joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
July 27, 2016, 05:37:35 PM |
|
also yes the z170 chipset is a bit ... light for multiple cards, check the max pci express lanes
Good point. Some lanes may be reserved for other devices like Sata Express. Check the BIOS config. Sometimes multiple devices will share lane bandwidth. If that's occurring two GPUs in one lane may be too much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
July 27, 2016, 08:59:32 PM |
|
i have already RMA'd it but thanks i have seen reports on this specific MB and the chipset in general here: https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/23808 , https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/24847 and https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/5787/3-way-mining-rig-nvidia-vs-amdi have opted for the ASRock H81 Pro BTC which should work rock solid and is designed for mining in my case adding more cards solved the mystery, im pretty sure the problems are related to this unstable pcie bus but yes in general where it could also have been the cards themselves yes, and in fact i have done that too, every card worked fine on their own, just more than like two connected didnt work that stable or at all regarding lanes, afaik every pciex1 slot only consumes one lane, correct? so in my case there should be plenty room for other devices and reservations as only 6 lanes out of 16 are occupied by gpu br
|
|
|
|
Vegetablepin
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2016, 07:55:23 AM |
|
z170 doesnt work with multiple GPU setups, 2-4 max depending on motherboard. gigabyte z170 wont work with nvidia cards.
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 29, 2016, 09:32:48 AM Last edit: August 02, 2016, 11:21:33 AM by mirny |
|
@felixbrucker
find yourself a better thread for your eth, hw related problems, you're totally OT in here, so please stay on-topic, thank you.
e: sorry, my fault, sometimes happens when reading 10 threads at once...
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 29, 2016, 10:22:58 AM |
|
he was not talking about ETH, but lyra2rev2 and hardware problems
|
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
July 29, 2016, 03:35:15 PM |
|
@mirny
im not talking about eth, where did you read this?
i initially posted to get this issue resolved i had at the time, and through the discussion (last time i checked this is a discussion thread, right?) that happend afterwards i discovered it had to do with the hardware instead of software
furthermore the issue is resolved and i didnt post anything at all since 27, maybe you can point me to the post you are referring to.
br
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 30, 2016, 12:08:25 PM |
|
How do you get 118mh lbry algo on a 970gtx g1? with latest 1.8 I can only get 62mh no oc'ing. Thx
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 30, 2016, 12:23:28 PM |
|
the normal is more 120MH/s try to reboot
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 30, 2016, 12:27:40 PM |
|
the normal is more 120MH/s try to reboot
I did..same thing. Then I tried oc'ing and it just crashes. So by default that 970 gtx g1 gigabyte core clock is 1413 and running in the p2 state. Do you have yours in p0 state? Thx
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 30, 2016, 12:30:01 PM |
|
no, but dont use the cuda 6.5 versions for this algo
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 30, 2016, 01:26:22 PM |
|
no, but dont use the cuda 6.5 versions for this algo
ooooo Ok I'm checking what version I have.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 30, 2016, 02:00:50 PM |
|
223mh 64x 980ti ty
|
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
July 31, 2016, 09:04:34 AM |
|
just wanted to post an update on my original problem: its fixed by the new mb thanks everybody who helped br
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 31, 2016, 09:07:27 AM |
|
nice to hear, happy mining
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
August 01, 2016, 07:00:35 PM |
|
so it was said that the miner could not be improved, but apparently there is one guy doing 400MH with a single 1070
not sure if legit, maybe he photoshopped, but the only reason behind this is a private miner
|
|
|
|
Heardalis
|
|
August 01, 2016, 07:29:43 PM |
|
so it was said that the miner could not be improved, but apparently there is one guy doing 400MH with a single 1070
not sure if legit, maybe he photoshopped, but the only reason behind this is a private miner
It is 401 mhs Amph not 400 and yes it is still not stable but it will be.Just because you r capable to do that u call it fake?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
August 01, 2016, 07:33:37 PM |
|
so it was said that the miner could not be improved, but apparently there is one guy doing 400MH with a single 1070
not sure if legit, maybe he photoshopped, but the only reason behind this is a private miner
It is 401 mhs Amph not 400 and yes it is still not stable but it will be.Just because you r capable to do that u call it fake? i'm calling it fake if it is done with OC, which it's impossible, oc will not increase your hash by 60%, that's plain stupid he is hiding a private miner at 100%, no doubt about this and actually i was the first that was saying that pascal still need to be discovered, and just porting maxwell code to it was not enough there are many optmization do to on the other algo with pascal, if it can reach 400MH on lbry, imagines on neoscrypt lyra2v2, spreadcoin etc, all should be increased by 60% which will make the 1070 the best card available without context
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
August 01, 2016, 07:38:06 PM |
|
so it was said that the miner could not be improved, but apparently there is one guy doing 400MH with a single 1070
not sure if legit, maybe he photoshopped, but the only reason behind this is a private miner
Where the screenshot?
|
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 02, 2016, 02:45:49 AM |
|
so it was said that the miner could not be improved, but apparently there is one guy doing 400MH with a single 1070
not sure if legit, maybe he photoshopped, but the only reason behind this is a private miner
It is 401 mhs Amph not 400 and yes it is still not stable but it will be.Just because you r capable to do that u call it fake? i'm calling it fake if it is done with OC, which it's impossible, oc will not increase your hash by 60%, that's plain stupid he is hiding a private miner at 100%, no doubt about this and actually i was the first that was saying that pascal still need to be discovered, and just porting maxwell code to it was not enough there are many optmization do to on the other algo with pascal, if it can reach 400MH on lbry, imagines on neoscrypt lyra2v2, spreadcoin etc, all should be increased by 60% which will make the 1070 the best card available without context Why is it fake? Because your cards can't OC like that? Why would he make a thread to "hide" a private miner? It would not be private then. Some people like to really push their cards as far and hard as possible. OC'ing does not make the hash fake if it is being reported at the pool. I on the other hand am not home a lot so I leave them as is. and take what I get.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
|