Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3

[Ambros]

Have you noticed any major difference between 9.7 an 9.6 in hashrates on RX cards?
I would like to updated my miners, but on my mule it seems that it's useless

[drr0ss]

15:08:03:552   ebc   Share accepted (47 ms)!
15:08:03:554   ebc   new buf size: 0
15:08:03:811   ebc   got 253 bytes
15:08:03:812   ebc   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0305b18ab9c305bd445849f96d802717976bad3a8b963a375708165dd14e7ba72c265651e2d1fa0 00000009cd03fa3310789f936b610b107779382ae28cc6878446bf1d91027f8fae2bcda17","job_id":"737135642999783","target":"b88d0600"}}

15:08:03:813   ebc   parse packet: 253
15:08:03:814   ebc   new buf size: 0
15:08:03:817   ebc   01/05/17-15:08:03 - New job received from xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005
15:08:03:819   ebc   Speed: 680 h/s, Total Shares: 705, Rejected: 0, Mining time:
15:08:03:821   ebc   03:45
15:08:03:823   ebc   TotalHashes: 6597K, DevHashes: 163K, DevFee rate is 1:39
15:08:04:252   b2c   Job changed, drop current round
15:08:04:254   b2c   Round
15:08:04:255   4dc   Round
15:08:05:088   ebc   got 78 bytes
15:08:05:089   ebc   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"","job_id":"","target":""}}

15:08:05:090   ebc   parse packet: 78
15:08:05:092   ebc   cannot convert blob data
15:08:05:094   ebc   new buf size: 0
15:08:05:802   b2c   GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1503 ms, hashrate = 681 h/s
15:08:05:818   b2c   Round
15:08:07:340   4dc   GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1502 ms, hashrate = 681 h/s
15:08:07:355   4dc   Dev round
15:08:08:879   b2c   GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1501 ms, hashrate = 682 h/s
15:08:08:895   b2c   Round
15:08:10:418   4dc   GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1502 ms, hashrate = 681 h/s
15:08:10:434   4dc   dev round found 1 shares
15:08:10:435   f84   DevFee: 01/05/17-15:08:10 - SHARE FOUND (target 2000) - (GPU 0 of 1)

what is this error about?

Dwarfpool goes crazy, as you can see it sends empty job:

15:08:05:089   ebc   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"","job_id":"","target":""}}

It's not miner issue.

@Claymore, another question, using tuning usually gets my ip banned, first of all, gpu is not overclocked, however, hashrates shown differs on multiples same gpu model, for example, rx 480 8gb, card 1, shows 690 h/s, rx 480 8gb, card 2, shows 660 h/s, the only way for card 2 to reach card speeds is to tune -h values, up and down -h 1024 to -h 992 and back to -h 1024, is there a way you can make highest values stable, i mean, all gpus reach highest possible hashrate?

Use "-h" option, read Readme for details.

Ok, but this not happens with previous version of miner 9.6

Edit:
I will sent you my log...

[Metroid]

Use "-h" option, read Readme for details.

I made that test, first computer 5 gpus with -h 1024, second computer 5 gpus without -h, usually 3 out 10 gpus reach highest hashrate values, others will need to be tuned via console with "m" keyboard key and then "-" and then "+".

[pehoko]

[off]
Everyone - stop mining on this freak dwarfpool please and stop spamming this thread with this pool!!!
[/off]

[Claymore]

Please don't report issues if you mine on Dwarfpool, today this pool has some problems.

Use "-h" option, read Readme for details.

I made that test, first computer 5 gpus with -h 1024, second computer 5 gpus without -h, usually 3 out 10 gpus reach highest hashrate values, others will need to be tuned via console with "m" keyboard key and then "-" and then "+".

I don't have any ideas, sorry.

[-Night-]

"-powlim x" option does not work! - unknown option.

[Claymore]

"-powlim x" option does not work! - unknown option.

Confirmed, will be fixed in next update.

[aaronsace]

[off]
Everyone - stop mining on this freak dwarfpool please and stop spamming this thread with this pool!!!
[/off]

LOL, these threads get full of stuff completely unrelated to Claymore's miners. The bios mod stuff is the worst, goes on forever.

[Metroid]

Have you noticed any major difference between 9.7 an 9.6 in hashrates on RX cards?
I would like to updated my miners, but on my mule it seems that it's useless

No, nothing. However he fixed and added many things. I'm also waiting hashrates improvements on 4x RX series.

[maxmad_x]

Yep;

Got my ID banned on dwarfpool

Code:

08:26:37:377	10e0	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1353 ms, hashrate = 756 h/s 
08:26:37:392	10e0	Round
08:26:38:236	10ec	GPU 3: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1360 ms, hashrate = 752 h/s 
08:26:38:267	10ec	Round
08:26:38:580	10f0	GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1346 ms, hashrate = 760 h/s 
08:26:38:595	1234	GPU 5: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1341 ms, hashrate = 763 h/s 
08:26:38:611	10f0	Round
08:26:38:627	10f4	GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1344 ms, hashrate = 761 h/s 
08:26:38:627	1234	Round
08:26:38:642	10f4	round found 2 shares
08:26:38:642	10e4	01/05/17-08:26:38 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 6)
08:26:38:642	10f4	Round
08:26:38:642	10e4	send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "199969689897261", "job_id": "689900684333406", "nonce": "54632500", "result": "1e9f2c565f18b51b23d06f6ac4a817aeaf59226214594db22f36795451f10400"}, "id":4}

08:26:38:642	10e4	01/05/17-08:26:38 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 6)
08:26:38:642	10e4	send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "199969689897261", "job_id": "689900684333406", "nonce": "f87f2500", "result": "30451fcb219ca302140fe54a2ab8fed67fa8befa365e3696b90e7d110d260100"}, "id":4}

08:26:38:689	114c	GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1336 ms, hashrate = 766 h/s 
08:26:38:705	114c	Round
08:26:38:720	10e4	got 73 bytes
08:26:38:720	10e4	buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

08:26:38:720	10e4	parse packet: 73
08:26:38:720	10e4	Share rejected (78 ms)!
08:26:38:720	10e4	{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}
08:26:38:720	10e4	new buf size: 0
08:26:38:767	10fc	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1356 ms, hashrate = 755 h/s 
08:26:38:783	10e4	got 73 bytes
08:26:38:783	10e4	buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

08:26:38:783	10e4	parse packet: 73
08:26:38:783	10e4	Share rejected (140 ms)!
08:26:38:783	10e4	{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}
08:26:38:799	10e4	new buf size: 0
08:26:38:799	10fc	Round
08:26:39:642	1108	GPU 3: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1364 ms, hashrate = 750 h/s 
08:26:39:658	1108	Round
08:26:39:955	1304	GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1346 ms, hashrate = 760 h/s 
08:26:39:970	10f8	GPU 5: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1340 ms, hashrate = 764 h/s 
08:26:39:986	1304	Round
08:26:40:002	10f8	Round
08:26:40:002	1370	GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1344 ms, hashrate = 761 h/s 
08:26:40:017	1370	Round
08:26:40:064	1168	GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1336 ms, hashrate = 766 h/s 
08:26:40:095	1168	Round
08:26:40:158	10e0	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1357 ms, hashrate = 754 h/s 

@Claymore; I am Pming you the full log file.

[jelin1984]

any option to make it better
for r9 fury

[Qazo]

can you please post example code for this new version with SSL on https://miningpoolhub.com/

I cannot get it work

[rawbert]

What's going on with the supernova xmr pool??
It barely shows any earnings and hashrate is dropping like crazy.. why are people fleeing?
Where do you guys mine xmr? All xmr pools seem to have issues..

[drr0ss]

Yep;

Got my ID banned on dwarfpool

Code:

08:26:37:377	10e0	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1353 ms, hashrate = 756 h/s 
08:26:37:392	10e0	Round
08:26:38:236	10ec	GPU 3: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1360 ms, hashrate = 752 h/s 
08:26:38:267	10ec	Round
08:26:38:580	10f0	GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1346 ms, hashrate = 760 h/s 
08:26:38:595	1234	GPU 5: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1341 ms, hashrate = 763 h/s 
08:26:38:611	10f0	Round
08:26:38:627	10f4	GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1344 ms, hashrate = 761 h/s 
08:26:38:627	1234	Round
08:26:38:642	10f4	round found 2 shares
08:26:38:642	10e4	01/05/17-08:26:38 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 6)
08:26:38:642	10f4	Round
08:26:38:642	10e4	send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "199969689897261", "job_id": "689900684333406", "nonce": "54632500", "result": "1e9f2c565f18b51b23d06f6ac4a817aeaf59226214594db22f36795451f10400"}, "id":4}

08:26:38:642	10e4	01/05/17-08:26:38 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 6)
08:26:38:642	10e4	send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "199969689897261", "job_id": "689900684333406", "nonce": "f87f2500", "result": "30451fcb219ca302140fe54a2ab8fed67fa8befa365e3696b90e7d110d260100"}, "id":4}

08:26:38:689	114c	GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1336 ms, hashrate = 766 h/s 
08:26:38:705	114c	Round
08:26:38:720	10e4	got 73 bytes
08:26:38:720	10e4	buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

08:26:38:720	10e4	parse packet: 73
08:26:38:720	10e4	Share rejected (78 ms)!
08:26:38:720	10e4	{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}
08:26:38:720	10e4	new buf size: 0
08:26:38:767	10fc	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1356 ms, hashrate = 755 h/s 
08:26:38:783	10e4	got 73 bytes
08:26:38:783	10e4	buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

08:26:38:783	10e4	parse packet: 73
08:26:38:783	10e4	Share rejected (140 ms)!
08:26:38:783	10e4	{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}
08:26:38:799	10e4	new buf size: 0
08:26:38:799	10fc	Round
08:26:39:642	1108	GPU 3: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1364 ms, hashrate = 750 h/s 
08:26:39:658	1108	Round
08:26:39:955	1304	GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1346 ms, hashrate = 760 h/s 
08:26:39:970	10f8	GPU 5: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1340 ms, hashrate = 764 h/s 
08:26:39:986	1304	Round
08:26:40:002	10f8	Round
08:26:40:002	1370	GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1344 ms, hashrate = 761 h/s 
08:26:40:017	1370	Round
08:26:40:064	1168	GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1336 ms, hashrate = 766 h/s 
08:26:40:095	1168	Round
08:26:40:158	10e0	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1357 ms, hashrate = 754 h/s 

@Claymore; I am Pming you the full log file.

Use version 9.6
@Claymore, one note, check please if working the flowing option in version 9.7 especially for dwarf:
-u wallet_id.wallet.(rig_number)
(dot rig number)
(this is regarding your notice from my log - Pool sends responses to shares that miner did not send)

[blue1984]

What's going on with the supernova xmr pool??
It barely shows any earnings and hashrate is dropping like crazy.. why are people fleeing?
Where do you guys mine xmr? All xmr pools seem to have issues..

same Problem

[maxmad_x]

Yep;

Got my ID banned on dwarfpool

Code:

08:26:37:377	10e0	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1353 ms, hashrate = 756 h/s 
08:26:37:392	10e0	Round
08:26:38:236	10ec	GPU 3: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1360 ms, hashrate = 752 h/s 
08:26:38:267	10ec	Round
08:26:38:580	10f0	GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1346 ms, hashrate = 760 h/s 
08:26:38:595	1234	GPU 5: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1341 ms, hashrate = 763 h/s 
08:26:38:611	10f0	Round
08:26:38:627	10f4	GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1344 ms, hashrate = 761 h/s 
08:26:38:627	1234	Round
08:26:38:642	10f4	round found 2 shares
08:26:38:642	10e4	01/05/17-08:26:38 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 6)
08:26:38:642	10f4	Round
08:26:38:642	10e4	send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "199969689897261", "job_id": "689900684333406", "nonce": "54632500", "result": "1e9f2c565f18b51b23d06f6ac4a817aeaf59226214594db22f36795451f10400"}, "id":4}

08:26:38:642	10e4	01/05/17-08:26:38 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 6)
08:26:38:642	10e4	send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "199969689897261", "job_id": "689900684333406", "nonce": "f87f2500", "result": "30451fcb219ca302140fe54a2ab8fed67fa8befa365e3696b90e7d110d260100"}, "id":4}

08:26:38:689	114c	GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1336 ms, hashrate = 766 h/s 
08:26:38:705	114c	Round
08:26:38:720	10e4	got 73 bytes
08:26:38:720	10e4	buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

08:26:38:720	10e4	parse packet: 73
08:26:38:720	10e4	Share rejected (78 ms)!
08:26:38:720	10e4	{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}
08:26:38:720	10e4	new buf size: 0
08:26:38:767	10fc	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1356 ms, hashrate = 755 h/s 
08:26:38:783	10e4	got 73 bytes
08:26:38:783	10e4	buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

08:26:38:783	10e4	parse packet: 73
08:26:38:783	10e4	Share rejected (140 ms)!
08:26:38:783	10e4	{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}
08:26:38:799	10e4	new buf size: 0
08:26:38:799	10fc	Round
08:26:39:642	1108	GPU 3: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1364 ms, hashrate = 750 h/s 
08:26:39:658	1108	Round
08:26:39:955	1304	GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1346 ms, hashrate = 760 h/s 
08:26:39:970	10f8	GPU 5: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1340 ms, hashrate = 764 h/s 
08:26:39:986	1304	Round
08:26:40:002	10f8	Round
08:26:40:002	1370	GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1344 ms, hashrate = 761 h/s 
08:26:40:017	1370	Round
08:26:40:064	1168	GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1336 ms, hashrate = 766 h/s 
08:26:40:095	1168	Round
08:26:40:158	10e0	GPU 4: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1357 ms, hashrate = 754 h/s 

@Claymore; I am Pming you the full log file.

Use version 9.6
@Claymore, one note, check please if working the flowing option in version 9.7 especially for dwarf:
-u wallet_id.wallet.(rig_number)
(dot rig number)
(this is regarding your notice from my log - Pool sends responses to shares that miner did not send)

Just tested my 9.6 for some more time. No issues. So I think something broke when the code was updated.

btw one correction
-u wallet_id.PAYMENT_ID.(rig_number)

btw how did you know that pool is repsponding to shares that miner did not send?

I have sent Claymore my log of whole 6 hours of 9.7. So lets see what happens

[drr0ss]

Just tested my 9.6 for some more time. No issues. So I think something broke when the code was updated.

btw one correction
-u wallet_id.PAYMENT_ID.(rig_number)
Right, never mind, you got my idea

btw how did you know that pool is repsponding to shares that miner did not send?
I not made a deep investigation on log, Claymore says this in PM to me.

I have sent Claymore my log of whole 6 hours of 9.7. So lets see what happens
Yes, let try to be patient a little bit, I try to be helpful for investigation

EDIT:
I think that something wrong with option (dot rig number) because have few rigs, on the same wallet/walletID, and if the pool not receive correct rig number, probably not communicate the right way with my rigs.
I think other people that have an issues, also with more than one rigs, but may be I am wrong

[partyman]

"-powlim x" option does not work! - unknown option.

Confirmed, will be fixed in next update.

Does  Dwarf pool Suppport SSL Dev fee ?

[cryptonitro]

SAME problem Unauthenticated .... when re-launch miner , it s ok , but after few time ... it broke

damm drawfpool get kraken adress xmr support , but this is buging after 15~30 minutes , get
- lowdifficulty share
and then ALL share rejected with unauthentificated instead of low difficulty

Code:

{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Unauthenticated"}}

i get nothing like that with standard monero adress ...

hope they fix that

[Golku]

"-powlim x" option does not work! - unknown option.

Confirmed, will be fixed in next update.

Does  Dwarf pool Suppport SSL Dev fee ?

no dwarf still doenst support SSL
the pool is good but still dont know why they dony support SSL