Actually, it is not a common feature of any gambling platform or casinos out here. I've tried a lot of gambling platform that has an ANN thread on the forum, and I can only remember doing such a thing to only one gambling site. Unfortunately, I cannot remember what casino it was, but I was able to deposit BTC and convert it to USD and then to another cryptocurrency that they accept on the platform such as XRP since it has one of lowest transaction fees and the most convenient crypto for me to withdraw on.

About the exchange feature that you're talking about, I don't think there's a casino that has it since it is not an exchange platform. You can only convert tokens to USD on some gambling platforms but not directly exchange them for another token.

Honestly, I don't think it's the best course of action for casinos to cut out on some games or tables even if they don't usually have players like some slots. Even if those games don't receive tons of players, they still bring out other things in the casino like the lighting that it produces that attracts gamblers to the casino which adds to the theme of the casino.

The latter choice would be the best solution, especially having Solar Panels to provide an additional electricity source and lower the cost. Also, most casinos and businesses already have it since having an additional source of energy would be beneficial not only in the short run but also in the long run since it can also be a type of investment for any business.

I don't think there really is something that a new casino can do to be able to compete with highly reputed gambling platform right now. One thing that makes gamblers go back to these casinos are its reputation for being a long time in the industry which even a new gambler can trust on. Even if new casino will provide a better promotion or bonuses, I doubt that gamblers will shift unto playing on that platform.

Probably, the only thing that would boost a new gambling platform on almost the same level of existing top online casino is to partner with these casinos and have known people on the gambling industry to introduce and be part of their team.

Nope, they, the casino, will accept the documents you've sent whether or not the amount listed on your pay slip is lesser than what you usually deposit and gamble on their platform. Those documents that they've ask for a proof of income is just an additional verification to support your initial verification, that is also why they ask for the most recent pay slip, so they'll be able to validate it better on their end. Also, just because you're earning lesser amount on your job doesn't mean that is the only way you earn money, there are investments, assets, gambling, trading, freelancing and much more that doesn't provide a pay slip. You're not applying anything like a credit card or loan on a gambling platform for it to require a certain amount of income to be qualified.

Legit, kung titignan natin kung gaano lang kadali ma-hack yung government websites and servers sa Pinas compared sa ibang bansa ay masasabi mong hindi pa talaga tayo ready sa gantong sistema. Oo maganda yung initiative ng gobyerno para ma-iwasan yung mga random SMS, Scams, Phishing at kung ano anong nadudulot ng pagkakaroon ng maraming SIM card pero mukhang yung risk of data privacy ay mas lalong lalala.

Yung mga paraan kung paano manloko ang mga tao through SMS ay sobrang hirap maiwasan at sa tingin ko mas mageevolve o hahanap lang ng ibang paraan kung paano makakapanloko yung iba lalo't nakaregistered na sa identity ng tao ang kanyang SIM.

I don't think na itong mga taong to will invest ng pakonti-konti at na ma-subject for investigation kung sakali dahil usual activity na sakali gumastos ng malaki at dahil may malaking silang balance sa account nila. Tsaka if ever naman, possible na may crypto person sila para ma-avoid yung mga ganyang issue from the government.

Based din sa statement nila, I doubt na nagtratrade sila. Most likely, investment lang talaga sila sa certain token na to na worth 2million pesos at 1Billion coins since wala naman silang nabanggit na ibang tokens.

It doesn't really mean that if one casino receives a scam accusation mean that it'll affect their reputation as it is normal for a platform to receive one. Also, based on the common complaint that you've mentioned, not all of it is the casino's fault but most likely the gambler or user's fault. Each casino has their own set of ToS and if a user violated it, they'll be subjected for some punishments such as account frozen and confiscated funds. Another issue is that these users don't like the service that casino provides and complains about it.

Exactly, if Pacman would want to end the fight as soon as possible, he could but he didn't as it was just an exhibition match. I mean, come on we did watch a lot of his professional matches and even if he was declared as the loser, people are siding with him and defending that he should be the winner, not only Filipinos but even other nationalities. 

Frankly, I don't really have any reason why a physical casino would need to include cryptocurrency on their platform as a mode of payment, especially that when you go into a casino that you'll need to trade your money for tokens or chips to play on most of the games such as card games. Also, anyone can just withdraw or trade their crypto to fiat so that they can use it in these establishments.

Anyways, it's likely that we can see crypto payments for these chips and tokens on casinos soon with how great online crypto casinos are going great right now such as Stake.

I'm really sorry to hear that issue of yours. I don't really follow much about your case but upon checking your previous post, it looks like they've put a hold on your account because of some issue relating to multi-account.

But since, you've mentioned that you don't have other accounts then you could just rest assure that your account will be release soon. It seems like Stunna hasn't responded yet because he isn't online since Dec. 10. I suggest that you wait at least until Stunna came back to respond more on your issue. I guess, she'll probably provide some leeway for the document you've sent especially that you're self-employed and won't be able to provide a payslip.

I guess that's also why he was able to knock DK Yoo due to his age he wasn't able to pull most of his punches. I mean, Pacquiao's specialty is his quick and powerful punches. It'll be hard for someone to pull punches if your main moves are based on speed. But still, we can based on his fight against Yoo that he was trying to make the fight much longer, but he probably released some of his power punches which causes his opponent to be KO'd.

Anyways, All is good since it was just an exhibition match and most of the winnings will go directly to charity.

Mismo, sobrang hirap paniwalaan nung story nila. Alam nilang may malaking halagang crypto sa phones nila pero basta basta lang nilang iniiwan. About naman sa opinion mo about tax evasion purposes, i think yan yung exact reason nila dito tulad nung ibang mga online vloggers na biglang na-hack or binura yung mga channels nila.

Pero ang general lang din kasi nung information na nabigay dito pero if ever na online wallet o software wallet ginamit, I doubt na wala silang back up keys para ma-access yung mga to unless na merong transaction na talaga from their wallet to other wallet.

No law? Falsification of documents and Identity theft are both serious crimes and people who do this are liable for some jail time once caught. Other than doing illegal activities, you may make the KYC thing worst, especially when a gambling platform requested additional information regarding your documents as it is just made up. You may also, not receive or recover your funds if you won't be able to provide the same information if the casino asked for further verification.

That's actually a crime especially if there is someone to the generated ID made. It's identity theft and once caught, you might get some jail time. Also, other than being in jail, you will have no way of obtaining your funds as those will be confiscated and be locked out from you.
And, yes, if this becomes a thing, more and more platforms would lean more on having a better and stricter KYC process which would involve more documentation and possibly your appearance during KYC process.

Haven't tried it but it looks like if I do try it, it'll be faster for me to lose my bankroll as each win will double my bet and in case I lose I'll be losing much more than what I have won. Also, it doesn't look like it's an efficient way to bet as the risk is too much on this strategy.

Anyways, having this kind of strategy where you will not go back to your initial bet is a bit too much for a strategy as you'll be betting much higher amount so if you encounter a lose streak, you might end up losing everything too fast.

Usually, soundtracks on various games came from their own sources or they outsource those kinds of things from different platforms that offer this service and I think it's just the same with gambling slot games. However, I highly doubt that they outsource and provide royalty to the artist who produces these soundtracks as it will cost them a lot and it may cause confusion on how to pay royalty as it's a gambling game, but things might be different if they produce a custom soundtrack and requested it to be played by famous artists.

As far as I know, Web 3 doesn't really focus on decentralization and KYC information but rather it is just an upgrade or a better web from the previous one which is web 2. It's great to know that a casino has made an update on their platform in integrating Web 3 but it doesn't really affect much to us users much other than having an up-to-date platform. Also, since it isn't connected to decentralization and KYC or your personal information then it won't change if the platform has requested it in the first place.

Para sakin yung pahayag about sa crypto ay may magandang hangarin naman medjo pangit lang kung paano nya sinabi. Sa pagkakaintindi ko, generally ni-warn nya yung mga new investors sa pagpasok sa crypto industry lalo na kung wala kang definite background knowledge or any research tungkol dito. Yung pag-compare nya naman sa Crypto as Gambling ay slightly appropriate naman dahil sa sobrang volatile ng kahit anong cryptocurrency kaya yung mga gantong klaseng investment ay na-iinterpret as gambling dahil sa sobrang laking risk na nakapaloob sa paginvest dito.

Still, Bitcoin o kahit anong crypto ay hindi gambling rather investment sila na sobrang volatile at too risky lalo na sa mga baguhan pa lang.

Hindi ko alam kung paano yung navigation sa coins pro trading platform dahil hindi ako nagpa-whitelist sa kanila pero I think madali lang naman ang navigation sa Binance. Sobrang user-friendly nga ng Binance dahil maraming options ang mga users kung paano nila gagamitin ang binance kung spot-trading, futures, P2P o iba pa. Siguro kaya feeling ng iba na mahirap at magulo gamitin ang binance ay dahil sa sobrang daming features ni binance pero kung magfofocus sila kung saan lang nila gagamitan, siguro nadalian lang din sila.

Sa totoo lang kahit maging maluwag si coins sa kanilang ToS. I doubt na magkakaroon pa rin sila maraming users dahil na rin sa mga exchange platform tulad ng Binance, Kucoin at iba pang exchange platform na marami kang magagawa as a trader.

May mga tools kasi na compatible lang sa mga exchange platform like binance na sobrang useful na hindi mo magagamit sa Coins pro. Yung trading volume at list of coins din as isang malaking factor kaya maraming trader ang gusto mag-stick sa mga huge exchange platform like Binance. Maganda ang coins pero may mas magandang platform lang kaya hindi masyado napipili ng mga trader.