KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks

[A.Delaney]

All in all, I am glad to be mining here. I just wish that stupid red line would hurry up and get to the top.
 

If you click on Accounts then Rewards and look at the far right column that says Your N Avg. That’s how far your ramped up for that particular block. So if that number equals the hash power of what your putting to the pool then your ramped up completely.

[1715163847]

1715163847

[1715163847]

1715163847

[1715163847]

1715163847

[fjtropepe]

So ... Slushpool just cracked a 550% that took 8 hours ...

Get ready for influx of refugees boosting our hash rate!

BLOCK DANCE!

Not sure where you are looking, but Slush reports block % favorable.  E.g. if they find a block in less than network difficulty, they count that as positive luck.  So the 550% block, took them 15 mins, not 8hrs (not sure where this number is coming from I looked back through their block history and I couldn't find an 8 hour block anywhere in that last few days/week).

However, with that said, they are also on the unlucky side by over 20%.  In fact all of their numbers show this.  10 blocks, 50 blocks and 250 blocks.  But what's worse is that their hash has doubled as well and their number of miners has gone from 47000 just a month ago to almost 97000.  Can you imagine how tiny those payout are now.  Both *bad* luck and a doubling in the number of users and hash rates.

I moved from Slush, did all the number comparisons, etc and I think I'll just happily stay here thank you very much.

How much hash are you putting out?

Further, and I just looked and slushs luck is really no different from ours right now.  Both are unlucky by approx the same percentage on the short term... I didn't look at the longer timeframe.

I'm just a small fish in the wading pool, trying to graduate to the shark tank

I ask because you state that you have done your calculations. Based on my current hash, we need to average a block every three days for my mining operation to make more money here than elsewhere. I was wondering what your calculations are.

[A.Delaney]

Looking at the block statistics, https://kano.is/index.php?k=blocks

If I am reading it correctly, it appears that we have had bad Luck% for all the block ranges except the last 500 blocks and All blocks, both of which are less than 2% on the positive side; whereas the other block groups are all greater than 2% on the negative side.

Shouldn't it be more distributed if it is random, or is 2204 blocks still too low sample size?


Also, in regards to the Last 88 Blocks chart, is there a place to see those details for the last 2204 blocks?

Thanks!

Can nobody answer this question?? The luck % column looks like garbage. is this just one long run of bad luck for this pool? Are we so small that bad luck lasts for the last 250 blocks?

Not counting this month. Of The last 11 months only 4 have a % significantly over 100%. I don’t think that is all that bad. Luck for all 2205 blocks is still 98%

[akadamson]

So ... Slushpool just cracked a 550% that took 8 hours ...

Get ready for influx of refugees boosting our hash rate!

BLOCK DANCE!

Not sure where you are looking, but Slush reports block % favorable.  E.g. if they find a block in less than network difficulty, they count that as positive luck.  So the 550% block, took them 15 mins, not 8hrs (not sure where this number is coming from I looked back through their block history and I couldn't find an 8 hour block anywhere in that last few days/week).

However, with that said, they are also on the unlucky side by over 20%.  In fact all of their numbers show this.  10 blocks, 50 blocks and 250 blocks.  But what's worse is that their hash has doubled as well and their number of miners has gone from 47000 just a month ago to almost 97000.  Can you imagine how tiny those payout are now.  Both *bad* luck and a doubling in the number of users and hash rates.

I moved from Slush, did all the number comparisons, etc and I think I'll just happily stay here thank you very much.

How much hash are you putting out?

Further, and I just looked and slushs luck is really no different from ours right now.  Both are unlucky by approx the same percentage on the short term... I didn't look at the longer timeframe.

I'm just a small fish in the wading pool, trying to graduate to the shark tank

I ask because you state that you have done your calculations. Based on my current hash, we need to average a block every three days for my mining operation to make more money here than elsewhere. I was wondering what your calculations are.

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

[jeecom]

Thank you cobramining for the block!   My 3rd block ever - things are speeding up and I like it.

All we need now is 10 quick blocks and then my luck will be in the positive!

[fjtropepe]

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

Money is not what keeps me here. I believe in the bigger picture. Again, you avoid the question. How much hashing power are you contributing? Should be a simple answer. Guessing one S9 based on your statements.

[NomadGroup]

That’s a present for Valentine’s Day guys!!! 

Happy Valentines to All! 

I bought a new ledger wallet for my BTC love!  What have you got? 

[perfectplus174]

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

Money is not what keeps me here. I believe in the bigger picture. Again, you avoid the question. How much hashing power are you contributing? Should be a simple answer.

I'm glad that block made everyone happy........except DPoS2  

[akadamson]

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

Money is not what keeps me here. I believe in the bigger picture. Again, you avoid the question. How much hashing power are you contributing? Should be a simple answer. Guessing one S9 based on your statements.

I figured my reference to payout amounts would answer the question.  I have 40Th/s and will  add 22 more on monday

[fjtropepe]

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

Money is not what keeps me here. I believe in the bigger picture. Again, you avoid the question. How much hashing power are you contributing? Should be a simple answer. Guessing one S9 based on your statements.

I figured my reference to payout amounts would answer the question.  I have 40Th/s and will  add 22 more on monday

LOL. Your reference to  turning .01 in 2+ days was what inspired that (which is far from accurate). I got you though. The way I like to look at it is simply this. This pool offers you the opportunity to gain much more when luck smiles upon us. As long as we are adding hashing power and brining new miners in we should be fine. Decentralization is power. Mine on fellas.

[akadamson]

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

Money is not what keeps me here. I believe in the bigger picture. Again, you avoid the question. How much hashing power are you contributing? Should be a simple answer. Guessing one S9 based on your statements.

I figured my reference to payout amounts would answer the question.  I have 40Th/s and will  add 22 more on monday

LOL. Your reference to  turning .01 in 2+ days was what inspired that (which is far from accurate). I got you though. The way I like to look at it is simply this. This pool offers you the opportunity to gain much more when luck smiles upon us. As long as we are adding hashing power and brining new miners in we should be fine. Decentralization is power. Mine on fellas.

well, it wasn't trying to be misleading, but I see how it was... 40Th did .010296<blah> and the problem was my days math - which technically was correct, but was far too misleading... ... but it was still better than slush

I'll blame it on the euphoria of finding a block ... lol. that's my story and I'm sticking to it...

[fjtropepe]

hmm I guess then I'm surprised you're still here.  That would take you back to the Nov/December time frame as we haven't ran 10 blocks a month since that timeframe.
A friend of mine and I mine here, I switched from Slush in mid Jan. *before* the doubling of hash and user @ slush, it  took me at average 6 days to mine .01 BTC there.  And luck at the time was closer to 100%.  For me we just turned .01 in 2+ days here.  Yes I know I didn't account for the 600% block.   And that block was 165% diff.  So I'm quite happy to stay right here and *gamble*.

about a week ago we looked at slush, btc, and here and decided this still was the better option even given the luck issue.  What do they say "A pendulum can only swing so far and then has to switch back"

I think the other thing that people forget.  A month ago, blocks were paying at average around 15-17 BTC, look at our last 2 - stuck right above the base pay.  so that in and of itself is a 25% reduction in revenue that effects *everybody*.

Money is not what keeps me here. I believe in the bigger picture. Again, you avoid the question. How much hashing power are you contributing? Should be a simple answer. Guessing one S9 based on your statements.

I figured my reference to payout amounts would answer the question.  I have 40Th/s and will  add 22 more on monday

LOL. Your reference to  turning .01 in 2+ days was what inspired that (which is far from accurate). I got you though. The way I like to look at it is simply this. This pool offers you the opportunity to gain much more when luck smiles upon us. As long as we are adding hashing power and brining new miners in we should be fine. Decentralization is power. Mine on fellas.

well, it wasn't trying to be misleading, but I see how it was... 40Th did .010296<blah> and the problem was my days math - which technically was correct, but was far too misleading... ... but it was still better than slush

I'll blame it on the euphoria of finding a block ... lol. that's my story and I'm sticking to it...

HAHAHA  good enough for me. Block for V-day. What is better? Oh ya, then next one right around the corner.

[rifleman74]

MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN! 

[ShefSam]

501835   1AQSeJNGEX8oceTjCEJaCXRj3M2MeJy1tk       0.00009100   *
501739   1AQSeJNGEX8oceTjCEJaCXRj3M2MeJy1tk       0.00007862   *
500907   1AQSeJNGEX8oceTjCEJaCXRj3M2MeJy1tk       0.00003152   *
500622   1AQSeJNGEX8oceTjCEJaCXRj3M2MeJy1tk       0.00002753   *
500096   1K3VcyGnkvM2ZV69GZRgtaELActKqFE4vp       0.00001819   *
498508   1K3VcyGnkvM2ZV69GZRgtaELActKqFE4vp       0.00000003   *
498476   1K3VcyGnkvM2ZV69GZRgtaELActKqFE4vp       0.00000003   *

It's been about two months already... can you please send these dust payments.  Thank you.

They can all go to the 1AQSeJNGEX8oceTjCEJaCXRj3M2MeJy1tk address.

Please feel free to delete this msg.

MINE-ON!

[VRobb]

Kanosan is working on new accounting code for the pool which will allow dust payments to be claimed.  He's just not quite done yet...  

Mine on!  

[heartlandmining]

...
It's been about two months already... can you please send these dust payments.  Thank you.
...

So that you don't have unrealistic expectations - if you're only mining dust, you should consider another pool.  

You'll get paid "eventually," however there is no definitive timeframe for the infrastructure rewrite necessary to pay out dust at this time.

Edit: I note that you also have different payout addresses in your dust - You should be prepared for the eventuality that the payouts will only go out to the addresses specified at the time the block was found.  I doubt there will be any type of "aggregate my dust to payout address X" functionality.

[A.Delaney]

What is mining dust?

[sruyle]

Accounting software and simple tasks are nowhere near the same. Accounting software has to make 0 errors. In anyone's favor, ever. It is also incredibly boring to write. And trying to do so while maintaining a pool has to be difficult at best.

[heartlandmining]

What is mining dust?

"Dust payments below 0.00010000 BTC are not sent out yet."  <-- from the Payouts page on your kano.is account.

[sruyle]

What is mining dust?

Rewards less than 0.0001 are considered dust. They cost more to send than they are worth and so are allowed to accumulate first.