To be honest if you shall watch the overall performance rating of PSG players at this season. Messi is having the highest rating and how can you say that if his performance was not good in PSG. The football is not only a bout a single player that playes for all. it's about 11 who has been combined into the squad. I think that you can also read it again what was the main reason for messi moves back again to the abrcelona.
The environment in PSG is not supporting him anymore. Messi agreed to cut his salary as long as he will able to join with barcelona. The problem is barcelona needs to fulfill all of requirements before the club will able to sign messi in summer.
The first thing that must be done by barcelona to find actual buyers to the list of players that will be sold by barcelona in summer.
The money raised from these sales are really important for barcelona.
I don't think so, Messi is the best player in the world but when he fails to be able to help or improve the team's performance then he is said to have failed, look at Messi's 2 seasons at PSG there were no achievements that PSG could achieve on the European stage and Messi's overall contribution at PSG is very small. Messi's return to Barcelona will not make PSG worse, on the contrary, Messi's departure has made PSG more flexible to find a replacement that is commensurate with him on the front lines. I would say he "was" the best player in the world. He is still great, but I would put Mbappe above him for example, he is not as good as he used to be. That is understandable though because we have seen him play for 20 years now, that does mean that even if you are at a great level, that is unheard of in most sports in the world. Not many people are at their peak best ever performance when they are on their 20th professional season, that doesn't really happen too commonly. This is why there are question marks about him even staying here, and there are discussions about Saudi league because of that as well. I feel like there is a bit of a trouble in the end and we shouldn't really be expecting him to do too much anymore, not for a few more years before he retires at least. |
|
|
|
If both teams were to be judged solely on merit, I believe Manchester City has an advantage over Arsenal because, despite having good midfielders, Manchester City is well-experienced, and judging Arsenal solely on the results of its last three games is not a reliable way to forecast the game. Additionally, Manchester City fans are already focusing on their first meeting with Arsenal before the game even begins. One thing I have noticed is that Arsenal consistently lacks confidence when playing against Manchester City on the road, once that confidence is there and our defense really needs to close all loops to avoid goals from goal machine like Haaland.
I think that's the thing that makes football great, because we do not judge them on their merit. I think it is important to remember that we are talking about a situation where it does help people a lot, but it may also fail them as well if you just judge them on their talent as well. Sometimes something goes wrong and suddenly one team plays better than the others. Look at Arsenal this year, by roster calculation I would have put City way above Arsenal, not even close. And yet when you look at the results, Arsenal is leading the league right now and that's what matters. This is why I believe that we should not really worry about anything else, we should only focus on making as much profit as we possibly could. That's how we could make a lot of changes. |
|
|
|
The bitcoin value is lessen yesterday and as we think about the previous price so it has touched 30k$ and now its 27k$ approximately so its better to take commitment this time and keep save your bitcoin to maximize your return.
We cannot say that which time is the best because we don't know that will this price persist as a dip or will boost next so in my opinion each day is the best day to purchase bitcoin and try to not follow others individuals as everyone's thoughts are different from one another. Try to create your own mind and your own thoughts because you will better know that how much money you can put into bitcoin and you will know better about your profit at current price so this is the thing to achieve better results.
I feel like that's an alright drop, that's not really a bad one and it is not too much of a drop. Depends on what to follow though, if we end up with even bigger fall then it would be terrible, but if it goes to a much better level then it would be even better. So it all depends what will come next. I hope and believe that the price will go up higher, and that should be alright and we could do better. Think about it, if we could end up with a better return then we are going to end up with a great profit eventually and that should be something that we care about and if the price indeed goes up then we would all profit. However, even in the worst case and it goes down, I would guess that it will go to a new and better level where we could make a great profit out of it as well and should be doing fine, all depends on buying at lower price. |
|
|
|
It is very difficult to say why such great soccer nations like Germany and Italy are in crisis. German and Italian clubs are very successful in European club competitions, but their national teams are not, with the exception of Italy at the last EURO.
For me, the main favorites at the EURO are France, England, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, but also Croatia as a hidden favorite.
The national team that has Modrić and won 2 medals at the last 2 world cups simply can't be underestimated.
However, in my opinion, France has the best chance.
On the particular case of Italy I think they are facing some sort of identity crisis, when I watch Italy I like the way they play and they are way more entertaining now than on their entire history, however they have failed to qualify to the world cup twice in a row, when on their entire history they only failed to qualify once, as during the very first world cup many European teams decided to not participate, so people are not happy with this as they preferred their national soccer team to play awfully and still win, a formula which gave them four world cup championships. I feel like more than identity, it's more about getting younger players to show up. It's obvious that they built a good squad before this one, and they won and they were all happy about it. But then they ended up losing and not even going to world cup as well, because some of their good players retired. I feel like they will do better during this euro cup compared to not even be in world cup, they will be at least in this, but they won't win it. They just need a whole new generation to grow up and be better as well. If they can do that then they could end up with a better result. How did France become this good? They found players that are great and close to each other at age, Italy needs the same thing, kids at young 20's to play and be good together. |
|
|
|
Last season, Manchester City was also very favored against Real Madrid and maybe what made the difference this time for Manchester City was that they had Haaland in the starting line-up. I admit that Haaland is a monster for any top European team at the moment, including Real Madrid. It's just that even though Manchester City has Haaland it doesn't mean they can guarantee victory. While Real Madrid's squad is still the same as last season, maybe what's different is that some of the young Los Blancos players are now starting to process being better than last season and all Real Madrid players have a winning mentality throughout the season. But for Manchester City, even though they have extraordinary squad depth, they still don't have a winning mentality so far. Maybe it's Manchester City's shortcomings until now that have made them often fail to win the Champions League trophy for the first time.
To be fair there was a reason why they were favoured and they did win the series up until 88th minute of the second game. That was a great series for City and they just got unlucky at the last five minutes, that gave the Real the win, just two goals from Rodrygo that changed everything suddenly. This season we are going to see Haaland be a problem for Madrid defense as well, how are they going to hold him down? I do not think that it will be possible and City has a chance to score at any moment, even if Real tries to attack, one country where they just throw the ball ahead could mean Haaland getting the ball and destroying anyone on his path. We may see Rudiger become like Upamecano as well, so there is a lot more chances this year without a doubt. |
|
|
|
increasingly I was also quite hot with Cristiano's attitude, however. al nassr is a team that is rich enough so that whatever negative actions cristiano does, he can get away with it (like the case of his obscene gesture towards al hilal supporters). As someone who plays in the Arab League, he should be able to maintain his attitude and prestige because Al Nassr signed him for quite a long time (with the aim of Saudi Arabia becoming a world football magnet country).
The funny thing is that Ronaldo seemed like he would be happy there, I mean he was the one that accepted the offer, if he felt like it would be a bit of a chore to him and he would not be able to accept the feedback from the fans then he shouldn't have accepted such offer. I always said that the best thing for him would have been a semi-bench player at Lisbon, go back to your roots and play in some games when you can, benched when you need a rest, and that way he would have been happier. This way he plays at a highly Muslim nation as a Christian, with very much different values, I mean they literally had to bend the rules on him having a girlfriend and not a wife, that seems as big as it gets and he still went there. So he has to take it as it is. |
|
|
|
we will not know for the price of bitcoin in the future, and I just want to know what you think, about the question this time that I will ask you all, namely..
what will happen to altcoins if btc price drops to 10 dollars?
It would be good for crypto if Bitcoin falls to 10 dollars as every crypto can trade against each other rather than BTC, which has no real utility other than being the first major crypto to be adopted. This would give other projects like XRP, MATIC, and Q Blockchain an opportunity to be #1 on CMC. but the best part of this for me? is the chance of making me a Millionaire if not billionaire in soonest time once bitcoin recovered as what happened many times before. Bitcoin is proven to be carrying the best interest for all crypto investors. buy bitcoin the lowest you can. Sell Bitcoin the highest you believe in. Never Give up , for all the supporters and even not because we have seen this happening many times before. I am not sure if I could ever be a billionaire, that seems like the most unlikely thing ever. And to be fair I am not looking for that neither, since living in my nation is not really that much insane, I could just get 100k and that would be more than enough for me and it's very realistic in the world we live in right now. Crypto could get me 100k, and considering 1k per month is more than enough for me and I already make nearly 1k myself as well, I would be able to live a comfortable life. I would put that in interest, and I would just spend the extras and I would live a much more comfortable life. In order to reach that I keep investing into bitcoin and check some alts, one day I am going to reach that level, even if it takes many years. |
|
|
|
|
I do, I mean it is something that I always loved and I believe that if I had more money than I would still only invest into more bitcoins. I would never buy stocks, gold ,other fiats, anything, only thing I would ever invest my money into would have been bitcoin and I think that would be a great thing. I know not many people feel the same way and they want to diversify their portfolio, but to me bitcoin is the only thing.
I could be making a million dollars per month and I would still not consider anything else, spend what I spend and rest will go straight to bitcoin. Which is why I would say advising others to keep buying more and holding is something I do constantly, probably once per day here every single day for years now.
|
|
|
|
There is still a chance for Inter Milan to finish in the Champions League positions, currently they are only two points away from Roma in fourth place. I think Inzaghi still prioritizes La Liga and the Champions League, it's just that their performance in La Liga has been a bit disappointing in the last six matches. This away win broke their streak of poor results in their previous six matches in La Liga and at least this is the first step to compete with Roma in fourth place.
Lukaku's performance has improved in the previous matches and he also made a big contribution to the 0-3 win away to Empoli. Two goals and one assist were good achievements for Lukaku, where before he seemed to have lost his instinct to score goals due to frequent injuries. The following week will be much more difficult because they must be consistent to compete for the top five positions and Inter Milan cannot afford to lose again if they wish to catch up with Roma.
I think you meant Serie A? In both cases, I do think that UCL matters in both cases that's the issue. If the question was "would you try to be second or have more time on UCL and be third in the league" then they would be third and spend more time in UCL, but right now both questions are about UCL at the same time. Do you try to go for the finals this season and risk missing it next year? Or do you go for UCL now and be in the top four so you are guaranteed to be there next season but risk this seasons finals which you may not reach for a long time? I still think they should put all their power to UCL this season, because that means they will be in the finals if they beat Milan and that is definitely a good decision without a doubt. |
|
|
|
I don't know. I think it isn't very good most of the time to have two drivers who can be number one drivers in a team normally in the same team. Leclerc - Sainz duo is just like that for example.
Keep in mind we had several rumors in the past month for a possible swap between Leclerc and Hamilton. I don't think it will happen but it was not a single rumor with a single source... I have seen those rumors as well but I doubt that they would ever be true. I am 100% sure that Hamilton will either retire at Mercedes, which is the likely situation, or he would be way too old to be there one day and do the Vettel/Alonso thing and go to any team that will take him at 40 years old. That's like the most possible thing at that moment, Kimi didn't retire until he was way too old neither, so it could be possible for him to retire like that, but as long as he can drive, he will be there. Charles is not happy at Ferrari that is known and it is obvious why as well, he hasn't been given a proper chance and he got unlucky with so many team decisions all the time which is why I guess that Charles may leave. But I do not know if Mercedes would be willing to let Hamilton go just to get Charles, maybe some other team could end up doing that. |
|
|
|
I know it's just one way, but if Zidane went to Juventus, maybe Juventus would become a great team again and we'd be able to go far in the Champions League, lately Juventus is just a team that fights for a place in the Champions League, very sad and regrettable that a team as big as juventus, today is reduced a lot. I imagine Zidane won't go to PSG because PSG management doesn't want a long-term project, they want to win the Champions League urgently, which is something very difficult for any coach
I read this too but I assumed he wanted to have a bigger role. Like most managers only decide on the tactics and such, but I read in my local news that he wants to have total control. The players they get, the players they sell, the teams training, the new tactical system, basically he wants to have the "new style" that only he brings to the table. We all know Total football, we all know tiki taka, we all know gegenpress. I read that he wants to make something that is his, and if he can achieve that which would take time to master by the players, he wants players that would work for that system, not the best players, but the ones that would fit the system the best. So he may go to a lower level team to get that type of permission to do whatever he pleases. |
|
|
|
There isn't a one stratefy to rule them all. If you want to be profitable you always have to adapt according to the market conditions!
but there are also times when old strategies work again, although at some point you'll have to revise your strategy again while adding the newer ones. as you've have said that it depends on the market conditions, and i still believe that some old patterns are still useful in todays trading style. still for one to become a seasoned trader, you still need to experience more trading patterns or should i say it is the culmination of your accumulated experience in trading. Basically when the market is similar to that old time. If X strategy works when Y happens, then when Y happens again in the future that could mean X can happen as well. This is why I believe that the best thing to do right now would be something that could benefit you the most, it could help you make as much profit as you could. It is going to take a while before we could see that strategy work again, but if you check the market and check the strategy that works the best, and note that down then you can use it later when you see the market similar. Check the chart, see what worked and save it for later and you can compare all the notes you have taken and see if current time is similar to any of the past and if it is then you can try the strategy again. |
|
|
|
Hell, just look at all the drug prevention programs aimed at youth and how that's worked out. It doesn't work, because once you tap the pleasure center of the brain, a lot of people will want more of whatever did the tapping. Add to that youths' natural defiance of authority, and any preventative measures against drugs, corruption, or teenage pregnancy for that matter are doomed to fail.
When you are prescribed Adderall and someone comes and tells you that this is bad, it's hard to believe them, you know  Well, the reason why drug prevention programs fail is that they don't tell you the truth. In school, once in a while we had a lecture about that and you know what, all they tell you is that drug usage causes death, it kills people and that's why it is bad. Rarely but sometimes they would add that drug usage cause depression but this part was mostly ignored but death was strongly highlighted. Youth don't care about it, you have to tell them truth: Drugs don't kill that easily, especially if they are pharma grade. What they do is that they mess with your psychology, destroy your brain's reward center and you don't feel a joy in life anymore, you have zero motivation, zero reason in your head to live or do something. They don't explain these details, they never talk about dopamine and serotonin, this is the real problem. I would say prescribed and otherwise are different. When someone smokes weed, that is not killing them right away neither, it is a slow process that may happen when they are elderly, but nothing happens at that moment, unless they smoke and drive. However, when they are prescribed it, that means they need it. In many nations of the world weed is prescribed as medicine for people who are doing chemo, you know why? Because during chemo you can't eat and you are constantly in pain, as someone who had a loved one go through chemo for 6 months, I can tell you that weed would have been great if it was legal where I live. Why? Because since it has a numbing effect, and makes you hungry, that person would have gone through the same process better, eat better, less pain. So what is right may change depending on the situation. |
|
|
|
Everything keeps turning in a sense where Tuchel is still the issue, it is not so much Bayern anymore, now instead of Bayern it is Tuchel, that Tuchel is part of Bayern it is well known that now these players are in the hands of a very controversial technical director Apart from the fact that he hasn't done badly, in fact, compared to other teams, I would say that Tuchel has done a great job, and with respect to Dortmund, because it is a team that has already lost to Bayern, nothing he does, the performance of the team is missing. Bayern against Union Berlin, I'm very curious about how this match will be.
I understand that Tuchel would be the make or break for this team and they got rid of their manager to hire him so he needs to really show how great he can be, and with them being out of the UCL then we could say that it should not really be an issue at all anymore. I think all they will focus is the title and they will be able to or at least should be able to win against anyone they face. This doesn't mean that they will, it just means with that much focus on just single game per week, they have a better chance. Dortmund could still do well, not expecting them to be terrible but Bayern will be just a bit better. This is why I am sort of happy, because betted on them to win the league at the start of the season. |
|
|
|
When talking about the Europa League, it is clear that at the moment there are some good things for them, especially with the current conditions where Roma and Juventus are in different conditions. for Roma at the moment their focus is clearly on the Europa League now so for the semi-finals they will definitely go all out.
Roma got the win but that was a really close one as well, if they didn't put on a show at the last 10 minutes or so then they would have lost that game as well and would have been out. Now they are going to face Leverkusen and that's not a small club neither but they could definitely get a win there too, not saying they will, not saying they are the favorites even, all I am saying is that they are good enough to beat Leverkusen if you ask me. Juventus is having the greatest week ever for them, both managed to beat Lisbon who beat Arsenal to get there, there were some doubts and they got it, but now they got their 15 points back too. That is the story of the week isn't it? They are not third and I be they will fight hard for second as well until the season ends too, should be a blast to watch. |
|
|
|
After the price rise over $30k there was an assumption that the market would turn lower again and we saw a continuation below $29k. But there was no reason to worry. From 29K it is again in bullish trend as before. BTC is currently trading at $30,224. If we take a look at a price chart over the past seven days, BTC is down 0.01 percent and the 14-day price chart is now up 7.3 percent. Various predictors are bullish on Bitcoin and believe that it will be able to overcome the $31k price in the next few days. Currently, there is strong support zone at $28k, so even if the market corrects, there is no possibility of going down much.
Indeed. But despite my confidence about my position, I am still being wary right now. I even updated my notifications just to get alerts when prices reach near my red zones so that I can prepare counter measures. I already learnt my lesson last time. Sometimes the prices moves so fast that you can't even finish transferring funds to buy or sell whenever it starts to go up or down in price. Losing money and missing out on profit opportunity really feels like crap especially when you know you could've done something. Although there's some on the exchange, it isn't that much since I only store a small amount of usdt on exchanges. I would guess that it would be enough to just put a stop loss a bit below 28k. Like you could literally put it at 27.9k and that would be enough, because it is obvious that if the price drops anything under 28k that means it could go down even faster, not saying it will, but going from 29k to 28k is a lot harder than going from 28k to 27k, there is a big difference between them. I hope that it does better in the end and we could end up seeing something much bigger, and the price would be 35k and then 40k and so forth. But even if it falls, I would give it time until 28k, we can recover from there to above 30k easily. However, if it drops even further, then I would say that it is time to let it be and drop a bit more before we buy again. |
|
|
|
Madrid is indeed reliable based on quality and experience but somehow I believe more in Manchester City
To be honest I'm tired of seeing Madrid dominance in the Champions League , I want to see a new winner this season
among other teams Manchester City is closer in my opinion but let's see how it ends.
I agree with you. I'm annoyed by watching Real Madrid dominate the Champions League. I want a new team to be champions. I would be happiest if AC Milan or Manchester City were champions. Manchester City management is trying hard to win the Champions League title. They spent a lot of money. Star players have been recruited. Guardiola has appointed experienced coaches. Even then the team is not able to win the Champions League. I will be happy if Manchester City wins the Champions League title this season. I would be incredibly happy if City won, but I am not even a fan of them. Not like I dislike them or anything, I just mean as in I am not English so I am not a fan of them who went to any of their game, never even been there, I do not even support them. I just want to see a different team win, and City did so much and I like Pep and his hard work, so I feel like it would be nice to see that rewarded. We can never know, Real could still end up winning, and they know that they lost La Liga so that means they are going to fight as hard as possible to the last minutes like last year just to win it. Because if they do not get this as well then they will have nothing else left to fight for and they will consider this season as a bad one. |
|
|
|
Automatic saving is good but in time of need, some may spend all their savings. Is there any reason not to use the money kept in that saving account? No, and this is why we need a reason to save for too. If we think that we need to save to achieve something, we will keep saving despite the fact that it is automatic or manual. And won't use that until it is fulfilled. If we save without any reason, then the chances of using that money for other thing is really high.
The automatic process you said in the OP is quite good, but I think adding some reason to save with that will make it even better.
That does happen, it happened to me so many times in the past 2 years, the pandemic caused a lot of sickness because even if you did not go outside and get covid, you were at home and that means you did not live a healthy life style. In fact, most developed nations had increased rate of obesity, which was assumed to be because people sit down and didn't walk around or basically used their body and ate fast food delivered instead of going outside, this is not backed by data but seems to be the most plausible reason. So all of that combined means that many people got sick and health is the most expensive thing in the world, it has no value at all, you can't put a price tag on health, so we all got destroyed and our savings got emptied multiple times. |
|
|
|
What I think Brian Armstrong did is try to find a cash cover for his foundation after the tightening of regulatory restrictions in the United States.
The problem of Brian Armstrong and Coinbase is that they need funds to maintain their stablecoin USDC, and therefore there must be bank accounts and financial flows to support them and support liquidity, and therefore he is trying to find a new headquarters, and it seems that his message is an attempt to sympathize with the United Kingdom, especially with the economic problems in that country.
In general, Coinbase in terms of guaranteeing customer funds are better than Binance, and perhaps the best currently, so I can consider it good news
I would say that it is a bit more clear at least, that's the difference. I can't say if they are protecting it better or not, I am not familiar with that, I would have to be inside on both of them to check how they do it in order to compare the two. But, I know for a fact what coinbase does and I have no idea what binance does, so that means that Coinbase is clearly the winner on which one is more transparent with your money and not doing anything worrisome. I am not saying binance does, all I am saying is that I do not know if they do or not, maybe they do or maybe they don't however at the end of the day it's just a thing that we have to live with. I personally hope that it gets better and clearer for binance as well. |
|
|
|
No.. for sure, the "feeding" mode is possibly on the in-house Stake original games, but you can test it for yourself. Do some DICE wagering before and after a Weekly has been paid.. and see how much more money it is costing you to wager than normal. I do think Stake has some options to chose from with some 3rd party Slot games ..like Hacksaw Games... but it will be too much hassles to do that very regularly. (they give multiple RTP options for casinos to chose from)  No, no, that's what I'm talking about: no "feeding mode" in in-house slots either. As I said, sites of the level of Stake don't do that, they don't keep track of your winnings and losses, and they don't adjust your future performance accordingly. Everything is completely random. That's the point. This is even proven for most of the games, some not in-house games that they got from third parties may not have it, but all of the in house games still have provably fair as well, this means that every single bet you make, the clock resets and you make a bet. This is also the reason why you could flip a coin 200 times and it could be tails for 200 times, because there is no "it was tails 199 times, 200th must be heads" because that 200th is also 50-50% like always. This is why I trust stake the most, because they are provably fair, any casino that has any games that is provably fair can get my money, if it is not provably fair then I am not there at all. They will not have feeding mode or anything like that, they can make profit enough with the current setup. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
