Because it is July and hot and you all are lazy, here is only one issue to be thought:
1. The logo should unify the community; it should not increase the dispersion e.g. by splitting the community into two opposite groups.
The dispersion could be avoided by a voting system which allows "negative" votes. Has such been considered?
The vote has now been thrown to the wall like a small note on the coffee room's wall: "please make a new coffee-pot after you have taken the last cup". (this note indicates something which is obvious - something similar is in the latest vote postings: it is obvious that the "brand new" logo is the winner ... )
I hoped to see more discipline in this matter, despite the summer.
It would do good if you get up and do something instead of being an armchair critic. You had all the time to come out with a serious concrete plan on the logo while we "lazily" discussed about it at great length in the last month.
NEM requires people who can contribute rather that just shoot things off their mouth. That, everybody can do. Walk the talk please.
Critics and discussion are contributions. It is unfortunate that rockethead does not realize that.
Yes, it is unfortunate that I cannot realize between good critics and discussions vis-a-vis things like calling NEM team being lazy and lacking discipline, whatever they mean.
Hey you, "rocketscientist"
Don't spread the context.
The context was 'logo voting' and 'summer'.
On lazyness:
how do you call it, if there has been info in the forums/boards and that is not used?
a) that info was not useful
b) that info was not seen
c) that info was intentionally skipped
If a), then where has been discussed that eg. my Trello-comments about different voting
systems have been detected as 'not useful'?
If b) or c), then could be asked "why?".
Other options mean lazyness.
Lately I have got such a picture that, after Utopianfuture left, the NEM team is
not so concentrated, not so organized, just getting (quickly) the solutions, which "feel" good.
(yea, this was not a comment about coding process)
In the case of logo the discipline process would have requested at least 3 steps:
1 - gathering the logo comments or at least reading all of them before starting planning the voting system
2 - discussion about different voting systems
3 - selecting the voting system
Were those steps used during "
a serious concrete plan on the logo while we "lazily"
discussed about it at great length in the last month" ?
I do not see that in Trello/'Logo Contest 2. Phase of Narrowing down'...
If you read my response to your accusation, you should notice that I've done my "walk".
And yes. I know that the dev team is doing their work - that was not the issue here.
During the ~ half a year I have also "walked near" the dev team; tho only doing reviews,
coz my Java skills ain't good enough.
(If being precisely, I do not
know the dev team's work until I have tested it)
