --disable-aes-ni
|
|
|
|
relm9
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2014, 12:29:28 AM |
|
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled. when I make , I got a error: gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ? thanks.
Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual E5-2620 with -t 12.
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2014, 11:52:55 AM |
|
Do you have plans to add merged mining (for FCN) ?
|
|
|
|
Syzygy123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2014, 08:56:19 PM |
|
Do you know what cpu models you were using with the amazon instance? I'm wondering if there is any more tweaking I can do with dual e5 2680s. I'm currently getting about 750 hash/s using 16 threads (tried the 21 threads that you used).
|
|
|
|
relm9
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2014, 01:24:05 AM |
|
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled. when I make , I got a error: gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ? thanks.
Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual E5-2620 with -t 12. It's not your GCC version - update your binutils. You may get a better hashrate with it. Worked - thanks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Slight speedup - +~10 H/s
|
|
|
|
ozzy1926
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2014, 06:03:01 AM |
|
whats the .bat settings for 4770k @win7x64
|
|
|
|
coinfusion
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2014, 07:44:54 AM |
|
Seems like everything after the may 28th commit doesn't work right for non-aesNI. Hashes are happening, but nothing is ever submitted to the pool. Gotta get more information but sleepy time now!
|
|
|
|
best2002
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2014, 09:17:21 PM |
|
AMD1055T won't run, you can solve? please .
|
|
|
|
|