The fact that those guys like it doesn't make me like it more But please write about it, in the end the majority of the users will decide anyway. (I am used to typing EUR already anyway as I have no Euro-sign on my keyboard, currently I am doing the same for BTC). Yea, I will still use BTC and it is impossible to erase BTC from the history of Bitcoin (lol) but I believe we should start making things easier for the community and newcomers, and I figure what better place to start than the very symbol we use?
|
|
|
I don't like it
Thanks for sharing! Look for the article explaining it better in the next issue of Bitcoin Magazine and on the website. Here are just a few public supporters for the change: Business Supporters Site Adoption Tier Bitcoin Magazine http://bitcoinmagazine.net 1st SafeBit http://www.safebit.com 1st WalletBit http://www.walletbit.com 1st ResponsePay https://responsepay.com/ 1st Slush's Pool http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ 1st Cheaper in Bitcoins http://cheaperinbitcoins.com 1st Starcraft Bitcoin Open http://www.sc2btc.com/ 1st BitStamp http://bitstamp.net 1st Pos-A-Doll http://posadoll.com 1st DCAO http://dcao.org 1st AnonymousAds http://anonymousads.com 1st Bitcurex https://bitcurex.com/ 1st Crowncloud VPS http://crowncloud.net 1st Private Internet Access™ https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/ 1st Apollo Digital Goods http://apollodigitalgoods.com 1st BitVOIP http://www.bitvoip.info 1st StuffExists http://stuffexists.com 1st Bitcoin Advertising http://bitcoinadvertising.com/ 1st h33t Torrents http://h33t.com/ 1st Bit-Pay http://bit-pay.com 2nd Coinabul http://coinabul.com 2nd Blockchain http://blockchain.info 2nd Bitonic http://bitonic.nl/ 2nd Cacascius Coins http://casascius.com 3rd Strike Sapphire https://strikesapphire.com/ 3rd CryptoXChange http://cryptoxchange.com 3rd
Personal Advocates Contact Matthew N. Wright matthew@bitcoinmagazine.co.uk Eli Sklar eli.sklar@gmail.com Mihai Alisie mihai@bitcoinmagazine.co.uk Vladimir Marchenko vladimir@bitcoinmagazine.co.uk Vitalik Buterin vitalik@bitcoinmagazine.co.uk Marek Palatinus info@bitcoin.cz Willem van Rooyen info@sc2btc.com Marius van Voorden Nuntius.Marii@Gmail.com Brian Santos itmanbrian@gmail.com Burt Wagner burt.wagner@gmail.com Pim Muilwijk bitsmithnl@gmail.com Stefan Thomas ~ Andrew Lee realrasengan@gmail.com Daniel Smith dslokk@hotmail.com David Schwartz davidjoelschwartz@gmail.com Jan Moller jan.moller@gmail.com Jonathan Ryan Owens jro@ringcoin.com Erik Voorhees erikvoorhees@gmail.com Richard Vialoux maplesyrupghost@bitcointrading.com Colin Dean @colindean Jean-Francois Arseneau jf.arseneau@gmail.com
Application Site Adoption Tier BitcoinSpinner https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.miracleas.bitcoin_spinner&hl=en 1st
|
|
|
The thing i have a problem with athiesm is that its just basically anti-everything considering its not a philosophy, or a view point or a practice or anything its just "anti-" everything really...I don't really understand the point of declaring your self anti-everything, sounds like pure rebellion but then again their is no view point or atheism or philosophy so by definition its not rebellion its just "not" religious/spiritual practice,but in action athiests seem to just be rebal against everything(even though I have heard some athiests mention Altruism, i've never heard an atheist declare a anything that would back up any thoughts on how atheism is purely to condone to altruism scince that is no inline with their beliefs considering they don't believe in anything or have any practices or agree with culture) So questions are going to be flawed when you compare it to stuff that is "anti-anti-" of atheism http://www.atheism-analyzed.net/Atheist%20Talking%20Points%20what%20is%20atheism.htmA good link i think that clears up meh thoughts I see you one one-sided argument website and raise you wikipedia commons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AtheismAtheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1][2] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[3][4][5] Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.[4][5][6][7] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[8][9] which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.[9][10] Please check your FUD at the door, thanks.
|
|
|
Good idea!
I guess I should start the Korean one. Facebook isn't popular in Korea just yet but it can't hurt!
|
|
|
I should sign up for a gax account there and purchase some bitcains.
|
|
|
is being an atheist a religion?
My favorite youtube channel of all time: http://www.youtube.com/user/nonstampcollectorIf atheism is a "religion",...
then Not Collecting Stamps is a "hobby".
If atheism is a "religion", ...
then Not Playing Football is a "sport".
If atheism is a "religion", ...
then 'OFF' is a "TV channel".
If atheism is a "religion", ...
then "Abstinence" is a "sex position".
|
|
|
This is where I found out about Ƀ.
And how did you know about bitcointalk? Google. I was searching for digital currencies to use on my social network project (which is still under construction even a year later), stumbled upon RipplePay, scrunched my face up hard not knowing what that was all about, moved to the next link and fell in love.* Although the next link was Japanese tentacle porn, I found out about the forums when it was forums.bitcoin.org and never looked back.
|
|
|
This is where I found out about Ƀ.
|
|
|
Oh look, Atlas's lack of creativity strikes again. Good god Atlas, get a clue.
|
|
|
Sorry if this has already been answered elsewhere, but I only skimmed the other thread, when can we expect #2 at our doorsteps?
I'll quote the website on that one. Readers should expect 1-4 weeks for delivery. Delivery may vary depending on country. Free shipping on all orders!
|
|
|
Vladimir Marchenko our Executive Editor has posted a thread already, but I think it was more useful as a progress report thread and did not make it clear (at least by the title) that issue #2 and #3 are now for sale. This is a quick update on status of Bitcoin Magazine.
We have firm date of release of DRM free digital edition of Bitcoin Magazine #1 to our subscribers. It will be done on 6th of August 2012.
We are also working on making Bitcoin Magazine issue #1 digital edition available on various mobile devices including at least iPad and Android marketplaces.
Release schedule for printed and digital issues was altered due to scheduling requirements of our distribution contract with B&N. This was unfortunate and should have been expected, but as mentioned earlier it was our first time releasing something to a distribution company.
We expect issue #2 to start shipping in the second half of August 2012.
We expect issue #3 to be available in some Barnes & Noble stores in September 2012. While we do not have firm data on B&N order yet we expect that issue #3 will have very limited availability in stores, 10 copies or less per store.
Negotiations are in progress to have Bitcoin Magazine on shelves of WH Smith (UK) and Walmart starting October - November 2012.
Thanks to the strong feedback from our subscribers on lost and delayed shipments and helpful feedback about print quality of Bitcoin Magazine issue #1 we have dramatically changed our print and logistics processes. Starting from issue #2 we print Bitcoin Magazine in UK with a very reputable partner and using significantly higher quality paper and print processes. We also have changed shipping process significantly. The changes made shall ensure quick and reliable magazine delivery to our subscribers, worldwide.
The pricing of the magazine has been changed. Starting with issue #2 the cover price for printed edition will be 8.88$ (USD) or local currency equivalent worldwide. This means price increase for US customers and slightly lower prices for the rest of the world. There will be discounts for bundles of 3, 6 and 12 month subscriptions.
Please note that due to distribution related print schedule shift, advertisers looking to place ads in issue #3 (the one that is scheduled to be sold via Barnes & Noble) should contact us immediately. There are still a few days to place ads in issues #2 and #3, but after August 6th this will not be possible.
As always, thank you for your support as a community. You have made Bitcoin Magazine a success!
Speaking purely aesthetically, Issue #1 was a deep kiss.
In looking at the next 2 issues I am editing right now, Issue #2 is dry humping and Issue #3 is double penetration.
I have never been prouder to be a part of this orgasmic magazine. See you guys at the conference. We'll be signing special editions there and broadcasting a feed for the people who couldn't attend.
TL;DR? Bitcoin Magazine Issue #2 and Issue #3 are now available for purchase!
|
|
|
then get the fuck off of my thread
Zhou: Remember when you personally told me that I would get my money back?
|
|
|
Speaking purely aesthetically, Issue #1 was a deep kiss.
In looking at the next 2 issues I am editing right now, Issue #2 is dry humping and Issue #3 is double penetration.
I have never been prouder to be a part of this orgasmic magazine. See you guys at the conference. We'll be signing special editions there and broadcasting a feed for the people who couldn't attend.
|
|
|
Have to love these forums. How did my thread descend into an argument about an IRC trading system?
Bitcoin is full of ideas and people anxious to share them. It's hard to be focused sometimes.
|
|
|
Okay, so the Mods and the Admins are really nothing more than the great unwashed hoi polloi like the rest of us but they get shiny user titles. The board is funded, in part, by those donations, so you are volunteers laboring for a system that is, in part, funded by questionable source. Personally I don't take issue with any of you, even when I have been rightly or wrongly disciplined, its the nature of a beast like this forum. But, please don't ask any body to believe that there is not a wider sense of tolerance for significant donators.
Uhh, isn't Chaang a donator? VIP even? Please don't make me prove you wrong. *pulls a list of donators he has verbally raped* Here, I'll help you out: https://bitcointalk.org/donate.html <-- a complete list of donators and VIPs Thanks! Let's go through the list: casascius - called him a loser, said he was ruining bitcoin for making Casascius coins and taking away from their validity of bitcoin (and confusing newbies) and for making a POS that I think will never be used ever. zhoutong - I've told him he's an asshole for fighting with Ken and throwing a tantrum where he posted a thread here about how Cryptoxchange was lying about their stats without even talking to Ken about it first, proved him wrong, then he retracted it like a child and didn't even apologize correctly. Goat - I've told him he's an annoying prick after he wasted my time, confused everything in his order, acted like a 60 year old grandma who's never used a computer before, made veiled threats and strutted his bruised ego around like a moron. Blitzboom - I've argued with him in depth about bitcoinica and whether it is good or not and shared quite a few insults with him shakaru - I've called him a fucktard and gotten in many arguments on the forum about him and his personal lack of business skills, to which he replied "You're a running joke" and referred to me as hitler in some context. DeathAndTaxes - This stupid mother fucker used to be cool in my eyes, but then flipped the bitch switch on for no apparent reason. I'll give him a chance to change his mind later, but I'm pretty sure he's one of those "old man" style cocksuckers that isn't worth having on your side. Boss - This is Atlas. Please dont' make me talk about that faggot as the conversation will result in reasons for why his mom should have aborted him. aurumxchange - This is Roberto, who thinks through intimidation that he can cover up his mistakes (which he's learning doesn't work). We have yet to end our little squabble because he's avoiding all the right questions. bccasino - Basically running an illegal website with a history of defrauding users and although I haven't -fought with him- at all, we've had a run in on this very issue that I was vocal about regardless of his "status". Unfortunately that's about all I can remember for now. I'd like to say that -most- of these little hissyfits were misunderstandings, me being too aggressive at a time I didn't understand the intentions of people and hadn't really gotten my hand on the community, and basically felt threatened easily by anyone and everyone. Things changes after that to just getting on people's nerves for shits and giggles. Now however, I'm a bit more sewious and typically only drill someone when I truly believe they're doing something wrong. Btw, I have fought numerous times with Theymos as well and think that his ridiculous claim that I was a "scammer" deserves a swift punch to the face, but we've agreed to disagree. There, that's my proof that no matter what someone's status, I speak my mind. Next mod's turn! P.S. In Bruno style, I reserve the right to delete this post later if I think it causes the above listed members unnecessary hurty touchy feelings.Too late, I quoted it. Me too! Now we're quote buddies!
|
|
|
Okay, so the Mods and the Admins are really nothing more than the great unwashed hoi polloi like the rest of us but they get shiny user titles. The board is funded, in part, by those donations, so you are volunteers laboring for a system that is, in part, funded by questionable source. Personally I don't take issue with any of you, even when I have been rightly or wrongly disciplined, its the nature of a beast like this forum. But, please don't ask any body to believe that there is not a wider sense of tolerance for significant donators.
Uhh, isn't Chaang a donator? VIP even? Please don't make me prove you wrong. *pulls a list of donators he has verbally raped* Here, I'll help you out: https://bitcointalk.org/donate.html <-- a complete list of donators and VIPs Thanks! Let's go through the list: casascius - called him a loser, said he was ruining bitcoin for making Casascius coins and taking away from their validity of bitcoin (and confusing newbies) and for making a POS that I think will never be used ever. zhoutong - I've told him he's an asshole for fighting with Ken and throwing a tantrum where he posted a thread here about how Cryptoxchange was lying about their stats without even talking to Ken about it first, proved him wrong, then he retracted it like a child and didn't even apologize correctly. Goat - I've told him he's an annoying prick after he wasted my time, confused everything in his order, acted like a 60 year old grandma who's never used a computer before, made veiled threats and strutted his bruised ego around like a moron. Blitzboom - I've argued with him in depth about bitcoinica and whether it is good or not and shared quite a few insults with him shakaru - I've called him a fucktard and gotten in many arguments on the forum about him and his personal lack of business skills, to which he replied "You're a running joke" and referred to me as hitler in some context. DeathAndTaxes - This stupid mother fucker used to be cool in my eyes, but then flipped the bitch switch on for no apparent reason. I'll give him a chance to change his mind later, but I'm pretty sure he's one of those "old man" style cocksuckers that isn't worth having on your side. Boss - This is Atlas. Please dont' make me talk about that faggot as the conversation will result in reasons for why his mom should have aborted him. aurumxchange - This is Roberto, who thinks through intimidation that he can cover up his mistakes (which he's learning doesn't work). We have yet to end our little squabble because he's avoiding all the right questions. bccasino - Basically running an illegal website with a history of defrauding users and although I haven't -fought with him- at all, we've had a run in on this very issue that I was vocal about regardless of his "status". Unfortunately that's about all I can remember for now. I'd like to say that -most- of these little hissyfits were misunderstandings, me being too aggressive at a time I didn't understand the intentions of people and hadn't really gotten my hand on the community, and basically felt threatened easily by anyone and everyone. Things changes after that to just getting on people's nerves for shits and giggles. Now however, I'm a bit more sewious and typically only drill someone when I truly believe they're doing something wrong. Btw, I have fought numerous times with Theymos as well and think that his ridiculous claim that I was a "scammer" deserves a swift punch to the face, but we've agreed to disagree. There, that's my proof that no matter what someone's status, I speak my mind. Next mod's turn! P.S. In Bruno style, I reserve the right to delete this post later if I think it causes the above listed members unnecessary hurty touchy feelings.
|
|
|
But, please don't ask any body to believe that there is not a wider sense of tolerance for significant donators.
Uhh, isn't Chaang a donator? VIP even? Please don't make me prove you wrong. *pulls a list of donators he has verbally raped*
|
|
|
|