|
Can you give us the transaction IDs so that we can check?
|
|
|
|
|
Did you also lose some Ponzi? Since I see your BTC address as "tip to a ponzi fool".
|
|
|
|
you must control your own coins with your own private keys
dont put any coins you cant afford to lose on exchanges
this lesson will strike again, it happens every couple of weeks
Not just exchanges, it also includes online wallets. |
|
|
|
With 50% reject rates. I earned 0.00453564 in 12 hours, so i guess reject rates does not matter if you are getting some profits.  They do matter. You are having 50% rejects. That means you should be earning 2x of what you are earning now with your hashpower. You should get around 0.008-0.01 with 900 kh/s. |
|
|
|
If you aren't the sole controller of your private keys, you don't have any bitcoins.
You also must ensure that you ARE the sole controller of your private keys. |
|
|
|
Do we NEED a controller? And how about the cable things? Can someone tell me what I need to get 1 unit up and going?
If someone can answer, I want one...
Sorry doing min 10+. Whoopsie didn't see that... But can you still answer the questions? |
|
|
|
|
I suppose you can sign a message with a bitcoin address, and use that as a password.
Or I suppose you could set up some kind of system that you can authenticate by sending some bitcoins to it, and it will automatically send them back. But that is a huge waste of transaction fees.
|
|
|
|
For all having issues with rejects -
-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).
-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).
Can you explain why you are suggesting this? Lowering my intensity lowers my overall hashrate - and on other pools I have close to 0% rejection rate (only here do I have a higher rate) Can you explain what -E, -S, and -Q are as well, what their default values are, and why you're changing up or down instead of giving blind advice? Even if you lower your hashrate, (by the way, everyone knows that lowering intensity = lower hashrate, so no need to tell us) you still earn more than on other pools. If you don't like CleverMining, then go away. |
|
|
|
|
Do we NEED a controller? And how about the cable things? Can someone tell me what I need to get 1 unit up and going?
If someone can answer, I want one...
|
|
|
|
|
Sonny, I literally have talked to you on a lot of topics you have posted in.
I do not believe that 90% were spam. Contact CasinoBitcoin. That's my suggestion, as the bit777 account is now closed.
|
|
|
|
|
Starting posts: 544
Bitcoin address: 1Cb2JZxh2R8UxLCuQofdNFm4qnSkga2YyU
|
|
|
|
I am running a 4x280x machine and a 1x7950 machine. Should I be using a different wallet address for each machine? and why?
thx
No, you can use the same one. |
|
|
|
|
Still Awesome. As I always say, cash is just worthless pieces of paper. Meaningless.
|
|
|
|
If I have a USB hub, and I have 3 different miners, will they all work together? Example:
2 Block Erupter USB - 300 MH/s
1 Antminer 1.6 GH/s
Or do they all have be the same to work together?
I am a bit new, but was just wondering about this.
Yes they do work together. |
|
|
|
|
Seems like rejects are not solved for some specific people. Have you guys tried lowering the intensity?
I'm having about 2% rejects right now.
|
|
|
|
so you mean there's no way too predict the time to mine a block.
I suppose you could average the time used to mine, but it should give you something around 10 minutes per block anyway. |
|
|
|
Yep. In the past, there were users that used LTC addresses and whatnot, and Terk kindly switched it back and fixed it. I suppose he still has to do a lot of backend work, setting up EU and Asia and vardiff and stuff. He'll fix it in a few days, I think. |
|
|
|
I think this is the first time I have ever seen the BTC/per day go below .01 in this pool At least everything else is running smooth now though. Hopefully something more profitable than litecoin crops up again soon.  Technical problems contributed to this. Well, it wasn't worse than Litecoin. LTC was at 0.0087 today. We still had 114% LTC profitability. Which of course is one of our worse days as our long-term averages are higher. I believe we'll be up again tomorrow. We've been leaving some money on the table because of technical problems. Terk, you said there was nothing more profitable at the moment.
I assume the system works with coins that have very little fluctuation, since I see Alphacoin, a coin with huge fluctuation, at 287% LTC right now.
I still see DOGE at 118% LTC, so I assume we are mining something like that.
Alphacoin has 0.8 difficulty and we are no longer mining it. We would find an ALF block every 0.5 seconds with our hashpower what would result in 70% rejected ratio. As for DOGE, I can only tell you to don't believe everything you see at Coinwarz/Coinchoose. You can also compare us to Waffle which publishes that they were mining LTC in 15% time of the last hour = 9 minutes. So they couldn't find anything more profitable during 9 minutes comparing to 4.5 our minutes. Don't worry about my profitability engine. As a long-time closed-beta user you should know that it's really good! Yep, as a beta tester I can vouch for Terk and say that the pool was totally awesome, earnt a lot, just wished it realized I could leave my pc on whole day. Now that most of the technical problems have been handled, does that mean you'll be turning vardiff back on soon?
I would expect it to be up once EU and Asia servers are up. Can I suggest a feature? I think that it would be quite smart if the pool refused connection to miners that used a worker not starting with "1", thus not a bitcoin address. |
|
|
|
So I can officially write that technical problems has been solved and rejected ratio is down to good levels.
Rejected average in the last hour was 4.8% pool-wide, which I consider a good value for a coin-switching pool, especially considering it's a worldwide average and users close to the server had much lower rejects (EU and Asia servers are now the first item on my todo list).
And just to let you compare. We've been mining LTC for 4.5 minutes in the last hour as there wasn't anything more profitable during these couple minutes. LTC rejected ratio was 0.92% which I believe is comparable to regular LTC pools (remember that we don't have regional servers yet). When mining DOGE, our rejected average was 2.02% which is also comparable to regular DOGE pools.
I think that everything on the pool's side has been done and we won't get lower numbers than this (other than adding servers in different regions). 4.8% average is because we are also mining some other coins which has their higher rejected ratio. I apologize for the past problems but the future looks bright!
If you stopped mining here because too much of your hashpower was wasted, I highly encourage you to start mining with us again!
Terk, you said there was nothing more profitable at the moment. I assume the system works with coins that have very little fluctuation, since I see Alphacoin, a coin with huge fluctuation, at 287% LTC right now. I still see DOGE at 118% LTC, so I assume we are mining something like that. |
|
|
|
|
The bitcoin network is supposed to adjust the difficulty to make a block to be mined every 10 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
