i think you guys overestimate the chances of monero going to zero.
Definitely not zero.  Claiming that there is a zero probability of failure would be foolish :-) |
|
|
|
DASH was billed as ASIC resistant. So that has to be taken into consideration.
"resistant" means that somebody would have to invest a lot of time and trouble to pull it off. In this case, somebody cared enough to do it. Not really in my opinion, resistant means that once ASICs are out they won't have a large advantage over the GPU/CPU miners and the latter group can still compete with them. |
|
|
|
Whithout payment ID it possible to lost coin  No, the coin is not lost. But it is much more difficult to prove that you are the sender. If poloniex were to use a distinct destination address for each depositor, these problems would not occur, but there are impediments to doing so, albeit fewer than there once were. Poloniex should migrate to integrated/serialised addresses in the foreseeable future, they are way more convenient than adding the payment ID as an additional step. Integrated/serealised addresses basically include the payment ID into the address, such that you only have to worry about 1 field. |
|
|
|
Is it safe to assume that in the future, any official GUI wallet or something will account/help with this issue, like coin control etc? I mean, if people can move thousands of bitcoins around without any issue like this, why not Monero someday? Thanks again everyone. The issue of unmixable dust is going away after the upcoming fork. All coins will be mixable, though there still may be some issues with fee calculation being complicated. In addition, in the future their will likely be an option to sweep your whole wallet balance at once. Fluffypony opened an "issue" for this at Github, see: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/issues/668"Add ability to sweep a wallet's balance". Also, regarding sweep_dust. It does exactly that if I recall correctly. It "bundles" all your dust outputs and sends them back to your own wallet. |
|
|
|
[1] Paper wallets are usually used to simply store coins. They aren't convenient to send transactions. You can recover/restore your wallet with the mnemonic seed provided by Moneroaddress. [2] The seed is compatible with both simplewallet and MyMonero. Thus, you can use both to restore/recover your wallet. Thanks, I just sent 1 XMR from mymonero wallet to my paper wallet but it has been 3hrs and I haven't receive it. I used mixing 3. Any idea what happened? what did you use to check your paper wallet balance? mymonero or simplewallet? mymonero Do you still have your transaction hash? If so, use this tool -> http://xmrtests.llcoins.net/checktx.htmlFill in your address, the viewkey that belongs to the address (Moneroaddress provides this), and the transaction hash of that 1 XMR transaction. It should show you something like: "These outputs are yours". The sum of those outputs should be equal to the amount that was sent. |
|
|
|
It seems like you forgot to include a payment ID in your transactions. See for example the first transaction -> http://moneroblocks.info/search/b14318595393a6971ddd9de9e441d5a2853130b02f77beec5128ede399c2eb60Also, I am not entirely sure but I think poloniex is running the latest version. EDIT: I checked the rest of your transactions, you forgot to include payment ID in each one of them. This is the problem. Contact Poloniex as soon as possible! Just ask them which additional information they need from you to verify the transactions are yours. Perhaps you need to provide them with additional information such that you can prove that the transactions are yours. |
|
|
|
[1] Paper wallets are usually used to simply store coins. They aren't convenient to send transactions. You can recover/restore your wallet with the mnemonic seed provided by Moneroaddress. [2] The seed is compatible with both simplewallet and MyMonero. Thus, you can use both to restore/recover your wallet. |
|
|
|
Doesn't seem to be very reliable... It's basically a fork of MyMonero. |
|
|
|
This needs to be in English. Especially the comments for 1 star. Fixed the link. |
|
|
|
If mymonero goes down there is no way I can access my wallet, right? I tried to use the simple wallet but is not very user-friendly. Are there more options? cheers
Here is your answer: is there a problem with mymonero today? when i login i can't see any transaction history or balance ...
Indeed - looks like the Galera cluster is getting hammered by a DoS, which is causing deadlocks for legitimate users. I'm busy filtering it out and it should be fine within the next 10-15 minutes. cool, thanks fluffy (for a moment I thought the worst ... cryptsy'ed) Even if MM disappeared we still wouldn't be able to spend your coins, and you'd be able to recover them either through some other service or directly through a modified simplewallet:)
Are there more options? cheers All client options are here: https://getmonero.org/getting-started/chooseIn addition, you could generate a (cold) paper wallet using MoneroAddress: https://moneroaddress.org/It's simply a port of: https://github.com/moneromooo-monero/monero-wallet-generator/ |
|
|
|
... This is my new favorite blanket question to whenever Bitcoin maximalists say things like... - SIDECHAINS!
- LIGHTNING NETWORK!
- PRIVATE ADDRESSES!
- MAGMA BLASTS!
- ICE CRYSTALS!
...are going to make Monero obselete. It's the "Satoshi's Coin's Test". Will this let Satoshi move his coins without anyone knowing? If the answer is no, I'm happy for you, but leave me alone. There is actually a even simpler answer to the above: 1 MB blocksize limit. Even if that gets raised, 32 MB message limit. |
|
|
|
Are these projects related? Is Moneta one of the private companies working with Blockstream?
"To my mind, Zerocoin and Zerocash are the low-hanging fruit of sidechains. Just transfer your bitcoin to a sidechain that implements one of those protocols, and voila, instant Bitcoin anonymity; you can send or receive money while maintaining mathematically perfect privacy."The vision of the Moneta project is to help significantly advance Bitcoin technology as a sidechain. As a sidechain, we want to help people realize that it’s possible to make Bitcoin lightning-fast, far more private, and far more scalable. For example, people often think that Bitcoin is limited to 7 transactions per second and can never compete with Visa. With some changes to the protocol, we can increase that number one-hundred fold. Also, with increased scalability comes decreased transaction fees. Think of all the new marketplaces and behaviors that can arise if we can decrease Bitcoin’s transaction fees from the magnitude of cents to the magnitude of hundredths of a cent … We hope to convey that Bitcoin’s underlying protocol can in fact be advanced significantly — not just marginal improvements, but 10x or 100x improvements.  Is it associated with XMR in anyway? No, and watch out for these guys (Moneta). Same guys as: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=846471.0& https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=391031This looks to be an actual privacy-centric side chain project, not an altcoin. Unless you have evidence to the contrary. How come we can't just make XMR the privacy side chain? Some technical reason? [1] https://news.bitcoin.com/first-implementation-zerocoin-released-introducing-moneta/, enough evidence in that article. [2] If we make XMR the privacy sidechain we inheret Bitcoin's security model as well. In addition, I am not entirely sure if there are already viable methods available to secure the sidechain itself. |
|
|
|
Technical question: Say I'm sending 2000 xmr someplace. How come I get errors like this with any mixin other than 0? [wallet xxxxx]: transfer 2 [xmr send to address here] 2000.4 [payment id]
Error: not enough outputs for specified mixin_count = 2:output amount = 0.006750010000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009772250000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004645490000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009978569999, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.006642110000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.076933380000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.006983820000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.042614780000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.006233280000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004649140000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.076870580000, found outputs to mix = 1or even for mixin 1? - Anyone explain? [wallet xxxxxx]: transfer 1 [xmr send to address here] 2000.4 [payment id]
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 27.858080413699, transaction
amount 250.050000000000 = 250.050000000000 + 0.000000000000 (fee)
[wallet xxxxxx]: balance
Balance: 2000.518080413699, unlocked balance: 2000.518080413699, including unlocked dust: 0.095951323699Now I know if i use mixin of 0 it will work, but why can't I use anything else? FYI, I'm using Monero 'Hydrogen Helix' (v0.9.1.0-release) on windows x64/win 7 - Thanks! Edit - is my tx fee too small, I don't know what it should be anymore?  Try sending a smaller amount, e.g. 1900 XMR. I see you got some dust as well, therefore the transaction might be relatively large and what remains after sending 2000 XMR may not be enough to cover the fee. |
|
|
|
Are these projects related? Is Moneta one of the private companies working with Blockstream?
"To my mind, Zerocoin and Zerocash are the low-hanging fruit of sidechains. Just transfer your bitcoin to a sidechain that implements one of those protocols, and voila, instant Bitcoin anonymity; you can send or receive money while maintaining mathematically perfect privacy."The vision of the Moneta project is to help significantly advance Bitcoin technology as a sidechain. As a sidechain, we want to help people realize that it’s possible to make Bitcoin lightning-fast, far more private, and far more scalable. For example, people often think that Bitcoin is limited to 7 transactions per second and can never compete with Visa. With some changes to the protocol, we can increase that number one-hundred fold. Also, with increased scalability comes decreased transaction fees. Think of all the new marketplaces and behaviors that can arise if we can decrease Bitcoin’s transaction fees from the magnitude of cents to the magnitude of hundredths of a cent … We hope to convey that Bitcoin’s underlying protocol can in fact be advanced significantly — not just marginal improvements, but 10x or 100x improvements. Is it associated with XMR in anyway? No, and watch out for these guys (Moneta). Same guys as: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=846471.0& https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=391031 |
|
|
|
I almost hate to say something for fear of jinx'ing it, but it looks like we may entering another period of explosive green candles on strong volume? Or is this just a bull trap?  The 4h MACD is bound to flip and major resistance is at 235k-246k, whereas major support is at 165-170k. It is probably too soon to say anything, but it's nice to see volume building up again. |
|
|
|
Bittrex will require ID soon as well if I recall correctly.
Source? If I recall correctly someone stated that here. Even if not, it's imminent given that they are an US based exchange. |
|
|
|
I thought cash was fungible, dammit: http://en.eurobilltracker.com/index.phpEuroBillTracker (EBT) is an international non-profit volunteer project dedicated to tracking Euro notes around the world. It is. It's enforced by law, therefore it's fungible. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
