Ofcourse. You can also excerse the body and keep fit by doing useful works or solving problems that involve adequate physical activities around you. In that way you'll be solving multiple problems at the same time rather than just keeping fit or benefitting the body alone. You could wash clothes or farm (for example) while benefitting the body at the same time.
That's actually what I feel more comfortable spending lots of time doing than normal excersing.

Interesting. I tend to go for short videos to avoid getting bored or entangled in long, incoherent, complicated and badly ordered contents/info.  I prefer to watch long videos made by people who do it well.

I don't depend too much on algorithm. I tend to search for what comes into my mind, and I'm really careful of recommended videos(for example) so no one is suggesting or giving me what to think. That's one of the ways people are controlled and made to behave in certain way.
And you have to be really careful of reward/incentive system that tries to make think or write in a particular way whether it's right or not.

No one can say that for sure. So I prefer we say "an inventor known as Satoshi Nakamoto."




Wonder what you mean by "Unified Currency for the whole World",   you mean like a One global currency without fiats , One Global currency without altcoins, or a Global currency with fiats & altcoins. I don't see why it shouldn't latter.... Should be that just incase your country requires you to have a mark of loyalty in order to buy and sell, then you can always flee to the available well decentralized currencies/currency.

This is actually nice to read. But I wonder if you used a Bitcoin payment processor for this, or were they direct p2p payments? How do you handle disagreements with your peer? Or does it have an escrow or something? Sometimes I thought about trying this but always got discouraged due to disputes or disagreement issues that may arise between me and peer. So, I decided it's better to do such transaction on advanced smart-contract platform that works automatically, even though it may have human arbiters.

Ofcourse, the pictures are really nice that I wonder if they're really owned by the poster and not just some of the nice pictures we see on the internet.
In regards to the second, i guess it's the way you tilted the camera/pic... Looks different at my end.
Nice pics.

Mine is simple: Forgive, forget the source of the anger (assuming he/she hasn't apologized or show signs of strong remorse), and leave judgment to the CREATOR who never fails in Judging Right. The anger will just disappear.
If the source sees nothing wrong in what he/she did, I just assume it's Insanity or he/she has being brainwashed, and i just feel deep sympathy.

I strongly believe that a currency system in decentralized space should be publicly owned, meaning it shouldn't be owned by a single person or centralized entity, hence shouldn't be privately owned. Private ownership of such delicate/important collective resource is an abomination in the world of decentralization. It's going to lead to abuses that are contrary to the Bitcoin Ideals/principles, unless the principles is coded in the rules and can never be changed without users participation/consensus, and this somewhat makes it publicly owned if your users determine the organization future direction, plus running nodes, helping to secure the network and possibly owning crypto assets in the organization.
Besides, money/currency is too important to be privately owned. That sort of private ownership will attract traditional regulators, if you decide not to attract them, then you need to keep things decentralized, transparent, public, based on the good bockchain principles, based on fair/good rule, consensus-driven, etc.

I think you can still be a founder of a decentralized public organization and still be as wealthy as "private founders in traditional world. (if you choose to). Things has to be unique in this space

The right consensus that produces the right kind of order, harmony, goodness, peace, forbearance, kindness, etc will end up being Love for GOD (the CREATOR of this World & Heavens) and love for people. If you Love the CREATOR you will not abuse/misuse HIS CREATIONS, you do what pleases HIM always. We will be guided by this golden rule (Love GOD and Love People) and we can be judged by it. I don't see why Blockchain Consensus shouldn't be guided by the golden rule. Consensus can be based on it.

I actually prefer a flexible system that regulates supply based on current demand and supply. The system regulatory system has to be decentralized, trustless, permissionless, etc. Anyone can participate by having their reserved coins locked automatically when demand & price are low ...unlocked and sold to buyers when demand and price are too high. I actually agree that the price should increase/decrease moderately to prevent the extreme price volatility and make Bitcoin better MoE

Imagine a huge crumbling Building that has many people in it. Few men miraculously held & stopped the building from crumbling further until people inside it are warned to escape the building for their safety.... The building was temporarily stopped from crumbling within a grace period but this temporal solution can be affected if the ones holding the building together are pushed or harmed.
Then there are fools in the building who occasionally provoke the ones holding the building together, which causes the building to start crumbling again and many lives are lost as a result.

The building is our World and there are few people assigned by its BUILDER to warn and save those who would listen during this grace period.

Ofcourse, its anti inflation feature makes it a better store of value considering that value can debased by excessively/unnecessarily printing like what  happens in fiat currency world. So it works like a good currency should and helps preserve value rather than reduce it. That's probably what decentralized scarce/hard-monies did in the old time.

You think this is caused merely by population or by population of living things (especially humans) with lifestyle that is unhealthy/bad for our world? Imagine what the situation will be like if you have that same large population of people living right and in harmony with the world...can population still be considered a bad thing in that case?
Well, I think if we begin to live right, our population will naturally be optimal and we wouldn't have to worry about it.

Guess I would say it's already a Global Currency (not the so called One World Currency) if anyone from any part of world can use or store Bitcoin. Doesn't necessarily have to be used by National governments for it to be seen as global currency. We could still have multiple global currencies as long as they are decentralized, safe and neutral currencies anyone can freely, easily and safely use without restrictions.

I actually used to plan my work/project by myself but started knowing that my plan would always clash with the plan of my CREATOR for me or they would be full of mistakes , so I resorted to asking that HIS Will/Plan for me be done by HIM. Whenever HE wants me to do something, HE can always move me to do it... So, HE gives me ideas and moves me to implement them in things HE's helping me to plan. This works way better for me, and the plans are always accurate and in harmony with HIS purpose us.
If you want the CREATOR's plan then you will have to be detached from worldly life and make HIM rule over your life.

What will you use the homeless animals for? In my opinion, if you will treat the animals well and won't have issues with their original owners when/if they come to claim them then you probably should go ahead. And I think it'd be important to obtain permission from the community's authority as long as you are doing what is good.

In regards to investment/support from others, I think you may not need alot of money for the project if you could start small, rent a land (or check for free land you can use temporarily), start with few animals, and grow gradually (or expand with the income from the business). It's better to learn to run the business successfully before starting or you could start little and learn from there... so you don't make too much mistakes and lose the investment or lose alot of money

Sorry for the loss.
Ofcourse. Though there are people who would be divinely told or who could have some idea when they will leave this world. That's why it's important to live according to the purpose we were created for to live in order to live a fulfilling life and never be too worried or afraid of death. Besides each human individually have a predestined time he/she will leave this world... No one can change this.

I'd like to add that we should only enjoy good things or enjoy doing things that are good/right.

Do you see them all? What do you think about them?
By the way, do you think they automated and random, or manual & not necessarily random, or all of these combined.

Which one do you find funny, strange, weird, informative, cringy, etc

Do you know what they all mean and their purposes?

The CREATOR will definitely be involved if the activity is good and beneficial to people. HE cares so much about our wellbeing... It's just that humanity have been so blinded and forgotten how loving HE is.

I believe HE will answer such prayers if there are good reasons to... For example, a humble underdog team playing against a proud, more skilled and godless one. GOD can miraculously intervene in this case to humble the proud team and lift up the humble one

Oh,ok. I asked that because I didn't think reenacting the scene from the The Shining would be a pleasant experience for anyone considering what I read about the movie before asking the question. It's actually important we relieve the stress as much as possible but only through the right ways which I believe anyone can do.

I actually prefer that both are very distinct words to avoid confusion in the future... For example: BitNet/bitcoin Or Bitcoin Network/bitcoin. Besides, the slight difference could be forgotten in the future by people who don't pay attention to details, or may even be abit difficult for different culture to use.