|
cointhinkers
|
 |
November 13, 2014, 12:48:37 PM |
|
When I mine with gpu miner,the console shows :
Failed to Update Height...
what's wrong??
|
|
|
|
hoze
Member
 Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 13, 2014, 01:07:02 PM |
|
When I mine with gpu miner,the console shows :
Failed to Update Height...
what's wrong??
Did you start the wallet ? |
|
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
November 13, 2014, 01:10:23 PM |
|
Thanks for the source. Is it possible that some files are missing from github? I can't find the Visual Studio solution and project files. |
|
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 13, 2014, 01:30:59 PM |
|
[METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8906.679880 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8939.901954 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8931.969476 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8590.293143 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8970.174300 KHash/s | Height = 51936 Does this mean mining normally???  |
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
November 13, 2014, 01:45:14 PM |
|
[METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8906.679880 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8939.901954 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8931.969476 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8590.293143 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8970.174300 KHash/s | Height = 51936 Does this mean mining normally??? I think yes though ~9000 KHash/s is a little low in my opinion. Of course it's depends on the GPU. What do you have? A more recent GPU with support for 64bit instruction set (which is required for this miner) should be faster I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 13, 2014, 01:58:58 PM |
|
[METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8906.679880 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8939.901954 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8931.969476 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8590.293143 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8970.174300 KHash/s | Height = 51936 Does this mean mining normally??? I think yes though ~9000 KHash/s is a little low in my opinion. Of course it's depends on the GPU. What do you have? A more recent GPU with support for 64bit instruction set (which is required for this miner) should be faster I guess. 6XR9270 algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-shaders" : "1280", "gpu-threads" : "2", "gpu-vddc" : "1100", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "512", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1", "devices" : "0" |
|
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 13, 2014, 03:39:34 PM |
|
[METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8906.679880 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8939.901954 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8931.969476 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8590.293143 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8970.174300 KHash/s | Height = 51936 Does this mean mining normally??? I think yes though ~9000 KHash/s is a little low in my opinion. Of course it's depends on the GPU. What do you have? A more recent GPU with support for 64bit instruction set (which is required for this miner) should be faster I guess. 6XR9270 algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-shaders" : "1280", "gpu-threads" : "2", "gpu-vddc" : "1100", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "512", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1", "devices" : "0" Change your config to this { "connections" : [ { "url" : "127.0.0.1:9325", "user" : "x", "password" : "x" } ], "algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1080,1080,1080,1080,1080,1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250,1250,1250,1250,1250", "gpu-shaders" : "1280,1280,1280,1280,1280,1280", "gpu-threads" : "1,1,1,1,1,1", "gpu-vddc" : "1100,1100,1100,1100,1100,1100", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22,22,22,22,22,22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "15232,15232,15232,15232,15232,15232", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "512,512,512,512,512,512", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1,1,1,1,1,1", "devices" : "0,1,2,3,4,5" } I know it's annoying to have to set all of the settings for each card, even if they are the same. I'm working on fixing this so it's easier. I'm also working on the "devices" section so you don't need to specify all of them. |
|
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 13, 2014, 04:03:10 PM |
|
Thanks for the source. Is it possible that some files are missing from github? I can't find the Visual Studio solution and project files. I didn't include the Visual Studio files because github is supposed to be used mainly for source code. So you can pull it and build with whatever compiler you want without having extra bloat that you don't necessarily need. You can set it up in Visual Studio yourself. Just keep the source and resources folders together. Include existing source files from the source folder. I wouldn't dare upload the library files needed. The library folder alone from boost 1.56 is 2.7GB! You can get the libraries from their own sites. I'll help you out though... The binaries for boost can be downloaded from the boost sourceforge page here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.56.0/You can get whichever version you need. For Visual Studio 2013 you want the package labeled msvc-12.0. For jansson 2.7 you would need to use CMake to generate a Visual Studio Project and then build it to generate the .lib file. If you trust me and don't feel like building it yourself then I uploaded the static .lib I had to build for Visual Studio 2013 to my dropbox here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/97985ohgh4irbbr/jansson.lib?dl=0For OpenSSL you can get the x64 binaries from here: http://slproweb.com/download/Win64OpenSSL-1_0_1j.exeThe OpenSSL website links to his site for the Windows binaries. You will want to use the static libraries if you don't want to have to include extra dll's with the exe. You will also need the AMD ADL SDK from here: http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/graphics-development/display-library-adl-sdk/ Hope this helps! |
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 13, 2014, 04:21:40 PM |
|
[METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8597.949376 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8906.679880 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8939.901954 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8928.008514 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8931.969476 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 96468992 Hashes | 8590.293143 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8971.773262 KHash/s | Height = 51936 [METERS] 100663296 Hashes | 8970.174300 KHash/s | Height = 51936 Does this mean mining normally??? I think yes though ~9000 KHash/s is a little low in my opinion. Of course it's depends on the GPU. What do you have? A more recent GPU with support for 64bit instruction set (which is required for this miner) should be faster I guess. 6XR9270 algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-shaders" : "1280", "gpu-threads" : "2", "gpu-vddc" : "1100", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "512", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1", "devices" : "0" Change your config to this { "connections" : [ { "url" : "127.0.0.1:9325", "user" : "x", "password" : "x" } ], "algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1080,1080,1080,1080,1080,1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250,1250,1250,1250,1250", "gpu-shaders" : "1280,1280,1280,1280,1280,1280", "gpu-threads" : "1,1,1,1,1,1", "gpu-vddc" : "1100,1100,1100,1100,1100,1100", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22,22,22,22,22,22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "15232,15232,15232,15232,15232,15232", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "512,512,512,512,512,512", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1,1,1,1,1,1", "devices" : "0,1,2,3,4,5" } I know it's annoying to have to set all of the settings for each card, even if they are the same. I'm working on fixing this so it's easier. I'm also working on the "devices" section so you don't need to specify all of them. thanks for your help,it works but sometimes gets stuck |
|
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 14, 2014, 05:00:16 AM |
|
Ok so I have a few changes that I've made to the AMD miner. I made some changes that should make it a little more stable. I can run an R9 280x all day if the intensity settings are low, around 16 and 1 gpu thread of course. I also fixed up the config a lot. The "devices" setting is no longer required, unless you need to disable a card or cards. Then you will need to list specific devices that should run in that section. You no longer need a setting for every card. 1 setting works for all cards now. You can also have say 2 settings for one section and 1 for another and everything works For Example "gpu-engine" : "1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1500", "gpu-shaders" : "1280,2048", "gpu-threads" : "1", works as it should. You also no longer need the config file if you don't wish to use it. You can put the settings in the .bat file. For Example: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 SKMiner.exe --connections 127.0.0.1:9325 user x password x --algorithm sk1024_djm This is all you need now to start the miner. You SHOULD put other settings in though. Otherwise your performance will be low A list of all of the optional settings are here: https://github.com/BitSlapper/SKMiner/blob/master/documents/config_parameters.txtI built a new version of the Win x64 binary with these changes. The file is on my drop box here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0 |
|
|
|
|
cestballot
|
|
November 14, 2014, 05:08:19 AM
Last edit: November 14, 2014, 06:00:32 AM by cestballot |
|
Ok so I have a few changes that I've made to the AMD miner. I made some changes that should make it a little more stable. I can run an R9 280x all day if the intensity settings are low, around 16 and 1 gpu thread of course. I also fixed up the config a lot. The "devices" setting is no longer required, unless you need to disable a card or cards. Then you will need to list specific devices that should run in that section. You no longer need a setting for every card. 1 setting works for all cards now. You can also have say 2 settings for one section and 1 for another and everything works For Example "gpu-engine" : "1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1500", "gpu-shaders" : "1280,2048", "gpu-threads" : "1", works as it should. You also no longer need the config file if you don't wish to use it. You can put the settings in the .bat file. For Example: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 SKMiner.exe --connections 127.0.0.1:9325 user x password x --algorithm sk1024_djm This is all you need now to start the miner. You SHOULD put other settings in though. Otherwise your performance will be low A list of all of the optional settings are here: https://github.com/BitSlapper/SKMiner/blob/master/documents/config_parameters.txtI built a new version of the Win x64 binary with these changes. The file is on my drop box here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0Start testing this new version. THX a lot Best Regards edit ; miner performance still decrease after 30 minutes :/ |
|
|
|
hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 14, 2014, 09:00:38 AM
Last edit: November 14, 2014, 09:37:27 PM by hoze |
|
Ok so I have a few changes that I've made to the AMD miner. I made some changes that should make it a little more stable. I can run an R9 280x all day if the intensity settings are low, around 16 and 1 gpu thread of course. I also fixed up the config a lot. The "devices" setting is no longer required, unless you need to disable a card or cards. Then you will need to list specific devices that should run in that section. You no longer need a setting for every card. 1 setting works for all cards now. You can also have say 2 settings for one section and 1 for another and everything works For Example "gpu-engine" : "1080", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1500", "gpu-shaders" : "1280,2048", "gpu-threads" : "1", works as it should. You also no longer need the config file if you don't wish to use it. You can put the settings in the .bat file. For Example: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 SKMiner.exe --connections 127.0.0.1:9325 user x password x --algorithm sk1024_djm This is all you need now to start the miner. You SHOULD put other settings in though. Otherwise your performance will be low A list of all of the optional settings are here: https://github.com/BitSlapper/SKMiner/blob/master/documents/config_parameters.txtI built a new version of the Win x64 binary with these changes. The file is on my drop box here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0Great update ! I will test today with 280x ! Edit: Tested with MSI Amd R9 280x 3GB Twin Frozr. Well, I found 1 block  My first block with AMD ( I will send my block reward to BitSlapper . He is good and helpfull , so he deserve it Not much but that is all I earn with AMD ). Hashrate is varies. From 25Mhs-35Mhs /GPU. Everythink was good in first 3 hours and after that hashrate drop from 35Mhs to 0Mhs ( zero  ) and after that jump back , but just to 6-8Mhs . I also tested with AMD Sapphire 270x Dual-X 2GB, with 4 GPU in rig. Total hashrate was ~55Mhs ( that is not so bad ). Unfortunately no blocks was found! After about 2hour of mining , the miner crash and in the background the miner found xxx blocks and every block was rejected by network. The total power consumption for 4 x 270x was from 450w to 550w, and I think that 550w is too much and mining CSD with AMD is not profitable at the moment. Maybe if someone make some optimization for amd miner or if price jump .... So, that was my little review. I just share my experience and I hope I helped to someone Here is my config file for Amd Msi 280x. Amd Msi 280x ~35Mhs : { "connections" : [ { "url" : "127.0.0.1:9325", "user" : "x", "password" : "x" } ], "algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1000", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-shaders" : "1280", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-vddc" : "1100", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "20", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "256", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1" } |
|
|
|
|
|
sologap
|
|
November 15, 2014, 11:30:26 AM |
|
WTS 50,000 COINS please offer ? Escrow welcome.
|
◥◣◥◣◥◣ ☠ CRAVE ☠ Embraces the privacy movement ☠ ◥◣◥◣◥◣◥◣◥◣◥◣ Your Market. Your Blockchain Business. Your Profit. ◥◣◥◣◥◣ |
|
|
|
bigreddmachine
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:30:14 PM |
|
WTS 50,000 COINS please offer ? Escrow welcome.
Edit: I'll buy at 300 400 satoshi --> so 0.15 0.2 BTC total. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 16, 2014, 05:39:31 AM |
|
Ok So I think I figured out the slow down issue with the AMD SKMiner.
Basically it was massive memory leaks.
I rebuilt it and I'm testing on my R9 270's and my R9 280x.
I'll let everyone know how it goes tomorrow and if it's stable I'll put a new build up.
|
|
|
|
|
cestballot
|
|
November 17, 2014, 12:42:34 AM |
|
Ok So I think I figured out the slow down issue with the AMD SKMiner.
Basically it was massive memory leaks.
I rebuilt it and I'm testing on my R9 270's and my R9 280x.
I'll let everyone know how it goes tomorrow and if it's stable I'll put a new build up.
GO dev :! First day blocks found send for you if miner will be stable  Best Regards |
|
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 17, 2014, 06:03:16 AM |
|
TY I fixed the memory leaks. So the miner is using less than 100 kb of memory instead of using all of it until the PC crashes. However, there is still an issue. Instead of slowing down now the miner eventually fails to work on blocks. I'm working on that issue now and will keep everyone updated. I hope to have it solved tomorrow. |
|
|
|
IMJim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 17, 2014, 11:45:35 PM |
|
Sorry if I missed this guys but why does the wallet have a staking option but does not stake?
|
|
|
|
|
|
bigreddmachine
|
|
November 18, 2014, 02:44:27 AM |
|
Sorry if I missed this guys but why does the wallet have a staking option but does not stake?
It is my understanding that CoinShield will eventually add a PoS channel, but not until after the market channels are added. Videlicet might have a timetable in mind, not sure... |
|
|
|
|
|
cestballot
|
|
November 18, 2014, 02:47:37 AM |
|
Some news about ati miner ? Best |
|
|
|
|
