Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 05:45:34 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 ... 249 »
2141  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [Raffle] Siliver Tigers, Koalas, and Kooks - All Spots Paid by Last of the V8s! on: May 02, 2020, 02:15:36 PM
random for me if any are left

and THANKS v8

EDIT too  late but thanks again for your generosity
2142  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Is the hardware wallet really safe? on: May 01, 2020, 11:07:44 PM
All protection is an illusion of security.
Your main defense is not to arouse interest in professional attackers. From this point of view, I would advise you to reduce the number of access points, especially if they are via a wi-fi.

I'm not a professional, I'm just keeping a close eye on the news on cyber security...

thank you for the detailed reply.

i wanted to reply in a bit more detail but ill just reply to this part (multiple wireless APs etc) for now.

i had though of the fact that a bunch of wireless individual APs and such in a single residence would be an invitation to see why. so my "solution" is to have most wireless APs in my basement on the floor. thus surrounded by concrete and dirt, so the only way for the signal to go (more or less) is up into the house space (which is the only place i want it seen), and not outside of the house footprint. as well as turn the power output as low as i can on device. thus minimizing  people driving by seeing the APs

low tech i know but its the best i can come up with.

2143  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Is the hardware wallet really safe? on: May 01, 2020, 01:00:00 PM
4. Do not use an Internet access point if at least one other (your) device, home IOT devices, is connected to this access point).

good point as anything with access to other machines on the network can sniff packets and otherwise wreak damage to machines on it.

i have several access points for the various stuff.. one for ip cams systems, one for stuff like TVs, one for google/alexa stuff, one for other IoT (washer/dryer etc), one for guests, and one for my wireless computers and such.

none of the items on those access points can see the others. but stuff on the same AP can (usually) see each other as they usually need to.

EDIT: forgot to mention the obvious takeaway.. plus a separate AP for the rig you use the wallet on.
-------------------------------------------
Are you writing this seriously, or is this a joke on the subject?
It's good from a security point of view, but it's too deliberate.

For example, why make a separate point "one for things like google/alexa" when this service already transmits everything it hears to servers, even when you don't use it? All that this service hears is the same thing that anyone who attacks you will catch on the network.

sniped a bit out but the short answer is no not joking. btw google mini has a hard switch to turn the mike off. and its usually off as i rarely use it.

yes there are a couple routers. along with straight wireless APs that (usually) do not allow connected devices to see each other. im not concerned about the main ip addy from the modem being shared among the various routers and such as i know they can be linked together. im not trying to hide from the government, just script kiddies, IoT crap with little to no security etc.

however your knowledge obviously exceeds mine. any suggestions to improve this? i mean this in all seriousness. im not super paranoid but since most I0T stuff never gets security updates what are my options?
2144  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 01, 2020, 12:27:26 PM
a 1200 stimulus check was issued to a dead family member that im executor of the estate of.

it went direct deposit to the estate bank account thats in my name as im the executor. since thats me the letter that told me of the 1200 went to me.

im not even sure what to make of that.

edit that person died over a year ago. and all relevant authorities were notified immediately (irs, ssa etc)
Return it. Not going to help the person, and is the right thing to do.

i will. just figure ill wait till there some sort of procedure in place. i have the feeling all they are worried about right now is getting checks out. doubt any though has been given to giving mistaken ones back yet.

so it will sit, untouched, in the estate account till then.

huh.

a quick search of the irs web site says this isnt uncommon (stimulus and such checks  going to dead people), and it seems i can keep it. as there is no law saying it has to be returned. guess the government thinks it cant possibly makes mistakes.

sometimes these wtf moments are priceless. people desperately needing the 1200 and not getting it, while the dead get theirs and can keep it (well, next of kin).

so looks like if this is true i will donate it to an organization (local to the deceased residence) to help the folks who got the royal shaft by the government.

EDIT: apparently this stimulus check was based on the deceased persons 2018 tax return.
2145  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 30, 2020, 09:20:45 PM
a 1200 stimulus check was issued to a dead family member that im executor of the estate of.

it went direct deposit to the estate bank account thats in my name as im the executor. since thats me the letter that told me of the 1200 went to me.

im not even sure what to make of that.

edit that person died over a year ago. and all relevant authorities were notified immediately (irs, ssa etc)
Return it. Not going to help the person, and is the right thing to do.

i will. just figure ill wait till there some sort of procedure in place. i have the feeling all they are worried about right now is getting checks out. doubt any though has been given to giving mistaken ones back yet.

so it will sit, untouched, in the estate account till then.

2146  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 30, 2020, 09:15:25 PM
so heres something i didnt expect.

a 1200 stimulus check was issued to a dead family member that im executor of the estate of.

it went direct deposit to the estate bank account thats in my name as im the executor. since thats me the letter that told me of the 1200 went to me.

im not even sure what to make of that.

edit that person died over a year ago. and all relevant authorities were notified immediately (irs, ssa etc)

They wont notice an error unless you point it out. i wouldnt have ever done that. nobody cares, literally nobody. You pointing it out just makes more work for someone.

still, sorry to hear it.
i would hold it for them in case they realise and want it back.
sorry i meant hodl it. in btc

yeah i plan on just letting it sit there until this blows over a bit and the mass confusion dies down.. at this point trying to figure out how to give it back will be worse that just letting it be for a while. i do intend on returning it but right now with millions not getting theirs i figure the last thing they want to waste time on is dealing on someone trying to give it back.
2147  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 30, 2020, 08:45:18 PM
so heres something i didnt expect.

a 1200 stimulus check was issued to a dead family member that im executor of the estate of.

it went direct deposit to the estate bank account thats in my name as im the executor. since thats me the letter that told me of the 1200 went to me.

im not even sure what to make of that.

edit that person died over a year ago. and all relevant authorities were notified immediately (irs, ssa etc)
2148  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTB] Stimulus Check on: April 29, 2020, 12:29:07 PM
This is what the check looks like:

https://www.wilx.com/content/news/Heres-what-stimulus-check-with-Trumps-name-on-it-looks-like-569786111.html

I got a letter today with his sig explaining the check. How much anyone wanna pay for that? Tongue



Edit - The back is the same thing but in Spanish.

i saw some guy on reddit post his letter. the letter explained his check was for four (4) dollars.

wooot. one loaf of bread coming up. you should be able to survive on a single loaf of bread for months, so hes good.

2149  Other / Off-topic / Re: anyone 3D printing stuff on: April 29, 2020, 12:22:59 PM
thanks everyone for your replies, my apologies for not getting back to you guys sooner.

i am looking at all those suggestions now.
2150  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 29, 2020, 11:32:03 AM
Over half of infected show no symptoms. They don't even know they have her inside them. Of those who do get symptoms, maybe a fifth will get sick enough to get tested. Those are the official numbers, so the actual number of infected is likely to be ten times as high.

From that group, maybe a fifth will get sick enough to need treatment. And of those, maybe a fifth die. So that gives us a 0.4% death rate overall. Let's assume I'm wildly off and call it 4%. Even then not bad enough to shut down the entire global economy, much less implement the kind of draconian measures that some here have personally experienced.

Is anything missing? Is the current state of the world anything other than an authoritarian power grab?

just curious. do you or anyone you know work in medical.

my wife and i did (not that that means we are super informed but we also know enough to not believe all the ridiculous crap circulating that the uneducated believe.

friends of ours in medical are scared. i mean scared. for themselves somewhat but mainly for their familys that they go home to and may possibly infect. and doctors and nurses do not scare easy (IMO at least the ones we know.. they will wade right into the thick of it. because thats what they do).

2151  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 29, 2020, 11:25:08 AM
We have several billionnaires who regularly participate in this thread... even if they will not reveal their holdings, exactly.

except mindrust. who did reveal his holdings (zero).

but he is slowly buying back in a bit i thought.
2152  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 29, 2020, 11:18:02 AM
observing $8100+ USD on coinbase (yeah i know its not what we use for that but..)

bull run is warming up the engines. test fire seems ok so far.

had a couple sells trigger. looks like some new toys may be on the way.
2153  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 27, 2020, 11:58:31 PM
can I share my Technical Analysis on crypto currency. I hope that It will be interesting and beneficial for all.

sure, give it a shot.

a thick skin will help as manners are not a strong point in this thread.
2154  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 27, 2020, 11:48:44 PM
Install the bitcoin wallet on your phone, remove the sim card, disable bluetooth wifi nfc, cancel all external connections and you already have your "military grade" Cheesy wallet

would you trust a soft switch for the radios?

hardware switch or disassemble the phone and remove the antennas. or if youre really good disable the comm chips if its doable. disconnect the power pins and such.

BTW a phone without a sim card can still make emergency calls (911 etc) its mandated. at least in the usa. so removing the card does nothing really.
2155  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 27, 2020, 06:10:02 PM
Install the bitcoin wallet on your phone, remove the sim card, disable bluetooth wifi nfc, cancel all external connections and you already have your "military grade" Cheesy wallet
No, military grade means the thing explodes if it's tampered with.

just dont press the little red button
2156  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Is the hardware wallet really safe? on: April 27, 2020, 04:12:47 PM
4. Do not use an Internet access point if at least one other (your) device, home IOT devices, is connected to this access point).

good point as anything with access to other machines on the network can sniff packets and otherwise wreak damage to machines on it.

i have several access points for the various stuff.. one for ip cams systems, one for stuff like TVs, one for google/alexa stuff, one for other IoT (washer/dryer etc), one for guests, and one for my wireless computers and such.

none of the items on those access points can see the others. but stuff on the same AP can (usually) see each other as they usually need to.

EDIT: forgot to mention the obvious takeaway.. plus a separate AP for the rig you use the wallet on.
2157  Other / Serious discussion / Re: Should I make an isolation box for my phone? on: April 27, 2020, 11:52:11 AM
In the past, I haven't really been bothered by geotracking on my phone, but I'm starting to rethink my attitude. It isn't just Google an Facebook. but a load of other organisations seem to be getting in on the idea. I've got some old roofing lead, and I'm thinking of lining a tin box with it, and using it to isolate my phone, especially when I am travelling.

Does any one else have similar concerns?

power it off?

after all its useless in a faraday cage anyway (or lead).
2158  Other / Meta / Re: Why not spoiler tag? on: April 27, 2020, 11:46:37 AM
considering how .. err.. offensive some images are to some people a spoiler would be nice.

after all many here read with family and kids present.

please note i personally dont care about so called offensive images but it severely limits when i can read the forum depending on the people present.

If you're referring to embedded NSFW images, then that's not a problem since they are already banned here. Only links to NSFW content is allowed.

10. No embedded NSFW images anywhere. NSFW content must be marked accordingly.

errr have you not seen some images that were not marked accordingly?

perhaps its better now.. if so i withdraw my comment.
2159  Other / Meta / Re: how to save bitcointalk account without band ? on: April 27, 2020, 11:34:46 AM
how to save bitcointalk account without band ?

easy

just play lynyrd skynyrd, molly hatchet, pink floyd. at reference level of course.

problem solved.
2160  Other / Meta / Re: Why not spoiler tag? on: April 27, 2020, 11:26:05 AM
If the images benefit and compliment the thread I don't see why they would need to be hidden. I would like to see them without having to click on 4-5 buttons while reading the thread.
A better suggestion would be not to use too large images or too many. And even better then that would be to make it impossible to quote a previously posted image when a user replies to a post. It's so unnecessary. 

considering how .. err.. offensive some images are to some people a spoiler would be nice.

after all many here read with family and kids present.

please note i personally dont care about so called offensive images but it severely limits when i can read the forum depending on the people present.

and no im not some prude or one to censor things. just give warning please.

EDIT: there is a width setting in img tags, that will tame the huge images. IF people learn to use it.
Pages: « 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 ... 249 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!