[LTCD] LitecoinDark.com ★ Scrypt ★ Difficulty Shield ★ Multipool ★ Fast

[raveneye]

wallet came on 36999 and blocked

This is the "fork" part of a hard fork.  We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere.  Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party...

So... Bittrex has 37008.
Did anyone bother to notify exchanges?

[madmartyk]

There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?

[aleckloss]

There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?

He posted 10 minutes ago and is showing online.

[TrollByFire]

There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?

I'm right here.  Trying to figure out who still has not updated and why.

[madmartyk]

There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?

He posted 10 minutes ago and is showing online.

Sorry looked at the OP

[JCJr222]

ETA till the coin halving?

We're above the block listed so it should have happened already

The explorer is still showing a reward of 800, is anyone seeing anything different on the actual mining end?

Explorer hasn't been updated yet

[TrollByFire]

ETA till the coin halving?

We're above the block listed so it should have happened already

The explorer is still showing a reward of 800, is anyone seeing anything different on the actual mining end?

Explorer hasn't been updated yet

Neither has best-pool.  Working with them to get it taken care of.

[nyo_x]

notified cryptsy right now...

[Xircom]

wallet came on 36999 and blocked

This is the "fork" part of a hard fork.  We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere.  Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party...

So... Bittrex has 37008.
Did anyone bother to notify exchanges?

I wrote to both cryptsy and Bittrex yesterday

[FamousRocky]

anyone else noticed that the client version,

downloaded from here https://github.com/TrollByFire/litecoindark-staging/releases/download/v1.2.0/LitecoinDark-v1.2.0.zip

isn´t really 1.2.0?  

[Xircom]

All devs are here 

[AminerMiner]

anyone else noticed that the client version downloaded from here https://github.com/TrollByFire/litecoindark-staging/releases/download/v1.2.0/LitecoinDark-v1.2.0.zip isn´t 1.2.0?  

good one...didnt see that mine is the same

[Litecoindark]

wallet came on 36999 and blocked

This is the "fork" part of a hard fork.  We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere.  Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party...

So... Bittrex has 37008.
Did anyone bother to notify exchanges?

I wrote to both cryptsy and Bittrex yesterday

Yesterday I wrote all Pools and als exchanges Also.

[nyo_x]

cryptsy is updated...

[JCJr222]

anyone else noticed that the client version downloaded from here https://github.com/TrollByFire/litecoindark-staging/releases/download/v1.2.0/LitecoinDark-v1.2.0.zip isn´t 1.2.0?  

good one...didnt see that mine is the same

It was brought up right after the wallet was released and TrollByFire already responded. Put simply, if you see the new logo you have the correct wallet, so no worries.

[antonio8]

anyone else noticed that the client version downloaded from here https://github.com/TrollByFire/litecoindark-staging/releases/download/v1.2.0/LitecoinDark-v1.2.0.zip isn´t 1.2.0?  

good one...didnt see that mine is the same

This has been addressed a few pages back.

As long as you see the new logo you are fine.

[TrollByFire]

anyone else noticed that the client version isn´t 1.2.0?  

Someone asked the same question yesterday.  I addressed it.  Basically it would have taken me an additional 2 hours to recompile and run my entire test suite, verify, sign, and upload the new wallet just to change the version number in the about page.  At which point, I would have needed to reevaluate a target block for the fork, and you have an endless cycle.  It's purely cosmetic as getinfo reports the correct version, and this can easily be fixed in a quick update later.  This was the least important issue that needed to be fixed, and was more urgent to get the update rolled out so that everyone would have time to update their wallets.

Basically: It wasn't overlooked, but there were more important things to address.  Let us deal with the issue at hand first.

[aleckloss]

wallet came on 36999 and blocked

This is the "fork" part of a hard fork.  We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere.  Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party...

So... Bittrex has 37008.
Did anyone bother to notify exchanges?

I wrote to both cryptsy and Bittrex yesterday

+1

[FamousRocky]

anyone else noticed that the client version isn´t 1.2.0?  

Someone asked the same question yesterday.  I addressed it.  Basically it would have taken me an additional 2 hours to recompile and run my entire test suite, verify, sign, and upload the new wallet just to change the version number in the about page.  At which point, I would have needed to reevaluate a target block for the fork, and you have an endless cycle.  It's purely cosmetic as getinfo reports the correct version, and this can easily be fixed in a quick update later.  This was the least important issue that needed to be fixed, and was more urgent to get the update rolled out so that everyone would have time to update their wallets.

Basically: It wasn't overlooked, but there were more important things to address.  Let us deal with the issue at hand first.

okay, thanks.
but what about the block explorer? it shows 37008.
my wallet (1.1.0 pre = 1.2.0) stuck on 36999 

[madmartyk]

Bestpool still finding blocks at the 800 rate