Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not. This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users like these. After closer investigation I can confirm that following message is posted in this thread. This is something I would never expect to see but as I see it and I can clearly read it I can't step over it. Good work actmyname for posting this. Can some one include a direct forum link please? Why are link shorteners being used? Ok, that's it. I am un-ingnoring you. |
|
|
|
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not. This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users like these. After closer investigation I can confirm that following message is posted in this thread. This is something I would never expect to see but as I see it and I can clearly read it I can't step over it. Good work actmyname for posting this. |
|
|
|
Update: What suchmoon says in the next post makes sense  Although it still doesn't make make Timelord2067 a victim. Yes but: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.0Donations:
Maintaining this thread takes up some time, validating all submissions and keeping everything up to date.
If this thread helped you or you want to send a little tip for another reason, the address for donations is: 1KnownF41AXkhgry3wNTHJ7NZM6jo1Kohy
Donations are managed an distributed by Lutpin, in coordiation with mexxer-2. It is clearly written that funds are for mexxer's thread. Thread is locked so it would be fair to distribute donations to contributors who contributed in that thread, not to send funds for new thread. Perhaps donators and other contributors from mexxer's thread can say a word or two, me, as contributor to threads started by lauda and timelord don't agree with this. I don't feel like I should get part of donations for thread I have never ever contributed. Question is, how these funds should be shared? Equally to every contributor or shares based on contribution? I can't find this in mexxer's thread. |
|
|
|
^ how is this related to this thread?
Further evidence that he’s not to be trusted. If you don’t like my post report it. I’ve supported the flag, he is untrustworthy. I like your post but that flag is definitely not for signature campaign. I think somebody must have bought his account or it got hacked or something. Lutpin was one of the most trustworthy, likeable people here at one stage. It was like a total personality swap, he totally changed. What I am trying to say is that timelord's flag has nothing to do with signature campaign nor that lutpin's account is maybe hacked or something (which is assumption). Timelord confirmed this: User: Lutpin
You must create a topic describing the specific acts which damaged you. It must not be self-moderated.
Year and month when the damaging act occurred.
On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user violated a written contract, resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future. Lutpin said to Timelord that he will send them their share which timelord refused IIRC and created tag type 3. Timelord wasn't in signature campaign, even if was, money was sent to participants so no one really can create flag 2/3 for signature campaign. Also, no one can create flag type 2 or 3 if lutpin's account was sold or hacked. I didn't make these rules, I am just pointing that flags type 2 or 3 can't be supported based on opinion and flags for 1 thing can't be supported because user did something different, in this case, you can't support flag because lutpin didn't send money for signature campaign. No hard feelings, it is just my observation about new system. I think there’s enough evidence there to support this specific flag. Maybe Lutpin can come into this thread & explain why he won’t distribute those funds.
He literally said he will  Here, in specific case: If and when they are distributed, they should go to those who have contributed back then, not be forwarded to be allocated to and by someone else.
While I respect the time spent and work done here, this is not what the donations were made for.
Based on that, I do not plan to send the full amount to Timelord to be held in the new donation address.
I however do recognize that Timelord did actively contribute to the mexxer-2 thread and would be more than happy to forward them part of the donations for that help.
If Timelord wants to send me an address to where I can do that, and then send those funds on to the new donation address, that's their decision.
Also, if anybody had sent funds to the donation address I control and disagrees with my decision, they can contact me and upon verifying their donation, I will refund them, should they not be happy with my handling of it. And Timelord said: As to the remaining donation funds, I actually don't want any
Sorry for editing post few times. |
|
|
|
^ how is this related to this thread?
Further evidence that he’s not to be trusted. If you don’t like my post report it. I’ve supported the flag, he is untrustworthy. I like your post but that flag is definitely not for signature campaign. |
|
|
|
|
^ how is this related to this thread?
|
|
|
|
Donations:I do not know who controls the wallet address 1KnownF41AXkhgry3wNTHJ7NZM6jo1Kohy which at the time of writing this has a balance of 0.017975 BTC (ie $ 268.3 USD on the 8th of December 2017 - via preev.com ) - It is also a little unclear the logic behind the distribution of prior donations from that address to some contributors... The following is a "live" balance:  which is valued at  | 1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziw |  | | 1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6 |  |
For what will you use donations? Are they going to be distributed to contributors in this thread? Or? I maybe want to donate something but I want to know in which way you will use these funds. |
|
|
|
There is no "opinion" - just facts. And where am I wrong?
I believe it is explained in quoted post. Donation funds are specifically for mexxer's thread. I believe they are for users who posted their findings in that thread. Lutpin told you to give him your address so he can send you your share of donations. Also, he said he will return donations to users who wants them back. So he didn't break anything here. Also, I don't see you have made contract with lutpin that these funds will be used in new thread which is "similar" but not the same community "project". All you have managed to do is re-confirm Lutpin is refusing to hand over the funds.
? I however do recognize that Timelord did actively contribute to the mexxer-2 thread and would be more than happy to forward them part of the donations for that help.
If Timelord wants to send me an address to where I can do that, and then send those funds on to the new donation address, that's their decision.
Also, if anybody had sent funds to the donation address I control and disagrees with my decision, they can contact me and upon verifying their donation, I will refund them, should they not be happy with my handling of it.
|
|
|
|
I hope forum's DT members will take appropriate action against this user.
You are DT member. |
|
|
|
Ok, I am not supporting the flag. The funds are from donations made for the mexxer-2 thread. That donation address has nothing to do with this thread.
While this thread and Lauda's thread carry on the initial idea of the known alts of anyone list, they are different projects.
The donations I hold were made during a time when mexxer-2 ran their thread and I managed most of the things for them.
As the quote by marlboroza shows, we've been clear that the donations are mainly meant for those taking the time to review submissions and format them to be added to the list.
It also mentions that the distribution of those funds is up to mexxers and my discretion. I hope that was clear to everyone donating.
If and when they are distributed, they should go to those who have contributed back then, not be forwarded to be allocated to and by someone else.
While I respect the time spent and work done here, this is not what the donations were made for.
Based on that, I do not plan to send the full amount to Timelord to be held in the new donation address.
I however do recognize that Timelord did actively contribute to the mexxer-2 thread and would be more than happy to forward them part of the donations for that help.
If Timelord wants to send me an address to where I can do that, and then send those funds on to the new donation address, that's their decision.
Also, if anybody had sent funds to the donation address I control and disagrees with my decision, they can contact me and upon verifying their donation, I will refund them, should they not be happy with my handling of it.
This is misusing flagging system, you are not allowed to give red flags to users based on your wrong opinion. |
|
|
|
Is that really necessary? It might be allowed to bump every 24 hours but imagine if everyone would start bumping while there's nothing new to share...
If you have read it doesn't mean everyone else have read it. If nothing new is shared I'm tired of silly bumps.
You can always push this button:  Topic title will become grey and you won't have problem with "silly" bumps  |
|
|
|
The fuck is this shit?
New shitcoin backed up by government agencies |
|
|
|
Bumping this for community opinion as my sleep last night was severely damaged worrying about the impending lawsuit from Thule, this mental anguish just isn’t fair, I feel that a more sever tag is necessary, what do the rest of you think? My beauty sleep means a lot to me
You will need medical confirmation that Thule caused mental damage to you. When you get one, pass it to judge cryptohunter, she will hire independent jury made up of quacky's alt accounts and they will decide whether you have case for red flag. Putting legal counsel on standby cost me fiat, so not only am I not sleeping due to all this worry but I am out Ł5 (my legal counsel is my youngest child, more than adequate to deal with anything Thule could manage) In this case your legal representative should come here to present observable evidence of insomnia together with Ł5 bill for legal services you payed them and then you are allowed to create red flag. |
|
|
|
Bumping this for community opinion as my sleep last night was severely damaged worrying about the impending lawsuit from Thule, this mental anguish just isn’t fair, I feel that a more sever tag is necessary, what do the rest of you think? My beauty sleep means a lot to me
You will need medical confirmation that Thule caused mental damage to you. When you get one, pass it to judge cryptohunter, she will hire independent jury made up of quacky's alt accounts and they will decide whether you have case for red flag. |
|
|
|
^ Evo: Guverner britanske središnje banke Mark Carney kazao je u danas emitiranom razgovoru za BBC da će vodeće središnje banke u svijetu i regulatori izravno nadzirati novu Facebookovu valutu i sustav plaćanja kako bi bila sigurna i kako ne bi postojala mogućnost pranja novca ili financiranja terorizma. Čovjek nije još ni lansirao crypto valutu a već ga idu regulirati, a još da ne spominjem da govore o libri kao "valuti" dok bitcoin i ostali "crypto" ne smatraju valutama. Ili su crypto valute - valute, ili nisu, pa tko je ovdje više lud  Sve mi se čini da sve ovo pokušavaju regulirati totalno neupućeni ljudi koji jednostavno ne znaju kako se postaviti prema novim tehnologijama. Jedna država vidi crypto kao valutu, druga smatra crypto nekakvim sredstvom u trećoj je ilegalan...biće svi se skupa slažu da je će libra ipak biti valuta Ko ih j. bitno da je bitcoin opet iznad $10K... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
