[ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)

[Epsylon3]

i think neoscrypt can see a farther optimization or fix don't know, because right now you need 2GH on the core to have 1MH, which is too much, also very power hungry compared to other algo

it should in theory touch 1M without that heavy oc, and around 1200 with oc, in fact in linux(using djm34 version) it reach 1150 with the same oc

so use djm version (and report me the 1080 hashrate also)

[liquidproman]

Thank you for your good job.
I tried to test with GTX980.

Code:

ccminer1.8 (CUDA6.5 32bit)
Lyra2REv2 (-i 22) 26.56MH/s 196W
Neoscrypt (-i 22) 728.88KH/s 260W
Neoscrypt (-i 22 TDP190W) 657.15KH/s 190W

ccminer1.8 (CUDA7.5 32bit)
Lyra2REv2 (-i 22) 24.03MH/s 181W
Neoscrypt (-i 22) 706.52KH/s 260W
Neoscrypt (-i 22 TDP190W) 637.51KH/s 190W

ccminer1.8 (CUDA8.0 64bit)
Lyra2REv2 (-i 21) 23.53MH/s 185W
Neoscrypt (-i 22) 724.53KH/s 251W
Neoscrypt (-i 22 TDP190W) 657.55KH/s 190W

(nanashi version)
ccminer1.7.6-r10 (CUDA7.5 32bit)
Lyra2REv2 (-i 24) 25.97MH/s 195W
Neoscrypt (-i 20) 709.91kH/s 261W
Neoscrypt (-i 20 TDP190W) 645.31kH/s 190W

ccminer1.7.6-r10 (CUDA8.0 32bit)
Lyra2REv2 (-i 24) 26.31MH/s 184W
Neoscrypt (-i 20) 716.63kH/s 257W
Neoscrypt (-i 20 TDP190W) 653.79kH/s 190W

In Lyra2REv2, I think 32bit ccminer is faster than 64bit one. So please release 32bit ccminer in CUDA8.0.

[Amph]

i think neoscrypt can see a farther optimization or fix don't know, because right now you need 2GH on the core to have 1MH, which is too much, also very power hungry compared to other algo

it should in theory touch 1M without that heavy oc, and around 1200 with oc, in fact in linux(using djm34 version) it reach 1150 with the same oc

so use djm version (and report me the 1080 hashrate also)

unfortunately i don't have linux, what i know is that there are guy right now reaching above 1MH with 1800 core, and i'm stuck at 900 with the same oc, something is wrong here

[Epsylon3]

Amph, you know what .... i dont care

[restless]

Is there dns problem with yiimp ?
I can't reach it

This site can’t be reached
The webpage at https://yiimp.ccminer.org might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

http, https doesn't matter, same result

[mirny]

Is there dns problem with yiimp ?
I can't reach it

This site can’t be reached
The webpage at https://yiimp.ccminer.org might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

http, https doesn't matter, same result

it's not, just use yiimp.ccminer.org/

[pallas]

i think neoscrypt can see a farther optimization or fix don't know, because right now you need 2GH on the core to have 1MH, which is too much, also very power hungry compared to other algo

it should in theory touch 1M without that heavy oc, and around 1200 with oc, in fact in linux(using djm34 version) it reach 1150 with the same oc

so use djm version (and report me the 1080 hashrate also)

unfortunately i don't have linux, what i know is that there are guy right now reaching above 1MH with 1800 core, and i'm stuck at 900 with the same oc, something is wrong here

Actually I'm getting more than 1 Mh/s with the lowest TDP possible (125W) on linux.
So the difference must the the OS or the drivers.

[restless]

Is there dns problem with yiimp ?
I can't reach it

This site can’t be reached
The webpage at https://yiimp.ccminer.org might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

http, https doesn't matter, same result

it's not, just use yiimp.ccminer.org/

nice joke :S

[Amph]

i think neoscrypt can see a farther optimization or fix don't know, because right now you need 2GH on the core to have 1MH, which is too much, also very power hungry compared to other algo

it should in theory touch 1M without that heavy oc, and around 1200 with oc, in fact in linux(using djm34 version) it reach 1150 with the same oc

so use djm version (and report me the 1080 hashrate also)

unfortunately i don't have linux, what i know is that there are guy right now reaching above 1MH with 1800 core, and i'm stuck at 900 with the same oc, something is wrong here

Actually I'm getting more than 1 Mh/s with the lowest TDP possible (125W) on linux.
So the difference must the the OS or the drivers.

it's the os for sure, i tried everything and without pushing it to the maximum which would result in 180w, you can not reach 1MH, normal is 920khs, with oc 950

if you can try with win 7 you will get the same, there is another user using ccminer-vert release getting 1050 like you on linux, so this confirm that it need some fix for windows if possible

[mirny]

Is there dns problem with yiimp ?
I can't reach it

This site can’t be reached
The webpage at https://yiimp.ccminer.org might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

http, https doesn't matter, same result

it's not, just use yiimp.ccminer.org/

nice joke :S

Isn't that link work for you, or what is a joke?

[restless]

Internet sites are accessed via http or https protocol.
It doesn't matter if one wrotes these in front...

I tried through 2 different ISP and nothing ;(, even though site opens fine through 3g on my phone

[Epsylon3]

no, there is no https http://yiimp.ccminer.org

[kenshirothefist]

@Epsylon3, do you have any plans for adding support for Sia algorithm? It was recently added to sgminer with stratum support: https://github.com/nicehash/sgminer/commits/master

[Amph]

Amph, you know what .... i dont care

See what you get when you do shit for free? Motherfuckers act like they're entitled to not just your work, but your time. They do not value it.

he didn't do it for free he was payed already

and do we really need to pay each time we ask about a little help here and there? this place is fucked with greedy people for sure

[Epsylon3]

you didnt paid a penny... guy, and i repeat, i dont care about neoscrypt, i just imported recent work from djm and then nanashi.

So please, stop poluting our threads...

[Amph]

you didnt paid a penny... guy, and i repeat, i dont care about neoscrypt, i just imported recent work from djm and then nanashi.

So please, stop poluting our threads...

well not everyone need to donate, also i was building my miner with the new 1070, i had no gpu to mine in that week where you was selling it, also i'm i don't have a big farm like maybe you think

i'm mining at your pool so you get 1% from me anyway

[Epsylon3]

  tx for the free insults

[Amph]

Amph, you know what .... i dont care

See what you get when you do shit for free? Motherfuckers act like they're entitled to not just your work, but your time. They do not value it.

he didn't do it for free he was payed already

and do we really need to pay each time we ask about a little help here and there? this place is fucked with greedy people for sure

Funny. You calling me greedy, when you pay nothing and get pissy when developers - who put in more time and effort than you probably have in life acquiring the skills - don't do what you want, when you want.

But I'm greedy. Okay.

i was talking in general not directly to you, i just find it absurd that everyone need to donate just to have little help

[Epsylon3]

i already answered you in multiple mails yesterday, you dont even read correctly. So please, stop boring us with that

[Amph]

i already answered you in multiple mails yesterday, you dont even read correctly. So please, stop boring us with that

our talking ended already, i'm not asking help from you anymore, so why you feel the need to respond is beyond me

also i did understand correctly, the problem was the SO nothing else, case closed