If they warned you at least once already (in January, according to your screenshot), why did you continue to use your "method" of placing multiple bets on the same outcome? It seems to me that they actually gave you a second chance, but you chose to ignore it.

For thousands of years, it is the greed of people to make big money quickly, without putting in a lot of effort, that drives such scams. This human flaw has resulted in countless frauds all over history and it is shocking how many people still fall for it. People are lured into a big deal that can not be proven as real, on the cheap, with barely any marketing.

It is only through knowledge that you can prevent such things from happening to yourself or to your friends and family, no matter what the big deal of the day is. Always do your own research, be skeptical of any offers you come across that sound too good to be true. Remember, we have the internet and other internet-based services which allow us to know, as much as possible, before taking any action that would compromise our interests.

Op, for someone supposedly located in the USA, you seem to have quite a language issue. Not only do you have a vocabulary problem, you don't seem to know the basics of grammar and spelling.

If you received something that does not belong to you, the best thing to do is return it to the rightful owner. It can be a very important sum of money for someone. Imagine that you are on the other side, and that you didn't get the product you paid for. I suggest that you should do what is right and explore all available options for returning miners instead of trying to sell them for personal profit.

I suggest you try the Ninjastic.space search engine. You can filter the results to only a specific board and put -"Re" in the "Post Title" search field so that you list only topics and not replies.

For example:
https://ninjastic.space/search?board=159&title=-Re

This topic by Ratimov compiles a great deal of information related to cryptocurrencies. It is worth checking out.

[HUGE LIST] Useful Crypto Links !!!

It has tons of information that will keep you busy for many months.

What experts? Can you cite the sources on the basis of which you came to this conclusion?


Number one (privacy) is the only valid reason as far as I am concerned. Two and three are complete nonsense.

Yes. While the coins look nice, the value is more in their material than in the amount of satoshis. Nevertheless, I would like to own one!
Who knows, one day 1000 satoshi might be worth enough to peel off that sticker.  

Don't see a reason? Let me give you a picture. Imagine you are living in the gold rush period and searching for gold in some backwater of the Wild West. Well, I bet for some members this forum is like they discovered gold, and it is new territory for them. Everyone is rushing around trying to get some! What if you could leave your gold mine to your children in the event of your untimely demise? That would be nice, right?

As the poll is now closed, I cannot remember if I already voted or not. My choice would probably be "Age, family, life, and/or personal problems prevent me from being active.", although "Getting banned" is also a valid reason. However, I wonder how many people actually lied when choosing that option. 

The problem is that posts can be edited and content changed at any time, so you would have to reindex the content on a regular basis in order to maintain the most recent version. I do not know if this is even possible and it would probably require a lot of processing power and a lot of bandwidth. That is why third-party tools, like Ninjastic.space, are good for archiving posts, but they cannot fully replace forum search since their database is out of date.

EpochTalk will probably handle this issue differently, so perhaps we just have to wait for a new version of the forum software (if that ever happens).

That's exactly why Oceat said physical bitcoins have value as collectibles. The coin from your example is so rare that its market value is therefore significantly higher than the nominal value.

This still does not explain the use of the same profiles from other social networks, such as twitter and facebook...
But since you asked for it, I will continue my investigation:

Case 3:

Last year, in the Ethernity.CLOUD Bounty campaign, you made a POA post with the wrong account, which links you to another alt account of yours (this is the eighth one already, if I am not mistaken):

8. Tybi

Proof:


https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Tybi&topic_id=5354912

And you did it once again in the Cat Fish bounty campaign:


https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Tybi&topic_id=5357709

Account Tybi is self admitted alt account of another group of already tagged bounty cheaters.

Trust summary for Tybi


Should we continue?

If what you say is true, then perhaps you can explain this:

Case 1:

(archived)

That same telegram username @onyka73 was used by other accounts even before you: https://ninjastic.space/search?content=%40onyka73

1. cryptofarid10
2. Motin9
3. MOOMTUCH

All of these accounts are already tagged as bounty cheaters or worse.

For example:

---

Case 2:

(archived)

That Facebook profile was used by at least 5 other accounts on the forum, including the aforementioned Motin9:
https://ninjastic.space/search?content=angela.ummi.5

1. Motin9
2. MOHIN93
3. AU4
4. U4A
5. Urmi3

Account AU4 is linked to another group of alt accounts and already tagged for bounty cheating by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

Should we continue?

Honesty? Well, I guess we do not see that very often from bounty cheaters. But I doubt that will help you much now. What you should have done was inform the bounty manager of your decision to change the campaign, and to avoid having stakes in both campaigns at the same time.

What I really want to know is why did you wait almost three months to ask for forgiveness? Based on your activity over the past few months, it is reasonable to ask if this is your only account here or just an alt?


This statement makes sense only if you can confirm that this is your first mistake and that you are looking forward to being a positive contributor to this community in the future. Was this the first (and only) mistake you have made in this forum?

I really do not see any use for a physical representation of digital currency other than as a collector's item. It also seems like the coin would be of questionable value to anyone using it. They would still have to be connected to the blockchain in some way to verify its value. Not to mention that physical representations of bitcoins are much more susceptible to theft.

Do you really believe that investing in gold has never produced a loss? You should check the gold price charts throughout history.


https://www.investing.com/currencies/xau-usd

I think it is safe to say that buying gold as a place to store wealth would not be a sound long-term investment unless you can wait decades.

Ultimately, it is not just about how new the site is, but also about how much faith we have in the company behind it. For example, would anyone leave their personal information with 1xbit and the like? Certainly not . People need to know the site is secure and reputable, and that there is a serious business behind it.

~


I think most licensed casinos do not allow gambling to teenagers anyway, so...

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)


7. MarryGun

Proof:



https://ninjastic.space/search?content=0xa9bBb77504a474288C9554c8ceC526ae618D7c6c

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:



Miscellaneous:

The account is connected to many accounts already reported and tagged for bounty cheating by enrolling multiple alts.

Yes, there is some truth to what you say here, merit is not a measuring stick for quality of posts, but it is a good indicator and will give you an idea as to whether the post you are reading is likely to be of good quality. I have observed, however, that there is no standard or clear guidelines that governs posts that generate merit. You will have to judge for yourself whether the post you are reading is worthwhile or not. For example, we have posts that have received a lot of merits but in reality, they are not so good and some that are truly crappy. It is important to be aware of that when reading posts. Don't take everything on face value. So, I don't judge posts based solely on merit, I consider the content quality as well as engagement.


No, I do not think something like this will ever be implemented on a bitcointalk forum. For starters, this would mean favoring posts from an elite group of members (high-ranking members usually get more merits than newcomers). Secondly, such a system could be easily manipulated in threads that typically do not attract a lot of merits. Thirdly, such a system would require an "us" versus "them" mindset, which is contrary to what bitcointalk stands for.

It is true that anyone can make their own NFTs, but that is not the point. Like everything else, some NFTs serve a purpose, some do not. Some are art, some are not. Some may be valuable to collectors, but others will not.
I don't think it's good to generalize things like that. Take the Internet and the World Wide Web for example, anyone today can create their own website, but that does not mean all websites are useless and worthless. And to expand on this analogy, back in the 90s, no one could have predicted the rapid development of the Internet over the next 20 or 30 years.