RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:12:38 AM |
|
Yes, but they sold at a loss (at least according to the data they released). Who cares what they did in sales if they lost money? Only thing that matters is profits.
What are you talking about? Chips are sold at around $0.5/gh and cost around $0.2/gh. If they sold at a loss how would they have $9,000,000 in assets? And distributors sell miners at well over 1$/GH which means that FC isn't maximizing profits for his shareholders. The distributors seem to do a much better job on that. What? How did you extrapolate that? I think you are imagining FC could have sold the same amount of chips at $1+/gh which is not realistic. $4,000,000 in chip sales suggests FC knows what hes doing. And distributors aren't fleecing anyone. For example hashratios production costs are $0.8/gh and sold for $1/gh. Extremely small margins. Even at the average price of AM hardware at $1.4/gh the margins are not huge. Certainly nowhere near the profit per gh on overpriced hardware like spondoolies but exorbitant prices does not equal maximizing profit. Extrapolating? I'm not extrapolating anything. I'm just stating facts. You just said that hashratio is selling for 1$/GH. That's a simple fact. I didn't say that FC should sell chips for more than 1$/GH. I said that he could sell miners for more than 1$/GH if he could produce them. How come that last year FC was able to sell for over 30$/GH when the market was below 15$/GH, but he can't do it again? Let's see how many chips will FC sell after the big sale worth 4 mil $ (from which you saw no dividend) because those 4 mil $ mean nothing if the chips which he paid won't get sold. Spondoolies seems to really get you since you mention them so often. This is not about SP-Tech. I was just trying to find out why would FC settle for ~0.2$/Gh profit when I think that he could get more. If hashratio has the same 0.2$/Gh profit then doesn't that mean that by producing his own miners FC could get at least 0.4$/Gh as profit?
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:15:38 AM |
|
Mining industry is scaling up and fc has anticipated it. If you think about it we're right on schedule. gen3 has been on the pipe not even for the last 6months, has been positively tested and is now being massively produced. By the end of summer we'll land on the moon.
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:17:46 AM |
|
Mining industry is scaling up and fc has anticipated it. If you think about we're right on schedu. gen3 has been on the pipe not even for the last 6months, has been positively tested and is now being massively produced. By the end of summer we'll land on the moon.
i agree that it is being scaled up, but not in the way you think. investors in mining equipment now want quality, ease of use and longevity.
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:37:35 AM |
|
Mining industry is scaling up and fc has anticipated it. If you think about we're right on schedu. gen3 has been on the pipe not even for the last 6months, has been positively tested and is now being massively produced. By the end of summer we'll land on the moon.
i agree that it is being scaled up, but not in the way you think. investors in mining equipment now want quality, ease of use and longevity. How would you know am chips arent good quality. They been produced by TSMC. Such contractor doesnt do small batches and shitty quality. Its all about arbitrage between price and quality. No need expensive 28nm chips in small quantity for now. Thats the scaling that comes after this one. Fisrt the flooding.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:38:53 AM |
|
I was just trying to find out why would FC settle for ~0.2$/Gh profit when I think that he could get more. If hashratio has the same 0.2$/Gh profit then doesn't that mean that by producing his own miners FC could get at least 0.4$/Gh as profit? It is $0.3/gh profit. And a few reasons why they wouldn't want to sell complete miners would be because it would require tons of extra funds/manpower, and it also creates a situation where AM is directly competing with it's partners. It's much easier to just ship out chips and let the asic builders tear eachother apart. Also there is no way AM would have been able to produce anywhere near 8ph worth of complete miners in a month.
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:40:26 AM |
|
Mining industry is scaling up and fc has anticipated it. If you think about we're right on schedu. gen3 has been on the pipe not even for the last 6months, has been positively tested and is now being massively produced. By the end of summer we'll land on the moon.
i agree that it is being scaled up, but not in the way you think. investors in mining equipment now want quality, ease of use and longevity. How would you know am chips arent good quality. They been produced by TSMC. Such contractor doesnt do small batches and shitty quality. Its all about arbitrage between price and quality. No need expensive 28nm chips in small quantity for now. Thats the scaling that comes after this one. Fisrt the flood. i didn't say am chips are not good quality. I will say, the miners into which they are going, are shite, many under-power for the current network and difficulty increases and do not, in any way work well in a d/c environment. you get what you pay for, and it's being realised by big investors.
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:41:37 AM |
|
you get what you pay for, and it's being realised by big investors
You're talking about the people who just bought around 8ph worth of AM chips right?
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:46:43 AM |
|
jimmothy, is there a losing stock you haven't invested in? How about sharing your portfolio with the other kids, so we could know what to avoid?
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:47:12 AM |
|
you get what you pay for, and it's being realised by big investors
You're talking about the people who just bought 8ph total worth of AM chips right? to build rigs to sell on? no. i'm talking about rigs that will be hashing for miners - people who have been in this game, upheld the network for long enough and still see a worthwhile investment in mining rigs. meanwhile... where dividends were due to shareholders, friedcat will continue to plough YOUR earnings into further development, continually reducing the profit margins until all that is left is a pittance of your original outlay. well done friedcat, genius business plan.
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:51:05 AM |
|
Dude you gotta give some time to asic manufacturers.. Lets not make the same mistake like the previous year with bogus chips and preorders scams like bfl hahfat avalon knc etc etc.. Two months is nothing considerong the scaling potential
|
|
|
|
madmax_ger
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:52:01 AM |
|
you get what you pay for, and it's being realised by big investors
You're talking about the people who just bought 8ph total worth of AM chips right? to build rigs to sell on? no. i'm talking about rigs that will be hashing for miners - people who have been in this game, upheld the network for long enough and still see a worthwhile investment in mining rigs. meanwhile... where dividends were due to shareholders, friedcat will continue to plough YOUR earnings into further development, continually reducing the profit margins until all that is left is a pittance of your original outlay. well done friedcat, genius business plan. Well, it's common that old products are sold until there is no market anymore. It seems like there is still a market for mining companies that do not deliver/fulfill (orders/promises). I would not bet on FC anymore. Who knows what he's doing actually?
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:56:16 AM |
|
Sorry but to save me scrolling through all these pages, when are we expected to hear answers to the new lot of questions collected for FC?
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:59:38 AM |
|
you get what you pay for, and it's being realised by big investors
You're talking about the people who just bought 8ph total worth of AM chips right? to build rigs to sell on? no. i'm talking about rigs that will be hashing for miners - people who have been in this game, upheld the network for long enough and still see a worthwhile investment in mining rigs. meanwhile... where dividends were due to shareholders, friedcat will continue to plough YOUR earnings into further development, continually reducing the profit margins until all that is left is a pittance of your original outlay. well done friedcat, genius business plan. I've never seen so much misinformation in one post. Who exactly will be using these chips other than miners? Our "dividends" were turned in to wafers worth 2.5 times their cost. The earnings were not spent on development. The profit margin might be reducing but it won't be below $0.3/gh. AM just doubled assets per share in one month. Not a bad business plan if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:03:36 PM |
|
I've never seen so much misinformation in one post.
you clearly never read your own
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:32:19 PM |
|
I've never seen so much misinformation in one post.
Who exactly will be using these chips other than miners?
Our "dividends" were turned in to wafers worth 2.5 times their cost.
The earnings were not spent on development.
The profit margin might be reducing but it won't be below $0.3/gh.
AM just doubled assets per share in one month. Not a bad business plan if you ask me.
This makes sense to me. People selling now are panic merchants.
|
|
|
|
willBTC
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:08:53 PM |
|
I've never seen so much misinformation in one post.
Who exactly will be using these chips other than miners?
Our "dividends" were turned in to wafers worth 2.5 times their cost.
The earnings were not spent on development.
The profit margin might be reducing but it won't be below $0.3/gh.
AM just doubled assets per share in one month. Not a bad business plan if you ask me.
This makes sense to me. People selling now are panic merchants. But the price for June's batch is 0.35$ per G for sure.
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ASICMINERTUBE The Best $/Gh Bitcoin Miner So Far Discover now! ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:17:40 PM |
|
But the price for June's batch is 0.35$ per G for sure.
Source?
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:20:47 PM |
|
But the price for June's batch is 0.35$ per G for sure.
Source? At this point plz stop extrapolating prices. Its obvious We know nothing for keeping competitive advantages. Believe or leave.
|
|
|
|
willBTC
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:33:38 PM |
|
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ASICMINERTUBE The Best $/Gh Bitcoin Miner So Far Discover now! ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
Blazed
Casascius Addict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:36:59 PM |
|
What blows my mind is the fact he will not address the investors directly... No one is that busy that they can not take 5 minutes and post some info to the people who funded his company.
|
|
|
|
|