Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2018, 11:56:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014  (Read 545673 times)
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:49:54 PM
 #101

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.

Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.



as far as u know right, cause cryptonote is anonymous.
1542326217
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542326217

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542326217
Reply with quote  #2

1542326217
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542326217
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542326217

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542326217
Reply with quote  #2

1542326217
Report to moderator
1542326217
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542326217

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542326217
Reply with quote  #2

1542326217
Report to moderator
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 10:57:24 PM
 #102

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.

ofc you rather get a cheap imitation get known.
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:13:41 PM
 #103

Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   Shocked
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:54:20 PM
 #104

Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   Shocked

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.

oh wait, u didnt even notice i was being sarcastic.
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:20:14 AM
 #105

I am attempting to compile this miner at two linux distros and have no luck. Need an advice.
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17

At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock is 2.68).

I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.

The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quiet if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.

Code:
./minerd -a cryptonight --benchmark
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have found numerous errors in config.log

At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:24:38 AM
 #106

The CPU is not really loaded, quite unusual.

After a time and vm.nr_hugepages I realized it is working. May I need to work out a better CPU utilization.
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 05:13:12 AM
 #107

Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...

[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 06:02:07 AM
 #108

Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...

[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)

CPU? Did you use CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure and then make? Also, did you configure the hugepages as detailed in the OP?

cd ~/ && rm -rf cpuminer && mkdir cpuminer && cd cpuminer && git clone http://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git && pushd cpuminer-multi && cd ~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi && ./autogen.sh && export CFLAGS="-march=native"  && ./configure && make && unset CLFAGS && popd

and just now enabled huge pages @ 21.
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 06:03:35 AM
 #109

[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

Looking better...
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 06:27:27 AM
 #110

[2014-06-11 02:25:08] submit_upstream_work stratum_send_line failed
[2014-06-11 02:25:08] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-11 02:26:14] stratum_recv_line timed out

Getting a lot of these now...
pattanan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 11, 2014, 09:04:54 AM
 #111

Can this miner run merge mining without using the crappy minergate.com?
If it can, how do I run it?
Thk
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:18:18 PM
 #112

This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.


PeaMine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 774
Merit: 501



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 07:00:02 PM
 #113

This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.




62C and you're worried?

I've ran them above 70c for weeks with no issue.  Cooler is better of course, but I don't think 60s C for your CPU is bad.

Datacenter Technician and Electrician
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 07:28:11 PM
 #114

This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.




62C and you're worried?

I've ran them above 70c for weeks with no issue.  Cooler is better of course, but I don't think 60s C for your CPU is bad.

Well it seems the IC7 diamond paste had dried up in 2 weeks, pretty crap. I added the crap coolermaster paste and its holding at 56 @ 4.4ghz. I read multiple places that 61 or higher on the amd fx isn't good.
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 11:10:04 PM
 #115

configure: error: could not find crypto

how do you solve this?
nrg_wolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 01:47:50 AM
 #116

is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃
Agamemnus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 268
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 02:11:10 AM
 #117

Well it seems the IC7 diamond paste had dried up in 2 weeks, pretty crap. I added the crap coolermaster paste and its holding at 56 @ 4.4ghz. I read multiple places that 61 or higher on the amd fx isn't good.

Ditch that EVO cooler and grab yourself a Silverstone TD03 or the nearest water cooler that you can fit in your case (they are all different, make sure it fits before you do it). Once you have that, your temps will be so much lower for everything you do. 60c isn't bad on those but 65c is shortening the life span. You should be able to keep it lower than 60 almost indefinitely, especially with this miner which doesn't even pass 45c on my 4930k.

nrg_wolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 05:49:55 AM
 #118

is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.0

smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1058



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 06:49:29 AM
 #119

is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

I don't see why it would be since it claims 270 H/s on a 4770 and this one claims 300+, and on top of that Claymore takes 5% of your hash rate. I guess Claymore has a fan base though, so perhaps people use it.

His low CPU mode looks interesting though, I wonder what that is doing.

ozzy1926
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 06:52:17 AM
 #120

is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

I don't see why it would be since it claims 270 H/s on a 4770 and this one claims 300+, and on top of that Claymore takes 5% of your hash rate. I guess Claymore has a fan base though, so perhaps people use it.

His low CPU mode looks interesting though, I wonder what that is doing.



i tried both and for me claymores is giving more stable hashrates win 7 x64
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!