Wonder why they are against it. I haven't fully gone through the proposal (EIP 1559) but it seems they are against because they probably benefit more from the current fee system (which clearly have problems) at the expense of the whole network/users.
Wish they have better solution that'll be acceptable to all network users/participants. Consensus should always be inclusive on truely decentralized system/network

I would rather not be part of such competition. Cheating to gain what you don't deserve actually deprive those who deserve them. That will have unpleasant consequences for society/humanity if everything isn't working together according to how it is purposed/destined to be.

If you deserve it, or if it's destined for you, you will win it whether you cheat or not. So it's better to win what is destined for you fairly without cheating. Cheat is actually immoral and will always have consequences.

I think the scarcity simply depends on its demand, and how much coins are available to take care of demand ... You know it's scarce when the price goes up due to high demand

One of my main concerns with the typical Personalized Targeted Advertisement is how it can be abused by companies/people who wish to track & understand large numbers of people in detail without necessarily breaking the law.
I will probably allow things like that if they are decentralized, if nothing else apart from the owner knows/understands his own interest/activities, should be safe, not accessible to people without my permission, it should anonymity-friendly/privacy-friendly, etc....

Imagine you give one of your Bitcointalk posts to a Translator to translate into a foreign Language you don't understand, and after translating, you take back the original post and ask the Translator to translate the translated post back to the language it was translated from... he/she translates it back but it turn out very different from the original post. Example:
You get a translator to translate the short post below into a foreign language I called "Kir":

- Original post:   "The cat needs something to eat. I'm going to get Linda to feed her."

- Post translated to Kir language:  Ta' kir ilum ko wol sucrum cim sin Linde dum melwzua

- Translated post translated back to English: "The cat was hungry and she ate Linda"



That^ is similar to what I discovered about a translation service I often rely on... though I never really trusted it 100%. It basically misinterpreted the true meaning of the original post. That could create misunderstanding, cause problems, plus other consequences

*Would you consider someone who cheated to win a contest the winner of the contest?
* Is ok to cheat to win?
*Can there be any kind of situation it's should be OK or acceptable to cheat to win? What kind of situation/situations?

Interesting.
The developers probably didn't anticipate the  high fee issue & its  consequences on the NFTs market & the Network in general. . Wish they used a unique model to bring down the fees rather than relying on old model that's based on old systems  which will likely be unsustainable for well decentralized system/network. 
Guess the high gas price is a main reason you are looking for alternative? What prevent fee from going that high on a new Blockchain if the underlying problem is fixed.
 By the way, I read somewhere (unverified source actually) that the gas fee issue will be fixed in few months time.

I think players could bribe their way up if you don't have a fraud-proof selection process that  is Merit-based. And I think bribery by players will reduce alot if a league (for example) is very competitive, has good incentives, is not rigged, has the right/sufficient rules and the rules are always followed/enforced . That will likely encourage the clubs/teams to go for the most qualified players because they will want to do well and be rewarded

I wonder what exactly the laws are against: Gambling (taking big risk)? Or not engaging in "fantasy sports" betting/predicting atall?

Perhaps the name "Gambling" is why the laws are harsh on it and they are able to get around it by practicing & encouraging safe/responsible betting.?

I actually think it's a good idea to give both the fish and teach them how to turn it into many fish.

In regards to Op point.
Ofcourse, I think people who understand what true cryptocurrency space seeks to achieve and care alot about it will likely know how to do well in this (especially long term) without getting entangled in things that are contrary to the good ideals  of true Cryptocurrency.
By the way, they should be careful investing in projects that lack all the important ideals of true Cryptocurrency. It's important not to get used to them so they don't feel too bad when they experience the consequences.

Mine would be getting the good things you need  from your CREATOR, whenever you need them.
You don't need to have the good things stored up somewhere for yourself alone to be considered rich... They are always available for you when you need them, but you don't necessarily own them alone, and you're just required to use them to do good before they can be released to you for free.

Just buy the significant dips with amount you can afford to lose using funds reserved in stablecoin. You could gradually sell parts of what you bought for profit as the price of the cryptocurrency rises significantly. But I'd  buy more and sell less to hold long-term & for a healthy market.

I guess by abolishing corruption in sports they mean to end the violation of good laid down rules or create new ones to help keep sports safe, fair, healthy etc. Bribery is actually part of corruption that can prevent the development of sports in the right direction.

In regards to bolded, love for money at the detriment of others people and society

Probably how you could consider using "Praying Mantis" to control insects/pest. I prefer things like that than using synthetic pesticides in Farms. I imagine you could have many of them in a farm to feed only on insects while the plants grow.
The ravens could be trained to guard against larger birds, in my opinion.

Interesting answer.
Mine would be to filter out and download lots the good/important stuff from the internet and throw the bad away.
I wonder where the good stuff can be found though....it will likely be rare to find. Good & bad usually get mixed up

By doing what pleases the CREATOR of Heaven & Earth rather than what pleases the world.
 It pleases our CREATOR to love HIM and your fellow man. If you truely love the CREATOR, you won't abuse what HE created. You will steadily do what pleases HIM.

Mine would be to find problems you really care about, solve them in a way that people will find hard to resist, and it should be affordable too for all budgets.
Turn it into a business, start small and scale it up gradually as you become consistently profitable.

Farmers don't have to buy lands to farm.
How about renting lands? Or the farmers could organize and move into forest or "no man's land" to farm.
I sometimes wonder why farmers don't take that risk to cut cost. They could even build temporary homes there to live close to the farms.

Not possible for humans, but I believe only the true CREATOR can travel through time.

Time travel could however be faked. An entity that records lots of our activities on earth could replicate it and the time they happen, then get people they control to visit it in a very controlled manner to trick the minds into thinking they are actually traveling through time.

What great reset ? Wiping clean memory and records of past guilt,evil, corruption, evidences,mistakes etc .? I don't believe they can do that now. People will continue to remember and be given opportunity to choose the path they wish to follow before the evil that will come.