This is another news story. In the US, there are 2 types of lawsuit. In the first version, Sam Bankman-Freed agrees with all the charges, cooperates with the authorities, and the trial takes place in a fast procedure with a minimum sentence. If Sam Bankman-Freed refuses, and agrees to a jury trial, then if found guilty, he may receive a long prison sentence or be acquitted. The jury will decide whose testimony is more honest.

This is a good conversation to think about. I myself rarely posted in the gambling section before being incentivized to do so and since then I have certainly gambled more frequently. While I don’t ever bet enough to truly matter to me, it is interesting to think that signature campaigns themselves could be making money by bringing in new participants by exposing them to the signature campaign and getting them comfortable with gambling.

I really think staking is not a good option, this is just my opinion because If we have to stake then there will always be some risk if the price of the coins falls or the project fails to deliver then what will happen? Someone will lost all his funds, but the good option is always trading.

Yeah, their website does look really good, and I wouldn't immediately call it an obvious scam.  I mean, someone clearly put in a lot of work and money to make it seem legit. But you know what? Looks can be deceiving. If they're scamming people selectively, like you're saying, they could keep it up for ages. Just like how 1xBit does it.

The dexsport.io account, which had been quiet for a while, suddenly came to life today, probably just after you called out the scam. Maybe now the casino's representative will actually show up on the forum and try to explain these disputed situations.

Referring to the title of this thread, the problem of belief is a phenomenon that is familiar to me personally. In Asia, there are various cultures and beliefs that are adhered to. no exception, when involved with gambling. I personally, have no problem with beliefs that are called strange by some gamblers who think more intelligently and modernly.
But believe me, even we will never understand something that someone does with his gambling that involves strange beliefs in gambling. but certainly, they exist and as long as it becomes a principle for them, or is part of the culture. everything is legal, even they have the right to express what they believe  like what we do, which puts forward something that is more realistic and logical. but in fact, those who believe in superstition have never opposed the modern style of gambling.

As I said at the beginning, in Asia there are many cultures that some people believe can be involved with gambling, especially regarding the lottery. they will try some methods, tricks, methods, which involve the beliefs we call superstitions. but anyway, it all depends on how we interpret it. if we don't believe it, just let them do as they want to do. most importantly, no one is disturbed and harmed. I personally am more realistic, especially when talking about football betting. research and analysis, is a part that I believe in when it comes to betting.

Has anyone made any progress is uncovering the secrets to get AI to help decide on bets to place for sporting events? With the NBA season now quickly approaching, it would be great to get to mess around with AI and placing bets on games. I guess I’ll have to get down and dirty and see what solution I can come up with.

If it goes the distance I think Sterling has a more likely chance of getting the W as we've never seen O'Malley go 5 rounds.  But O'Malley's fight vs Yan looked like he wasn't tired after R3.  So he prolly has the gas tank to go all 5, who knows...  But still a question mark.

As for Sterling, what's the best strat to avoid O'Malley's powerrr?  Just do what he does best, wrestle and take his opponent's back.  Sterling via sub is at 3.05.  I think that's fair value.  But if you really wanna go for value in O'Malley, the R1, R2, and R3 propa are at 10, 13 and 18.  A KO at the early rounds is O'Malley's best chance to win.

UFC 292:  Embedded 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAByh9xLw8M

Did Actually Mark take this circus seriously?
I doubt it, and if he did then he must realize as soon as possible that Elon is doing what he usually does, to troll around and catch the attention of the masses. Just think about it, once people started to talk about the fight in a relatively serious manner, Elon suggested to measure their genitals instead a cage fight.

He is intelligent enough to know he cannot give anyone the chance to publicly defeat him and make a public humiliation out of him.  I am expecting this fight not to happen and it may be forgotten as time goes on, unless the lawsuit from Twitter against Meta's threads continues to move forward and people continue to try to convince Elon to accept the challenge.

It’s not about controlling lust and desire but rather they learn how to be satisfied when they play gambling because they knew exactly what their goal on gambling. If peope can control lust and desire then they shouldn’t gamble already but instead control it within themselves.

As an experienced gambler, I cherish all my gamblin games win or lose and this makes me entertained when gambling including the short pain when losing my money. An amateur addicted gambler doesn’t know what they really want to get and blindly gambling just to chase their unknown profit target.

I have also seen such news, that finally Conor is having a fight, and his opponent gonna be Chandler. That is the fight UFC have planned for a long time ago. I think it is about time Dana or UFC bosses show who is in charge there. I think they are sick and tired when fighters choose who they want to fight, instead of choose opponents UFC give them. Even in Conor case. It is about time to show who is employer and who is employee.

I haven't seen the distinctive style of the Adesanya fighter since the last two fights against Alex Pereira, even though Adesanya won in the last fight but he is still recorded in history having one unfinished defeat against Alex Pereira back in 2017. But I am surprised that Strickland's next challenger will be against Adesanya and based on his history he lost against Alex Pereira and there are other defeats that it will be difficult to predict his chances of winning.

As @bittraffic said, the Pre-conference will be more interesting to watch than a real fight in the octagon as they will be fighting for recognition as the best fighter position, but I hope Strickland doesn't talk as much nonsense as he did during the UFC 276 Pre-conference, if he doesn't prove his ability to defeat Adesanya.

Evidently because Mark Zuckerberg has been with some famous UFC stars that helped prepare him in his supposed fight with Elon Musk but the latter is not taking things in a serious state which disappoints Mark because it was Elon who started all of these talks and even proposed a cage fight. But now, it turns out that Elon doesn't want any of that fight as he is now making an excuses, an excuse that he will never ran out of.

Can stablecoins be able to prevent de-dollarization?

That's what makes the people to be more curious if they are indeed making the fight happen because both of them are saying the same thing, it's not just a plain words because both of them are also having their respective preparations for the fight. But yes, I do agree with you, they have something different in mind that is why they are making these things and staying relevant to the public.

It seems that there is a misunderstanding here mate because I honestly think that @len01 is saying differently, so different that you have misunderstood his comment.

It's not a wishful thinking nor a guarantee that watching a live broadcast will help you to win those bets or to prevent those bets from going South because first off, nothing will go South if you don't have any bets on a certain game to begin with. Watch live broadcast will help you analyze the situation and will help you to make a better decision so that you will not lose your bet.

I wouldn't call Sean chubby, unless he gained weight recently and I don't know about it. He's notably shorter than Alex and (I'm guessing) has shorter reach.
He's definitely not a retard neither, he got some good observations (the one about Joe Rogan that you quoted being one of them). The way he talks makes him sound dumb, but it's just part of the act, he decided to not hold back and talks whatever's on his mind at the moment. If you look at his early career interviews, he was much more respectful and not very controversial.
And yeah, there's a big chance pre-fight conferences will be much more entertaining than the fight itself. I wish Strickland could beat Adesanya but I just don't see that happening, he just doesn't have what it takes.

I don't know, here in my country where everything is also same as you said. Everything has taxes, they would like to put any transactions as possible to apply taxes, so what could be the reason? Of course, corruption. With those taxes, lot of taxes they could easily rob fund of the country for their own comfort. Evading tax is literally could get you to jail, but if you are doing it like in the crypto, they can't arrest you for it since crypto is decentralized and not controlled by the government. I think this would only apply to any businesses especially the big one that are not registered plus doesn't contributing tax for the country. And some people could also evade tax from their own salary especially if you are in the higher position since you have the power to manipulate things that could evade taxes. So they can have their full income with the deduction of taxes which is actually huge if you salary income is high.