tex81
|
|
October 15, 2014, 09:23:17 AM Last edit: October 15, 2014, 09:54:33 AM by tex81 |
|
... what does "Sender's array of best deadlines" limit mean?... I think it is a size of array for found deadlines (work-array for "send-share-to-pool" thread)
|
Russia
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
October 15, 2014, 09:48:04 AM |
|
The problem is they seem to be getting drained by the same addresses, so some sort of rate limiting needs to be done. Some examples: --- I know, in a couple days it will block by ip Nice
|
|
|
|
crowetic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1072
https://crowetic.com | https://qortal.org
|
|
October 15, 2014, 02:28:41 PM |
|
If I have 40 TB storage for burst mining which of the following is better (of course in terms of pool mining not solo) ?
I plot all the available space to same account
or
I divide the space between 2 accounts (20 TB each).
Since I want to test some pools & may be want to open one myself in near future I want to keep 2 different accounts so that I don't need to change the reward assignment for the whole available space every now & then while testing. The question is, does it impact the possibility of getting a block while using the same resources (40 TB) but divided between 2 different burst account or it just generates the same number of coins giving the same equation of possibility ?
Throw all your power at us. mine.burstcoin.info
|
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
| ORTAL
| .⊙.Web and Application hosting. ⊙ decentralized infrastructure .⊙.leveling and voting.
| Founder/current dev group facilitator |
[/td][/tr][/table] [/table]
|
|
|
crazyearner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 15, 2014, 03:56:08 PM |
|
If I have 40 TB storage for burst mining which of the following is better (of course in terms of pool mining not solo) ?
I plot all the available space to same account
or
I divide the space between 2 accounts (20 TB each).
Since I want to test some pools & may be want to open one myself in near future I want to keep 2 different accounts so that I don't need to change the reward assignment for the whole available space every now & then while testing. The question is, does it impact the possibility of getting a block while using the same resources (40 TB) but divided between 2 different burst account or it just generates the same number of coins giving the same equation of possibility ?
Throw all your power at us. mine.burstcoin.info Any updates on payments yet as I have now close to 15k burst waiting to be paid on?
|
|
|
|
hvidgaard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 15, 2014, 04:36:21 PM |
|
I'm using quite large stagger size files, 1048576 to be specific, setting CacheSize to a value lower than that actually result in much faster processing (51s vs 40s).
If you set CacheSize - 1048576 , miner's thread finding 1 best deadline in 1 file and put it's to Sender. If you set CacheSize - 131072, miner's thread finding 8 best deadlines in 1 file and put it's to Sender, Sender sends first best deadline to server, waiting response too much time, after sending second deadline, waiting again Setting the stagger size to 131072 is actually faster. Only takes 41-43 seconds to process all the plots, setting it to 1048576 it takes at least 53 seconds and the CPU utilization is not 100%, so bigger is not better in this case for some reason.
|
|
|
|
Youghoor
|
|
October 15, 2014, 04:41:56 PM |
|
I'm using quite large stagger size files, 1048576 to be specific, setting CacheSize to a value lower than that actually result in much faster processing (51s vs 40s).
If you set CacheSize - 1048576 , miner's thread finding 1 best deadline in 1 file and put it's to Sender. If you set CacheSize - 131072, miner's thread finding 8 best deadlines in 1 file and put it's to Sender, Sender sends first best deadline to server, waiting response too much time, after sending second deadline, waiting again Setting the stagger size to 131072 is actually faster. Only takes 41-43 seconds to process all the plots, setting it to 1048576 it takes at least 53 seconds and the CPU utilization is not 100%, so bigger is not better in this case for some reason. bigger is always better.
|
|
|
|
PummelHummel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 15, 2014, 06:03:00 PM |
|
has any one figured it out whether 5400 vs 7200rpm is better, or does matter at all?
|
|
|
|
DrTrouble
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
October 15, 2014, 06:21:58 PM |
|
has any one figured it out whether 5400 vs 7200rpm is better, or does matter at all?
As long as you are getting all your shares in on time it shouldn't really matter. It is obvious that plotting will be a bit slower. Personally, if I already had the drives I would use either 5400 or 7200. But if I was buying them, I would pay the little bit extra for 7200rpm as they will be better to resell later on...
|
What is this "Bitcoin" of which you speak???
|
|
|
tex81
|
|
October 15, 2014, 06:26:24 PM |
|
has any one figured it out whether 5400 vs 7200rpm is better, or does matter at all?
Reading speed is not related to RPM (on a different models of HDD)
|
Russia
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
October 15, 2014, 06:33:36 PM |
|
Maybe a lower-speed drive would benefit more from optimization? (Seeks would take longer?)
|
|
|
|
Pilotseye
|
|
October 15, 2014, 06:57:13 PM |
|
Just ordered 3x 3TB USB 3.0 drives, please give me an idea what would be the most efficient way to plot them with R9 290X GPU and i7-4700MQ CPU with 8GB RAM, in regards to plot size and stagger. Thanks
|
|
|
|
xizmax
|
|
October 15, 2014, 07:00:07 PM |
|
Just ordered 3x 3TB USB 3.0 drives, please give me an idea what would be the most efficient way to plot them with R9 290X GPU and i7-4700MQ CPU with 8GB RAM, in regards to plot size and stagger. Thanks Quit making my 200gb plot on a pentium E5200 feel inadequate On another note, is blago's new miner tested?
|
|
|
|
ArnMan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
October 15, 2014, 07:01:12 PM |
|
New update Miner-BURST-1.141014 * rewrote the sorting code + added output messages of checks + added rainbow and fun + added debug parameter ! during the tests was not found differences in deadlines ! better use "CacheSize" => your max stagger limits: 1000 files in 1 path (folder) max paths = 24 Sender's array of best deadlines = 2400000 https://www.dropbox.com/s/9so0bo71wg6nf3k/miner-burst-1.141014.zip?dl=0Does this support Pool 1? the dev's first pool?
|
|
|
|
crowetic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1072
https://crowetic.com | https://qortal.org
|
|
October 15, 2014, 07:12:23 PM |
|
If I have 40 TB storage for burst mining which of the following is better (of course in terms of pool mining not solo) ?
I plot all the available space to same account
or
I divide the space between 2 accounts (20 TB each).
Since I want to test some pools & may be want to open one myself in near future I want to keep 2 different accounts so that I don't need to change the reward assignment for the whole available space every now & then while testing. The question is, does it impact the possibility of getting a block while using the same resources (40 TB) but divided between 2 different burst account or it just generates the same number of coins giving the same equation of possibility ?
Throw all your power at us. mine.burstcoin.info Any updates on payments yet as I have now close to 15k burst waiting to be paid on? What are you talking about? lol.
|
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
| ORTAL
| .⊙.Web and Application hosting. ⊙ decentralized infrastructure .⊙.leveling and voting.
| Founder/current dev group facilitator |
[/td][/tr][/table] [/table]
|
|
|
crazyearner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 15, 2014, 07:25:53 PM |
|
If I have 40 TB storage for burst mining which of the following is better (of course in terms of pool mining not solo) ?
I plot all the available space to same account
or
I divide the space between 2 accounts (20 TB each).
Since I want to test some pools & may be want to open one myself in near future I want to keep 2 different accounts so that I don't need to change the reward assignment for the whole available space every now & then while testing. The question is, does it impact the possibility of getting a block while using the same resources (40 TB) but divided between 2 different burst account or it just generates the same number of coins giving the same equation of possibility ?
Throw all your power at us. mine.burstcoin.info Any updates on payments yet as I have now close to 15k burst waiting to be paid on? What are you talking about? lol. my bad am getting pool owners mixed up lol tohught you owned multi pool had long day lol.
|
|
|
|
Irontiga
|
|
October 15, 2014, 07:57:03 PM |
|
@burstcoin are we updating to nxt 1.3.0? It makes use of a database and stores stuff about shareholders...which I think is handy!
|
|
|
|
DrTrouble
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
October 15, 2014, 08:16:41 PM |
|
Just ordered 3x 3TB USB 3.0 drives, please give me an idea what would be the most efficient way to plot them with R9 290X GPU and i7-4700MQ CPU with 8GB RAM, in regards to plot size and stagger. Thanks Quit making my 200gb plot on a pentium E5200 feel inadequate On another note, is blago's new miner tested? One site that I found myself and have not seen anywhere else is this Plot Composer - http://plot.burstcoin.ru/ . When I first started mining and was having a hell of a time figuring out plots/staggers and such, this site saved me big time! I used it to figure out which plots I was going to use across my nearly 30TB of distributed HDDs (I used 256GB plots). Note: I did not use the java plotter, I used the GPU plotter. But this Plot Composer told me how the plots should all be lined up. I have asked the dev to place it on the first OP but no word back so far. I just looked in to it and realized Uray created it...I should have known!! Thanks again, Uray!
|
What is this "Bitcoin" of which you speak???
|
|
|
burstcoin (OP)
|
|
October 15, 2014, 11:11:18 PM |
|
@burstcoin are we updating to nxt 1.3.0? It makes use of a database and stores stuff about shareholders...which I think is handy!
This has just become new top priority. The database stuff fixes a major scalability issue that needed to be addressed at some point, and since this breaks compatibility with a lot of stuff I've done with the client, it doesn't make sense to keep adding stuff the current way to just have to change it over later.
|
BURST-QHCJ-9HB5-PTGC-5Q8J9
|
|
|
Irontiga
|
|
October 15, 2014, 11:41:36 PM |
|
What is the formula to change basetarget to network size?
|
|
|
|
kamronk
|
|
October 16, 2014, 01:29:27 AM |
|
From what I'm gathering, you still need a decent graphics card to mine? Or how does your cpu/gpu come into play here?
Also, is there a pool that works best with ubuntu?
|
|
|
|
|