VRobb
|
|
December 24, 2016, 05:28:06 AM |
|
Block! Cheers to random btc address 12ND...! Glad the block wasn't 12ND!!
|
I don't believe in superstition because it's bad luck: 13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc These aren't the Droids you're looking for: S5 & S7 (Sold), R4B2, R4B4 (RIP), 2x S9 obsolete, 2xS15-28, S17-56, S17-70 Pushing a whopping 1/5 PH! Oh The SPEED!!!
|
|
|
MisterWeh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 24, 2016, 09:09:01 AM |
|
Thanks Kano, thanks Bio for pointing that out. This is what I did last time, collecting and transferring all at once. And sure, I know there is no fee for receiving rewards. And the low pool fee is what first brought me to Kano.is, now I know there are a lot more positive aspects with this community.
Enough said, I wish all of you Merry Christmas and nice days with family and friends!
|
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
December 24, 2016, 09:13:13 AM |
|
Is there anyway Kano could include a tx in the next block? I'm trying to consolidate some payouts and I've put a few on there but obviously too low.
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 24, 2016, 09:30:52 AM |
|
Is there anyway Kano could include a tx in the next block? I'm trying to consolidate some payouts and I've put a few on there but obviously too low.
Well it will be in the block if it fits and it's in the pool's mempool We confirm any and all transactions but in tx reward order - meaning the block will be full even if there's only zero fee transactions. FYI this might change soon back to similar to how it was before where the block change first work usually had no zero fee transactions. As I mentioned before, the update to 0.13.0 caused a double in the block change time (but still almost always less than 1 second) I'll see once I sort out 0.13.1 if it can still be full or just ignoring zero fee transactions for the first work after a block change.
|
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
December 24, 2016, 10:03:44 AM |
|
Ok no worries. I'm only a small time miner so the fee for consolidating was quite a bit. I'll just wait and see what happens. With all transactions waiting to be confirmed I doubt it will be soon. Just thought I'd ask if it was possible.
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
kipper01
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
1KippERXwH1PdBxKNt1ksgqh89WBv6CtWQ
|
|
December 24, 2016, 12:22:35 PM |
|
Well it will be in the block if it fits and it's in the pool's mempool Not sure what you mean by this... I have 1100+ transactions from Kano's pool.. It sure would be nice to consolidate in cost efficient manner.
|
|
|
|
scouse15
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 24, 2016, 01:10:50 PM |
|
Hi All,
Just writing to wish everyone here a merry xmas. I have learned so much since I joined Kano pool. Thank you.
Edit, CK pool, lol, kudo's to both of you.
|
|
|
|
HagssFIN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1710
Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.
|
|
December 24, 2016, 01:35:11 PM |
|
Yeah it has been nice to participate in btc mining in this pool Merry xmas to all!
|
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
December 24, 2016, 01:59:04 PM |
|
Totally agree. Merry Christmas everyone. Now can Santa, Father Christmas, Saint Nicholas etc bring some lovely green blocks this weekend please.
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 24, 2016, 03:17:58 PM |
|
Bit pointless looking at any list on bitcoincore.org because it obviously wont include those who say no......
Logic dictates that any list that "only tells you who said 'yes'" still, in fact, tells you who said "no". If a list of "yes" votes = ~25%, then the other ~75% said "no".
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
in2tactics
|
|
December 24, 2016, 04:31:33 PM |
|
Bit pointless looking at any list on bitcoincore.org because it obviously wont include those who say no......
Logic dictates that any list that "only tells you who said 'yes'" still, in fact, tells you who said "no". If a list of "yes" votes = ~25%, then the other ~75% said "no". I am not 100% sure that your argument is a formal logical fallacy, but it does appear to be akin to the informal logical fallacy known as the red herring fallacy. The chart on bitcoincore.org only shows the number of adopters of SegWit based on previous blocks submitted. It is not possible to logically infer that a non-SegWit block implies a "no" answer. While each block without SegWit could be a "no" answer, it is possible some of those blocks are from people too lazy to update, undecided or confused, simply holding out in an attempt to delay adoption, or with who knows what other reason.
|
Current HW: 2x Apollo, 2x Apollo BTC, 2x Apollo II Retired HW: 3x 2PAC, 3x Moonlander 2, 2x AntMiner S7-LN, 5x AntMiner U1, 2x ASICMiner Block Erupter Cube, 4x AntMiner S3, 4x AntMiner S1, GAW Black Widow, and ZeusMiner Thunder X6
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 24, 2016, 04:57:25 PM |
|
I am not 100% sure that your argument is a formal logical fallacy, but it does appear to be akin to the informal logical fallacy known as the red herring fallacy. The chart on bitcoincore.org only shows the number of adopters of SegWit based on previous blocks submitted. It is not possible to logically infer that a non-SegWit block implies a "no" answer. While each block without SegWit could be a "no" answer, it is possible some of those blocks are from people too lazy to update, undecided or confused, simply holding out in an attempt to delay adoption, or with who knows what other reason.
1) I wasn't aware we were adopting formal debate rules in this thread. 2) SegWit requires acceptance (an actual implementation) or non-acceptance; "might", "confused", or "other" are not options. 3) An abstaining vote, from that which requires actual implementation to be a "yes", is still a "no".* 4) "Simply holding out in an attempt to delay adoption" is a "no".* 5) Due to the nature of the acceptance rule (2) any non-"yes" is a "no" (there can be no "maybe" in something that, by definition, requires a hard "yes" or a hard "no").* 6) Because someone's current vote is "no", they are not estopped from later changing that vote to a "yes"; however, a later change does not change the current "no" form current existence. Any more Ph.D. tests or may we continue the thread? *Robert's Rules of Order apply loosely
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
delicin33
|
|
December 24, 2016, 05:27:05 PM |
|
...And sure, I know there is no fee for receiving rewards.
....
this may not be the case for me, i was charged BTC0.0001 each payment received recently i had changed my payment address to other wallet after they charged me for 15 payments
|
|
|
|
DarkStar_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
|
|
December 24, 2016, 05:38:26 PM |
|
...And sure, I know there is no fee for receiving rewards.
....
this may not be the case for me, i was charged BTC0.0001 each payment received recently i had changed my payment address to other wallet after they charged me for 15 payments That isn't related to receiving payments, but rather using them. More inputs creates a larger transaction size, which in turn requires more fees to be used. If you're not in a rush, do what others here have suggested and send a tx with a 20 satoshi/byte fee (roughly half of 0.0001 per input) and it will get confirmed eventually.
|
taking a break - expect delayed responses
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 24, 2016, 06:11:42 PM |
|
...And sure, I know there is no fee for receiving rewards.
....
this may not be the case for me, i was charged BTC0.0001 each payment received recently i had changed my payment address to other wallet after they charged me for 15 payments https://youtu.be/F12lpqnug-0
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
December 25, 2016, 01:07:23 AM |
|
Block by cobramining with his 9th Kano Block! This is our 1st of the new day!
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
December 25, 2016, 02:09:33 AM |
|
Merry Christmas everyone! It is a delight to be here among so many I respect and admire greatly!
|
|
|
|
fvineyard
Member
Offline
Activity: 135
Merit: 11
|
|
December 25, 2016, 02:58:59 AM |
|
Merry Christmas to all my fellow miners here. In about three weeks I can check off one year @ Kano CKPool. Glad I found this place. Great bunch of folks here.
|
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 25, 2016, 03:23:49 AM |
|
Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah...best to all. It's a good place here. All the best to Kano, CK, & respective "crews."
Peace be with us all.
|
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 25, 2016, 07:47:42 AM Last edit: December 25, 2016, 08:27:11 AM by kano |
|
I'll add another 1BTC onto today's block miner rewards. That's one so far (I'll update it soon) Edit: Done [2016-12-25 19:02:04.162+11] process_pplns(): *** block 444959 payout reward overridden, was 1251788626 now 1351788626 = 100000000 (7.9886%) more
Edit2: UTC or course
|
|
|
|
|