Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:30:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 367 »
1941  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Legendary Account for Sale on: June 22, 2019, 10:16:41 PM
Ask here or send an mp!

Which account?
1942  Economy / Reputation / Re: Flagging accounts which are up to sale [DT member actions needed] on: June 22, 2019, 09:50:56 PM
Interesting point of view. I kind of agree here, despite these people being account sellers, was it really right to mislead them (and in a way, scam them?) as 2 wrongs don't make a right. Curious as to how other people think about this..
Sting operations are always double edged sword.
Sting operations are a) done by law enforcement with strict oversight, and b) do not allow law enforcement to steal (or attempt to steal) from others, nor do they allow law enforcement to commit other torts
Thanks for explaining me something I know. Jesus, some people on this forum  Roll Eyes

@OP good job exposing those accounts, account with positive trust could end up in wrong hands and do damage. Don't listen to QS, just take a look at his signature - he is knowingly advertising pump and dump.
1943  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: June 22, 2019, 09:12:50 PM
I don't think this is normal DT behavior https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152921.msg51564704#msg51564704
1944  Economy / Reputation / Re: Flagging accounts which are up to sale [DT member actions needed] on: June 22, 2019, 08:22:34 PM
Interesting point of view. I kind of agree here, despite these people being account sellers, was it really right to mislead them (and in a way, scam them?) as 2 wrongs don't make a right. Curious as to how other people think about this..
Sting operations are always double edged sword.
1945  Other / Meta / Re: Diruna, 13 pages of spam... on: June 22, 2019, 06:19:00 PM
Isn't this "kind of" allowed on the "Games and rounds"? Because I see many other gambling websites doing a similar thing and their threads are months old.
As loyce said, it is for bitcoin giveaways.

They have a slot machine which is part of Gambling and I doubt there is a possible different section for that.
If they are accepting only altcoins their gambling site should be in altcoin section, gambling section is for sites which are accepting bitcoins or bitcoins and altcoins, I am 100% sure in this (unless something has changed recently  Roll Eyes)
1946  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Porez na bitcoin i kriptovalute 2018-2019 on: June 22, 2019, 05:11:45 PM
Kaj me sprecava da ja napisem izjavu od kud mi btc u ime tog ciju putovnicu kupim? Jel ce ga porezna zvati na razgovor? Mislim, nema nikakve logike kad nasi ne kuze pol posto. Kak uopce neko ime povezati sa tom uplatom? Ne mogu biti sigurni ni da hoce.
Recimo, nečija putovnica i nekakva stara transakcija na tvoju adresu - nemoguće je dokazati da osoba je ili nije poklonila bitcoine, ali, kao što je već rečeno:

Dodatno, u svim slučajevima trebaš imati ugovor o doniranju ili potvrdu uplate iz koje se vidi (citiram): "osobni podaci darovatelja i daroprimatelja, datum darovanja, datum stjecanja od strane darovatelja te vrijednost financijske imovine na dan stjecanja od strane darovatelja, vrijednost (broj jedinica i tržišna vrijednost) koja se daruje, potpis i dr."
Netko ti donira bitcoin u vrijednosti 100 kuna i brzo na avion da potpišeš ugovor  Grin
1947  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BITDICE SCAM CANCELED WINNING BET on: June 22, 2019, 03:53:26 PM
The only issue was the delay in informing you the bet was not accepted. However, you would have seen an error message when placing the bet.
When was bet "not accepted", before match started or after match ended?

What does this mean:



Does it mean that player was able to see that bet was accepted? Or?

Was wager returned to player after bet was accepted or bet was never accepted? I don't see this from your screenshot.
1948  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Porez na bitcoin i kriptovalute 2018-2019 on: June 22, 2019, 03:12:02 PM
Eto, nis od toga, znam da on prvi nece na to pristat. Ali isto tak, mogu na deepwebu kupiti neciju putovnicu i reci da mi je taj i taj to poklonio. Nasi su ovo bas vrhunski izveli.
Recimo, netko iz filipina ti pokloni bitcoin, tražiš ga sve moguće i nemoguće podatke, zatim ga lijepo zatražiš da ti kaže na koji je način došao do bitcoina i kada i sa svime tim ideš u poreznu.
Tako da ti ta putovnica neće igrati neku veliku ulogu s obzirom da ćeš ipak morati pokazati kako je osoba koja ti je donirala btc došla do tog btc-a.

A zamislite netko vam pokloni bitcoine, tražite podatke i onda saznate da je osoba is bangladeša i nije mogao na legalan način pribaviti bitcoin s obzirom da je bitcoin ilegalan u bangladešu - a ne smijete mu vratiti jer i vi onda radite kriminalno djelo. Još se uvalite u probleme  Cheesy
1949  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: mydogedice is very likely scam on: June 22, 2019, 02:39:08 PM
Someone suggested to create thread in scam accusation for flags but I didn't know that I can't create flag for the same user 2 times within 180 days (thread for first flag was deleted so yellow flag is not valid). I guess tag should be enough but to be honest I don't like new system at all. In old system it was enough to place tag and add link for reference, now we should create new thread or something for every flag. We can also move 99% of investor based games to scam accusation for flags, or am I missing something again?
1950  Economy / Reputation / Re: Request support for Flags here! on: June 22, 2019, 02:23:25 PM
I've seen many flags use the scammer's thread as a reference, and I think that's a mistake. It's better to make a new topic on the scam accusation board, and use that to create a flag.
I did and this happened:



I have to recheck rules about flag thingy I probably missed few, but if anyone wants to create flag type 1 to warn newbies please do, here is thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157280.0 for reference.
1951  Economy / Scam Accusations / mydogedice is very likely scam on: June 22, 2019, 02:13:52 PM
Site: mydogedice.com

Accounts: doge-games, mydogedice1

Mydogedice created thread https://archive.fo/UooJF for site which had not provably dice and some kind of money making scheme inside https://archive.fo/OJSOd (I couldn't archive page inside, however, there was no information about bankroll nor income), from thread:

Quote
-Cloud Miner: 0.9% day | 27% month
- You can invest in a company, we pay 0.9% per day in DogeCoin currency

There is no information about company.
No ToS.
Dice is not provably fair.

They have removed investment option but dice is still not provably fair:



And account doge-games starts new thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157148.0 archived http://archive.is/yDu47.

I can't create another flag for doge-games Cheesy
1952  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: reeldice.com is a scam on: June 22, 2019, 01:01:50 PM
Hello there,

the site under development and the site owner trying t fix all the bugs. So please try later and contact support.
Probably one of those scamming bugs, where player win something and bug eats their funds.

You can't start and promote gambling site without testing it first and then when someone wins money say "it was a bug". And also, you have recently ask for 0.04btc non collateral loan which makes me think if this site is solvent. Can you sign message to show that you have enough funds to pay players?
1953  Other / Meta / Re: WHICH flags are appropriate for each scenario listed here??????????????????????? on: June 22, 2019, 12:39:05 PM
Just to get a rough idea of how to set up my flags. With some examples of scenarios
I think you have gathered enough information how to set up your flags in the last 9 days so either set them up or lock the thread, it seems you are moving this topic to different direction (meritcycle, FJ...)

May I remind you that I am still waiting for answers to something which you started, if you don't mind to respond in that thread.
1954  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: VFarm possible scam on: June 22, 2019, 10:49:58 AM
Have you contacted Rashad on linkedin and asked him is he advisor? Or Carol Tan? Someone who is COO is probably very active so you should get answer in no time.

You can also ask them here https://t.me/finafex.
1955  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [FLAGGED] [scam] BetKing.io broke ICO promise and dropped token value 99% on: June 22, 2019, 12:09:52 AM
I'm done with you guys, your forum is corrupt! You all lie! You All make assumptions that fit your narrative that your riding! You ain't hurting Dean at all, your just hurting investors in ICO! Dude ain't even trying to make a freaking penny , he wants us to be made hole!
^^^
This billyburns side-kick of serial scammer Dean Nolan seems to have cyber equivalent of Stockholm syndrome.


Poker failed
Advertising failed
ICO promises failed.
Wagering contest failed.
Buying bustabit script failed.
Screwing token holders - chiching!

@LoyceV, because Dean broke ICO deal, you will have to wait some time for token to reach 4.4X and then, when you sell it, you will break even. Dean will tell you when that will happen.
1956  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [FLAGGED] [scam] BetKing.io broke ICO promise and dropped token value 99% on: June 21, 2019, 10:56:43 PM
-snip-
And you're okay with the buybacks being canceled.
Despite it being displayed on the ICO page.
Despite there not being any stipulation stating that it could/would be removed.
Despite having the resulting price of BKT be less than 50% of your original buy-in price.
Despite Dean stating that buybacks would continue both on and off-forum.
Despite the price calculation of tokens being a large part of the ICO.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4751127.msg51398125#msg51398125

I will just drop this on top of that https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2897545.msg47592095#msg47592095
And there was something about canceling wagering contest and scamming gamblers.

I can only imagine someone winning national lottery and they say - "you have won $100M but we decided that we don't give a fuck about that. Here you go, a dollar. Now buzz off."
1957  Economy / Reputation / Re: Request support for Flags here! on: June 21, 2019, 10:31:32 PM


Quote
The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.

The newbie has 0 posts now as of now ( obviously  that post was deleted due to spam / off-topic  )  so what happens now? you can't edit the flag ! wait for him to make another scam attempt and get someone else to flag him ? the new system is a bit messed up.
I am not sure what happened, thread was up whole day and I edited post just recently with correct link to flag, double checked it and thread was there. I went to check modlog http://archive.is/g90p5 and thread is from what I see removed recently https://prnt.sc/o52g5y but I don't see that user is banned.

Of course, I forget to archive thread so I can't really create new flag and I can't delete this one, well, what I can do is to remove "my support" from this flag because I can't support something which is not there  Roll Eyes and I will also edit again my post above.
1958  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stake your flags here if you dont want to start everytime an Topic ! on: June 21, 2019, 08:17:17 PM
first, I copy a quote of the English ann. and after that, I translate all English sentence with reading all link published (not all the time).
Ok. In case you missed my post above, where can we find announcement thread with link you posted?
Looks like that is the Orginal !  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5107654.0?

And i guess that he used an Fake ANN and translated that one because the link with the malware was in !

I have no other idea how it was possible !
I feel like idiot now, I forgot that I have already posted link to that thread .

is any translator should be punished if there any (scam) of the announcements? I think @yanoaziz was just a translator because based on all his posts he made a lot of translation of many projects
You need very good reason to post link to malicious file and translation isn't one.
1959  Economy / Reputation / Re: Request support for Flags here! on: June 21, 2019, 10:41:59 AM
Anyone wants to support this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=251 ?

Edited link  Roll Eyes

Edit 2

Thread is removed, no evidences left so no one should support this flag.
1960  Other / Meta / Re: Diruna, 13 pages of spam... on: June 21, 2019, 10:17:35 AM
Report OP to moderator and write in comments "altcoin giveaway", it looks like one.
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 367 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!