It kinda looks just like a list of users he doesn't like. In my opinion it doesn't seem substantial enough to be stickied. It's an arbitrary thread with a mere 5 usernames listed, most of which haven't logged in a while. No info or details, no nothing other than a list of random names calling them scammers. 2 of them don't even have flags on their account. I'm sure there's more than 5 scammers in the currency exchange. In fact, there's been hundreds if not thousands. Why is there only 5? What is the criteria to get listed on Nutildah's incredible list of scammers and is he going to keep it updated? Is he going to add to it? Is it going to be an exhaustive list of all bitcointalk fiends past and present or is it just going to be a list of a handful of random scammers/ones he's left feedback on? New threads should only be stickied if they're of high value and important and if I'm being honest that thread looks pretty lazy and largely useless to me regardless of who created it. Do you think we should sticky every thread that user's request or let everyone post their threads where they personally feel is best? I can create a thread with more than 5 scammers on it as I'm sure many others can. Both lists will help next to nobody if anyone at all. Scammers come and go and most of them listed have seemingly already gone so I'm not sure why a couple of people are clamouring for it to be stickied. It seems to be of little to no value to me, but Nutildah is free to add to it or expand it if he wishes, just as long as it's in the right place.
I didn't say it needs to be stickied. I asked why it's not fit to stay on that board if it's not substantially different from other warning threads on trading boards, including some that are stickied. You're also wrong about there being no details - every username links to detailed posts that not only show why these users are scammers but also highlights all the red flags and warning signs users should look for. I think if you're unable to judge whether a thread is substantial or valuable you should probably leave it as is. If that also means that Rambotnic's post stays up - so be it. Removing both and/or banning someone because of some misguided false equivalence does not seem right. |
|
|
|
Who exactly are you competing against here?
Against other shitposters for merit I'm guessing. Mentioning a few dozen users and hoping that some of them will tl;dr some merits. |
|
|
|
The vibe around here lately makes me wonder if cryptohunter or some other megatroll from the past has returned.
This is likely one of the scammers nutildah outed in the marketplace, like colires/vareole. Red trusted, has disposable sockpuppets, nothing to lose. |
|
|
|
Give the mods some time, Just keep reporting the posts.
Mods moved the thread instead of trashing it (it was a duplicate). Also - there is no plausible trade dispute so that dox shouldn't exist even in Investigations. And repeatedly maliciously posting dox in Reputation should get at least a temp ban otherwise what's the point of the "no dox" rule if you can just keep posting it indefinitely. |
|
|
|
My same game parlay in on the Eagles, went with Hurts over Dak for my fantasy team. I hope i won't regret this, Chargers have the worst rush d in the league, so why not... You might be ok with that one - Dak (and Cowboys in general) is sucking horribly so far. I chose CeeDee over Deebo so I'll probably regret it. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah this is getting beyond ridiculous. I've reported all those threads for dox and for duplicated topic. Most have been deleted but the last one is still up, go figure. Somehow shitheads of all sorts are getting way too much benefit of the doubt here.
Edit: now two threads are in Investigations even though the second one was reported as duplicate with a link. Third one in Reputation, reported just now. 4 have been deleted. So that's 7 total. #freespeech
|
|
|
|
On a note, has PN7 or Quickseller ever admitted they are the same person?
She hasn't. But that's kinda the point. For example if LoyceV posted here using the LoyceMobile account, it's quite obvious that it's the same person. However when someone is pretending to be two different users that's when I think we have a problem. Isn't the proper way to use forum features to Flag all accounts, so they get a warning on top of their own topics? Those are more likely to be seen by visitors than a warning topic.
Ideally those warnings should link to reference threads but they don't so nutildah's topic served a purpose for guest users. Only scammers benefit from its removal and no one (except said scammers) was harmed by it being on the Currency Exchange board. |
|
|
|
|
I'd make it 3600 seconds for newbies. No one needs more of such illiterate garbage like the OP. If you can't spend a few extra seconds to spell-check and proof-read your shit, Twitter would be a great fit for you.
|
|
|
|
Quickseller and suchmoon never gone side by side. I wonder how hard it's to hit the ignore button for you two 🤪
Fair point but I have a thing for when someone sockpuppets with multiple accounts in the same thread. Honestly I think no one should tolerate that but if I'm wrong then you (or anyone who thinks such sockpuppeting is acceptable) is welcome to hit the ignore button on me. |
|
|
|
Suchmoon sees nutildah as expendable. She doesn’t care if he gets banned. She posts nonsense with the hopes that he will ignore my very specific warnings about what will happen if he continues to move his thread, hoping that the mods will blufff, but also not risking anything in terms of consequences if nutildah does get banned.
It should go without saying that suchmoon is not honest and doesn’t care about anyone except herself.
Hmmm... so your accusation here is that I want nutildah to get banned because...  Nice attempt to get a page out of Og's trollbook and try to drive a wedge of some sort between us but the reality is that the only bad thing I wish for nutildah is to lose his week 13 FF game. You gotta try harder, maybe post with the PN7 account again to make this absurdity more absurd. |
|
|
|
Because obviously when you repeat something with two sockpuppets it becomes a fact. I am curious if anyone encouraged anyone to be dishonest in this thread or elsewhere about this situation.
there is a very high probability that the OP is either an admin or a moderator trying to give advice to nutildah.
Must be a very dumb "admin or moderator" who doesn't know about the existence of PMs. |
|
|
|
The amazing thing is the con still want on for six more months even though I clearly showed they had fucked up methods to determine earnings.
Right, they tried to do an ICO and staking and some other sketchy things afterwards, but the writing was already on the wall when you exposed the exploit. It was a full-blown ponzi, no actual mining was taking place, the whole thing was a scam and the SEC correctly identified all that. Now seven years later a jury is manipulated into believing the charade all over again. Fucking Wall Street bankers and their lawyers, what a nasty bunch of lying bastards. |
|
|
|
That's obviously not how this works. Otherwise anyone could make a thread saying I'm buying/selling coins, oh and here's also a giveaway/reflink/ponzi/nft I'm selling/list of users I don't like.
nutildah isn't doing a giveaway, and it's not merely a list of users he doesn't like. It's a list of proven scammers. It's a thread specific to the currency exchange board and makes the board safer. Why is it not fit to stay on this board? Not much different from saying "beware of PayPal" and that thread is stickied. |
|
|
|
The quoted part can be a separate topic in the currency exchange board and everything else are well qualified for reputation section.
But that means moderating scam warnings to appease scammers. If we don't remove scams let's not remove scam warnings unless they're zero value like "SCAM!" with no proof. Seems fair to me. |
|
|
|
If this is the topic in question then what is wrong for it to be in reputation section? Because nutildah is clearly using this topic to promote his currency exchange business. It's a very sneaky way of getting a trade topic into a high-traffic non-marketplace board but if everyone reports it to be moved to Currency Exchange then hopefully with some help from moderators we can fix this. |
|
|
|
Also, Henry Ruggs was released by the Las Vegas Raiders. Everyone, do not drink and drive.
A person died in the crash so I'd say losing his job is going to be the least of his problems. I'd be shocked if he can avoid serving time for this. |
|
|
|
~
I had no choice but to report it now to be moved from Reputation to Currency Exchange because I can't have you spamming the Reputation board with trade topics. Well, if you get banned at least you'll know whom to blame. |
|
|
|
I find one from your past
Can you? That'd be awesome. I had one where I mined a few hundred bucks worth of doge back in the day but I can't find it now. I reckon it would buy a lot of SHT today. Well, you may also need to brute force the private key, but that's minor details. |
|
|
|
Is the error at the end the issue?
Uhm... I don't see any errors, looks perfectly fine. Do you see my DT2 badge? Any other data, like BPIP rank? Here is how my profile should look like with your settings (I'm not inactive etc so there won't be that):  And here is someone who is banned: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=357340 Edit 2 - Maybe I should clean my chrome cache completely? (Ugh, no!!!)  Before doing anything so drastic (and the cache shouldn't matter) please try updating the extension - click the update button on the chrome extension page. Your screenshot shows version 2.2.4, the latest version is 2.2.5. I don't think there were any breaking changes in a minor version update but just in case. |
|
|
|
it's not showing for any profiles, but I can see the element on inspection, like your profile says:
The extension creates the element on page load and fills it in once it gets data from the server. If you can't get it work after restart, could you please try the following: - Go to the extension properties: chrome://extensions/?id=ecpfdlfjiabpdnlhmkmannofnmpdakkj
- Click Inspect views -> background page.
- Check the console there for any errors.
Normally it should show the request that it sent it to the server and the response, e.g. API request: {"instance_id":null,"scope":"[DT][S]","items":["662400"]}
API response: {"result":{"662400":{"dt_score":null,
"dt_status":"<span class=\"inject-dt-status\" title=\"Member of Default Trust level 2, strength 3\">DT2</span>",
"user_status":"<span class=\"inject-status inject-status-inactive\" title=\"125 days since last activity\">INACTIVE</span>",
"recog_rank":null,"earned_merits":null,"earned_merits_all":null}},"server_settings":{"warning":"","cache_time":600}} |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
