|
Zombier0
|
 |
January 01, 2015, 10:41:57 PM |
|
Any blocks found yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
January 01, 2015, 11:25:52 PM |
|
Any blocks found yet?
It's very easy to find the block found reports in this thread. All you have to do is look. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
|
fresca
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:39:10 AM |
|
will the hash rate be lower on solo pool than other pool such as kano.is? For Antminer products I get significantly lower hash rate on solopool than kano.is. It seems that this is the case with newer S3 chip firmware for both S3 and C1. Is this to be expected due to cgminer or that it is mining solo. C1 is about 100GH lower and S3 about 40-50 GH lower.
|
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:42:45 AM |
|
will the hash rate be lower on solo pool than other pool such as kano.is? For Antminer products I get significantly lower hash rate on solopool than kano.is. It seems that this is the case with newer S3 chip firmware for both S3 and C1. Is this to be expected due to cgminer or that it is mining solo. C1 is about 100GH lower and S3 about 40-50 GH lower.
There's absolutely no reason it should be any different. They even use the same pool software with only minor differences between them. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
fresca
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:58:50 AM |
|
will the hash rate be lower on solo pool than other pool such as kano.is? For Antminer products I get significantly lower hash rate on solopool than kano.is. It seems that this is the case with newer S3 chip firmware for both S3 and C1. Is this to be expected due to cgminer or that it is mining solo. C1 is about 100GH lower and S3 about 40-50 GH lower.
There's absolutely no reason it should be any different. They even use the same pool software with only minor differences between them. ok, thanks. I'll have to retry in a bit and see if it is something else. I ended up cycling the C1 and on kano.is it is back at 1TH. The S3 is on beta firmware and is up higher now on kano.is as well. Maybe a hardware issue. |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinPappi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 915
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:31:01 PM |
|
Have any small miners with < 1 TH/s ever got block solo on your pool ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:32:15 PM |
|
Have any small miners with < 1 TH/s ever got block solo on your pool ?
They have as much chance per TH as someone with >1TH |
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
BitcoinPappi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 915
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:37:10 PM |
|
Have any small miners with < 1 TH/s ever got block solo on your pool ?
They have as much chance per TH as someone with >1TH Yes, I know that. I am asking if anyone that has < 1 TH has been so lucky . The more TH/s you have the more tickets and therefore a greater chance of on of your tickets being a winner(shares submitted ) . So has anyone that has <1 TH mining been lucky enough to find a block soloing with the pool |
|
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:38:49 PM |
|
I'm guessing if there is they'll post a response
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
hedgy73
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:47:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinPappi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 915
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 02, 2015, 05:36:13 PM |
|
Good stuff. In that case I will simple set a old S1 with the hopes of being lucky  |
|
|
|
|
hedgy73
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
|
|
January 02, 2015, 05:42:10 PM
Last edit: January 02, 2015, 06:19:55 PM by hedgy73 |
|
Worth a try, good luck  |
|
|
|
|
bonds
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
January 03, 2015, 12:59:59 AM |
|
Good stuff. In that case I will simple set a old S1 with the hopes of being lucky Best I've done so far with my 120ghs rig is a 128M share  |
1Bonds3znU2tqc99b8cdDkBX9m6q9ftVG2
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 03, 2015, 05:36:15 AM |
|
i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block
Yes Please! That would greatly help those of us whose miners do not report the best share or those that rent miners and have no way of knowing how close they came. This could be done but would require new code, testing and a pool restart. I'm loathe to touching the pool when everything's stable even if the downtime would be very short. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 03, 2015, 05:56:11 AM |
|
i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block
Yes Please! That would greatly help those of us whose miners do not report the best share or those that rent miners and have no way of knowing how close they came. This could be done but would require new code, testing and a pool restart. I'm loathe to touching the pool when everything's stable even if the downtime would be very short. The pool works. Don't touch it |
|
|
|
|
cisahasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 03, 2015, 03:49:15 PM |
|
i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block
Yes Please! That would greatly help those of us whose miners do not report the best share or those that rent miners and have no way of knowing how close they came. This could be done but would require new code, testing and a pool restart. I'm loathe to touching the pool when everything's stable even if the downtime would be very short. The pool works. Don't touch it my vote is for adding this even if it will mean some down time people would be informed i hate when renting rigs and never know how close i was |
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 03, 2015, 03:56:49 PM |
|
i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block
Yes Please! That would greatly help those of us whose miners do not report the best share or those that rent miners and have no way of knowing how close they came. This could be done but would require new code, testing and a pool restart. I'm loathe to touching the pool when everything's stable even if the downtime would be very short. The pool works. Don't touch it my vote is for adding this even if it will mean some down time people would be informed i hate when renting rigs and never know how close i was Does it really matter how close you were? There are no bitcoins for second place. Either you find the block or you don't. Current difficulty is 40,640,955,017 and if I find a share with difficulty of 40,640,955,016 or 2, it doesn't matter, no block for me. |
|
|
|
|
cisahasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 03, 2015, 04:01:28 PM |
|
i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block
Yes Please! That would greatly help those of us whose miners do not report the best share or those that rent miners and have no way of knowing how close they came. This could be done but would require new code, testing and a pool restart. I'm loathe to touching the pool when everything's stable even if the downtime would be very short. The pool works. Don't touch it my vote is for adding this even if it will mean some down time people would be informed i hate when renting rigs and never know how close i was Does it really matter how close you were? There are no bitcoins for second place. Either you find the block or you don't. Current difficulty is 40,640,955,017 and if I find a share with difficulty of 40,640,955,016 or 2, it doesn't matter, no block for me. it does matter, read above.. it really makes pools more reliable i have no means to know if my rented found a block(unless rig owner tells me i found 40g++ share), it could be mined to non public wallet |
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 03, 2015, 04:39:58 PM |
|
i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block
Yes Please! That would greatly help those of us whose miners do not report the best share or those that rent miners and have no way of knowing how close they came. This could be done but would require new code, testing and a pool restart. I'm loathe to touching the pool when everything's stable even if the downtime would be very short. The pool works. Don't touch it my vote is for adding this even if it will mean some down time people would be informed i hate when renting rigs and never know how close i was Does it really matter how close you were? There are no bitcoins for second place. Either you find the block or you don't. Current difficulty is 40,640,955,017 and if I find a share with difficulty of 40,640,955,016 or 2, it doesn't matter, no block for me. it does matter, read above.. it really makes pools more reliable i have no means to know if my rented found a block(unless rig owner tells me i found 40g++ share), it could be mined to non public wallet Guess I read that a little too quickly. That would make sense when renting rigs (I don't have any experience with that). |
|
|
|
|
|
