I prefer my pepes on the Bitcoin blockchain tyvm..
Yes better waiting 20 hours for confirming instead 1 Minute like on eth for sure.. forces better decisions..
|
|
|
I prefer my pepes on the Bitcoin blockchain tyvm..
|
|
|
I'd be trying passwords all day if I was you..
|
|
|
If they listened they would be in very healthy profits right now and continuing, sky still the limit..
|
|
|
dead or alive.. all thats going to happen is, if satoshi was to move his coins.. the core devs will proclaim that its some doomsday D-wave machine that has hacked the satoshi keys. and core will get pools to not accept the tx's into blocks and instead core will enable their satoshi stash prunning event.
Are you serious? Is that really a thing? I say if Satoshi wants to dump his coins let him, even encourage him.. He deserves them..
|
|
|
stuff can be rolled back .......... So you want a president, remove the 21mm coin hard cap, and now just throw immutability out the window too.. Don't worry if our code is shit, we have enough hash to just rewrite the blockchain.. Might as well grab satoshi's coins while your at it.. WTF over... Guess you didn't/don't believe in Ethereum either. Anything else? For anything more than a prototype heck no.. Guess you don't believe in immutability and capped inflation.. Have fun with your altcoin..
|
|
|
stuff can be rolled back .......... So you want a president, remove the 21mm coin hard cap, and now just throw immutability out the window too.. Don't worry if our code is shit, we have enough hash to just rewrite the blockchain.. Might as well grab satoshi's coins while your at it.. WTF over...
|
|
|
SATOSHI wanted 1 MB blocks, not 2MB or unlimited block-size.
Are you sure about that? Iirc I'm pretty sure he started with something much more than that and even said that it should be adjusted when needed..
|
|
|
Aware of it but not 100% comfortable using an exchange like that.
Are their any exchanges you are 100% comfortable with? Not me.. I'd say that I am the most comfortable with my coins on TUX actually because I have gotten to know the owners very well, I know their names, where they live, what they drive, and what their motivations are.. Notice that TUX is 100% built and funded by the owners/operators themselves and they are not desperate for their exchange to explode in volume as fast as possible, they don't need the exchange to make them profits quickly because they both have very well paying jobs in technology.. It's a work of passion not greed.. As explained I'm not fond of tuxexchange
Could you maybe expand on why that is so whatever the problem is can be communicated to them so their can be an attempt to resolve the issue? TUX is extremely interested in user feedback and recommendations for improvements.. DTB is putting down good volume on TUX, it's a nice market to flip..
|
|
|
LINK BROKEN TO DOWNLOAD THE WALLET WINDOWS
You really just blindly download whatever new wallet you see? How many times have you been hacked?
|
|
|
Peter R charlatan seems more likely to be a government shill as we've speculated the first time he showed up on a Bitcoin conference. He looked phony from day.
BTU recap: 1) Emergent consensus -> more power to the miners -> more centralization. 2) President of BTU & BTU federation. 3) Inflation non-zero, a.k.a. remove the 21 million limit.
Whoever doesn't see something *seriously* wrong here, especially in point 3, you need to get a 'reality check'. If anything is going to kill Bitcoin (from this list), then it is most certainly point 3.
Yeah, that does it for me.. I could never in a million years support that point 3.. No way..
|
|
|
I think that everyone sitting here calling Ver all sorts of names is quite disrespectful, quite the same as a bunch of libtards running around calling Trump a racist child molester, have some respect...
As far as signing an address with over 40k BTC, well, if I had that much BTC I highly doubt I would have it stored that centralized in a single address. I would probably have it distributed in a bunch of cold addresses containing 100-1000 BTC each..
I think it would be nice for Ver to sign a staked address of some sort with acceptance of the deal proving it's him and making it official, but what reason do any of you really have to doubt that it is Ver himself and not an impostor?
I opined that I don't think Ver will take the deal because I don't think it's a good deal for him, I think it is likely he could do better on the open market, but this deal being done by Ver and Loaded, plus anyone else that wants to join, is very good for Bitcoion ad BU.. If this amount of BTC/BTU can be swapped off market that is a whole lot less of each that will get dumped after the split helping both retain more value after the fact which is good for me because I'll probably just sit on my private keys for a while and see what happens, so this many coins out of the hands of dumpers is very good for my strategy..
Here's a lot of respect to both Loaded and Ver for their displays of conviction.. If I was Ver I might leave you all hanging on a string too, let the haters hate and just make me more famous, tease em for a bit..
Myself I don't think I personally stand with either BU or Segwit, I think they both have their merits and it's a shame they can't come together and implement both IMO.. I don't really want to see big blocks but no new tech, or new tech and not bigger blocks, I would much rather see bigger blocks without a hardcoded limit AND new tech.. I think a hardcoded blocksize limit is far from ideal as it pretty much guarantees another fight over a fork sometime in the future when we again need to scale.. LN, great, but I don't see that being very good for the average user like me..
It is what it is, I just hope you all pull your heads out of your asses before you destroy this grand experiment..
|
|
|
As much as people hate on BTU, there's a risk of the chain surviving. Exchanging your coins for one chain is a high risk move that could leave you penniless.
Their may be a correlation between people that own crypto and are willing to take risks.. Maybe because investing in any of this could leave you penniless.. Like the OP and Ver, sitting on that much BTC, that's a massive risk right there by itself.. I think us bitcoiners are risk takin dudes in general..
|
|
|
What I am seeing is that with the price of BTC going up, these coins relative value against BTC is going down because people are pricing the collectors value of these coins in dirty fiat rather than BTC..
So my casascius .5 is only worth like .7-.75 BTC (if that) now rather than the .8 I paid for it because the additional value in fiat has remained almost the same but BTC being worth more I'm taking a haircut on my invested amount of BTC..
I did not expect the value of these things to be so closely tied to fiat rather than BTC and am a bit disappointed..
Everyone is rushing to dump their coins while they can still get the most BTC out of them, especially when it looked like BTC was going to moon.. So, the market is getting flooded with sellers likely further decreasing even the collector value in fiat related terms also..
They took a big hit just before china hit 8888.. "Here comes $10k better dump these coins"..
|
|
|
This may not matter anyway, I'm having trouble verifying the signature. So likely troll fake.
Addy holds aprox 40k BTC..
|
|
|
I think you would if your offer involved some profit for him, like above the current rate.. I'm not so sure anyone holding 40BTC would want to just sell like that and if they did they would probably choose a better way of doing it, unless they have a reason to need a cash deal..
|
|
|
|