even if they are , its their coin , they actually give a damn about thier ecosystem and economy unlike bitmain and innno who just dump into oblivion. If they are mining they probably need to in order to get back market share of the coins that inno and bitmain haven’t had time to dumping comparing the dev mining to the asic company dumpers is truely apples to oranges. |
|
|
|
Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.
I hope you are joking. If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia. Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork. First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon. Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one. If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices. Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. Asic manufacturers ARE the bad guy wtf u blabbing about, I own zero obelsik and I applaud the move by sia developmers have to take a hard line vs the champions of centralization, bitman and innosilion compete with thier own customers to mine and also keep they best gear to themselves and thier friends. we need more forks to drive them out |
|
|
|
Hi, Doc!
Is "Cryptonight Adaptive" support planned?
No , not at the moment. are you going to reduce power usee like team red miner did, it uses 10 to 15 percent power same hash
too unstable for me tho compared to srb
Well that miner gave me homework to do, so i am working on something since then. It will definitely increase the hashrate, but don't know about the power consumption. we will see. good to hear , I love the stability of your miner so always keep that feature |
|
|
|
|
are you going to reduce power usee like team red miner did, it uses 10 to 15 percent power same hash
too unstable for me tho compared to srb
|
|
|
|
it can be usefull if somebody makes one Guide about "how to sell altcoins". I tried several differents (Raven, Bytecoin, GoByte, etc...). But was not successfull when i tried to sell it on exchanges. So maybe there are something i don't understand good on this part of business  Thank you and sorry again for my poor english I'd recommend you to have a look at the table provided by CoinTelegraph.com on this page: https://cointelegraph.com/ethereum-for-beginners/how-to-sell-ethereum-guide-for-beginnersBTW, what's your electricity cost (per kWh)? Thank you Raja_MBZ for this link. Yes i actually sell my Monero from mining on Krakken and use bank transfer to compensate electricity cost. I hold a small part in differents coins and cash out when price is not so bad to buy new GPU/rig parts. Is it good or not good strategy? My electricty cost is 0.09 kWh in the day 0.07 kWh in the night Thats a poor strategy. In traditional gold mining people were mining for gold just to pay off their equipment and shovels after all said and done. The people selling equipment made the most. And those that held onto their gold and never sold any ended up 10X their money after many years of hodling. Same principles with crypto. If your selling to cover electric then u got weak hands and deserve pigeon profits. You should be paying electric with your day job money to offload your filthy fiat, and wait till the bull market to return then sell some. I would not sell any coins in a bear market at the bottom. Keep it simple Mine low, sell high. bingo , hold hold |
|
|
|
|
2.5 fee is nuts , will not be using this one
|
|
|
|
IMO Zcash is doing it right; Concentrate on the core functionality of the coin before getting concerned with the smaller details. Look at all of the coins that have fell victim to the ASIC witch hunt. They have wasted development time to appease a vocal minority. Not saying that switching algos for asic resistance is bad, but there are only a few coins that done it that actually already have a pretty stable ecosystem. Actually scratch that, there is only one coin, Monero. Looking at the coinmarketcap top 100, the only coins to alter their algos are Monero, Bitcoin Gold (does a bitcoin fork even count?), SIA (switched to make their own asics exclusive!), and Electroneum (who then switched back to an asic friendly algo). Its not even a large development effort wtf are you talking about, if just changing algos is a huge part of your development budget or taking time away from improvement of functionality then you development efforts are doomed to fail most likely. Electroneum and BTG have shitty developers so its no surprise they had fork issues. They have not delivered any of the stuff they promised and the algo changes they attempted were minor efforts at the most, remember they are not even coming up with the algo changes, they just copied other coins changes. |
|
|
|
one thing I need to understand is why the hell does the miner keep trying to mine neoscrypt when its less profitable by all the oline calculators than x16r
its not the power setting becase I set my power cost to zero
If you right click on the miner and select View Details - is the Profit Switching tab indicating that Neoscrypt is on top based on your profile hashrate? yes it does say that but on all the online calculators its x16 |
|
|
|
|
one thing I need to understand is why the hell does the miner keep trying to mine neoscrypt when its less profitable by all the oline calculators than x16r
its not the power setting becase I set my power cost to zero
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 5.7.4
GPU mining
- Display warning on the Summary tab for miners with old nVidia drivers not supporting the latest CUDA version
- Diagnostics feature improved and includes OS and driver information
Configuration
- External Miners can be configured with a Profit profile without having to enable profit switching
Rules
- Triggers using the concepts Greater/Less Than or Equals also includes support for Greater/Less Than
Mining software
- Added mining software: Zjazz CUDA miner, for X22i
- WildRig Multi Miner 0.12.5 beta
Corrections
- Correction to the default pool configuration of Antminers
- Correction to revenue calculations for a number of coins based on Equihash variants
SO what do we do with the error : no pool avaiable for benchmark ? I get that for like 9 algos including the new one X22i , sonaa and all the equihash forks How do I fix this ? , I know blockmasters has x22i for sure why does it not allow benchmark , same with the equihash 192 etc because they are not included in default Online Services list yet, but you can add them manually. not same with sonoa and equihash192, predefined pools do not support them. @patrike you can consider adding NLPool, Phi-Phi-Pool and Starpool as predefined Yiimp-type pools in place of Zergpool, which is gone now. they all support autoexchange to BTC wallet. @darkneorus dumb question maybe sorry , how do I add them manually and also add them to profit switching or should i wait, it seems the the equihash192 and btg will never be supported , is there a turotiral on how to add pools manually and also have them work for profit switching and benchmarking ? |
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 5.7.4
GPU mining
- Display warning on the Summary tab for miners with old nVidia drivers not supporting the latest CUDA version
- Diagnostics feature improved and includes OS and driver information
Configuration
- External Miners can be configured with a Profit profile without having to enable profit switching
Rules
- Triggers using the concepts Greater/Less Than or Equals also includes support for Greater/Less Than
Mining software
- Added mining software: Zjazz CUDA miner, for X22i
- WildRig Multi Miner 0.12.5 beta
Corrections
- Correction to the default pool configuration of Antminers
- Correction to revenue calculations for a number of coins based on Equihash variants
SO what do we do with the error : no pool avaiable for benchmark ? I get that for like 9 algos including the new one X22i , sonaa and all the equihash forks How do I fix this ? , I know blockmasters has x22i for sure why does it not allow benchmark , same with the equihash 192 etc |
|
|
|
Yeah same here payments are low, my pool hashrates match what i see on srb tho |
|
|
|
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU0 : 1883 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 1090, CC: 1474 MHz, MC: 920 MHz][BUS:20]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU1 : 2099 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 4803, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:11]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU2 : 1959 H/s [T: 45c, RPM: 3264, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:8]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU3 : 1962 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 3333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU4 : 1817 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2404, CC: 1407 MHz, MC: 900 MHz][BUS:14]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU5 : 2115 H/s [T: 58c, RPM: 4751, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:17]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] Total: 11835 H/s
2115 and 2100 on both my Vega FEs beast of cards , under 60 degrees too I had to reboot then turn off HBBC then turn it on again and reboot again and it worked I try to do that on my rig, but the problem still persist. my steps.... enable hbcc, reboot... disable it .. run miner |
|
|
|
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU0 : 1883 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 1090, CC: 1474 MHz, MC: 920 MHz][BUS:20]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU1 : 2099 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 4803, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:11]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU2 : 1959 H/s [T: 45c, RPM: 3264, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:8]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU3 : 1962 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 3333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU4 : 1817 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2404, CC: 1407 MHz, MC: 900 MHz][BUS:14]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] GPU5 : 2115 H/s [T: 58c, RPM: 4751, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:17]
[2018-10-23 19:44:18] Total: 11835 H/s
2115 and 2100 on both my Vega FEs beast of cards , under 60 degrees too I had to reboot then turn off HBBC then turn it on again and reboot again and it worked |
|
|
|
SRBMiner-CN.exe --config Config\config-normalv8.txt --pools pools.txt --enableduplicategpuid --logfile LOGTIME.txt
"gpu_conf" :
[
{ "id" : 0, "intensity" : 124, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false},
{ "id" : 1, "intensity" : 124, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false},
],
}
1222/1100 mhz
why is it that my hashrate for vegaFE is still 19xx?
shit id be happy with 19xx for my FE |
|
|
|
You can trade BCI on stex.com (formerly stocks.exchange), but I've never had a positive experience with them and they have a bit of a shady reputation. I'd wait for hitbtc or bitfenix to open their wallets again personally.
never had issue with stex. I mine,deposit, trade, and withdraw almost every other day trade volume very low, price is way too low to sell imo , need at least $5 |
|
|
|
|
any way to pass an windows environment variable from the client to the pool such as rig name ?
|
|
|
|
C:\Latest cast_xmr-vega-win64_120>switch-radeon-gpu -G 1 --largepages=on --hbcc=off autorestart
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Switch Radeon GPU 0.9.5
Restart GPUs and switch 'Compute Mode', 'Large Pages' and 'HBCC memory'
on or off for example:
'switch-radeon-gpu -G 0 --compute=on restart'
Run with --help to list available optionss
Coded by [glph3k] for more info visit http://www.gandalph3000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Detected OpenCL Platform: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2580.6)
GPU1: Radeon Vega Frontier Edition (gfx901) ... no changes.
GPU1: Radeon Vega Frontier Edition (gfx901) | HBCC: OFF | Large Pages: ON
C:\Latest cast_xmr-vega-win64_120>switch-radeon-gpu -G 1 --largepages=on --hbcc=off autorestart
still no good hash rate on FE with large pages on and HBCC off , using may 5.2 driver
2018-10-22 22:28:07] GPU0 : 1856 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 2004, CC: 1474 MHz, MC: 920 MHz][BUS:20]
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] GPU1 : 1385 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 4811, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:11]
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] GPU2 : 1933 H/s [T: 40c, RPM: 3887, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:8]
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] GPU3 : 1933 H/s [T: 42c, RPM: 4316, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] GPU4 : 1832 H/s [T: 40c, RPM: 3033, CC: 1407 MHz, MC: 900 MHz][BUS:14]
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] GPU5 : 1350 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 4803, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:17]
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] Total: 10289 H/s
[2018-10-22 22:28:07] Pool accepted result 0x000189B9
[2018-10-22 22:28:08] Pool accepted result 0x00004A03
se below 1350 max hash on both FEs , so damn anoying |
|
|
|
|
whats the point of dealing with all this instability and extra heat from cnv8 when its less profitable atm than even eth.
hash rate is pretty much back to where it was 500ghs WTF lol
|
|
|
|
ETH not profitable?
I have 6 x RX 570s mining ETH only, and it has yielded a lot of profit, 29-30 mh/s per card.
not profitable enough he means, these algo jumpers are the main problem with gpu mining , they see a coin go up in price and immediately start to want to mine it, I get that you want to mine something more profitable, but you have cards that are better on cn forks and eth forks and terrible at x16 , if you wanted to. mine x16 you should have built nvidia rigs |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
