Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 03:05:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 [917] 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916319 times)
cs54
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 09:15:05 PM
 #18321

Seems like we are basically transferring the profit margin to the miner assembly companies.

Soo about that Rockminer IPO...

Would be nice if there was an 'obligation' to disclose related party transactions to the board, so we could get the full picture...
1713884712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713884712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713884712
Reply with quote  #2

1713884712
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713884712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713884712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713884712
Reply with quote  #2

1713884712
Report to moderator
1713884712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713884712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713884712
Reply with quote  #2

1713884712
Report to moderator
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 09:15:47 PM
 #18322

. (As well as at how low voltage the chip totally stops working and how at how high it explodes)

Comedy gold FC

Gold, Jerry, Gold!

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 09:24:11 PM
 #18323

Seems like we are basically transferring the profit margin to the miner assembly companies.

Soo about that Rockminer IPO...

Would be nice if there was an 'obligation' to disclose related party transactions to the board, so we could get the full picture...

We are also transferring... support, logistics, sales, marketing, replacements.  We get to develop chips, and profit.  They have to deal with all sorts of curve balls, and day to day problems... and they will get paid for it.

By focusing the business, instead of getting distracted for months after you finish a chip with dealing with that chip, you can instantly focus all efforts on the next chip.

SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
April 01, 2014, 10:48:09 PM
 #18324

It might be a preproduction with a couple chips only. Its cheaper than producing a full production mask and you can check if the design works. The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case.

For clarity... If the sample run is complete and the chips were tested and found to work, then by definition the tape-out happened weeks ago.

"The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case" in this context means that it has to have already been done.  Not that it's now time to do the tape-out.

Sorry, was just confusing when I read your reply.

I often mix things in the area and i thought tape-out is meant only when you created the final production masks. If you build sample chips you wont have a mask useful enough to run the mass production of wafers. And since those full masks are the thing that costs millions its better to make some samples first. Its cheaper, you only get a couple of asics and you can test if the design will work.

But i think its correct that the production of sample chips meet the definition of tape-out too. I guess it has to be described more in detail to know exactly what was meant.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
vortex1878
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 492
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 01:47:58 AM
 #18325

It might be a preproduction with a couple chips only. Its cheaper than producing a full production mask and you can check if the design works. The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case.

For clarity... If the sample run is complete and the chips were tested and found to work, then by definition the tape-out happened weeks ago.

"The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case" in this context means that it has to have already been done.  Not that it's now time to do the tape-out.

Sorry, was just confusing when I read your reply.

I often mix things in the area and i thought tape-out is meant only when you created the final production masks. If you build sample chips you wont have a mask useful enough to run the mass production of wafers. And since those full masks are the thing that costs millions its better to make some samples first. Its cheaper, you only get a couple of asics and you can test if the design will work.

But i think its correct that the production of sample chips meet the definition of tape-out too. I guess it has to be described more in detail to know exactly what was meant.

Your post again makes no sense at all. Why don't you keep quiet if you are clueless?!
KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 08:56:26 AM
 #18326

It might be a preproduction with a couple chips only. Its cheaper than producing a full production mask and you can check if the design works. The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case.

For clarity... If the sample run is complete and the chips were tested and found to work, then by definition the tape-out happened weeks ago.

"The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case" in this context means that it has to have already been done.  Not that it's now time to do the tape-out.

Sorry, was just confusing when I read your reply.

I often mix things in the area and i thought tape-out is meant only when you created the final production masks. If you build sample chips you wont have a mask useful enough to run the mass production of wafers. And since those full masks are the thing that costs millions its better to make some samples first. Its cheaper, you only get a couple of asics and you can test if the design will work.

But i think its correct that the production of sample chips meet the definition of tape-out too. I guess it has to be described more in detail to know exactly what was meant.

Tape out is not "physical". It's when you send the finished "chip program".
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 09:39:25 AM
 #18327

You guys ever heard of Google? If you don't know shit you can look it up.

Obviously there's still no relevant new information. I'm attempting to see if rockminer can offer up any insight through their blog. Maybe instead of mental masterbation you may want to try something similar.
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 10:40:25 AM
 #18328

It might be a preproduction with a couple chips only. Its cheaper than producing a full production mask and you can check if the design works. The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case.

For clarity... If the sample run is complete and the chips were tested and found to work, then by definition the tape-out happened weeks ago.

"The tape-out has to be done now if thats the case" in this context means that it has to have already been done.  Not that it's now time to do the tape-out.

Sorry, was just confusing when I read your reply.

I often mix things in the area and i thought tape-out is meant only when you created the final production masks. If you build sample chips you wont have a mask useful enough to run the mass production of wafers. And since those full masks are the thing that costs millions its better to make some samples first. Its cheaper, you only get a couple of asics and you can test if the design will work.

But i think its correct that the production of sample chips meet the definition of tape-out too. I guess it has to be described more in detail to know exactly what was meant.

Your post again makes no sense at all. Why don't you keep quiet if you are clueless?!

Well, since Sebastian conducted several groupbuys of Avalon chips before - for several 1000s of BTC, he has been involved with chip production cycles before and does it matter whether the creation of the mask set is a one time thing or whether there may be multiple ones? I don't think this is an example of getting the concept totally wrong.
We should rather be nice and convince him to buy a couple PH of chips from AM  Smiley

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 03:14:51 PM
 #18329

Yeah always be careful who you insult.. you never know when you're talking to a big customer  Cheesy

sngwinner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 06:30:53 PM
 #18330

So it looks like havelock pricing has adjusted for low dividends. It would be great if Friedcat could provide some guidance on whether or not AM is still going to self mine with their chips and is going to shoot for holding 10% of the network. Is juratol the designated board member contact? Could you maybe get a response from Friedcat.

Nothing has been said about abandoning this goal but the fact that they aren't going to be manufacturing miners and the board member involvement in Rockxie has me concerned.

ETERBASE | TRADE WITH NEGATIVE FEES
xbase ▬▬▬■▌[SIGN UP NOW]▐■▬▬▬ xbase
ANN THREAD   |    TELEGRAM    |    FACEBOOK    |    TWITTER
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 06:42:08 PM
 #18331

So it looks like havelock pricing has adjusted for low dividends. It would be great if Friedcat could provide some guidance on whether or not AM is still going to self mine with their chips and is going to shoot for holding 10% of the network. Is juratol the designated board member contact? Could you maybe get a response from Friedcat.

Nothing has been said about abandoning this goal but the fact that they aren't going to be manufacturing miners and the board member involvement in Rockxie has me concerned.

Few of your questions have already been answered.

AM will be solomining with the immersion-cooled datacenter. No word about the air-cooled dc or franchising but my guess is that they will both be converted to gen3.

Also AM will manufacturer some small batches of gen3 machines.

I'm still interested to know if FC still has a solomining goal of 10% which would be a nice addition to chip sales.
sngwinner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 07:05:10 PM
 #18332


Few of your questions have already been answered.

AM will be solomining with the immersion-cooled datacenter. No word about the air-cooled dc or franchising but my guess is that they will both be converted to gen3.

Also AM will manufacturer some small batches of gen3 machines.

I'm still interested to know if FC still has a solomining goal of 10% which would be a nice addition to chip sales.

Thanks Jimmothy. Do you know when this was mentioned or if it was from Friedcat himself. I keep up with this thread and check each of FCs posts and I don't remember this being directly stated. Assumed by others in this thread, but not stated by FC or a board member.

ETERBASE | TRADE WITH NEGATIVE FEES
xbase ▬▬▬■▌[SIGN UP NOW]▐■▬▬▬ xbase
ANN THREAD   |    TELEGRAM    |    FACEBOOK    |    TWITTER
ujka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 07:07:39 PM
 #18333

quote from friedcat, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=438359 :
Quote
Full devices from ASICMiner are definitely going to exist on the form of samples and small batches. ASICMiner may also build new mining farms based on new chips. Unsliced wafers may also be available for sale. But the main business direction is to provide packaged chips.

and from 'Answers to Recent Questions of Shareholders' Concern' https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg3901066#msg3901066
Quote
- How will Gen 3 be divided between mining, franchising and hardware sales?
  It depends on the users of our chips. It is a safe bet that we will be moving more to pure chip distribution. But if the edge of low cost on whole devices and deploying still exists in 2014 on our side, we will do more mining/franchising/hardware sales ourselves.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
April 02, 2014, 07:10:55 PM
 #18334

Your post again makes no sense at all. Why don't you keep quiet if you are clueless?!

I could have saved the explaination of what i thought, right. What i was interested in was if friedcat is already mass producing chips. Though it looks like friedcat already answered that question. He speaks about an engineering batch that comes out and shortly after that the chips work. So the full production didnt start yet. I doubt that friedcat already placed himself in a queue in the foundry since he would have to pay upfront before knowing if the design works. Which means at least a month before real production of wafers.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 07:11:13 PM
 #18335

Quote from jutarul.  The official non-official relayer of info.

5) What is the status and capacity of the immersion-cooling data center, and will it house some of the 3rd generation hardware used for mining?
re 5) Capacity is at least 1P. And yes it will be used.
bitcoin.newsfeed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 07:52:54 PM
 #18336

I'm still interested to know if FC still has a solomining goal of 10% ...

When I was investing into this company ~ 1 year ago, it was publicly known that ASICminer's goal is to maintain at least 10% of global hashrate, so i did some calculations and bought shares. I was investing into mining company which goal was to mine bitcoins. I was not investing into chip manufacture which will be selling chips for fiat after one year. But yeah ... I am now in huge 75% loss, no point of selling now. I feel quite fucked by ASICminer.

... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 08:14:40 PM
 #18337

I'm still interested to know if FC still has a solomining goal of 10% ...

When I was investing into this company ~ 1 year ago, it was publicly known that ASICminer's goal is to maintain at least 10% of global hashrate, so i did some calculations and bought shares. I was investing into mining company which goal was to mine bitcoins. I was not investing into chip manufacture which will be selling chips for fiat after one year. But yeah ... I am now in huge 75% loss, no point of selling now. I feel quite fucked by ASICminer.

You might be the only person who feels they were screwed by asicminer.

I am assuming you bought when AM had 30% hashrate?

The 10% goal would have brought in 100k bitcoins per year which is only half of what asicminer earned.

AM can only mine if it is economically feasible. Can you imagine how much smaller last years earnings would have been without hardware sales? We were able to squeeze an extra 80k bitcoins from selling hardware that would probably never or just barely reach a positive roi.

I think FC knows this game better than anyone and will go down whatever path is most profitable as has been done in the past.
electerium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 08:25:52 PM
 #18338

selling bare chips is/was the fastest way to the market. FC probably knew that gen2 couldnt compete with the current market when it owuld be released, so he scrapped it and went with the plan that pushes his chips into the market the quickest.
server
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 892
Merit: 1002


1 BTC =1 BTC


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 08:35:41 PM
 #18339

Is AM shareholder of this new Rockminer company ?

Or are all AM shareholders cut loose and will profit only be for the happy few ?

I mean AM will make no or minimal profit by selling gen3 chips at $0.49/GH.

jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
April 02, 2014, 08:39:36 PM
 #18340

Is AM shareholder of this new Rockminer company ?

Or are all AM shareholders cut loose and will profit only be for the happy few ?

I mean AM will make no or minimal profit by selling gen3 chips at $0.49/GH.

Other way around. Rockminer holds shares of AM.

And you are wrong about making no profit. If AM sells 1600PH with a profit of $0.5/GH that would mean 1,600,000 BTC or 4 btc per share.
Pages: « 1 ... 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 [917] 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!