alani123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1406
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
February 02, 2015, 04:46:47 PM |
|
20007 replies and counting. We reached page 1001.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoCobaine1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2015, 04:51:37 PM |
|
It was just down for a few minutes, seems to be back up.
|
|
|
|
|
WaffleMaster
|
|
February 02, 2015, 04:53:35 PM |
|
Damn, that's super depressing. Wonder how many others are exactly like this guy. I knew I almost was. Homero only stole $40 from me.
|
|
|
|
msarro
|
|
February 02, 2015, 04:54:41 PM |
|
Yep, bl4nk is gone as well. GAW MO is to burn any bridge that has outlived its usefulness so it isn't surprising. Sorry for the brusque language, just tired of seeing people try to make excuses for the HT community OR saying cf throws around baseless accusations and that's how I took what you were saying.
|
|
|
|
CoinFire
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:01:25 PM |
|
We never blamed GAW. Not once, we have never once even implied it is GAW themselves.
A GAW faithful, yes. We have an IP address, we have some relevant information and we know based on the email we received they are a member of Hashtalk.
The emails and IP address of the attack both match and they return here in the States, the person didn't take many steps to cover up who they are. We won't name them but we know EXACTLY who they are and so do the relevant law enforcement officials who have to date not taken any action.
We will provide an update once law enforcement decides to do something. If they don't eventually we will release the relevant information (sans name).
Thanks for this, this is the response I expected from you and hope you'll get them. I don't support any hacks ddoses and other crap and would like to know if GAW was really involved. Thanks for being vigilant Stargazer! If we weren't all skeptics regarding the things presented in front of us this entire thread wouldn't exist. I really hope that something comes from it as well. That was one of the most damaging situations for us we've encountered to date. Not something I'd want to experience again. That was one of the most stressful days we've had to date. I appreciate your hard work. In hindsight, you probably saved some people thousands by allowing them to dump early. rather then continue being brainwashed. Thanks, we simply report what we find. We will keep searching regarding a plethora of companies and claims to help make sure our audience is always informed. We may not always report the news people want to hear but we will keep reporting the news.
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:01:49 PM |
|
If you're gonna do that, lock the thread now so the lawyers don't have to read so much. That would save about $20k-$100k.
|
|
|
|
NeonTranceBadger
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:08:54 PM |
|
Didn't suchmoon prepare a google document timeline detailing the GAW corruption? Is that being kept up to date? Could the SEC not use something like that in their investigation?
It wasn't Suchmoon it is some guy that escapes my memory but I have some PMs to him. That was me. I haven't had much of a chance to update it but like I said previously PM me what you need added and I will get it added.
|
|
|
|
KC6TTR
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:16:13 PM |
|
Look out the debit card scam is entering real wanker territory now with that loser bitcoin bar defending this shit with idiotic claims that only a moron who has NFI about crypto would believe. Seriously people the more this guy speaks the less brain cells you have IF you bother to read the shit dribbling from its fat mouth Your pathetic bitcon bar and reaper, I hope you get ass raped so hard, but then again you both strike me as people that enjoy that kind of thing. Also that will get you banned or shadow banned sburn how dare you ask questions and tear apart their scheme/scam I still don't understand why people think there have never been any prepaid debit cards that are based on converted crypto. Here is one of mine, which has no yearly membership cost and the last time I checked had no fee above 3%. Scott-
|
|
|
|
vabchgent
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:19:05 PM |
|
Look out the debit card scam is entering real wanker territory now with that loser bitcoin bar defending this shit with idiotic claims that only a moron who has NFI about crypto would believe. Seriously people the more this guy speaks the less brain cells you have IF you bother to read the shit dribbling from its fat mouth Your pathetic bitcon bar and reaper, I hope you get ass raped so hard, but then again you both strike me as people that enjoy that kind of thing. Also that will get you banned or shadow banned sburn how dare you ask questions and tear apart their scheme/scam I still don't understand why people think there have never been any prepaid debit cards that are based on converted crypto. Here is one of mine, which has no yearly membership cost and the last time I checked had no fee above 3%. Scott- Scott - But why are there no Debit crypto card providers located in the US. I am just curious any Ideas. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Mr Felt
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:24:38 PM |
|
Haven't compared w/ edited versions yet, but here's the initial (unedited) "Personal Note about Tonight" post; as always, I used Bitcoinwisdom to time stamp the posting - note UTC time at bottom of Bitfinex chart: http://imgur.com/a/SEjrk
|
|
|
|
msarro
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:27:45 PM |
|
Look out the debit card scam is entering real wanker territory now with that loser bitcoin bar defending this shit with idiotic claims that only a moron who has NFI about crypto would believe. Seriously people the more this guy speaks the less brain cells you have IF you bother to read the shit dribbling from its fat mouth Your pathetic bitcon bar and reaper, I hope you get ass raped so hard, but then again you both strike me as people that enjoy that kind of thing. Also that will get you banned or shadow banned sburn how dare you ask questions and tear apart their scheme/scam I still don't understand why people think there have never been any prepaid debit cards that are based on converted crypto. Here is one of mine, which has no yearly membership cost and the last time I checked had no fee above 3%. Scott- Mind sharing with the class who the bank is to provide that? I've been waiting on a shift invite for a LOOOOOONG time now.
|
|
|
|
DaveWave
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 806
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:32:03 PM |
|
Price is in free fall at the moment.
I think 5th place on coinmarketcap could be lost within the hour
|
|
|
|
CoinFire
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:32:12 PM |
|
Yep, bl4nk is gone as well. GAW MO is to burn any bridge that has outlived its usefulness so it isn't surprising. Sorry for the brusque language, just tired of seeing people try to make excuses for the HT community OR saying cf throws around baseless accusations and that's how I took what you were saying. No hard feelings. I expect facts, especially from journalists and i'm satisfied with CF's response at the moment. We had enough FUD in crypto. I used to be GAW client in August and September and they looked like a responsible company at the time. Them DDOSing sites and stealing domains still seems improbable, at least to me, but a burned investor like geekhaven... who knows. Possible FUD below: Another thing I'm interested in is their relation with Hashie. Back in the day a lot of people attacked GAW threads pushing hashie shares and calling GAW a scam, later when hashie failed somebody said that the owner of hashie is a moderator on hashtalk. Can anyone confirm this? Did GAW have a double agent leeching their clients and mimicking their business model, or were they working together, acting like a competing businesses to get the most out of the market? That is something we've been trying to followup on regarding Hashie. One of our contributors made some headway regarding a moderator on Hashtalk having something to do with Hashie but as of yet we haven't found anything conclusive enough that I'd be willing to publish. We are going to be releasing a blog post this afternoon detailing our editorial process and fact-checking systems along with a commitment to publish an Editorial Bible on GitHub for others to use, edit and guide when running any sort of news site. The post detailing our process has been on the back burner but we promised to do it and I have a copy editor reviewing the feature now. The GitHub release of the Bible will come in the near future as well. We need to remove some of our "secret sauce" such as who can be contacted to vet something off the record and the naming of some sources but we hope that this document can help not only those in the cryptocurrency news space but those in other news spaces as well. It is sad that some investors have been burned in this and many other cryptocurrency things but we hope we can help provide some accurate reporting to prevent further things like this in the future and show people they can vet statements as well.
|
|
|
|
Bourbon44
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:36:49 PM |
|
Farewell sweet paycoin, we hardly knew ye...
Or maybe we did.
|
|
|
|
CryptoCobaine1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:44:51 PM |
|
Farewell sweet paycoin, we hardly knew ye...
Or maybe we did.
Haha, good one.
|
|
|
|
owlcatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3612
Merit: 1965
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:46:01 PM |
|
Yep, bl4nk is gone as well. GAW MO is to burn any bridge that has outlived its usefulness so it isn't surprising. Sorry for the brusque language, just tired of seeing people try to make excuses for the HT community OR saying cf throws around baseless accusations and that's how I took what you were saying. No hard feelings. I expect facts, especially from journalists and i'm satisfied with CF's response at the moment. We had enough FUD in crypto. I used to be GAW client in August and September and they looked like a responsible company at the time. Them DDOSing sites and stealing domains still seems improbable, at least to me, but a burned investor like geekhaven... who knows. Possible FUD below: Another thing I'm interested in is their relation with Hashie. Back in the day a lot of people attacked GAW threads pushing hashie shares and calling GAW a scam, later when hashie failed somebody said that the owner of hashie is a moderator on hashtalk. Can anyone confirm this? Did GAW have a double agent leeching their clients and mimicking their business model, or were they working together, acting like a competing businesses to get the most out of the market? That is something we've been trying to followup on regarding Hashie. One of our contributors made some headway regarding a moderator on Hashtalk having something to do with Hashie but as of yet we haven't found anything conclusive enough that I'd be willing to publish. We are going to be releasing a blog post this afternoon detailing our editorial process and fact-checking systems along with a commitment to publish an Editorial Bible on GitHub for others to use, edit and guide when running any sort of news site. The post detailing our process has been on the back burner but we promised to do it and I have a copy editor reviewing the feature now. The GitHub release of the Bible will come in the near future as well. We need to remove some of our "secret sauce" such as who can be contacted to vet something off the record and the naming of some sources but we hope that this document can help not only those in the cryptocurrency news space but those in other news spaces as well. It is sad that some investors have been burned in this and many other cryptocurrency things but we hope we can help provide some accurate reporting to prevent further things like this in the future and show people they can vet statements as well. This seems fairly accurate. she did have an interview (bitjane) on her blog with bbit, but then deleted it all when hashie took the money and ran... http://hashieexposed.iblogger.org/
|
. I C Λ R U S | | | | █████▄▄█████▄▄ ████████▀▀▀████ ██████▀█████▀███ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ░▄█████████████████ ███████████████████ ███████████████████ ████████░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ████████▄▄▄████████ ███████████████████ █████████████████▀ | ░░░███ ▄▄▄███ ██████ ░░░███ ░░░███ ░░░███ ░░░███ ░░░███ ░░░███ ░░░███ ▄████████ ███▌░▐███ ████████▀ | | | | | █████████████████████ █████████████████████ █████████████████████ ██████▀▀▀▀████▀▀█████ █████░░▄▄░░██░░░█████ █████▄▄██░░███░░█████ █████▀▀▀▀░░▀██░░█████ ████░░░░▄▄▄▄█▀░░▀████ ████░░░░░░░░█░▀▀░████ █████████████████████ █████████████████████ █████████████████████ █████████████████████ | ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████ | ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████ | ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████ | | | | ████ ██
██ ████ | | ████ ██
██ ████ |
[/ce
|
|
|
DaveWave
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 806
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:54:18 PM |
|
Price is in free fall at the moment.
I think 5th place on coinmarketcap could be lost within the hour
....and 20 minutes later I see paycoin is now in eight place. To the moon lol
|
|
|
|
Subtuppel
|
|
February 02, 2015, 05:54:33 PM |
|
Price is in free fall at the moment.
I think 5th place on coinmarketcap could be lost within the hour
8 PayCoin PayCoin $ 13,260,922 $ 1.05 12,659,712 XPY ** $ 271,466 -41.77 % Still about $ 1.05 too expensive.
|
|
|
|
|