raveneye
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 03:57:48 PM |
|
wallet came on 36999 and blocked
This is the "fork" part of a hard fork. We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere. Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party... So... Bittrex has 37008. Did anyone bother to notify exchanges?
|
|
|
|
madmartyk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030
Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 03:58:57 PM |
|
There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?
|
|
|
|
aleckloss
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Official BitFoundry Dev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:00:36 PM |
|
There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?
He posted 10 minutes ago and is showing online.
|
BitFoundry - The Future is Transparent BTC Donation Address: 17pfLHegqJ3EPkbitbkyw37hi4ATvvJRdD
|
|
|
TrollByFire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:02:34 PM |
|
There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?
I'm right here. Trying to figure out who still has not updated and why.
|
BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
|
|
|
madmartyk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030
Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:03:00 PM |
|
There is a hard fork and the DEV is not online for it?
He posted 10 minutes ago and is showing online. Sorry looked at the OP
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:04:46 PM |
|
ETA till the coin halving?
We're above the block listed so it should have happened already The explorer is still showing a reward of 800, is anyone seeing anything different on the actual mining end? Explorer hasn't been updated yet
|
|
|
|
TrollByFire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:07:54 PM |
|
ETA till the coin halving?
We're above the block listed so it should have happened already The explorer is still showing a reward of 800, is anyone seeing anything different on the actual mining end? Explorer hasn't been updated yet Neither has best-pool. Working with them to get it taken care of.
|
BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
|
|
|
nyo_x
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:09:36 PM |
|
notified cryptsy right now...
|
|
|
|
Xircom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:11:43 PM |
|
wallet came on 36999 and blocked
This is the "fork" part of a hard fork. We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere. Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party... So... Bittrex has 37008. Did anyone bother to notify exchanges? I wrote to both cryptsy and Bittrex yesterday
|
BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
|
|
|
FamousRocky
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
RTFM ;D
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:11:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Xircom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:13:05 PM |
|
All devs are here ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
|
|
|
AminerMiner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:13:48 PM |
|
good one...didnt see that mine is the same
|
|
|
|
Litecoindark (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:14:47 PM |
|
wallet came on 36999 and blocked
This is the "fork" part of a hard fork. We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere. Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party... So... Bittrex has 37008. Did anyone bother to notify exchanges? I wrote to both cryptsy and Bittrex yesterday Yesterday I wrote all Pools and als exchanges Also.
|
BTC: 1JwLwhZNy8CtKL92NcwNHJNFB8gwF1kRN2
|
|
|
nyo_x
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:15:14 PM |
|
cryptsy is updated...
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:15:17 PM |
|
good one...didnt see that mine is the same It was brought up right after the wallet was released and TrollByFire already responded. Put simply, if you see the new logo you have the correct wallet, so no worries. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:16:28 PM |
|
good one...didnt see that mine is the same This has been addressed a few pages back. As long as you see the new logo you are fine.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
TrollByFire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:17:11 PM |
|
anyone else noticed that the client version isn´t 1.2.0? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fotos-hochladen.net%2Fuploads%2Fltcdvg0wj4fc6s.jpg&t=665&c=VtZN-B_rrkGnyA) Someone asked the same question yesterday. I addressed it. Basically it would have taken me an additional 2 hours to recompile and run my entire test suite, verify, sign, and upload the new wallet just to change the version number in the about page. At which point, I would have needed to reevaluate a target block for the fork, and you have an endless cycle. It's purely cosmetic as getinfo reports the correct version, and this can easily be fixed in a quick update later. This was the least important issue that needed to be fixed, and was more urgent to get the update rolled out so that everyone would have time to update their wallets. Basically: It wasn't overlooked, but there were more important things to address. Let us deal with the issue at hand first.
|
BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
|
|
|
aleckloss
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Official BitFoundry Dev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:19:26 PM |
|
wallet came on 36999 and blocked
This is the "fork" part of a hard fork. We have more miners on the old fork than the new one... Until someone on the new fork finds block 37000, we're not going anywhere. Anyone showing a height of more than 37000 in their wallet (including the block explorers *ahem*) are late to the update party... So... Bittrex has 37008. Did anyone bother to notify exchanges? I wrote to both cryptsy and Bittrex yesterday +1
|
BitFoundry - The Future is Transparent BTC Donation Address: 17pfLHegqJ3EPkbitbkyw37hi4ATvvJRdD
|
|
|
FamousRocky
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
RTFM ;D
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:21:42 PM |
|
anyone else noticed that the client version isn´t 1.2.0? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Someone asked the same question yesterday. I addressed it. Basically it would have taken me an additional 2 hours to recompile and run my entire test suite, verify, sign, and upload the new wallet just to change the version number in the about page. At which point, I would have needed to reevaluate a target block for the fork, and you have an endless cycle. It's purely cosmetic as getinfo reports the correct version, and this can easily be fixed in a quick update later. This was the least important issue that needed to be fixed, and was more urgent to get the update rolled out so that everyone would have time to update their wallets. Basically: It wasn't overlooked, but there were more important things to address. Let us deal with the issue at hand first. okay, thanks. but what about the block explorer? it shows 37008. my wallet (1.1.0 pre = 1.2.0) stuck on 36999 ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fotos-hochladen.net%2Fuploads%2Fltcdqiz0w8j723.jpg&t=665&c=-xIJ-CwZUAWBCA)
|
|
|
|
madmartyk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030
Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2014, 04:24:02 PM |
|
Bestpool still finding blocks at the 800 rate
|
|
|
|
|