The post below was deleted but archived in the #2 post in this thread.

What message are Liverpool and Arsenal sending out when they lost their games one day after Manchester City had an emphatic 5-1 win over Luton Town? What is even more surprising is that both teams were playing their games at home therefore had the backing of home fans. Though Manchester City are now favourites by most to win the title, there are seven games to go and still many things could change.

It is not over yet, the title race is still open. If Manchester City drop points, I am sure Liverpool and/or Arsenal will take an opportunity to close the gap at the top.

If the title of the thread is something that can be repeated and rinsed (admittedly this is not my only post here), then I have to state I am not surprised to see Bitcoin fall. It will of course eventually reach that all-important $100,00 milestone one day but for now the dip is in process. Considering it was above $70,000 but is now at $62,500, I would be inclined to think this is an ongoing dip.

One of the things Wilder complained about during their trilogy was that Fury was lean on to him and by using his weight he forced Wilder to use energy to try to push back. I am unsure how Usyk would handle that tactic if it were employed by Fury but he was successful when he shrugged off Joshua when he was clinging on in their fights.

It is good to read the activity in the thread but unfortunately no names have been added to the mix. Hopefully members will add a name or two and allows to read what they are doing and if it even warrants the amount of pay they are receiving from campaigns as they spam their way to meeting their signature quota.

Hopefully some names might be added to further the discussion.

These are all of the results since my last post:

Monday 15th April
Chelsea 6-0 Everton

Sunday 14th April
Liverpool 0-1 Crystal Palace
West Ham United 0-2 Fulham
Arsenal 0-2 Aston Villa

Saturday 13th April
Newcastle United 4-0 Tottenham Hotspur
Brentford 2-0 Sheffield United
Burnley 1-1 Brighton and Hove Albion
Manchester City 5-1 Luton Town
Nottingham Forest 2-2 Wolverhampton Wanderers
Bournemouth 2-2 Manchester United

Sunday 7th April
Manchester United 2-2 Liverpool
Sheffield United 2-2 Chelsea
Tottenham Hotspur 3-1 Nottingham Forest

What a turnaround of events that have taken Manchester City to the top of the Premier League table with a two point lead as Arsenal and Liverpool suffered defeats.

Tuesday 16th April
Barcelona vs Paris Saint-Germain
Agg:3-2

Borussia Dortmund vs Atletico Madrid
Agg:1-2

Wednesday 17th April
Bayern Munich vs Arsenal
Agg:2-2

Manchester City vs Real Madrid
Agg:3-3

Well, the first legs were played and the results were a mixed bag. The 3-3 was a surprise, I did not anticipate Manchester City would take the lead or even score three goals therefore I believe anything is possible in the return leg. Overall, I still am very confident Real Madrid will go through to semi-finals and Manchester City knocked out.

The names that are supporting the flag are seasoned forum members therefore clearly there is consensus on this particular individual. Apart from himself, he has no member supporting him and that speaks volumes for his character.

Personally, I would have expected to have seen more members supporting the flag but at the same time I would have expected to see a few newbie accounts (or those with red tags that are probably farmed account that were caught out) opposing the flag.

Filling Only For Fun ?

Joshua had a fantastic win over Ngannou and we were all surprised to see how he completely dominated the fight. The ending was a sad thing to watch as Ngannou required medical attention. Having said that, I believe Parker will beat Joshua. It went to the judges scorecard the first time they met in 2018 but if they were to meet today, I am confident Parker will defeat Joshua.

The claims made could have been done in the OP of his thread but instead he wanted to be contacted on Telegram.

If gullible people had done it, who knows how far they could have been reeled in. After this thread was created he stated he was not after money but just trying to help.

He seems to have given his proof in this post but what conclusion does anybody reading it come to? His advice seems to refer to patience being the initial step before starting to chase losses: Professional Crypto Gambling Advice

One of them is running the Stake campaign. There is no logical reason one can think of that would provide any explanation as to why certain members have been selected to participate in that campaign.

The other, he was affected when mixers were banned. Eventually several of those participants I referred to were dropped because the pool to select participants became larger. It is still did not negate the fact he used far too many members with tags during that period but that is a different matter.

Here is another account. The previous spamming, news spamming and low quality posts have improved but nevertheless it being included in a high paying campaign raises questions:

==========
Campaign: Bitcasino
Member: mich
Trust:    # +0 / =1 / -4
Reason: Account changed hands. Previous low quality posts/news spammer.
==========

Finally there is a video from Usyk, it took a long time. The problem is the amount of talk there is going on in the media. Fury is keeping a low profile with the exception of his recent sparring video and we are scratching our heads wondering where the promotion is. Where is the media hype?

Could it really be a case of both boxers simply being focused on their training to the extent they have almost closed themselves off from the outside world media?

What you have posted is utter and complete nonsense therefore the full message in the OP has been quoted as a reference to keep on record.

What you are offering is something that cannot be proven to be true because there is no formula to make it work.

On the other hand, what can be done is for you to use Telegram to connect with gullible people that will put their trust in you and allow you to ask them to make payments to you for a service that you (and nobody else) proves works.

Reference thread on Stakefast's newbie warning flag.

I have supported the flag and excluded the member (Stakefast) from my trust.

Without delving in to everything he stated in that post (or even the context of what he stated), taking the last two lines literally is evidence enough that the one making the claim cannot be trusted: If you want to start winning, contact telegram

Any person that offers these types of services cannot be trusted, especially when they are hiding behind the anonymity of chat apps they will use to extract money from gullible victims.

Over a period of time, the software behind AI (and there are multiple sources) will improve and become closer to what we could deem as perfect in the sense we will be unable to distinguish between a human or AI when reading the text. In the future, the same will be applied to audio where we will be unable to distinguish of the voice we are hearing is from a human or AI generated.

As for the forum, the use of AI will increase and even though many will use it for many purposes (not exclusively to increase member rank), it will be driven by account farmers who will use it for precisely that reason and/or to try to infiltrate the trust system.

Here are the games taking place today Sunday 7th April:

Manchester United vs Liverpool
Sheffield United vs Chelsea
Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest


These are the results from the games played yesterday:

Crystal Palace 2-4 Manchester City
Aston Villa 3-3 Brentford
Everton 1-0 Burnley
Fulham 0-1 Newcastle United
Luton Town 2-1 Bournemouth
Wolverhampton Wanderers 1-2 West Ham United
Brighton and Hove Albion 0-3 Arsenal

Manchester City and Arsenal have shown they are going all out to try to become champions but I still believe Liverpool will win the title if they draw or win their game against Manchester United today. The crucial wins at the bottom of the table were for Everton and Luton.

I also thought about malware, clipboard malware and even using a phishing URL as possibilities behind this allegation because of the amount mentioned ($30,000-$40,000) is huge but there is an update on this situation.

Thankfully a lot of time and effort has gone in to the translation that has taken place. As icopress stated, there seems to be something of substance to the claim: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.msg63911576#msg63911576

A poll cannot be added because this thread is designed for other members to post the names of accounts they deem to have a dubious enough background to not be enrolled on campaigns and then to question why any manager would bother enrolling them in the first place. That was discussion could take place but adding a poll would limit the narrative to just the name (or names) in the OP.

Personally, I would do the same as you but it would be interesting to see how many back that view.

Well, the aim has to be Hero/Legendary rank and the reason for that is obvious. That arimamib account like a huge number of accounts is trying to increase rank as soon as possible in order to join campaigns. Generally speaking, it might not be an issue but when it comes to account farming and using AI, it probably is changing the way the forum operates.

There were are/only two campaign managers that enrolled an unnecessary number of members with negative tags (or highly critical neutral tags). It does make you question theie mindset.

Yee Haa! You sound like one of those tobacco-chewing baddies from a western. I am on it Sheriff  

If was not supposed to come across as rhetorical, I was inviting discussion and/or debate.

As for chatbot spammers, clearly this will get worse over time. If Carollzinha were to take action on many of those enrolled in the Stake campaign, I think it would have a profound effect in helping to clean up the forum.

What it cannot do is stop AI being used by account farmers because before those accounts can apply for campaigns they need to be of a certain rank but at least Carollzinha would be sending out a signal to those hoping to spam their way to Hero/Legendary rank before applying to join the Stake campaign.

The bar seems to have fallen extremely low when it comes to getting enrolled in the Stake campaign but I completely understand your views on the subject about managers implementing their own rules and interpretations. Having said that, what would you do? If you were a campaign manager would you select these two members for campaigns?