Well, if you knew the truth, you probably will be very angry with me for not forceful getting the world out of centralized systems/internet.
    Sensitive/private data need to be controlled by their owners.

I hope people will eventually go for safe and truely decentralized communication platforms .
My experience so far in this world is like a person who is trying to get people off poisoned water and the people get mad at you and request for concentrated acid to drink.

Interesting.
If what you certify or vet end up becoming really useful without compromising on cryptocurrency principles/standards like Decentralization/safety, transparency, censorship resistant, immutablity, privacy, etc then you know your company did a good job.

False crypto (centralized crypto) getting certified even if they're useful is not actually a good job.

You could just certify Decentralized and Centralized crypto projects seperatetly  if you want to be honest and still certify useful cryptocurrencies whether they meet the standards or not.

The sovereign nations would want to fully control their fiat currencies. Stablecoin doesn't give that kind of control if it is on True Blockchain or decentralized network. The Blockchain/Blockchains have to be control by them (national governments)... which is not the right kind of decentralized networks any True Cryptocurrency should be built on.


True Cryptocurrency should be independent of the system... not a good idea to compete with it.

Probably mean alot to them but they don't have the right word to express it.
Others are probably just copying their popular role model, to be respected or "to belong" etc.
People should be careful with tattoo though, especially those that involve blood-letting . Could be deeper than you think

Interesting. I guess to lots of people, "seeing is believing". Those that are used to the physical would be toned more to physical/tangible things.
 I think they would make sense of the virtual coin if it can be touched, Maybe exchanging a "physical bitcoin" with peers for products or services will convince them.

I guess if you make stocks as easy to participate in as crypto and make crypto as difficult as stock, they will be proud to speak about cryptocurrencies. People typically flaunt things that are seen as valuable but difficult to have.
You could also blame bad publicity.

If we stop talking about It it will suddenly happen because we are on a borrowed time that is no longer in use for what it was meant for. Our world is currently under a grace period...this grace period was pleaded for to enable us warn others. It will eventually elapse but before then we will continue to see signs that something big is about to happen. The signs will keep increasing in intensity as we approach the global crisis.

If my messages still do not convince you yet, I wonder what will

Be prepared and you will be glad you found this forum.

Well, I wish cryptocurrency developers always consider the worst case scenario when developing a cryptocurrency. Their works will be  tested to see how decentralized and safe they are. I just hope the tests do not affect people's assets. So, it's better to always choose True Cryptocurrency rather than false ones to avoid regretting in the future.

I sometimes think one of the main reasons some developers are careless is due to not considering the possibility of a future storm. Things should be built to survive the storm. Any form of centralization should be concerning to them.

I'm more interested to know whether the tax haven countries accept those who are dodging taxes... better still, those who avoid paying justified taxes. And I hope the owners actually own the money and honestly worked for it.
Better to have the tax haven countries only accept those that have meet the right requirements for saving funds in their banks.

In regards to the bold, assuming you mean "to prove he's the right Satoshi", I think nothing will change much other than checking if the proofs is in line with Bitcoin principles and his character. If the community decides to allow him to be part of community, his posts will be judged by his past characters and principles. Anyway, he won't have more authority than anyone else over the Bitcoin Network and it's future developments. So, his contributions will judged based on their merits and honesty.


Still on the bolded, If you mean evidence to proof if he's right concerning his past works as Satoshi, I think he will be able to do that if he still remembers why Bitcoin was created in the first place. Future uncertainty will justify his creation especially if it's able to be useful globally even in very difficult times

Depends on the kind of game. If it's safe then I probably will have nothing against it. I wish there is a good alternative for the word "losers" so we don't mistakely create too many angry people which could affect our freedom journey in this boat.
I hope to see that we continue the journey in love, friendship, and without much fear.

I think certain people can survive alone for really long time. If you live in such places with purpose or with goals to accomplish, you'll probably do well. I think some people are created to spend most of their time alone, such people will thrive alone if they are always in the presence of their CREATOR.
  I may try to make friends with animals, get them suitable roles to help build a community, do farm work, etc

Things like that could easily be stopped if the community, those affected, law enforcement agencies etc are doing their jobs well.
These people care very little about others, so they cheat and let things like that pass by.
If you insist that the right thing be done, certain people will be mad at you or try to attack you as if they enjoy the problem or are part of it.

I occasionally come across similar issues in physical World, but you could get discouraged by people when you want the right thing to be done. They may do worse things to repay you for daring to "interfere" or for trying to stop the evil.
I'm still trying to properly understand why certain security agencies don't want to interfere or act when issues like that are brought to them. Guess there are issues they consider too much for them to handle, they're trying to avoid causing more problems, or they probably just don't want to intervene in things that are beyond their control... Still not good excuse

I think having all your funds in your savings account not controlled by you can be really risky especially in times of uncertainty.
In regards to crypto, I wish we don't have lots of characters that are so obsessed with sabotaging the market or people's wealth. That's probably where the budgeting would have been safely done without withdrawing a large chunk.

My budgeting method(which I'll probably update later) works for me. I don't think it's a good idea to share it publicly without being careful. However, I don't really depends too much on budget because I don't know what tommorow will bring. I try to spend prudently when the need arises or on necessary things.

Firstly you need to have the right rules/guidelines guiding those you employ to work for you and solve problems. If they are able to solve the problems without compromising on the rules then their merit/reputation automatically increase.
That's basically what it means to have a merit-based work. There are qualities that are required for employees or job seekers to have in order to be considered on merit. So this is tested or verified before they qualify based on merit.
The ones earning higher merit must have gotten the required knowledge that enable them earn the Merit. So both Merit and Knowledge are needed for success.

If you based employment on merit, you are simply looking for who can do the job really well. Those who qualified are assumed to be knowledgeable in the job whether they learned that in school, church, home, etc. There are self-taught people who don't need to go through schools to qualify.

Inflation caused by scarcity of good quality things is likely a possibility and will be permanent. I however think that good quality could be replaced by substandard poor quality alternatives to mitigate serious inflation. To maintain the system the people controlled by it will consume poor quality... they will likely not know, understand or remember what good quality used to be. *Lands of forgetfulness

You could also take care of your health really well and not  have any child. I think each of us were made with predetermined amount of kids.  It's better to wait for the right time without necessarily living unhealthy lifestyle. If you're desperate for example and have one child the wrong way, you will likely not like that... Children conceive while you are living in sin and not well shielded/protected by the CREATOR will likely be as unstable as the sea. They need to be conceived when women/parent are holy. That gives you quiet, intelligent, caring, loving, etc children

Was wondering what the word "bimonthly" meant when I first saw it. Guess we are now in the bimonthly and should expect to hear from him soon.
I was actually more worried about his well-being than the payment. The strange absence is abit long for confort, so I had to pause joining another campaign to be sure he is ok.... I thought the reactions on this thread concerning this current delay was touchy and hard to go through.   He compensate for the delays, which shows he cares... That's all that matters.

Well, I'm not in support of editing of human genes by the Bind... They could be used to do what they are not supposed to do.
In regards to altered people losing their human rights. , I believe that will no longer apply to those who have been healed by our CREATOR. There is nothing impossible for the CREATOR to do.

Interesting.
Guess we could say the government is incentivizing people to use its wallet rather than compelling them. Well, as long as the government has good reasons why it wants users on the wallet. I think the good reasons should outweigh the subsidy cost.
It's OK to make price of petrol cheaper if it really beneficial. The benefits should be able to cover the subsidy costs  and make the whole scheme profitable. The result produced by this in the future should determine how useful & worthwhile the subsidy is to the people/country.  So, it should be well done.