Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2024, 06:21:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 369 »
1281  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Minimum Age to gamble on: July 02, 2023, 06:40:53 PM

As we all know that the age limit for gambling in casinos varies from country to country and can also depend on certain casino policies. And in most countries the minimum age for gambling in casinos is 18 years, there is also in some countries the age limit may be 21 years or more.
and 18 years and over are considered adults, but it is important to remember that gambling can be addictive and can have negative social and financial consequences, so it is important to gamble responsibly and really think maturely and play maturely to avoid addiction.
At least between 18-21 years of age a person becomes an adult then he has the right to do everything on his own knowledge. and even though he has been allowed to do everything since then, including gambling, drinking, but today's youth doesn't care about age. Kids also now spend time online gambling away from their parents.  Because only one smartphone is enough to play online gambling and a smartphone is a common Daily tools for everyone now. So adults with kids find it difficult to control themselves from gambling
That's what you really have to think about, because it's easy to find online gambling sites and the way to register is very easy, even online gambling sites that use KYC that are underage can still do it by falsifying their identity.
so actually the age limit is just a formality because there are indeed many underage gamblers who are involved in online gambling, and are also supported by the majority of underage children who use smartphones.

If that is the case and gambling casinos do not take into account the age of the gamblers, then can we take legal action against them? They are allowing minors to access gambling which is prohibited in the law.

This is one thing that they should get from KYC data and if they do not consider this (age) a priority then why do these casinos want us to do the KYC. Also, I know that most casinos will ignore the age factor because they want that everyone should deposit and play at the casino so that the casino income increases. (the more people wager, the more they lose, and hence the more profitable will be the casinos)

Those who gamble with a minimum amount of money which the casino are not asking KYC, I think can gamble even if they are underage. Its kind of a way to get away from online fiat casino since they are obviously asking for KYC data even when you are depositing.

Who would file a legal action against them when the lawyers see there is a hole in this KYC law in crypto casinos.  Even the exchanges today AFAIK wouldn't be asking KYC when their money is too small.
1282  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Zhang Vs Joyce II WBO Interim World Heavyweight Championship on: July 02, 2023, 06:31:12 PM
...Zhang will prove that he deserves to be taken seriously by the top names in the heavyweight.

Zhang can't be taken seriously by the top names in the heavyweight division because he isn't on their level. He stays where he matters and be competitive.

Maybe he was just too complacent and think ahead of his fight with Tyson Fury.

Now, everything is back to zero for him, obviously he has to win this fight otherwise no more big payday for him against Fury.

Lol. Let's be realistic and accept the fact that Zhang will never ever be given a match against Tyson Fury. If this Chinese old man is thinking he will defeat Joyce the second time around so that he will be having a huge payday when he finally faces Fury, then he is having an illusion. He better just fight and defeat any opponent for its own sake rather than dreaming of a fight against the gypsy king.

He should have entered the scene much earlier with his record and perhaps he could have gotten the attention of anybody from the top.

you're underestimating Zhang a lot to the point of thinking that he won't have a chance to win this fight, but you're forgetting that Zhang already beat Joe Joyce and if you look at the Highlights just to remember well that Zhang didn't win the fight for being lucky, you can see it here in this video that is well summarizing the fight:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QNhi7voF7Q

you can see that Zhang defended himself better, Zhang was much more effective in his attacks, Joe Joyce was taking a lot of punches and at some point he was a little unbalanced although he recovered quickly and didn't fall, while Joe Joyce's punches they hit zhang's body and zhang's arms when he defended himself, on the other side zhang managed to land his punches on joe's face, just see that at the end of the fight joe's face is much more hurt than even at some point the referee had to grab joe's face

and tell him to close one eye and then open it and then see the other eye and conclude that the wounds were too bad for joe to keep fighting, and see that zhang has a normal face, so of course zhang can win again , one should not underestimate the zhanga who has already won once and can win again, the most likely scenario that happens here is that joe will have difficulties in winning or then losing again

Zhang did it well. Not a fluke for sure but this is with the advantage that Joyce's vision in his right eye is not very clear after a blow. That one shot give him the advantage to win. He didn't even KO Jyce but the doc stopped the fight because even the ref sees the guy is not fit to fight anymore.

Credit is given though. He fought well even from the start. He throws counter and he is also big which is sure his fists carries weight.
1283  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Will you find it offensive to be referred to as an addicted gambler? on: July 02, 2023, 05:56:49 PM
Exactly, people always tend to say things on every detail on your life like your hobbies and that's a reality for everyone. That's why it's important to have a mindset that doesn't need to think of everyone's opinion since some of them are not even relevant and valid. If you're really enjoying something and it doesn't hurt anyone like your family, friends or girlfriend plus yourself like your physical and mental state. Then you're all good, no need to overthink about the addicted thing, if that's how you enjoy life then keep enjoying, we all have different business to mind.
They don't need to listen to other people's words, especially if those words don't match the reality that is happening to them. They just want to bring us down by trying to incite other people so that others believe that we really do it even though we don't do anything as they say. It's better for us to enjoy what we already have, and do whatever we like, and as long as it doesn't disturb and harm other people, we don't need to think about it. And if you can help other people, that would be even better because it will make other people not believe in people who want to bring us down or badmouth us even though it doesn't match the reality.

People like to talk about themselves and how they struggle. Kind of normal I think they share how they suffer and survive, its how they voice out their feelings and the willing listeners and more willing to listen if they also encounter the same like the support groups. If they find ears here, it's still gonna help the person's feelings.

You can't stop anyone from badmouthing though. Even the saints will have people talking behind them. Even your siblings do that to you. You just have to get used to it. Not find it offensive anymore.

1284  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: A qualified strategy exist in gambling?If yes, come and talk. on: July 02, 2023, 05:14:26 PM
I didn't understand anything you posted, I confess that when I read the thread title I was very curious to know what the strategy was, so I clicked on the thread and took the time to read it, but as I was reading the thread I didn't see anything about strategy, at one point I even thought that when I finished reading I would know about the strategy, but after I finished reading I see that there was no strategy, it was all a lie, that is the thread title is something misleading, You created this thread just to promote your site

also after I saw that it is a misleading title with the aim of making people click on your website, I did not click and I will not click on your website and I recommend that no one clicks, we all know that there are no magic forums for correct bets sports and we all know that at the end of the day the casino owners are the only ones who make a profit. so gambling should be seen as fun only, otherwise the person will lose money until he becomes addicted. As long as people look at gambling as fun, they won't have problems in the real world and will have control of their finances.

That's why it can't be a qualified strategy. You can't even understand it. I bet OP himself didn't understand it well. He is searching for a strategy thats why he is asking for users to post it on this thread. lol

But he is spamming his kick.com. I don't think that 300K pay goes into his account, the casino let him roll in on the casino itself. Streamers not getting audience anymore and so he goes here. 
1285  Local / India / Re: What do you think about Cardano? on: July 02, 2023, 05:04:48 PM
I have been recently trying to find out which crypto projects can become an Ethereum killer? I did a few search and found out that Cardano could have become the next best cryptocurrency after Ethereum.

It could have even become better than Ethereum. It was launched in 2015, by Charles Hoskinson who was also the co-founder of Ethereum. At that time it was way ahead of the Ethereum blockchain.

It was scalable, energy efficient & used POS protocol. What I see now is Ethereum is following its footsteps. What I want to know is why it failed? I do know that the developers were lazy and they did not provide the necessary support.

What else can be the reason? Help me with the reasons and do tell me is it worth staking Cardano? I see the price very lucrative but I don't know how much it can make a difference in my life if I purchase it only for the purpose is staking it.

Thanks.


I don't really think it can be anything now. The project was very good at a time. But I think it's problem just like any other 3rd wave cryptocurrency was that it was too centralized and concentrated in few hands. Even though that helps in lobbying the devs to actually work but also works in a negative way because losing one investor can affect price and even motivate others to withdraw as well.

There are only a few projects doing it on Cardano so there is not much activity on it besides the memecoins they have. But there are tons of NFT and DEFI projects on Cardano that seem to be making progress on it.

The latest news I saw on Twitter about ADA was Vodafone releasing NFTs on the platform. Nothing really that might contribute to ADA being one ETH killer but for those who ikes staking I guess the token will still be attracktive.
1286  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: turn $40,000 into $4,000,000 with me (Record 2-2) | $40,000 on: July 02, 2023, 04:45:14 PM

I will be posting my picks on here for FREE. Tail at your own risk and BET RESPONSIBLY.


Very interesting challenge, thank you for posting it here and giving us some insights into your sports betting career. So far you had a bumpy start and already got wiped out once. I am wondering now, how many bullets do you have available for your challenge? Is there like a fixed number of tries you plan to do or will you decide it as you go on. Your first two bets where great as you got above 100k USD really quickly, unfortunately you lost it again afterwards. In your first two bets you paced all your money and only after 2 wins you took out the 40k USD again. Is there like a fixed rule for when to bet everything and when to only bet a smaller amounts? I am always interested in seeing new sports betting strategies. Thanks again for sharing your betting history with us.

I try to treat every bankroll as if it’s my last. But I also look for value and I tend to be more risky on the first few bets to kickstart the challenge.

That's not gonna be a good strategy for many of us who want to keep playing but I will cheer for your adventure. 2 losses so far, and wish you can continue to win this time for I'm really hoping you can get that 4M. After 2 losses, however, I may not copy this time.

We might understand why you bet on a certain team and not the other. It's getting riskier by the way, the last one is 4.70.
1287  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: 🥊 The UFC Info and Prediction Thread on: July 02, 2023, 04:32:28 PM
Sean Strickland VS Abus Magomedov ROUND 2 KO/TKO - LOST

I really thought that Abus Magomedov will win this he got all of the needed techniques to pulverize Sean Strickland

I did not expect you would bet on Magomedov. I think your attention was taken by his record and number of KO. But like I often post, there are overall and UFC records (you might notice that I add in brackets UFC record separately). Outside UFC Magomedov is good, but UFC guys are on another level when we talk about guys in top. In this fight I saw that Sean allowed Magomedov to try all of his arsenal, waited for round two, and showed him his boxing skill.

I did go for Magomedov as well. Funny how he gassed out not even trying to reserve some. He just covers and gets wrecked. Sad day that I allocate an amount for that guy. His attempts in the first round were all just botched.

He was successful in leg kicks, I don't understand why he stopped doing it, it should have been a good strategy to not allow Strickland to move by damaging his leg.  When during his first fight he won and took a long time he got another fight, this time he may really not get another.
1288  Economy / Economics / Re: What roles does the poor play in the Economy? on: July 01, 2023, 07:02:37 PM

When government stimulates the economy of the country, they will create jobs that only the poor will take. Like construction laborers who will toil all day and night to pour cement on bridges and roads. The money they make keeps the economy alive that's how the money circulates as they buy stuff during paydays.

The poor guys are making all the efforts so the rich can rest assure they stay rich. This keeps the balance that's why the government always make sure there are poor people.
1289  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: 🥊 The UFC Info and Prediction Thread on: July 01, 2023, 06:19:45 PM

Ariane Lipski VS Melissa Gatto

The Stake odds for this fight are 2.90 for Lipski and 1.42 for Gato, In this fight, we can see that Ariane Lipski had solid striking for me she will give better output in striking and will be better on her feet against Gatto, and has a good takedown defense her fight on JJ Aldrich she have used those takedown defense on her advantage then punishing JJ Aldrich on striking, while Melissa Gatto is much stronger because of her Physique so her takedowns could be easy against Ariane Lipski wrestling will be her main bread and butter in this fight she got striking but she can not fight this with the stand-up against Lipski, for me both of this girl is a fighting kitty, but Ariane Lipski has a much higher level in my list and in my heart, and I am torn on who's to bet because Melissa Gatto is one crazy lady, but I think I may risk it by going with Ariane Lipski


That's a bold bet. Looking at their records, Gatto seems to have the upper hand over Lipski.
I tried several times for Gatto by Submission or by KO but Stake doesn't want me to win, it always rejects my bet saying Maximum exceeded. No place for my bet there anymore.  To me, Lipski would be so lucky if she wins this fight.

With Grant Dawson vs Damir Ismagulov, I'm also picking Dawson. In the last 6 fights of Ismagulov, they are all decisions. I would consider it a decline of his MMA skills.
1290  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: European Sex Championship 😳, Will you Bet? on: July 01, 2023, 05:52:47 PM
I see your point, however, let me push back just a bit. While I agree that gambling platforms need to be responsible, placing all blame squarely on them may not be entirely justifiable. Now, let's break this down logically:

Yes, the aspect of public vs. private is crucial here. It's awkward, as you say, to have a private act become a public spectacle. However, it's important to remember that these platforms are businesses. If there's a demand, they will supply. Sports betting, by its nature, attracts spectators. If that's paired with something explicit, it's only a consequence of that demand. It's less about "promoting pornography" and more about giving the audience what they want. Minors accessing these platforms is, indeed, a serious concern. Yet, we must remember, the responsibility to regulate such access lies not solely with the platform, but also with guardians and government bodies. Implementing effective age verification and parental controls is key. Lastly, stating that no gambling platform would promote this because it "purely promotes pornography" is a bit too sweeping. There are always outliers. Some businesses will push boundaries for profits. It's up to us, the consumers, and the regulators, to push back.
On point! Though I'm totally against this sex becoming a sport thing, I do agree with what you say about sportsbooks and gambling platforms, they wouldn't really care about the moral aspects of this but they will only see if they can benefit from it or not, if a large audience starts watching and liking the sport, I'm pretty sure that sportsbooks will start adding the matches up for gamblers to bet on because they would know if people would do it or not.

And talking about minors accessing sportsbooks and casinos, I think it's their elders' responsibility to keep them away from these things, and if they don't or can't, you can't really blame casinos for what they might see or experience because they won't shut down their business for people not taking care of their own responsibilities.

This is why this is not going to work. Not a sport in every way. They will be bringing a lot of organizations into the gambling industry with awe on their faces because this is inhumane to the privacy of an individual. Anyone who seriously wants to participate in this sport is too naive and is taken advantage.  
 
Are we going to congratulate a person who publicly have sex and won the match?  What would happen to the kids growing up watching the elders cheering their favorite sex athlete?
1291  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: turn $40,000 into $4,000,000 with me (Record 1-0) | $60,400 on: July 01, 2023, 05:13:07 PM
and it happens again. looks like the OP wants to make history in his gambling by getting a big win on sports betting.
a few weeks ago OP had a goal of $1 million and now has an even crazier goal of $4,000,000 Roll Eyes

if I see everything that OP is doing is not showing off or any other purpose but OP is a gambler who has the motivation to get big wins to be recorded here to let everyone know that he is a professional gambler in sports betting.

I agree and also believe that having this kind of post like OP did would eliminate or lessen posts about how gambling is threatening to one's life. This just shows the possibility to others that successful and profitable gambling is possible for them too. That's a great deal of risk with the money involved and the exposure of bets. But I think OP raising his yearly goal is either unrealistic or somehow pushes him to go further on his gambling. In any case, that's an achievement of winning.

I believe this more on self satifactory on sharing achievements on gambling or simply show off since gambling is very hard to express physically were people view this as negative due to money risk involved. I sometimes do this too when I’m winning good amount of money since I can’t share my gambling success on my family and I find the forum as very welcoming on achievements like this.

I browse post history of OP and he makes multiple post in the past about showing off his lose bets with huge amount of money at stake. Many user demand to share his bet slip to ride OP bets. I think this is the reason why he is making his bets publicly. We are lucky to witness this kind crazy bet amount with amazing prediction accuracy.

The 2nd bet is quite not chilling. Sure he had some moment there thinking he is going to lose. If he is still going to go all in that $115K again, I really would think this guy is crazy and determined to get that $4M in his pocket.

I'm starting to think he has inside information about a fixed match but who knows he must be great at analyzing which team. This is gonna be a good thread to watch when he hit that $4M. Cheering for the courage.

1292  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: How is your Gambling Pattern Like? on: July 01, 2023, 04:58:22 PM

I'm starting to think I got used to this kind of activity every day but I'm still aware that I'm not an addict. No specific pattern but I bet every time I have my phone. I should not use the phone anymore if I should quit.  Grin

You seem to be defining what it is already  Grin When you have the pulse to do one thing consistently, it shows you kind of getting use to that thing. I guess there may be levels of addiction just maybe you are not sure yet if you are there yet  Grin. But on a lighter note, it does happen especially if you play online, you are tempted to always check to see what's happening with the game and checking either livescore if FT is to your favour.

It's not very different to what you do as well. Like anyone here, users constantly check the coinmarketcap or coingecko when they have browsers on their phones. I bet you unconsciously do it too even before you have your breakfast. That is sort of an addiction I think.

Nothing wrong with it too but like you said levels of addiction. It becomes a pattern as every day as its a repetitive task especially if you earn some BTC here.
There are some of us who bet on sports that only have one event which is every weekend, particularly UFC sport, that is also the time they pour all their pay but I don't think they are addicts.
1293  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Zhang Vs Joyce II WBO Interim World Heavyweight Championship on: July 01, 2023, 03:41:23 PM
Not used to seeing Chinese being a boxing champ, very surprising that he once upset a fight against an African American with a 93% KO rate. He must be special. He'll gonna have to prove it twice though. Despite Joyce's loss in their first fight, he is still the favorite in this match.

Was intrigued so I watched their first, though slow Zhang can actually counter but I think it's Joyce's eyes that cause his loss. He was hit over and over in that right eye. If he can avoid that in this 2nd fight, he will be the victor.

Yeah, no one saw a 40 year old Chinese HW beat a prime boxer in Joyce.

Zhang battered that eyes and shut it down causing the referee to intervene. To be fair with Zhang, he has a long amateur record and a Olympian. So he has that experience years under his belt. And perhaps Joyce might underestimate and never see how tough and powerful his punches are even at his year and this is supposed to be like tune up fight for Joyce.

Not quite trivia for a fan, Zhang for sure has long experience before he even got into pro boxing. He got some power in his hands. Joyce was probably too confident during that time, with no worries in his mind fighting an old dog but suddenly got the trouble after a left hook that ruined his eyesight. Fighting with one eye handicapped Joyce in that first fight.

I doubt Zhang can win again, I think he was just lucky to have pricked Joyce's eyes that lucky day.
1294  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: How is your Gambling Pattern Like? on: July 01, 2023, 03:19:49 PM

Seem we are all very aware of our gambling activity so far. I myself have been observing my own that every time I get my phone, I tend to look at my bets whether I won or not and then check also some matches. Nothing to track actually since all those are in the platform's record.

I'm starting to think I got used to this kind of activity every day but I'm still aware that I'm not an addict. No specific pattern but I bet every time I have my phone. I should not use the phone anymore if I should quit.  Grin
1295  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Which League Makes Sports Betting Easy to Win? on: July 01, 2023, 07:25:12 AM
It is all about the matches that can be predicted easily makes the bets win. So, every league have got some difficulty, in every league there'll be top teams. When these top teams play against the small ones, we can easily predict the winner. This is possible with most of the Matches. Even here sometimes the underdog wins, which is the luckiest thing for the gamblers who always prefer to go against the winning odds. Mostly Tennis matches can be predicted easily, but in recent leagues young players disappointment with their performances.

The matches you can predict easily have to match with the prediction of others, right?
Tennis and Soccer had not disappointed me so far. I don't even have to know those teams but I just look at the tipsters list and go for whatever they list there. Although sometimes I check those odds and if I find something that I don't agree I can just ignore the match. I'm not familiar with the athletes so I would be dependent on pickers for the bettors.
1296  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: who Want To Bet On 2024 USA elections? on: July 01, 2023, 06:44:25 AM
LOL.. sadly that is the state of affairs in US politics right now. For both the mainstream parties, there is no acceptable choice for nomination apart from these two old men. Trump is far ahead of DeSantis within Republican Party, despite all the drama surrounding conviction. On the other hand, Democrat Party believes that Joe Biden is the only candidate who will be able to win the moderate votes (despite his poor health). The other choice they have (Robert Kennedy Jr) is not acceptable to the establishment wing of the party. 
How terrible it is isn't it? I mean Trump vs Biden, even the most notorious Democrat must realize that they should be putting front a better candidate than Biden, and even the most hardcore Republican should realize they should be nominating someone who is not on trial for stealing sensitive documents related to nuclear weapons USA has.

And yet these are the two people they are going to show. I wonder who the next ones will be, I know whoever wins, the other one will not be the candidate after this time, so it is going to be a tough one to see who will be the next one. DeSantis is trying his best, but he is not a star politician, he doesn't have that type of fame, none I can think of from DNC at all as well. That's going to be important thing for the future of the nation.

It's something to weigh in on which of the two that will make the country perform well not just in economics but in military dominance. Trump doesn't have the craving for wars while Biden despite the poor mental condition, all he needs to do is to nod and it's good to go.

Biden has the advantage in every, even if he just admits to selling State secrets in front of leaders, his mental health will save him from prosecution. Trump will be indicted and trainwrecked every time.
1297  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: turn $40,000 into $4,000,000 with me (Record 1-0) | $60,400 on: July 01, 2023, 06:26:35 AM
Those are huge bets but I can understand that he is rooting for those teams.
I followed that last bet already, he seem very confident that he'd win so maybe I'd just copy his bet. Nothing beats a good opportunity and if we lost I'd be relieved to think I'm not the biggest who lost $60,400. A small amount is okay for me. I just want to see the result and if we win, I will follow more of his bets.

Quote
Bucheon FC - Sangju Sangmu Phoenix
Asian Total
Over 2.25

1298  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Banks offering investing in Bitcoin on: June 30, 2023, 07:22:25 PM
Since they couldn't suppress Bitcoin, some banks are now endorsing investing in it. I remember seeing that I could buy and sell Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies if I remember correctly) straight from my business banking app when I was working on financials in some company a while ago. Now I wonder, do they just want to enter the market and profit off of it or are there some other intentions? Since they offer an exchange for business users, could it be possible that the system could be used so the government could actually tax Bitcoin by taxing the company investing in it trough the bank account?

Maybe I'm overthinking this, but when banks are involved with Bitcoin it always seems like an attempt of gaining some sort of control over it or push it to be more centralized in some way. And seeing more and more of them getting involved doesn't really comfort me.

What do you guys think, should banks even be in 'the game'?
Bitcoin was created for everyone but banks, government, and everyday people, but we all know most governments are against the decentralisation of bitcoin and with your above statement I think I find the bank suspicious because it is centralised and controlled by the government, just like In my country where the cbn asked some local exchange to flag the accounts of some crypto investors.

 However there's a saying that if you can't beat them, you join them maybe these banks have come to understand that is almost impossible to restrict people from using Bitcoin and crypto exchanges in saving and have found out that it aids a better and faster means of transaction so they decided to join. But left for me I'll rather invest or buy cryptocurrency through safe and trustworthy exchange than investing through the bank.

They will attempt to take over BTC. It's not a problem as far as I know since they are going to be using it as well. Otherwise, it will just be in their wallet. Supposedly they will also be selling their BTC when the time comes. Hard to say they can buy all the BTC supply in the market, it wouldn't be that easy but Blackrock is quite rich and they are using coinbase for their custodial.

If they all got the BTC, what would they do to it? Kill?
They had to realize there are lots of cryptos.


1299  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Your rate in betting base on odds alone? on: June 30, 2023, 07:05:16 PM

I'm hoping to make more BTC so the more bets from now on the more chances of winning. I think that's what I'm going to do now before the bull run takes full speed.
Regardless of which game. To me, I bet on Soccer but I seem to have lost every day. How often do you win in Soccer games if you just bet based on odds by picking a team with 1.50 and 1.70?
Are you kidding me because I can see that your are trying to chase your loss that is why you want to change your strategy to betting on small odds...we can't be accurate with betting on small odds to guarantee our wins,because gambling is based more on luck but sometimes skill and knowledge also helps. The probability of you placing your bet on small odd in sportbet is 50-50. It is only if you are sure that the team with small odd is far better than the other team that is when this works. Don't gamble to win btc for the bull run because you might end up losing them all,and you will start to regret when the bull run comes.

I think we can agree that in soccer matches the team that first score already has the highest chance of winning the game so if the odds is 1.30, you can simply say the team will win.
Given that kind of odds, I will already be grabbing that chance to win.

Like @KTChampions said,  bookmakers determine the result of the game with an error of 1%.  At this rate, it's close to perfection. The only chance the other team has is a divine intervention.

1300  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: 🥊 The UFC Info and Prediction Thread on: June 30, 2023, 06:55:19 PM
^  Matomedov's first opponent in the UFC, Dustin Stoltzfus, isn't really that good tho...  I think his contract wasn't renewed and he was released after the fight.  And with the 19 second KO, there isn't really much to tell how good Magomedov is.  We don't know if he has the cardio, the ground game or if he's durable enough to go toe to toe vs Strickland for 5 rounds.

And it's a huge step up in competiton.  But watching his highlights in YT, he does have decent stand up, he seems to have powerrr in those hands and his front kick could be a problem for Strickland.  If Magomedov is gonna win, it's gonna be via KO more often than not.

I really feel like this is gonna be a big upset. You already know by the way they stand, compare to how flatfooted Strickland is. It would be hard for Strickland to move quickly if the front kick comes.

Magomedovs gonna KO Strickland in the first round also, it will be a quick fight. He better do it quickly if he can't last 3 rounds else it will be him lying on the ground. And we'll not see him again.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 369 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!