Continuing a discussion from another thread: When you have one global corporation (a group of companies beholden to their collective oligarchy) charging fees, this is equivalent to taxation. They will charge their failures to the collective and keep the profits. It is just a world government by another name.
And I agree they will want privacy, except they will demand to have the masterkey to see everything.
I totally agree with making privacy technology for corporations. I was emphasizing that months ago in the Thoughts on Zcash thread.
Individual focused anonymity technology (i.e. resisting the "State" or collective outcome) has no market and no future (whereas privacy controlled by corporations does). I don't like this realization. I am ready to retire to some obscure place and ignore the world. (but first I'll try to make my technology contribution, health willing)
Note we are threadjacking the DAO hack theme. So if we want to discuss the tangent further, it would be best to start a new thread or move discussion to an appropriate existing thread.
Fair enough. I think the only sticking point we would have is over the new corporate system's need to see people's private information as they would get their money upfront, while traditional governments have used taxation to get their money after the fact--so if you started a new thread, my point would be that you don't need an IRS if you have a national sales tax, and if the companies are collecting the fees for themselves, you don't need much, if any, oversight at all. Sorry, smooth, for getting this off-topic. Politics of regressive taxation. I don't know if it would amount to that or not, as marginal costs are trending towards zero and it's in the best interest for companies to move that way rather than glean a few extra sheckles by pissing off their user base --think of a world where you can buy a shirt (or print one) that doesn't need to be washed and changes colors and patterns on demand, a world where you don't need a car as you can make car appointments with automated uber-like systems and your job is likely in a digital capacity, so you really don't have many places to go and you can take a vr vacation without the threat of kidnappings, zika, or just a crumby locale that you got locked into--in that world the costs are so minimal that, unless your country is engaging in taxing for a living income--which will likely rise before it crumbles under the weight of its absurdity, then you can expect companies to manage by streamlining operations and lowering costs, rather than increasing pricing and remaining top-heavy. Until you imagine a world where humans can be replaced by quantum computers and traditional jobs replaced by virtual endeavors, you can't imagine a future without traditional governments and taxation schemes. The real question is what the future military looks like--will it be old style war machines that are costly and spend much of their time collecting dust, half-breed systems of corporate mercenary mechanization, OR control systems that use economic policy to set an ever widening global, and post-planetary, border system? What do we do with all the people who don't have a job? Harvest them for body parts in an efficient corporate world? Costs go closer to zero, so it is nearly free to give them basic needs, but still there needs to be a transfer of wealth from the productive to the non-productive in order to pay for it, no matter how epsilon it is. Would corporations offer a signup program for indigent to exempt them from fees and thus the productive can pay for the indigent without needing to provide their identity? What is the economic advantage for the corporation? Hmmm. We are moving towards a boon, and yes, that boon will be built on machinic labor, rather than human labor. I doubt we will actually produce much, if anything, ourselves--as even music and art can be produced by programs--my guess is we will busy ourselves with video game-like jobs within VR culture or produce blogs about our kids and dogs, and create art and other hobby/busy work to give ourselves the satisfaction of feeling productive--my guess is a lot of people will just sit on their asses. Corporations will likely spread further from the planet collecting resources that, when compared to our present state, will seem infinite. Though, I guess atomic printers essentially do just that without us needing to leave the planet. Think of us moving from a tribal state to a parasite state--where our existence is subsidized by machinic labor capacity. I'm sure some (maybe all that survive) will cross the bounds into cryberhumanity, but then you will a world no one 100% human can comprehend, and certainly not one living before it happens. My guess is that we will have multiple systems competing with each other until a dominate form takes shape (much as today)--But I'm betting on the corporate model pre-singularity, efficiency trumps tradition. |
|
|
|
So i pretty much just see what is in ALT-Main..
BOTH have had their share of spammy antics i think we all agree.
But Monero's 2 year long history is what i noticed..
The Morono crew has been unbelievably manipulative here and deceitful.
They play games..
They have orchestrated spam here that was clearly organized & planned and not organic / real.
I have watched them ramp up a campaign then push this forum to the limit many times.
They push as hard as they can they reel it in hide & play dumb.. then do it all over again.
it's simple: they get paid to spam monero. otherwise how do you explain this people are ready to spam it 24h/7 and usually answer to any post in a matter of minutes? and i believe behind the scenes there are actually 2-3 people that handle around 10 accounts (check writing styles), doing this as a job It's idiots like you that are high up on the governmental pole and can't figure out how to destroy organizations like wikileaks and anonymous. News flash, idiots, we're decentralized, like-minded, and motivated. But keep on believing what you want to believe and suffer for how wrong-headed you are. |
|
|
|
Continuing a discussion from another thread: When you have one global corporation (a group of companies beholden to their collective oligarchy) charging fees, this is equivalent to taxation. They will charge their failures to the collective and keep the profits. It is just a world government by another name.
And I agree they will want privacy, except they will demand to have the masterkey to see everything.
I totally agree with making privacy technology for corporations. I was emphasizing that months ago in the Thoughts on Zcash thread.
Individual focused anonymity technology (i.e. resisting the "State" or collective outcome) has no market and no future (whereas privacy controlled by corporations does). I don't like this realization. I am ready to retire to some obscure place and ignore the world. (but first I'll try to make my technology contribution, health willing)
Note we are threadjacking the DAO hack theme. So if we want to discuss the tangent further, it would be best to start a new thread or move discussion to an appropriate existing thread.
Fair enough. I think the only sticking point we would have is over the new corporate system's need to see people's private information as they would get their money upfront, while traditional governments have used taxation to get their money after the fact--so if you started a new thread, my point would be that you don't need an IRS if you have a national sales tax, and if the companies are collecting the fees for themselves, you don't need much, if any, oversight at all. Sorry, smooth, for getting this off-topic. Politics of regressive taxation. I don't know if it would amount to that or not, as marginal costs are trending towards zero and it's in the best interest for companies to move that way rather than glean a few extra sheckles by pissing off their user base --think of a world where you can buy a shirt (or print one) that doesn't need to be washed and changes colors and patterns on demand, a world where you don't need a car as you can make car appointments with automated uber-like systems and your job is likely in a digital capacity, so you really don't have many places to go and you can take a vr vacation without the threat of kidnappings, zika, or just a crumby locale that you got locked into--in that world the costs are so minimal that, unless your country is engaging in taxing for a living income--which will likely rise before it crumbles under the weight of its absurdity, then you can expect companies to manage by streamlining operations and lowering costs, rather than increasing pricing and remaining top-heavy. Until you imagine a world where humans can be replaced by quantum computers and traditional jobs replaced by virtual endeavors, you can't imagine a future without traditional governments and taxation schemes. The real question is what the future military looks like--will it be old style war machines that are costly and spend much of their time collecting dust, half-breed systems of corporate mercenary mechanization, OR control systems that use economic policy to set an ever widening global, and post-planetary, border system? |
|
|
|
When you have one global corporation (a group of companies beholden to their collective oligarchy) charging fees, this is equivalent to taxation. They will charge their failures to the collective and keep the profits. It is just a world government by another name.
And I agree they will want privacy, except they will demand to have the masterkey to see everything.
I totally agree with making privacy technology for corporations. I was emphasizing that months ago in the Thoughts on Zcash thread.
Individual focused anonymity technology has no market and no future.
Note we are threadjacking the DAO hack theme. So if we want to discuss the tangent further, it would be best to start a new thread or move discussion to an appropriate existing thread.
Fair enough. I think the only sticking point we would have is over the new corporate system's need to see people's private information as they would get their money upfront, while traditional governments have used taxation to get their money after the fact--so if you started a new thread, my point would be that you don't need an IRS if you have a national sales tax, and if the companies are collecting the fees for themselves, you don't need much, if any, oversight at all. Sorry, smooth, for getting this off-topic. |
|
|
|
drama queens, trolls, monerotards spam, self declared heroes with agenda, SCAAAM everywhere.
this is what is left of Altcoin Discussion, if you are looking for interesting technical content you are in the wrong place
BINGO! That was the point. Though, just say spam next time, you're signaling your agenda when you single out any one coin's spam--they all have it and will continue to produce it. lol you even edit my quote. the most of spam comes from monero, you can find it spammed in most of threads even when is totally unrelated. it's not only me telling this, it's LOT of people now tired of this. Huh, I'm looking at the ratio of Eth to Monero spam..... and guess what? That's why I said your agenda is showing. |
|
|
|
The corporation will still charge the costs to the collective and keep the profits for themselves. And it will still be a power vacuum of winner takes all. So it doesn't change my argument.
Corporate-fascism is just the State by another name. It will be multi-national, i.e. a world governance.
But that doesn't change my point about taxation--it's more efficient to just charge fees onto purchases, and the corporate algorithm machine will figure this out, which means anonymous coins aren't a threat and actually give them better ways to secure the information associated with their finances. I can't imagine any company who would want their payroll or research and development funds tracked on an a clear blockchain or a traditional bank. My inkling is that banks adopt means to keep these records safe from human eyes or the corporate world does it for them. |
|
|
|
drama queens, trolls, spam, self declared heroes with agenda, SCAAAM everywhere.
this is what is left of Altcoin Discussion, if you are looking for interesting technical content you are in the wrong place
BINGO! That was the point. Though, just say spam next time, you're signaling your agenda when you single out any one coin's spam--they all have it and will continue to produce it. |
|
|
|
He was suggesting a fork that would block some or all transactions unless they have ID attached, a form of whitelisting. It is the method of 51% attacking the coin to hold it hostage to demand design changes. It might work, but waiting out the attacker is another option. The more of a backlog of fee-paying transactions develop that the attacker won't process, the more incentive there is for other miners to join.
IC, thx for clarifying that for me. smooth thank you for the honest re-summary of my statement. smooth actually including the viewkey, not necessary an ID. smooth I am thinking of 10X hashrate attack as well, not just a 51% attack, which I had explained in the other thread is much more brutal on the other miners. In either case, the attacker can change the protocol to award his miners the fees from "incorrect transactions", while refusing to process the other outputs. So sorry your logic is refuted. The payer's input becomes spent/confiscated and the Cryptonote rings can do nothing to stop this. Mea culpa. I got some sleep, then upon awakening, I realized smooth is correct. If the 51% (or 10X) attacker adds the transaction to the block chain, even if it interprets that only the fee UXTO is spendable, then when the other outputs are spent, it must add those transactions in order to take their fees. So indeed as the transaction fees excluded from the block chain accumulate to be greater in value than the excess hashrate possessed by the attacker, then honest miners are economically incentivized to process the blacklisted transactions. However, the attacker may drive the exchange value of the token so low by attacking it, that the transaction fees might have to accumulate over very long periods of time. Perhaps the excessive delays (a year?) would spiral the exchange value downwards and/or many users would capitulate and provide the viewkey required. So actually smooth is only correct if the number of users of the token who don't capitulate is greater than those who do (presuming the attacker has an externally funded incentive to attack providing the excess hashrate in the first place), otherwise the attacker will have more funding than the honest miners. Because even if the honest miners include the capitulated transaction, the attacker can blacklist those blocks due to the attacker's higher level of base hashrate aforementioned. In other words, the success of the defense smooth advocates is quite slim, because if the token ecosystem is only composed of diehards, then it is likely won't have a very high base hashrate, thus an attacker with a higher base hashrate is more likely. Whereas, if the token ecosystem is composed of the masses, then most are likely to capitulate. Even if the token's protocol made anonymity mandatory on every transaction, such that users' clients would choose the minority hashrate fork which enforced the ban against capitulating users, the problem is it is possible to capitulate external to the block chain data, thus there would be no means by which the users' clients could discern which transactions capitulated. It seems that it is impossible to make a minority block chain protocol that defies the desires of the majority and their collectively funded State (which can charge the cost of attacking a minority block chain to the collective, even surreptitiously). Ironically, AnonyMint had written about this in 2013. This is why I became less focused on the anonymity feature over time. I always wanted it and was trying to find a way to perfect it, but really what we need is to make decentralized money popular. And hope that some good comes from that. We can't actually succeed by fighting the majority, unless our minority is very significant in size. I am hoping that microtransactions are so numerous and tiny, that the State can't afford to enforce some form of taxation on all of them. But I admit that eventually the global State will get organized and perfect the systems of digital control. It just seems inevitable. Only the will of the people at-large will decide if the State's power is curtailed. Privacy on block chains could be a popular feature. But preventing the State from tracking criminals will not be popular. Thus the State must be given a viewkey. This is why I am more focused on scaling block chains, not only absolute anonymity. Privacy can be added with much less costly technology than the very heavy RingCT. That is why I was excited last month when I discovered a way to fix off chain anonymity and scale it. The state is corporate (or becoming obviously so with every passing day--everything from prisons to schools becoming privatized), so assuming the state is the power who will bring down crypto is a no go for me. Rehash your analysis using corporate interest and you might see anonymous digital money as a great tool in their arsenal--the bigger the threat, the more likely it will be adopted. This would be obvipus if you took the time to read Delueze and understand old world discipline systems are being replaced by more efficient new world control systems. Now, will the new corporate state be afraid of anonymous cash? Probably not as it doesn't matter to them if people spend their money morally and they are being paid for services and not tax based in any traditional sense. |
|
|
|
Tell me how you ever managed to hack solitaire Spoetalizethis?!
I bought a deck of cards and played go fish--world class cracker  |
|
|
|
Oh! Monero? Yeah I agree man. I agree with all your messages. Monero.
I will respond to you in the spoetnik dismissive: "Shut up, noob!" Yes. Even a noob knows that you convey only one message: Monero. Spoetnik conveys a number of messages thus I prefer his posts. They are fun. Noob, I've been speaking about privacy and fungibility when you while you were busy watching Power Ranger re-runs in your mom's sister's trailer basement. Go drink another mountain dew slushy with your meth-headed neighbor, Monero Monero. Bla, Monero, blablabla. Fungible. Buy Monero. Unlinkable Moan. Monaero. Moanero. ... please... Misquote me again and I'll slap you so hard that your flabby ass will sound like a whale trying to do the truffle shuffle in a vat of I can't believe it's no butter, but it is butter, freshly churned out of your mom's do-it-yourself liposuction kit. |
|
|
|
Oh! Monero? Yeah I agree man. I agree with all your messages. Monero.
I will respond to you in the spoetnik dismissive: "Shut up, noob!" Yes. Even a noob knows that you convey only one message: Monero. Spoetnik conveys a number of messages thus I prefer his posts. They are fun. Noob, I've been speaking about privacy and fungibility when you while you were busy watching Power Ranger re-runs in your mom's sister's trailer basement. Go drink another mountain dew slushy with your meth-headed neighbor, while your Rican neighbors argue over pitbull breeding. Hitler should have won the war, so I wouldn't have to listen to you blathering incoherencies--you got too much slushy jizz on your keyboard to make any sense and I know you can't see what you're typing because the same gut that's hiding your tiny worm of a penis is the same one blocking you from seeing above the ctrl key. I was a famous cracker, and not the white kind, but the black hat spelunking the justice league of 'murica kind--so sit down and respect your elders. Adults are talking and you've got the IQ of a Back-Street-Boy-ass-baby who was used as a stunt double for a Johnny Knoville movie. Stand down, Punk, or you'll make my day, by including extra ketchup with the fries I ordered. |
|
|
|
Oh! Monero? Yeah I agree man. I agree with all your messages. Monero.
I will respond to you in the spoetnik dismissive: "Shut up, noob!" |
|
|
|
|
1. Here's a bunch a crap I dug up, and if you believe me, then it serves as evidence enough that what I say is true--never mind that it's all a circumstantial hodgepodge of rhetoric jizzed over with hyperbole and a generous skattering of self-gloss and half-truths- wait, that's it -- whoops! Forgot to throw in a few random insults and self-mockery-in-the-name-of-disarming-fools.
|
|
|
|
apparently this isn't something to argue. for if one of these token get to be on the market with high value. it wouldn't be scam anymore.
That's not how the word scam works. I may sell you a cheap knockoff product (let's say a designer handbag) with full knowledge that the handbag isn't from the designer you think it's from (let's say Louis Vuitton), but if the knock off bag suddenly becomes popular (let's say a famous actress says she loves her knockoff bag by the scam artist more than her real Louis Vuitton bag), and the price rises, that doesn't mean suddenly you were unscammed, it means you got lucky and the scam turned out to profit you as well as the guy who intentionally ripped you off--i.e. a scam isn't dependent on monetary return or benefit, it's only requirement is that someone intended to trade or sell you something that they advertised as something else (usually of inferior quality or of less perceived value). |
|
|
|
generalizethis that was funny and that perspective has some validity. I actually agreed a little bit with some of the things Spoetnik wrote.
I would like to make the following point in response. And it is not to say you are wrong or anyone is wrong, but to try to point to a larger issue that gets overlooked in this bickering.
We lose our focus on silly nonsense, while Monero has not accomplished enough to offer a successful alternative to the criminal enterprises that are overtaking the crypto ecosystem.
Monero is focused on not so compelling features (anonymity) and a leaderless community of bickering that is doing nothing to provide leadership for this greater community to give a bonafide rallying cry and alternative to the criminality that is sinking our crypto ecosystem ship.
I don't know if anyone is capable of leading in the situation we are in. This is going to be very difficult. But I don't see the Monero as strong leaders. Too much nonsense they allow. I am not criticizing their coders. I am not even really criticizing Monero, other than to say that as I predicted since 2014, they would not know how to lead. I warned them about that, and they ostracised me for that.
Folks we need to get serious and focus our resources on serious leadership and honest development.
Pronto.
Sorry for the drama, but this my sincere opinion. It is quite urgent actually.
Accuse me of being an opportunist or all talk. That is fine. I don't want to argue it. My point remains.
I am trying to code now. I am only 1 guy. You all hold a lot of BTC resources. Please invest them wisely. You all hold the keys to our future in your hands.
P.S. 5th strong run in 5 days. Hadn't done that for 6 years. Illness is finally starting fade. Which is what fucked up my ability to code for past 3 - 4 years.
Glad you are feeling better--have you seen a doctor yet? As for sputz, he took an apology from david latapie and turned it into the Watergate hearings--he's an opportunistic exaggerator and all around troll who lives in the myopic bubble of a few well wishing troll-brothers and the illusionary grander audience he thinks he has (though risto's actual influence in the space is probably why he's obsessed with him--just my hunch). But as to your point about leadership, I don't think a single crypto will do that for the entire space--you can do for your own coin and hope others follow suite if the project is fair and honest. I feel fluffy is a great leader for Monero and his presentations and leadership on IRC during the Dev meetings is always a pleasure to experience. Monero's trying to fill the gap as cash and doing what it can to make sure it can deliver what it promised--the development of kovri with I2p developers is an example of attacking a flaw and working with programmers outside the community to solve a problem that the coin alone can't address. I think we get too caught up in this tiny pond with tribal animosity--though it's bound to happen given the different, and sometimes nefarious, agendas. I like you, Shelby, I think you are smart and understand much I can't, but I also think that about shen, fluffy, smooth and the other Monero developers, so when it gets to name calling between you guys, I try to stay out of it, but I think there is enough blame to go around. I don't really care which coin produces the best privacy solution, but this is the one that gives the best shot at a digital cash at the moment. Yes, there are things to work out, but stepping through a minefield of FUD every day, tends to make people cranky, and lashing out at each other will happen. I just hope that the coins that are genuinely trying to solve a problem don't get overlooked for borderline scams with clever marketing. |
|
|
|
|
Sputz is like that idiot girlfriend who mistook a text from a cute spammer as a girl you've been cheating on her with. She won't let it go for years on end--and continually rehashes it and adds details that never happened so she can say how awful you are to her mom and her friends and play the righteous victim--never has any real proof just lots of posturing about the "truth" and innuendo biased on imagination and an axe to grind.
Ceti's like a that scene in being John Malcovich when John Malkovich enters his own brain and sees dozen of himself--though ceti only sees risto.
BTW, what is the obsession with risto? Are you guys like secret gay for him and "hate" him for being so damn cute--sorta like that tard who shot up a gay club because he wanted a hug so bad. You guys should check into that and take care of it before it becomes a bigger issue.
|
|
|
|
Can anyone translate what he wrote to some coherent statement that implicates me and my participation in this thread  I think this thread has proved one truth. Everything you say, can be held against you, in ways that don't make any sense, and you will spend the rest of your life defending every word you ever wrote. tldr; Don't write English, only write code. Only write for your WoT. (When appeasing to the general public, candy coat profusely or just don't bother.) Shakespeare purposely wrote so one could have multiple readings of the same text--great writing is like quantum coding. I think you are making the mistake of trying to write things into a neat box that limits the reader to one view (your own). Language doesn't work that way unless you write "Bob ran up the hill." even then the reader will infer how he ran, what Bob looked like, the scenery, the type of hill, whether he was naked or wearing an Armani suit, whether he was running from something or towards something, whether it was sunny, cloudy, windy, whether the writer miswrote "hill" and actually meant "bill" and the setting was a Korean restaurant on the corner of 6th and Main... I'd either give up your desire for (undo?) control or go back to coding something (hopefully something great that extends privacy rights and capabilities). *Also, many in the Bitcoin realm (including icebreaker) are militant in their abhorrence of lesser shit coins, and that hasn't seemed to have any negative impact on adoption--the real limiter to adoption seems that no one in the real world knows what the hell is going on in this tiny pool. When they do know, where and how a coin is positioned will be of upmost importance--IE this is the time for technical people to have technical arguments and hash out what's good and what's crap. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it until someone can point out how any currency, digital or otherwise, with under a $100 billion marketcap matters to a general consumer. My point is that we are at the exploratory stage and exploration is what has been going on, so to fault that (IMO) is an obvious case of putting the cart before the horse. |
|
|
|
Put him on ignore
I can't (in every case) put false allegations on ignore. Be stop being disingenuous. There may come a day (not too long from now) where I only post in my official coin thread and no where else. But that wasn't today. And besides, Monero is getting this feedback from others. It isn't only coming from me. Whether Monero reforms or not, is not my problem. I will probably try to eventually never read anything outside of my coin's thread, so I don't know what is being said about me. Success/zen is when you know that everything everyone is saying is entirely useless. When actual victory is attained, words become irrelevant. I am not quite there yet. Crypto currency isn't there yet. But i can assure you that those fucking their marketing will not be victorious. I didn't say to put every false allegation on ignore--I said put him on ignore. As you've mentioned him many times, he seems to be a particular thorn in your side. As for the feedback from others, that's mainly coins that don't like having their scammy designs revealed for the public to dissect fairly and openly (I thought you knew that--as the some of those same coin's investors have made the same claim against you, when you've criticized their design). Anyway, peace be with you and smell a few roses on the way--too many people stoop to smell the fertilizer and miss what's being fertilized. |
|
|
|
To be fair, if you had a coin and were acting as you do now, you'd be driving it's reputation into the dirt by your own standard--namely name calling and criticizing coins other than your own is the mark of a bad or unimportant coin.
Agreed I would be. But I don't have a coin. But again, I was only responding to r0ach telling everyone that Monero was the only worthy altcoin and his allegation that Z(ero)cash will suck in every way compared to Monero. Don't forget why I posted in this thread. If r0ach didn't do that, I wouldn't have posted any thing about Monero. It's a FOSS project, and hopefully, no one will ever be reigning anyone in as it is likely a waste of time and would be a case of developers trying to use their position to bully the message.
First of all, the inventor of the term "open source" says to please stop using that term "FOSS" because it was created by an academic as weasel word. Feel free to not reign anyone in and fuck your marketing. It is your choice. I don't mind the technical arguments, but you and icebreaker going back and forth on who REKT or PWND whom is like listening to two boys argue over whos dad would win in a fight.
If you can't see he instigated that and continued that even as I tried to cut him off, then I don't know how else to get you to understand the definition of disingenuous. I responded to him in his own language of slum, because that is the only language he understands. When speaking to baboons, we must grunt and thumb our chests, otherwise they won't have any clue we are communicating. Put him on ignore--the Monero devs can't do that for you and it would be the quickest and easiest way to get him to shut up. Personally, I have no interest is arguing with baboons, especially when I can just delete their existence (within my own existence) with one click. |
|
|
|
How nice everyone is friends now. No need to worry about baseless accusations or name calling.
As if the Monero community never called me names. When I made a statement about the Monero community, it wasn't a personal attack on you. When I wrote that you are a "hypocrite", it was a factual statement because you advocated that your community can't (or shouldn't) apply censorship, yet you do in your Monero Speculation thread and besides I wasn't asking your community to censor. I rather suggested to your community you might want to tell this rabid dog to fuck off, because he continues driving your community reputation into the dirt: Dash has no plan for a dynamic blocksize; hardforking is required every single time it is adjusted up or down.
Here we go again.  Put that information in your thread. You don't need to chase every coin thread on the forum to create flame wars. Are you that afraid that no one will bother to notice the feature, because maybe that feature isn't important to everyone. What matters in the end is your community and your adoption. If your project can't generate that without attacking other coins, then that says something about your coin's importance. To be fair, if you had a coin and were acting as you do now, you'd be driving it's reputation into the dirt by your own standard--namely name calling and criticizing coins other than your own is the mark of a bad or unimportant coin. I almost think you don't want to create your coin as it allows you to play back-seat developer to other coin developer's decisions. It's a FOSS project, and hopefully, no one will ever be reigning anyone in as it is likely a waste of time and would be a case of developers trying to use their position to bully the message. But by all means, develop your coin and show everyone how it is done if you think Monero or Bitcoin can't live up to your expectations. I don't mind the technical arguments, but you and icebreaker going back and forth on who REKT or PWND whom is like listening to two boys argue over whos dad would win in a fight. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
