Seems like it will ring a bell. Looks suspicious to me, it's either s/he is promoting those sites indirectly by creating such or s/he is just an idiot who can't read and get what are the signs of scam attempt and obvious scam offers.

I will still considered it as ban evasion no matter when both account was created or what are the names used on those accounts. With that being said as per the forum rules, the chance of this account getting banned is higher. Although just like what above said, feel free to appeal the ban.

I can confirm this scenario as i'm also managing some websites that accepts article publication. In my many years of working i've never experience of getting refunded through Paypal from different clients because it's easy for you to unpublish the article once they do that, talking about business ethics, there might be a delay of payment but no for refund issue.

What OP or the article mentioned is not particularly about "bitcoin casinos", most pros mentioned are pros of all online casino over traditional ones except the transparency. Most bitcoin/casino gambling using a in-house games like dice uses provably fair which is 100% transparent.
But not all bitcoin casino uses this method, because most KYCed casinos now don't use provably fair, most of them uses the methods from third party game-providers and usually there's no transparency, you just need to trust them, which oppose what bitcoin is trying to convey.

That's not what i understand, when he said "when i get profits" i understand that it's not an always win. There is no always win in gambling, there's no people having that luck without getting a loss.

In the past few months, i usually convert a huge ratio of my crypto to fiat for saving purpose, and the rest is investments. Never bought any crypto-related item as well.

Na check mo na arenaplus.ph? At inplay.ph? Pagcor credited sila at partnered ng evolution gaming at most likely may gcash payments din both deposit and withdrawals. Di pa ko napakag laro dyan pero based sa research ko both sites ay licensed. You can check naman sa pagcor sites na andun sites nila

Then why don't you share the website URL? Do you accept cryptocurrency payments? How legit are you when in the first place  you don't require legal docs of the service/casino. It looks suspicious to me when a payment processor don't required legal docs from a business.

Aside from posting complaints on their ann thread try to directly message their forum's representative^[1] to beep them or their email regarding your issue.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=3562258

Looks like ang ma hi-highlight sa bagong regulation is majority para sa mga businesses na mag o-open dito sa atin eithe foreign anf ld locals, pero so sympre may para sa users din mga yan.
Ang sa palagay ko magiging katulad ito sa US regulations na ire-restrict ang paggamit ng mga pinoy na unregulated exchange, pero di ko alam pano sila magiging stricto at pano sila mag i-implement ng sanction sa mga lalabag dito.

Exactly, this kind of casino will be listed on a no-recommendation casinos for sure. While it's normal to be required KYC especially if a user withdraw a huge amount, so withdrawing it in smaller multiple times might avoid this kind of issues. While it's good to see that the issue is now resolved i hope duelbits will check and prioritize an issue that were already months old ^[1]

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459283.0

Many people and called "experts" said the same but the result always in the opposite a bit. Look at the of pandemic, it was hit hardly that it feels so much in march the start of lock downs of countries. But of course it recovers just like the other assets after a month or two, good thing it grows so much after few months.
The same thing when the war between Ukraine and RU last year. So what do i mean, bitcoin has a potential to be a safe haven but not yet because it still have get affected—a huge effect from the regulations, world economic crisis and etc.

Well, you have a point, but you can't do about it, it's their bitcoin after all. They have their own reasons to use bitcoin anything they want. Also, the same things in holding. But most people here actually use bitcoin to buy things because what could be the other reasons of having bitcoin other than holding, of course to buy things you wants.
Those who have small/huge bitcoin holding are the ones with good and enough reserve money for them, while the others are maybe enough for them to convert it on fiat or just really want to buy for their selves.

Trading is a skill, having a good results in every trade is a rare skill. While on the other hand, gambling is a pure luck. Even if you're trying to be specific say sports betting, and always have good result you might have the knowledge regarding the teams and great skills to choose and bet but you can't deny that luck is still on it.

Duplicate posts happen when you try to reload the page after you make a post and error occur (error 524 or so). Just check your post in a new tab because its already there and no need to reload the page again and again if error happens.

I regularly experiencing this since earlier, well even now accessing this page. Also, accessing bitcointalk in another page always load so much time i don't know if this something what happened before that is a server issue and theymos didn't do anything, it just comes back after few hours.

Edit: even posting this i get error 524, but when i check this thread in different tab it successfully posted.

Survey? How accurate ito lol, kahit nag yung "Half of the Filipino population has owned cryptocurrency" eh ang labo. Kahit pag sama samahin pa coins, pdax at abra users malabong maka 50% ng population total. Anyway, about the decrease naman, that's okay di lang sa mga pinoy nangyari yan lalo na bear season yung previous few months.

There are advantages of using this kind address as well as disadvantages. Say, like me i will only use it for accepting donations on my site, or here i used it on staking address it one of Meta's thread so it's easy to remember and its unique.

But privacy-wise, nah, its just like how bitcoin users use legacy address few years ago when HD wallets are not a thing.

Bluewallet is open source, open source community and source code audits will eventually find if they save the private keys of their users on any servers they controlled.

And also, don't be confused of custodial and non-custodial wallets. Most or all custodial wallets are centralized it means they have full control of its user's funds, non-custodial wallet is the opposite.

In lightning, when you say custodial, it means that the service say bluewallet, have the control of the node server used in lightning. When you say non-custodial, these are the nodes that its either from the community or the one you self-hosted. But in this case, since bluewallet stops their custodial lightning node, the only thing you can use their wallet's lightning feature is to use other lightning node or your self-hosted node, and it's non-custodial or what they called self-custody Lightning wallets.

In twitter? With a deposit requirement? Or a private key requirement for a "legit" giveaway? Nah, people with that kind of mindset always the first victim of this kind of scheme. Especially for a verified account who does not make giveaways then suddenly created one in skeptical way.

The announcement only affects its custodial lightning nodes, although you can still use other or own self-custody nodes to proceed a lightning transaction. This also mean that their main wallet and other features are not affected by that changes.