|
VRobb
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 07:42:06 PM |
|
Pool side and it should certainly be up to full speed by now. It's obviously doing the 'one board down' thing which seems to be not too uncommon if you check the R4 thread. Did it to me once while I was setting it up to mine here via nya, cold restart got it back - seems warm reboots can cause it for some reason.
Harrumph!
|
I don't believe in superstition because it's bad luck: 13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc
These aren't the Droids you're looking for: S5 & S7 (Sold), R4B2, R4B4 (RIP), 2x S9 obsolete, 2xS15-28, S17-56, S17-70
Pushing a whopping 1/5 PH! Oh The SPEED!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Make-A-Buck
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
January 04, 2017, 08:14:47 PM |
|
Pool side and it should certainly be up to full speed by now. It's obviously doing the 'one board down' thing which seems to be not too uncommon if you check the R4 thread. Did it to me once while I was setting it up to mine here via nya, cold restart got it back - seems warm reboots can cause it for some reason.
Harrumph!
Back OT. Posted a reply to this over here... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597639.580Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
bittalc1
|
|
January 04, 2017, 10:50:54 PM |
|
Hey guys, i wanted to transfer my remaining bitcoins to bitstamp but because i was mining i have a lots of tiny amounts received and when i try to send them i must give big amount of btc for transfer. Is there anyway that i can lower that amount? I know that this question is off topic but im long time with this pool and i need some help from you friends  .Thanks |
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
January 04, 2017, 11:12:38 PM |
|
Block by kaliorang with 140TH/s! This is his 2nd Kano block and our 2nd of the day!  |
|
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1220
|
|
January 04, 2017, 11:43:40 PM |
|
Hey guys, i wanted to transfer my remaining bitcoins to bitstamp but because i was mining i have a lots of tiny amounts received and when i try to send them i must give big amount of btc for transfer. Is there anyway that i can lower that amount? I know that this question is off topic but im long time with this pool and i need some help from you friends .Thanks Create a new wallet address and transfer your coins into that one. You can do that every so often and it consolidates the transactions when you do that, normally you would do this when you are not in a hurry as then you can put a low fee on it and the hours it takes don't matter. But sounds like you need to sell pronto. In which case you have to pay the higher fees. If you can wait til tomorrow to sell you could probably consolidate without the high fees as explained above |
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
January 05, 2017, 12:27:09 AM |
|
On the hashrate when logged in, what is the first and second number mean?
18.85/16.64THs
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1220
|
|
January 05, 2017, 12:30:40 AM
Last edit: January 05, 2017, 12:40:47 AM by Biffa |
|
On the hashrate when logged in, what is the first and second number mean?
18.85/16.64THs
[corrected] The number on the left is your 5min average. The number on the right is your 1hour average. From https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg10483721#msg10483721 |
|
|
|
tholmes4005
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2017, 05:02:47 AM |
|
I know this is off topic, but Kano always talks up Avalon. Just got another A721 man these things are awesome...just steady hashing machines! Blows Bitmains quality out of the water, so far.
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7849
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 05, 2017, 05:04:05 AM |
|
I know this is off topic, but Kano always talks up Avalon. Just got another A721 man these things are awesome...just steady hashing machines! Blows Bitmains quality out of the water, so far.
I have two. I prefer them over the s9 |
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
January 05, 2017, 05:44:23 AM |
|
I have two. I prefer them over the s9
$ for $, even if you buy an S9, unbox it, and take a hammer to 1 board before you ever turn it on (still leaving you with 8+TH), it's still cheaper (in electric usage and total hashrate cost per TH) than 6TH burning 1k Watts for ~ the same purchase price.  Edit: It must be nice to not have to worry about ROI  |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 05, 2017, 06:39:22 AM |
|
I have two. I prefer them over the s9
$ for $, even if you buy an S9, unbox it, and take a hammer to 1 board before you ever turn it on (still leaving you with 8+TH), it's still cheaper (in electric usage and total hashrate cost per TH) than 6TH burning 1k Watts for ~ the same purchase price. Edit: It must be nice to not have to worry about ROI Meanwhile the latest S9v1 statistics on the pool since the S9 existed: They've found 82 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 110.666 ... |
|
|
|
yxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3528
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 05, 2017, 06:51:27 AM |
|
I know this is off topic, but Kano always talks up Avalon. Just got another A721 man these things are awesome...just steady hashing machines! Blows Bitmains quality out of the water, so far.
I have two. I prefer them over the s9 And the best is that they are much more durable than the S9. |
| BTC | Kano Pool | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██
██
██
██ | | ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██
██
██
██ | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██
██
██
██ |
|
|
|
n200UG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2017, 06:52:18 AM |
|
r4 just about the price of a s9 11.85? Seems like they could do better than that. Noise seems cool but still generates heat you have to deal with.
Guy's, setting up Antminer R4, Batch 3(8TH/s). Having issue connecting via API. The web interface as zero setting for API. Anyone have some insight ? |
|
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
January 05, 2017, 07:21:16 AM
Last edit: January 05, 2017, 07:42:39 AM by ComputerGenie |
|
Meanwhile the latest S9v1 statistics on the pool since the S9 existed:
They've found 82 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 110.666 ...
28.666 ... of all 37 "short"?
We're back on the whole "the S9s are the entire reason for our bad luck" thing again? 
Edit: for the record, a 12.9TH S9 @ 1509 watts (1372+10%) hitting only 74% expected is still cheaper to run than 6TH @ 1000 watts hitting 100% expected - by about 8 watts per effective TH... let alone the fact that 9.5 > 6 |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
n200UG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2017, 07:46:03 AM
Last edit: January 05, 2017, 07:56:56 AM by n200UG |
|
Meanwhile the latest S9v1 statistics on the pool since the S9 existed:
They've found 82 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 110.666 ...
28.666 ... of all 37 "short"?
We're back on the whole "the S9s are the entire reason for our bad luck" thing again?
Edit: for the record, a 12.9TH S9 @ 1509 watts (1372+10%) hitting only 74% expected is still cheaper to run than 6TH @ 1000 watts hitting 100% expected - by about 8 watts per effective TH... let alone the fact that 9.5 > 6Interesting - Perhaps Bitmain send programmed bad luck S9 to the world so THEY can catch all the block them self ... :-) And the crazy thing is .. I wouldn't be surprise if it was true! |
|
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
January 05, 2017, 08:13:29 AM |
|
Interesting - Perhaps Bitmain send programmed bad luck S9 to the world so THEY can catch all the block them self ... :-)
...
That, or it could be that with a massively larger sampling, the "losses" are statistically less noticeable. Because, math...  |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
January 05, 2017, 08:17:17 AM |
|
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that S9s aren't a steaming pile of bovine dung; I'm saying that, dung or not, they pay the bills better than the current alternatives.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 05, 2017, 09:15:27 AM |
|
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that S9s aren't a steaming pile of bovine dung; I'm saying that, dung or not, they pay the bills better than the current alternatives.
Not if they're not finding blocks... |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
yxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3528
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 05, 2017, 10:36:21 AM |
|
or only show XXXX after a half year like some of my B1 S9
|
| BTC | Kano Pool | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██
██
██
██ | | ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██
██
██
██ | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██
██
██
██ |
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 05, 2017, 11:33:15 AM |
|
Meanwhile the latest S9v1 statistics on the pool since the S9 existed:
They've found 82 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 110.666 ...
28.666 ... of all 37 "short"?
We're back on the whole "the S9s are the entire reason for our bad luck" thing again?
...
I quoted some statistical facts. I'm not sure what your trying to say ... As for the probability of that particular number, its CDF[Erl] is 0.998094 so expected to be worse about once in 43,000 blocks ... Your comment implies linear, statistics are not. e.g. the A6+? stats are: They've found 74 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 84.22 10.22 short. But the CDF[Erl] for that is a lot lower 0.880096 so expected to be worse about once in 617 blocks ... 617 vs 43,000 ... yep they're dramatically different Though some time soon I do a pretty graph that makes it even more obvious ... |
|
|
|
|
