ROFL! I can see South Park, and I feel like they probably already did, those guys just have to be into cryptos.

But if they mention bitcoin in F is for Family, a 1970's themed animated sitcom, my head might explode. Would be hilarious though, if one of the stoner baggage handler dudes was Satoshi.

And while we are talking about it, people, if you have Netflix, for the love of God go watch F is for Family . If you can't relate, your parents were probably serial killers and the apple didn't fall far

No seriously, it's great.

Finally found that Adult Swim bump I was talking about like a year ago.

Shit, that was like 3 years ago, apparently.

http://www.bumpworthy.com/bumps/7491

https://i.imgur.com/pjlP8g8.jpg

Watch it, the beat that goes along with it is pretty fetch

And it was like no one else saw this, neither my friends when I asked them about it the next day, nor did it blip on the forum (as far as I saw). Tres cool to see the writers at AS this into crypto, and interesting that this first aired in 2014 (I keep forgetting how old bitcoin has become).

So, as far as I'm aware, this bump, Family Guy, and Almost Human have directly mentioned cryptocurrencies on primetime TV.  Are there any others you guys are aware of, and how do you feel?

I'm just geeked I get to see it again, I thought I might have imagined this. But, I convinced myself that Alf wasn't real as a young adult, so I probably have some shit I need to work out.

I  saw this too, and mentioned it a while back. Poster is referring to Adult Swim, night time adult animation for college kids (it comes on from like 11ish to  3am ish). Goes well with pizza, pot, and  the FPS of your choice.

It was hard as hell to find this, here:


Edit: found the bump!
Our Favorite Cryptocurrencies | BumpWorthy.com - adult swim bumps
http://www.bumpworthy.com/bumps/7491

Few questions for the followers of Trump:

Which do you think is more important to national security, a POTUS getting head in the Oval Office, or a possibly illegitimate POTUS?

Before you answer, remember, the investigation on Lewinski, which went on for years,  was totally appropriate and necessary, yes? The public thought so, Dems gained 5 seats that midterm. Crazy huh?

So why wouldn't an act of war by a foreign state be more important than a dude getting head?

So if we shouldn't investigate Russian interference, why did a Republican led Congress spend years trying to impeach The Bill?

And sweet Jesus, for the last time, y'all do know that the intelligence community, and the military, are overwhelmingly conservative voters.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/26/poll-shows-drop-in-conservative-military-officers/

See how much I love y'all? I cited the Dailly Caller.

Results from a new poll show that the traditionally conservative political leanings in the military’s officer corps has taken a slight drop.

The poll, conducted by the National Defense University, surveyed 500 active-duty officers and West Point cadets. While those identifying as conservative took a clear majority, the results suggest the first shift in the officer corps’ political ideology in decades...

Fifty-four percent of officers identified as Republicans, while twenty-four percent said they were Democrats, with fourteen percent identified as independents. Surprisingly, the numbers associated with party identification did not line up with ideology. Only forty-seven percent of those polled considered themselves conservative, 32 percent said they were moderate, while 22 percent identified as liberal. Previous surveys have shown as many as 65 percent of officers identifying as conservatives.

The poll also showed that officers are politically active, specifically on social media. Seventy-five percent of those surveyed said they have seen fellow officers share political articles or promote politically charged views posted by other individuals.

The intelligency agencies are all executive functions. Trump also just increased military spending at the expense of the rest of everything.

 Why the fuck would they be helping Hillary?

Breitbart lied.

I'll bite. These are like breaths of fresh air after some of the partisan political threads. This is plain crazy, it's the covert crazy that grabs you by the ankles and pulls you underwater. This, I can deal with

Define American. Do you mean native born citizens of the United States, or does your America include those that may have recently immigrated here? So like, as soon as you take the oath of citizenship, you lose all your morals and devolve a little bit? Or is it more immediate, does it happen at the border crossing or when you get off the plane?

*steps on tarmac*
*is instantly broke and overweight*
*is suddenly holding a cellphone and an empty McDonald's™ cup*



Just questions man, just questions

Those questions lead to other questions..

What country are you from, and how old are you? (you are male obviously)

What ideology are you trying to push, or what is your political affiliation?

What strain of marijuana are you currently smoking, and can I have some please? (It's a sativa I bet).

If you only answer one question, let it be 3

Maaaaaan, it was just Trump on a tweet bender just saw an article that was a statement from his lawyer saying that Trump actually isn't under investigation, and his tweet that specifically said he was under investigation, a damned Presidential proclamation, was a response to a mainstream news article.

So, not yet (I had a feeling it was like this. I haven't started any Trumpgate gloat threads yet because I could never source the investigation claim independently, but only through that article). But, somebody is about to eat a special investigative dick, Meuller (I murder that poor man's name) is assembling the legal equivalent of the Harlem Globetrotters to work on this case. You don't bring out the artillery unless you see some tanks, I think this investigation will yield some very interesting fruit.

My above post literally describes a situation where a person that made death threats to the former POTUS and SOS on stage at a concert, and then was invited to the White House by the sitting POTUS, Trump.

No conservative outrage here:


But this picture is fake news. Probably some Liberal asshole with Photoshop

So to review, this part is fine:

But let's fix this to:

Much better

And you don't see the exact same scenario, which you just decried, in the normalization of Trump's behavior by the GOP? Members have been on record stating how unprecedented the actions of this administration have been, yet Trump is beyond reproach, despite threatening the very existence of his political platform (the GOP will suffer at the polls in 2018 for Trump's gaffes).

For the rest of America, he 'proved himself not good for the Presidency' roughly 150 days ago most weeks are an affirmation of that opinion.

Back to the topic on hand. Why wasn't thus a conservative  talking point back when it happened to Bush, or Obama?

http://www.thewrap.com/real-time-fact-check-liberals-react-obama-themed-julius-caesar/

The reaction was instead mainly a collective shrug. Critics weren’t blown away, but they by and large liked the idea in theory.

For one example, here’s what MSPMag said about portraying Caesar as a lanky Black man. “It fits, sort of. Like Caesar, Obama rose to power on a tide of public goodwill; like Caesar, there were many in government who doubted Obama’s leadership abilities; and now that Obama’s first term has failed to live up to the messianic hype, there are plenty of people who — for the good of the country, you understand, not their own glory — want to take Obama down.”

Few conservative groups commented on the production at the time, but those that did praised it, like The American Conservative.

And Bush, a Republican, couldn't get any conservative love hell, they didn't even know if they were talking about him or Tony Blair.

But because Scalia got shot, this is a talking point, I guess..

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-93558340/

The production, which has been in previews since May 23, got little notice until the cri de guerre was issued last week by right-wing Breitbart News (“‘Trump’ stabbed to death in Central Park Production of ‘Julius Caesar’”), followed by Fox News.

Somehow I just knew Breitbart would be wrapped up on this. Bannon is never too far away in this day and age

Meanwhile, no outrage when a musician says shit like this about a sitting POTUS and secretary of state:

About Hillary Clinton: "You probably can't use the term `toxic cunt' in your magazine, but that's what she is. Her very existence insults the spirit of individualism in this country. This bitch is nothing but a two-bit whore for Fidel Castro." [Westword, 7/27/94]

Obama, he's a piece of shit, and I told him to suck on my machine gun. Let's hear it for him. And then I was in New York. I said, "Hey, Hillary, you might want to ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless bitch. Since I'm in California, how about [Senator] Barbara Boxer [D-CA], she might want to suck on my machine gun. And [Senator] Dianne Feinstein [D-CA], ride one of these you worthless whore. Any questions? [Ted Nugent via LiveLeak.com, accessed 10/1/12]

No sir, Mr Nugent, you have made yourself quite clear

We should invite that guy to the White House..

Oh wait, Trump already did

I think staking a career on the single thing is the definition of risky, unless one knows with certainty that said 'stream' is permanent.. BTC has great potential and blockchain technology will be a household concept within the next few decades (provided bitcoin persists). Meanwhile, one should keep pursuing his current career goals with bitcoin as 'side thing'.

Bitcoin is cool and all, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it. Eggs and baskets and such

Banning bitcoin and other cryptos by the government is not enough to make them die. Because as long as we are still here, the market is there and people will still use it, bitcoin will go undeeground first, it isn't going to die And even if ISP's will block connections, I feel as though someone would make a work around, we are dealing with open sourced code here.

I'll follow BD up with another article,  because if you want to talk about Africa, let's talk about Africa.

From Wikileaks (we can all agree.thus isn't fake news, no?)

https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Hiding_Africa%27s_Looted_Funds:_The_Silence_of_Western_Media

Quite often when you read newspapers, listen to the radio and watch television in the West you will are bombarded with how poor and corrupt Africans are. However, you will never watch, read or hear anything in these media outlets on the role play by : Western banking institutions; property development and estate companies; technology corporations; oil and mining cartels; defense and engineering companies; and western political and business elite in promoting corruption in Africa.
When it comes to Africa and the developing world, the Western media pretend to be doing a good job only when there is an embarrassing story or a scandal that undermines their own credibility as the watchdog of the state. It is not uncommon to see poverty stricken Africans being shown in documentaries, movies, and television screens in the West but these same documentaries fail to show the involvement of Western capitalist institutions in fanning the poverty. Although corruption involves a giver and recipient, it is always the taker who is reported in the media. In many instances bribes are offered in order to secure contracts, secure official favour or to induce officials in order to influence the out come of a government decision. In other instances people become corrupt because of the existence of favouring conditions as can be seen in most western countries with their banking secrecy laws.
Why does the media in the West ignore the role of western institutions in corrupt deals? The media in the west tend to ignore the role of western institutions for many reasons. They would rather show the poverty level in Africa but refuse to show the role play by western institutions for fear of loosing revenue through adverts. Most media outlets survive through advertisements from mega businesses and the multinational corporations so for fear of loosing revenues the media turn a blind eye to their activities such bribing politicians, public officials and polluting the environment. Again the editors, programme directors and the other big wigs in the media are thelselves shareholders in the companies in question so why would they want to jeopardise the source of their own wealth?

Man, you give absolutely no fucks. It's entertaining

I like, don't know how to address this, LOL.

I will say plainly I think the hands that type your words are the same hands that type EchoYuHatesBlacks', but what do I know? Just more words and opinions, we all have them.

Your babies grow up to be Negros? That's cool as fuck, I thought you needed Black parents

I learn ALOT from this forum, everyday

We can fight the environment together. Fuck nature. I'll burn some old tires next to some trees.

But seriously, your rhetoric has limited scope, and begs an equivalency. If you would consider the imposition of carbon controls as a crime against your person, what about the greater crime that your unrestricted footprint causes against your fellow? If you would effect the environment in a way disagreeable to another, what about the crime against that person? Someone's free will is going to get stepped on in this, which one is more important?

Does the ability to exercise ones will only apply to yourself, or do you respect everyone's free will?

And from the greater societal viewpoint, which does the most harm to the human gestalt? Your will being preserved, or the 'others'  that would deny you your right to waste energy?

You know they will tax the second job as well, yes?


Unless you are about to suck dicks, or sell heroin (both very high growth industries I hear), you didn't get far

Serious question, how do you feel about the gun laws in place, do you think they are too strict generally, and how do you feel about folks having assault weapons? Not trolling you, I see you are very pro gun but I am not aware of the extent.

With that being said, I don't think the mass shootings are an issue of gun control. It's an issue of crazy motherfucker control. This could have been done with a rifle and a BumpFire stock. We need to monitor social media a little better for radicalization, and people need to chill the fuck out.

Edit: Gibbar came to the forum like a wrecking ball

How do you guys find this place? It took me 3 years to 'discover' this subforum. Guess I was slow, or not angry enough

LMAO. Cookie +1

I'm going to go out on a limb. I'll eat anything, given the situation. Dog, cat, horse, no fucks given; of course we are talking about an emergency situation for a lot of these. I say that to say this; no problem with the eating of dogs, but if you are going to harvest anything, do it right. I'm a hunter. Use what you kill, and kill as clean as possible. Just as easy to kill the dogs cleanly, but like you, I am aware of the cultural practice of 'tenderizing meat' through suffering (it actually does the opposite).

With that being said, I bet that shit tastes sooo good Asians and Hispanics have harnessed the power of MSG, these dogs are probably off the fucking chain with a bottle of TsingTao and some hot white rice.

Going make breakfast. I want Chinese so badly now

We agree partially. This is certainly leftist terrorism, the likes of which we haven't seen since the 60s (think of all the environmental terrorists from back in the say, the animal rights dudes that would attack whaling ships). But the statement should read:

'For over a year, we've all been spectators to increasing amounts of violence on the American ideological far right, as well as a higher occurance of hate crimes.'

Did you not read my alt right terrorism thread? You posted on it like, ten times, I thought you were soaking it all in, like seasoning

And now y'all can pretend the collusion didn't happen, but the intelligence reports are saying otherwise.

And your guy is under investigation. I've been trying to be cool about the shit. You know this is like Christmas, my birthday, and my anniversary rolled into one series of events.

Can't wait to start responding in earnest we have sooooooo much to talk about, Trump apologists

Bitcoin is both a currency and an asset, it doesn't actually reduce efficiency through which is what would improve the economy of a country. The only way is if a specific country disproportionately has a large amount of bitcoin relative to its population compared to other countries and its price went up then you would at some point see flows of money going to that country and improving the economy. This is however an unlikely scenario.

Hey peeps, Green here. Read an article a little earlier today about a possible flip of major value from BTC to ETH, essentially that Ethereum will overcome the price of Bitcoin. That's a pretty hard sell for me Bitcoin is too old, too trusted, too capitalized for that. But there are some variables..

We are looking at scaling issues still (Amiright? Jesus!) on top of this possible hark fork that aforementioned shitshow has possibly yielded. On top of this bubble finally popping (it was intentionally popped by the coordinated DDOS efforts across multiple exchanges, but that's a whole different thread )

So what do you guys think? Anything to this 'Flippining', or is it just a bunch of baloney?

If it will be anything like the Fappening, then I at least want to sit back and see what develops

I see what you did there, and that's fucking hilarious
You get a cookie.

But seriously, don't go full retard folks. Bitcoin might be a little dicey at the moment, but you should never put all your eggs in one basket in the first place. Diversify as much as you can inside this space (multiple coins) as well as outside (traditional assets, specie). Because right now, USDt is looking like a safer investment than any altcoin, LOL. Notice the difference between BTC/Tether and BTC/USD