Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 07:22:26 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ... 233 »
2261  Other / Meta / Re: Seriously? "WARNING: This user is a newbie.." on: November 08, 2015, 01:51:51 AM
Good feature that helps cripple scammers preying on distracted/gullible users through PM.

Plus, it doesn't take much activity to get out of the newbie status anyway.

The Gullible shouldn't really be using the internet if they can believe information sent by a pm from a random stranger they don't know and to hand over money from this!
Can people not just check the activity of a person and their rank to see that they are not a hero member they were expecting a PM from? That's the first think I check when reading amessage, who it was from!

Some people deal with dozens of PM a day, having to manually check everything every time is a lot of work, and not every user that they deal with are users with avatar or with a lot of posts.

Its pretty easy to catch an impersonator this way and it does not affect legit users.

I don't think people realize how many of these attacks there were daily.
2262  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Calculating HW error rate on Antminer C1 and strange ASIC Status on: November 07, 2015, 10:40:24 PM
Hello everyone. This is my first post so you can expect it to be pretty noob. Maybe I'm missing something obvious, or important here, but I can't seem to find the HW number anywhere on my Antminer C1. It's been running for a few days now and mostly everything seems to be fine. The first thing I'm wondering is, where can I find this number? There is an HW category strangely under Pool URLs that says 3. That can't be right can it? Is there some other formula I should be using to find the error rate? As far as I can tell, it should be HW/(diffA+diffR+HW)*100.

Second question is, What's up with the Asic Status? It looks like this:

00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000
 000000 00000000 0

The bottom row is missing one, and is organized strangely. No x's, just a missing 0, and strange spacing. Does this reflect something I should know about?

Thank you for any light you can shed on these issues for me.


0 mean chip is reporting, X mean the chip reporting wrong, but does not automatically mean that it is not working - mean it is not reporting. This at least i can answer.

For the HW, my S1's dont have it on the GUI either, but the information is still there on the miner. Screen -r is not installed on the S1, but maybe it is on the C1 (i have no idea). Simply SSH into the miner with putty.exe, login. Not password could be admin instead of root on certain miner. Then type screen -r. If the package is installed you will see the familiar cgminer window with all the data.

Then if you add the miner to a monitoring software, like M's Miner Monitor, it will also be able to read the data through the miner api and show it to you.

Oh and. Welcome to the forum. Smiley
2263  Other / Meta / Re: Seriously? "WARNING: This user is a newbie.." on: November 07, 2015, 10:36:02 PM
The only people moaning about this are the newbie scammers because its making their scamming difficult.

Well do you know what I say about that. Fuck them they're not welcome here Angry.

True, everyone who have good intentions don't seems to care, takes it as a information and that's all. I think that's what most bothers scammers!
I found that quite annoying when I was a newbie. I am not a scammer or anything but it does leave a large flag up to everyone that I pmmed. Luckily it was very few people. It could at least be in the same size as the message text rather than in the bitcointalk maximum size of 50pt instead of 20pt.

I had no problem doing dealings as and with people with the flag. People will just expect you to do escrow, you'll only gain instant distrust if you refuse escrow, refuse to prove you have the goods with the typical picture + handwritten note.

If anything, there is a certain bias because most of the people with that flag are often people who don't want to follow the etiquette. Those who does lose the flag momentarily.
2264  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: antminer S7 with Corsair PSU on: November 07, 2015, 10:21:50 PM
Good question. On paper it should be able to be powered by the 750PSU, since there are more slots.

Regarding the controller this is new to me. Normally i connect 2 miners to 1 PSU, not the other way around.

I guess you asked bitmain they say no and tell you to buy their PSU. It should be good if they recommend it, however it is an unknown brand to me and when it goes to PSU i rely on server PSU or Corsair.

Please post your answer/ solution here.if you have it. I can bring my oldS3 PSU to use.

It cannot, like i said, you cannot use different PSU for a single board. So to be more precise;

At an estimate 1200W at the wall, to give an idea;

-PSU #1 will need to draw 800W~ (2 boards)
-PSU #2 will need to draw 400W~ (1 board)
-PSU #2 would ideally power the controller as well (which power the fans), it need its own 6 pin, not its own PSU. Total 10 PCI-e pins.

Actual power draw of PSU#1 would be a bit lower, but overall a 750W PSU should probably not be asked to pull this much.

Last thing, if you get a corsair make sure the OEM is Seasonic or Superflower, they have some batches/series that used low quality OEM.

Personally i think i would go with a EVGA G2 1300 with this. Any 1300+ PSU made by Seasonic or Superflower behind whatever brand should do.

This is it, for using 2 PSU on a miner. As far as using a ATX PSU anyways.

With other words i would need 3 PSU's of 2x 750 and 1 of little W. Hmm I think buying an EVGA would be better then.

Can you tell me if this setup will succeed:
-PSU #1 will need to draw 800W~ (2 boards)
-PSU #2 will need to draw 400W~ (1 board)
-PSU #2 would ideally power the controller as well (which power the fans), it need its own 6 pin, not its own PSU. Total 10 PCI-e pins.

PSU 1 Corsair RM 1000W
PSU 2 Corsair CSM 750W



That would work, but i would definitively go for a EVGA G2 1300w instead, cheaper than those 2 PSU combined, better PSU, no risk of having a part not powered at the same time or part of the miner shutting down after a surge.

If you already have them available or are a hardcore fan of picking up PSU of varying OEM, then sure, i guess it'll work anyways.
2265  Other / Meta / Re: Seriously? "WARNING: This user is a newbie.." on: November 07, 2015, 05:10:23 PM
I didn't really mind it much initially either. Took some getting used to. But I didn't mind it much. And I don't mind it now. It may be bothersome to some people. And yes, it isn't really needed.

Yes, it is really needed. I am very small time here, only picking up some small deals from time to time, i don't deal in pricy stuff or anything of significant value, yet 4 persons tried directly to scam me. So imagine how bad it is for bigger players.

I also reported a couples of impersonators that were posting in someone else's thread, impersonating the OP, "reducing the price for a quick deal" and giving a BTC address, then also sometime sending PM to the people who had replied to the thread to raise their changes. The warning is here to prevent mostly this.

Its a necessary evil, one that a new account can get rid of quickly and if you are legit, it does not even apply to you, since it merely say "If you were expecting a veteran user, then this is not that person."
2266  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: s5 board detected oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooo no speed on: November 07, 2015, 04:53:08 PM
Huh
one of my boards has this behavior when it is alone connected to the controller.
when 2 other boards and this one are connected, it is xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx
anybody know what  to do?


Sound like typical dead boards, all my dead boards do the same thing. You can check core voltages to see if the voltage to the chip is good, can try a reflow soldering. To be honest trying to fix a board is kind of a pain, takes time and expertise.

Assuming the PSU and the controller is good, after assessing that, the only thing you can try without expertise is a reflow soldering and then if that does not work, you're better off selling the deadboard and enjoying your 1/2 miner.

oke thanks for the advise Smiley
people buy dead boards?

Yes, people buy dead boards for parts. Unless the board is really damaged, the chips cracked, etc, the board can be salvaged for its components and even chips. Depending on where you are, if in north america or can ship there for cheap, even i would be interested in a cheap one. If elsewhere in the world, some others pick up dead S5 boards as well.
2267  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: s5 board detected oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooo no speed on: November 07, 2015, 08:41:03 AM
Huh
one of my boards has this behavior when it is alone connected to the controller.
when 2 other boards and this one are connected, it is xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx
anybody know what  to do?


Sound like typical dead boards, all my dead boards do the same thing. You can check core voltages to see if the voltage to the chip is good, can try a reflow soldering. To be honest trying to fix a board is kind of a pain, takes time and expertise.

Assuming the PSU and the controller is good, after assessing that, the only thing you can try without expertise is a reflow soldering and then if that does not work, you're better off selling the deadboard and enjoying your 1/2 miner.
2268  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: antminer S7 with Corsair PSU on: November 07, 2015, 07:55:51 AM
Good question. On paper it should be able to be powered by the 750PSU, since there are more slots.

Regarding the controller this is new to me. Normally i connect 2 miners to 1 PSU, not the other way around.

I guess you asked bitmain they say no and tell you to buy their PSU. It should be good if they recommend it, however it is an unknown brand to me and when it goes to PSU i rely on server PSU or Corsair.

Please post your answer/ solution here.if you have it. I can bring my oldS3 PSU to use.

It cannot, like i said, you cannot use different PSU for a single board. So to be more precise;

At an estimate 1200W at the wall, to give an idea;

-PSU #1 will need to draw 800W~ (2 boards)
-PSU #2 will need to draw 400W~ (1 board)
-PSU #2 would ideally power the controller as well (which power the fans), it need its own 6 pin, not its own PSU. Total 10 PCI-e pins.

Actual power draw of PSU#1 would be a bit lower, but overall a 750W PSU should probably not be asked to pull this much.

Last thing, if you get a corsair make sure the OEM is Seasonic or Superflower, they have some batches/series that used low quality OEM.

Personally i think i would go with a EVGA G2 1300 with this. Any 1300+ PSU made by Seasonic or Superflower behind whatever brand should do.

This is it, for using 2 PSU on a miner. As far as using a ATX PSU anyways.
2269  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Confirmed Pay Flucuations on: November 07, 2015, 07:42:25 AM
Been mining Slush for 10 days or so and my confirmed goes to say $2.34 (I have it set in US money) then down to $2.14 then goes back up a few cents I have been off and on tweaking my Bitmain U3's and have had ZOMBIES,,and other such errors as I learned about hotstarts,,,driver issues ect....
Am I fined for my sudden flucuations in Hash Rates.?


No, it does not matter if your hashrate is 10gh within a given hour and 100gh in the next. I'm pretty sure that in a daily thing, you're just being hit by the obligatory payout variance. Look at the dashboard you will see last day luck, etc.

One day the pool simply find X block, on a worse day, the pool find less than X block, hence variance.
2270  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: antminer S7 with Corsair PSU on: November 06, 2015, 10:57:45 PM
Hi everbody,

I want to order the S7 batch 6. Does anyone know it works with 2x Corsair 750CSM PSU's?

Reading the specs it should:
https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694

However i read the controller needs a seperate PSU.

Theres 3 boards with 3 PCI-e each. You can't mix PSU for a board. So you need to power 2 boards off one, 1 board of another, not sure 2 Corsairs is the way to go. The Controller just need to be powered, it does not need a dedicated PSU.

The boards need to be powered before or at the same time as the controller.
2271  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Thoughts on using AM Tubes for heating this winter, any info about undervolting? on: November 06, 2015, 07:03:15 AM
Voltage control on these means pencil modding, or changing resistors, or adding pots.  Can't be done in software.  At least not one that I know of.

I have one that does 300gh@300w.  The BE200 seems to be linear at 1w/GH.

The tube I modded bottomed out at 0.75V.  Below this too many chips where turned off.  Had to change each regulator individually, 8 per board. Tongue

Pen modding would not be a problem, is that actually doable? If someone would kindly point me to the information i need to do this. If not, i'm not very familiar with soldering stuff, but i have a soldering iron, maybe i could do it?
2272  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How many confirmations to be sure about a transaction? on: November 06, 2015, 07:00:11 AM
6 to be absolutely 100% safe.
I agree. for a lesser value transaction a single confirmation has been safe enough. But like its been said for high value transaction, just to be satisfied regarding the risk of reversing, it is better to go for at least five confirmations.
I wouldn't need a confirmation if it has a small value, convenience over security. Still, it is quite secure already to accept a transaction without confirmations. The risk is pretty much close to 0. Any amount of confirmation wouldn't help if an attacker has over 51% of the total network hashrate for an extended period of time.

Yes its not really a risk if its like buying a coffee at the starbuck. And one transaction when you are buying something on the internet should not be a big bother if its something like an full priced AAA game.

And the confirmations that "we" recommend to wait before releasing whatever products is not really about the 51% attack. Its more in case we get a rollback because a split or a bug occurred. Some transactions can disappear when that happen, it did in the past, no idea if it will happen again.
2273  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S5 board gone bad, options on: November 06, 2015, 06:56:22 AM
Honestly the easiest option would be to sell it as a one blade miner and someone will probably pick it up for ~200$ and just use the funds to help purchase a fully working unit.

No way.  I see no more S5's for sale by Bitmain.  To sell this perfectly working board running at half speed for money toward somebody else's 2 board castoff that in all probability would be a can of worms and nothing but headaches is not a smart idea.  If an S5 is working good who in their right mind would sell?

Okay so you have 3/4th a miner, not 1/2 of a miner. Would be more than 200$.

And replacing the board is strait forward and the go to solution when you have a dead board. But your is... half dead. Sound like it could go at any time. But not necessarily worth swapping it out yet, if the miner also run at the proper 3/4th of the power consumption.

Anyways the boards don't work together or anything, they are completely individual, they are merely two different miner running on one cgminer, so you can run 1, 2, 3 or 4 (or more) on a controller, you can even hack together a way to connect them through USB to use a miner on another OS to run them.

So buying a good board is exactly the same as buying a used complete S5.
2274  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: good places to hide paper wallet ? on: November 06, 2015, 06:47:41 AM
You could also use a bitkee.



You wont have any trouble with water or fire. All you need more is a safe place to hide it. It isn't that big so you could hide it anywhere you want.

I would not say no problem with fire.  It seems that if a long fire hits it that metal might have some issues.  It looks like a slim card like metal slab.

So I would predict at a certain point it would burn/char.  But yes it's better then a piece of paper for sure.

I`d say keep all your precious stuff in a metal box.

If the house catches fire, you grab it and run out. Or just leave it there, since it wont burn down like the rest of the house.
Some metals do melt after being in high temperatures for a long time. That titanium wallet isn't the best solution. It is so small and you probably will have a hard time finding it from all the rubble and things could have melted and tainted it, making the characters and QR code hard to decipher.

The metal card in a fire-retardant safe would not be a bad bet and fairly easy to find. Otherwise, i'm not sure. The card would not melt but the ink on it would and the metal would be dark and singed, so possibly erasing the information on it one way or another?

Regardless, i think you should engrave a very valuable key on metal, and then put it somewhere fire cant really destroy it, like in a safe or in the basement somewhere fire can't get around.
2275  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Mining when the Bitcoin value goes up on: November 06, 2015, 06:43:30 AM
I live in Quebec and pay my electricity 8.6 CAD/Kwh. I've been reading about mining a lot this week and I'm seriously thinking buying an S7 now lite (maybe there are better options). They currently ship these units 17th December + 5 days (not late delay)

I'm totally afraid that difficulty will increase by a good factor during these waiting days and killing all profitability. If my calculations are good, at constant BTC, I would break even if difficulty increases steadily by 5%. Does a steady 5% make sense?

Halving that is coming before my projected ROI is another factor...

Any advices?


First of all, the rumored S7 lite was a 2 board design, which is not what we're looking at with the S7 "now lighter", just to point out what i meant by one and the other. The now lighter S7 seem overpriced to me, it is the same price as what the default S7 was. So an actual S7 light, or one with 2 boards that does 3.5TH/s could be more attractive.

Then the 5% seem unlikely for any amount of prolonged time, if it does it would probably be because BTC keep going up at the rate it is. Also don't put all your hopes on ROI'ing a S7 solely on the current BTC price, it could go down.

Since we have cheap electricity here, your rate seem to mean you're mining at home counting the rate after the first 30 kWhs in a day, i think a better miner for you would be the S5, or maybe even a S3 depending on the profitability of the next 3 months and how much you can get them for.

Do the math, but i doubt the S7 would be better for you than a S5 at a acceptable price, by quite a fair margin.
2276  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Remote Management on: November 06, 2015, 06:35:19 AM
Hold on but I still don't have any monitoring software that allows me to power down remotely?

Just looked at CGwatcher but it's dead in the water.

The software i am am pointing you at is CGRemote.
CGwatcher is a watchdog program for a localhost miner so not exactly what you want.

But CGRemote is a paid software, also i'm a bit surprised you're saying Cryptoglance does not have a remote shutdown command. Anyways i tried cgremote and it mostly worked (not very will with the S1's) but it is (or was) paid software

With TeamViewer, you can connect to your miners as if you were there locally and enter the kill cgminer command in terminal. So if your miners are overheating or whatever, the miner software will stop, so the controller will idle(power down the chips) until you tell it to restart mining or reboot it.
2277  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Thoughts on using AM Tubes for heating this winter, any info about undervolting? on: November 06, 2015, 04:11:34 AM
Hey Virosa,

I'll include some extra rosewill 120mm fans for it.  The factory fans are REALLY annoying, push-pull is the way to go with these but you may have to replace the main fans.

Sidehack I remember you posting a flat efficiency chart over a large frequency chart?

Aweh man, you're the best, thanks. Cheesy
I intend on running them with the outside hair blowing in them to cool them off for a while but when it get colder, i thought it would be nice to mess around with volt, especially for efficiency.

I spent some time starting to plot curves, but to get the kind of data I wanted was taking forever and I had other stuff to do.

I do have three Tubes running right now, undervolted to about 0.73 and 180MHz. I couldn't get much stable below 730mV but it could have been a software limitation. I only spent one evening testing what I currently have running.

Does that mean the machine take -vddc voltage command or such? Because gaining a bit of efficiency i could run 2 or 3 on one 15a 120v, would be nice. So if the machine has a easy way to down volt, that would be very nice.
2278  Bitcoin / Hardware / Thoughts on using AM Tubes for heating this winter, any info about undervolting? on: November 06, 2015, 01:31:32 AM
I been trying to find information about this, the most relevant post i found was sidehack saying he would try to hack it, see what the efficiency it gets at different voltage and would then post the performance sheets at different voltage, i did not see any followup to this.

I dont feel like bothering Sidehack in private, so does anyone have information about this miner's design that could allow me to undervolt it?
2279  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitcoincore wallet fee on: November 06, 2015, 01:26:27 AM
I would say 0.001.

That is what I have it set to.
I would say that's quite high Grin It's usually 0.0001 but to guarantee it gets into the next block 0.001 it's fine too
This 0.001 is very high  0.0001 take time so I mostly go with 0.0002 and 0.0003 and its works for me very quickly

I use, and recommend to go at 0.00011 per kB. Its a tad higher than default so you have better odds of getting confirmed, i don't really like waiting long times for confirmations. Right now 0.00008 per Kb is being recommended as the cheapest that still get you confirmed.
But i don't like to change it all the time so instead i just leave it at slightly above average and only  change it to higher during spam attacks.

Cointape that was recommended many time already is a good source if you want the math to be done for you.
The default differs between client to client. The minimum for a paid transaction fee is 5000 satoshi as it is the default relay fee as of Bitcoin Core 0.11.0.  During spam attacks, I used 0.0001BTC as a fee and I didn't find any problem getting it included in the block. If the spam attack uses lower fees such as 5000 satoshi, 0.0001BTC fee would be more than sufficient.

I put 0.00125 and it gets comfirmed really quick, 10 minutes or so for 1 comfirmation, 30 minutes for 3 comfirmation aproximately, maybe less time
That's a tad too high. If a block doesn't get mined, you would have to wait longer till it gets mined to stand a chance to eg a confirmation. After the first confirmation, any other block after that will gain you another.

Hmm, well i guess, i've used Multibit, Multibit HD and Greenaddress, though Greenaddress also has a auto-calculate fee thing that is pretty nice. Since we're talking about Bitcoin core here then yeah true. 0.0001 just seem very standard so i mislabeled it as "default".
2280  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Oct 11 to Nov 11 Sidehack stick pool club. on: November 06, 2015, 01:18:47 AM
I hope that our club / pool finds a block.  That would be really cool to see and be part of.

so far no but My act of good karma for fredi has resulted in a block

https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=763510.msg12850655#msg12850655

Well congratulation, i seem to understand you will be splitting half and half with him. 12.5BTC could buy a lot of Sidehack sticks/pods Wink

no ⅓ spilt as a third party saw what I did and said if my shot missed he would play using my address.  which was really amazing some one would see what I did and add to it.   So he hit the block with my address and we will three way spilt the block and of course give ck a tip.  So my kind act  + a follow up by another got 3 people to have 8.4 btc a piece and ck 0.32 btc tip.

Once I  spilt the coins I will be sure to donate to the next round here so maybe it can multiply again.

I see, still nice. I hope you got yourself an extra permanent S7 for the trouble. I kinda feel like we're leeching off you a tiny bit here since you put so much toward the club, so hopefully you get a return here for your troubles.

With BTC jumping I don't have a problem going to 40 next cycle.  I like that we limit it where it is some fun for everyone.  But with Europe just getting sticks I don't want to leave all of them out.   I think 40 will be pretty high side of what we should go. 

I think this club idea is a good one.  So I'm hoping we are able to do a Pod club (once they release) and a Compac club.   I don't know if there is enough but a U3 club could be interesting if there was the people, crazy guy's custom R1 firmware has actually made it very stable on U3.

Thank you for thinking of us Europeans! I'm still messing around with mine at the moment but would be up for a place in the next round.

should start on Nov 11th  we will bump to 40 from 30

Sound good for 40 days runs.

runs stay 11th to 11th of each month.  But we have at least 4 more looking to join. 

I meant 30 slots goes to 40 slots.

should still be a decent prize .3 btc is just about 111 usd


Ah okay, that sound good too. Still would not mind longer runs but then again i guess it doesn't matter. Or A faster cycle would allow quicker update on spot closed and spot opened.

Maybe we should set a rule that if you go AWOL for X time your spot become available to someone else.
Pages: « 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ... 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!