Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 12:37:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 291 »
1661  Other / Off-topic / Re: database screwup - any help fixing on: June 15, 2012, 10:42:13 PM
Do you have access to a shell on your mysql server?

mysqldump is faster and more powerful than phpMyAdmin.

I don't think your dumps will not have any users or permissions in them though.  I don't think phpMyAdmin exports them.
Yes I have a shell, and when I search in the exported .sql file, I see usernames and password hashes. I'm just not sure how to import the dump using the command line. If I could log into phpmyadmin, I could import it there, but I can't login because the controluser is missing or some permission for it is messed up. I had to manually reset the root password since the upgrade blanked it.
1662  Other / Off-topic / [solved] database screwup - any help fixing on: June 15, 2012, 10:21:19 PM
So I thought I would upgrade my MySQL minor version from 5.5.15 to 5.5.25. Stupid me, never touch something that is working.

For some stunningly idiotic reason, the "upgrade" deletes all local users and basically screws over the permissions.

Anyways, I used PHPmyAdmin's export functionality and exported the entire server, with all of its databases in one dump file, instead of doing each database individually. Is there any way to import this all at once? So far all I can find is that I need to import each database individually.

Unfortunately, PHPmyAdmin won't open since the permissions table is screwed. Any hints?
1663  Other / Off-topic / Re: this is crazy on: June 15, 2012, 08:26:33 PM
Yeah whatever, so are they actually valid, with proper ECC and stuff?

you can try them yourself

maybe she implanted private keys of her btc stash
u never know, she might not be telling us everything she knows Smiley
Actually I was bored, so I did. But none of them scanned, and I'm not sure whether that is because my scanner app is shitty, or whether the codes are invalid.
1664  Other / Off-topic / on: June 15, 2012, 08:24:15 PM
1665  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin: low transaction fees, I don't think so on: June 15, 2012, 08:23:20 PM
It's a free market. If you want something cheaper, do it yourself and take their business.

If you want 0% transaction fees, mine them into your own blocks.
+1

Free market doesn't mean access to it is free, or that you don't get charged to use it. It means that you are free to implement your own service in it however you want to.
1666  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin: low transaction fees, I don't think so on: June 15, 2012, 08:16:23 PM
... but service providers that have to deal with fiat are going to charge more.
I disagree.  An exchange which holds peoples' (e.g.) USD and BTC balances does not pay any external service (e.g. a bank) when two people trade with one another.  They just move numbers around within their own database.  Of course, this has to be done in a clever way so as not do annoy your users and that requires paying good devs and admins.
They do have to pay en external service in the form of fees for deposit and withdrawal. Take for instance a wire transfer - often the sender and the receiver pay a fee. And paying devs and admins is why internal trade fees are levied. Not to mention the cost of a set of high performance servers if you have any kind of trade volume to worry about. What are you expecting, a non-for-profit charity exchange? Have you considered the cost of licensing fees and lawyers too?
1667  Other / Off-topic / on: June 15, 2012, 08:03:57 PM
1668  Other / Off-topic / Re: this is crazy on: June 15, 2012, 07:47:42 PM
Yeah whatever, so are they actually valid, with proper ECC and stuff?
1669  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin: low transaction fees, I don't think so on: June 15, 2012, 07:45:23 PM
Yeah, when promoting it, people need to be very careful about how they approach fees. The network itself charges a fee that is on the order of one fourth of a US cent or thereabouts, but service providers that have to deal with fiat are going to charge more. The inbred banking system doesn't know how to do it any other way, and exchangers suffer for that. Additionally, the network itself doesn't need a corporation or people to run it as such, so there are no salaries or wages to pay, and no investors to spend money on. This isn't true of a service provider that interfaces with the outside world.
1670  Other / Off-topic / Re: Help pirateat40 find love! on: June 15, 2012, 06:08:17 PM
lololol
fail
Neither of those are the right guy, sorry.
1671  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1397 GH] BTC Guild - Pure PPS Merged Mining, Port 80 Mining, No Invalid Blocks on: June 15, 2012, 04:34:48 PM
Also, The longer they do it, The higher the odds of them going to jail.
Shh, I wanna see them burn.
1672  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Quad XC6SLX150 Board - Initial Price £400/$640/520€ on: June 15, 2012, 04:31:42 PM
Watch his unboxing video, not just impatient, just a bit spastic. Grin
Looks like fun. Grin
1673  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: ASIC = The end of decentralized mining on: June 15, 2012, 03:50:24 PM
Probably noon their time.
In 4-6 weeks... sorry I had to.
1674  Other / Meta / Re: Unjust scammer tag on: June 15, 2012, 03:48:40 PM
Why is this thread still going on?

He has admitted he is a scammer in his posts and his signature.
He has said he doesn't care if he has a scammer tag.

Just lock it or ignore it and let's move on.
Why did you bump it?

and you?  and me?
Mine didn't count as a bump since it was posted one minute after the previous post.
1675  Other / Off-topic / Re: not so smartphone on: June 15, 2012, 03:48:05 PM
Yeah I didn't think much of that when I heard it.
1676  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Get Free BitCoins by Tweeting a link on: June 15, 2012, 03:24:54 PM
One topic is usually enough, you'd probably get more if you pushed your drug service on the playground newbie section. Grin Grin
1677  Economy / Services / Re: [ANNOUNCE] TORwallet - anonymous mixing wallet service on: June 15, 2012, 03:18:25 PM
Using a big service with your own coins does not help. They can still link the inputs to outputs. Since we are using a pool of many people's coins, simply linking the input to output only links us to ourselves, but introduces clean coins into the mix and makes it even more difficult to trace our client's coins. The worst case is that someone tracing can determine you used our service, but mixing with other services increases our pool size and makes this much more difficult.
I fail to understand how it's different, send coins to Instawallet, withdraw coins half an hour later, you won't get the same coins since it's a shared wallet.
Repeat this step with a second shared wallet, in another country preferably => coins cleaned.
And all this without handing your coins to a onion service that could instantly disappear with all the users funds.

So are you going to swear to us that you keep no logs of incoming and outgoing transactions? And that you too won't disappear suddenly? Obviously you aren't quite as anonymous as a Tor operator, so you can't bill your service as equivalent in terms of privacy.
1678  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1397 GH] BTC Guild - Pure PPS Merged Mining, Port 80 Mining, No Invalid Blocks on: June 15, 2012, 03:14:45 PM
Whitelists DO NOT WORK because the bad connections will still hit your server before they get turned down.

Who says they have to reach your RPC mining server?
How does an upstream filter differentiate between good work and ddos spam, when it's all being directed at the same port?
1679  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Diablo III replace Real-money ah with BTC on: June 15, 2012, 03:13:17 PM
At this point I think they are looking for a large market, as well as implementation details. For instance, how are things currently handled on the auction house, is it by email or account number? Or by player name? I doubt they will want to switch over to a bunch of unintelligible addresses, because that would confuse the users. Come up with a detailed plan on how to properly implement it, and try sticking as close as possible to what they have created so they don't have to change much. Player experience is going to be of prime importance to them, regardless of how cool this bitcoin thing is.
1680  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: [ATTN: POOL OPERATORS] PoolServerJ - scalable java mining pool backend on: June 15, 2012, 03:02:15 PM
Instead of EC2 as such, Amazon also offers Elastic Beanstalk, which might be more appropriate. It is designed to run Java programs on Tomcat, and automatically scale up and down with usage.
They also recently added support for PHP and .NET applications, and I've always wondered how well it worked. Haven't heard from anyone that has tried it. But basically it takes care of all the "gluing together" that needs to be done.
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!