Yes, everyone has the right to believe you're full of shit, if they choose. 


It's always such elaborate excuses and sob stories with you, elmanchez.  Full of tragedy and hardships.  I bet the reality is that you still live in your mom's basement and she makes your bed every morning.


Who wants to waste time, effort, and money to schedule a meeting with someone they're convinced is a scammer?  Do you really expect anyone to care that much about proving you wrong?  If so, that makes you rather narcissistic.  Sorry to burst you're bubble, but when I'm in Thailand next year, the last thing I care to do is waste any of my time on you.  And one more thing, I still think you're lying about your location is really doesn't matter.


You're entitled to your opinion, and others are free to disagree.


It's never about the amount or the need when we're talking about kleptomania.

Well, this all looks settled to me.  Unless I forgot something, please let me know.

1) Spot lockup deadline: 3 Weeks (7 votes in favor)

2) date of draft day: Sunday, September 3rd (7 participants agree)

3) Accept Yahoo and Seek3r into joining the league? Yes (7 votes in favor)

4) Keep Hueristic as Commish? Yes (7 votes in favor)

5) Keep DireWolfM14 as treasurer? Yes (6 votes in favor)

6) should we go into debating and voting for rule changes before the player list is set and dues are collected?: Yes (7 votes in favor)

---

---

Now for something completely different; a man with more questions:

1. For what time do you prefer to schedule the draft?  I vote for ~12:00 UTC and later, or 05:00 UTC and earlier.

2. Get rid of kickers?  NO!

3. Change waiver order to reverse standings?  Yes.*

---

*This isn't such a big deal to me, really.  I don't mind keeping things the way they are, so consider this a soft vote.  The way things were last year certainly didn't hurt Hueristic, he was doing horribly at the start of the season, and made a ton of smart moves despite the random waiver order.

I just think that "reverse standings" could help keep the league more competitive, and it's worth trying for a year.

---

---

I think it's fair to allow yahoo62278 and seek3r to vote on the above questions.

Bitcoin as a decentralized network, for the people, by the people should provide as many options as possible to make it easy for all types to use.  So, no it should not force TOR onto it's users.  Some folks will require more privacy than others, such as those who live where bitcoin is banned, but others who don't need the IP privacy should be able to use faster, less congestive, more accessible networks.  As mocacinno said, there're other ways to maintain privacy, since no one can determine if a node originated the transaction or merely broadcast it.  Especially if a node has both, clearnet and TOR enabled.

The sad truth is that most people who were born after 1985 have no clue what privacy really looks like, and couldn't care less about it.  They're used to living in world with cameras everywhere, including one in every pocket of every human they encounter.  Geezers such as myself are still distrustful and skeptical of the Surveillance States that have taken over the majority of our national governments.  But that doesn't mean I won't troll them.  So, unlike o_e_l_e_o I have one node server running both clearnet and TOR, but I never transmit any transactions over that node.  

I run two other nodes purely over TOR; one is my desktop hot wallet, and another server for SPV services.  So, whether I use Electrum, or just transact through my Bitcoin wallet, I know that my transactions are likely to be routed through TOR.  I say "likely" because there is a chink in my armor; all three are configured with addnode to connect to each other using my local LAN IPs, so in reality I don't know which of the three is going to broadcast my transactions to the rest of the network.  But that's a decision I made fully conscious of the risks, and it's something I can change in about 30 seconds.

So, why do I want to troll my government?  They deserve it, and should be put on notice!  The Federal Reserve is a leading cause of corruption within our economic structure (banks are too big to fail? WTF) and facilitates the federal government's overreach of power.  Not to mention it's unconstitutional.  

So yeah, bitches!  I'm using bitcoin every chance I get.

Lol, I think he just locked down the account and left in a tizzy.  Don't worry, he'll be back in a couple of days, if that.  He can't get enough of this place.  Usually he starts another account before abandoning his red-tagged ones, so he may already be posting as I type.

This latest debacle makes his personal text ironic to the point of being absolutely hilarious.

 

Why did you ask LoyceV to leave that tag in the first place?  Trying a bit hard to fit in?

1) Spot lockup deadline: 2 or 3 weeks

2) date of draft day: Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, but Wednesday is too late.

3) Vote on Yahoo and Seek3r joining the league? Yes

4) Keep Hueristic as Commish? Yes

5) Keep DireWolfM14 as treasurer? Abstain

6) should we go into debating and voting for rule changes before the player list is set and dues are collected?: Yes

1. Draw 1-1
2. 43'
3. 3
4. DireWolf

Whoa, how have I missed this month-old post?  IIRC you sent out some PMs last year, no?

Anyway, I'll pay up this weekend, but count me in.

1. Nottingham Forest

2. Wolverhampton Wanderers

3. San Francisco 49ers (but I'd settle for the San Jose Earthquakes if we can't pick a real football team) 

4. Southampton vs. Leeds United (September 30th)

a.  SPFC
b.  1-0
c.  SPFC
d.  Under
e.  No
f.  68'

11. Cory Sandhagen
10. Tatiana Suarez
09. Kennedy Nzechukwu
08. Diego Lopes
07. Tanner Boser
06. Ignacio Bahamondes
05. Kyler Phillips
04. Jeremiah Wells
03. Billy Quarantillo
02. Jake Hadley
01. Asu Almabaev

NOT go the Full Distance: 2

1.  Paul
2.  UD
3.  2
4.  Paul

It's not a problem at all.  As I said, it would be problematic if Hhampuz's review somehow mentioned the accusation or refuted it, but the review makes no mention of the scam accusation.


He's not going to get the details, so forget about it.  If Rollbit was your casino would you disclose sensitive data to some anonymous guy on the internet?  Even if he was responsible for promoting my business, I would protect as much information about my organization as jealously as possible.  Need to know basis, and Hhampuz doesn't need to know shit.  

And, you and I will have to disagree about whether that's interference or not.  Would Hhampuz's review prevent me from red-tagging the account if I felt there was sufficient evidence of scamming?  No, it would not.


That's exactly the right thing to do.  There's no more evidence of a scam than there is of no scam.  His experience with the team behind Rollbit is more significant than anyone else's on this forum, so why would we discount his assessment of their character?  You're jumping to the conclusion that he's trying to protect his client or his income, but I've known Hhampuz for too long to believe he would compromise his ethics in that way.


Lol, some people got their panties in a wad about 1xBit, but I'm not one of them.  Yeah, 1xBit got a lot of bad reviews and you know what they say about smoke and fire, but I've yet to see enough evidence to say that they are definitely scammers.  Their reviews were enough to keep me away.  And don't look to me to justify all the frivolous tagging of 1xBit sig-campaigners that went on around here.  That's JollyGood's job.

Quoted and signed message verified.

---

Doh!  Thanks, I don't know what caused me to overlook that when I first saw your post.

The review is accurate from his perspective, the timing is irrelevant.  If he had written something excusing the scam accusation that would be different.  

Hhampuz has already stated that in his opinion the accusation is without merit.  He has no evidence to counter the accusation because Rollbit hasn't shared it with him.  It would be a breach of Rollbit's and their client's privacy to share that information with Hhampuz.  Sharing any personal or proprietary information with anyone on this forum (even the campaign manager) would be irresponsible of Rollbit, and likely a violation of their information protection policy.

I can only assume that Hhampuz added his review to the account that was red-tagged to counter the negative review, as you suggest.  However, as long as the review is accurate and pertinent to his interaction with the account I don't see it as a problem.  We're all human, and to me it's not only acceptable, but noble and loyal that he took it upon himself to counter a negative review he felt was based solely on speculation.  This is a client with which he's had years of experience, and his decision to defend their reputation by including himself as "character witness" isn't suspicious to me at all, even if was only to counter the negative review.

To prove that you are the real BitcoinGirl.Club you really should sign a message using your previous key or a staked bitcoin address.  Anyone who hacks an account could make a post such as this one, but only you should have access to those private keys. 

That was literally the first thing the OP addressed.


What are you doing now?


Is there an echo in here?

Why do you guys care if the OP used a throwaway account?  The issue brought up by the OP was a good one.  He had a concern, asked the question, and got the answer from the community.  I'm not defending the OP, HH's review is perfectly justified, in my opinion.  This thread was valuable until about post 17, so now it's just going to be filled with spammers attacking the OP's choice to use an alt?  Don't you guys have better things to do?

Really, it's as if you guys are on que, making the case for the OP's choice and his first comment.

The issue here isn't that the OP used an alt (which was smart for obvious reasons,) but whether HH's review was unjustified, and whether Rollbit is scamming it's clients.  The status of the account who brought up the issue is meaningless.

1. Excellent.
2. Sketchy.
3. $4?
4. Can't wait.


So, every time I borrow and payback a loan (with interest,) I can them borrow twice the amount next time?  That's great.  I'll borrow $4 today, and payback $4.004 worth of TRX tomorrow (that's the principle plus 0.1% interest, your daily rate.)  Once I pay back tomorrow I'll borrow $8, and pay back $8.008 on Monday.  I'll keep this up for the next thirty days, at which point I'll have developed enough credit to borrow $4.3 billion worth of TRX.  This is the best service EVER!  Please, please let's start now.  I mean really, what could go wrong?

Sorry for your loss.

Care if I ask which wallet(s) you used to access this account?


So, the first question you should be asking yourself is who knew you were about to receive the large deposit.  Obviously you don't want to answer that here.

I have some questions:

1. What's required to open a line of credit?
2. Do you have a secure web portal where I can login and manage my account?
3. Is there a minimum or maximum limit to what I can borrow?
4. When will the official Telegram link be ready?


Indeed.