I don't usually tag the newbies in this section for asking for a loan without collateral, but I come here from time to time and in this case I did because as much as it is a sobbing story it doesn't hold up.



Source: Education and Living Cost in Bangladesh.


I'm also not going to do much research on how the university system works specifically in Bangladesh because I'm sick of seeing these kinds of sobbing stories that are nothing more than covert scam attempts but I find it very hard to believe that you're going to lose the subjects you've passed simply because you can't pay. I mean, if you are studying a 4 year degree and you have passed 3 years, with those 3, even if you can't pay now, when you can pay in the future you should be able to enroll in the fourth year again, if not in that university in another one where you can transfer your transcript after a transfer procedure or credit recognition.

Well, it is clear that as has been commented, if someone asks you to give him money to win a bet you can be sure that it is a scam. But there is one thing that is not so clear to me.


Oh no? And where did it pay for it? Out of thin air?

I would appreciate an explanation on this, if possible with link to back it up, because it seems quite counter-intuitive. In modern slots this is clearly not the case, and some time ago I saw a program on Las Vegas in which they explained it but the statement you make seems to me too counterintuitive not to question it.

Well, considering that 20K nigerian naira is $14.5 at the exchange rate, yes, yes I have taken risks of that amount and higher. Nigeria being a low GDP per capita country I understand that that $14.5 may feel like higher amounts in other parts of the world, but it still doesn't seem like a crazy bet to me either. It all depends on one's personal situation, that is, income, job stability, savings and investments or dependents. With that in mind I guess that's why the OP experienced it as a high risk situation.

Well, no, this summary is not correct. Reputation is not teleported by default, you can pay to have it done, but I don't think anyone is dumb enough to have negative reputation (at least clearly negative, with more negative feedback than positive from DT) and pay to have it teleported.


Source: Altcoinstalk shop.

Sounds pretty much like a made-up story to me but for the sake of argument I will respond. Personally no, I don't go inviting around with the profits I get from playing poker. I consider it as one more source of income that is added to my total monthly income, with the difference that at the beginning of the month when I make the budget I don't know how much I am going to make that month (not even if I am going to have a profit, but in most months I get some). With that total income I make a forecast of expenses that includes donations and money for leisure where I can buy dinner or drinks. This is how I do it.

Personally and as of today I would not leave feedback on any account on this forum because of what happens on another one. If something happens in that forum it is a problem there, as several members have said.

I think in fact that what the OP raises is less of a problem than the opposite: people with a bad reputation here being teleported there, as they don't put problems to people with several red tags to be teleported. But in any case that's that forum's problem, not ours.

I will agree with the comments of my colleagues that the website has a lot of room for improvement.


It is simply a site with affiliate links, if you scroll over the casino banners you will see it. 


That's it. The faucets give you free money but it is so little that you can't even withdraw it, unless you spend months with the faucet until you accumulate the minimum amount. It is the way they have to attract people to deposit and bet. freebitco.in is very successful precisely because of that.

That and having a minimum idea about how the markets work and the returns that can be obtained, in order to be able to detect right away scams just by the profitability offer. Someone who offers you $400 a day profitability for investing $4,000 is trying to scam you. Period. I'm offered that and I don't think anything else, I know it's a scam. That's why I think we need more education in that sense.

Yes, it seems that he believes he is a reincarnation of Buddha, or at least he tries to pretend so in order to swindle people.


No wonder the post has been deleted. At this point I imagine he has a mental problem or something, otherwise I can't explain that behavior.

I would sum it up by saying that in video poker you can't win money in the long run, it's an EV-game like many other casino games, while in poker you can.


That's why I only play poker on fiat sites. More security, more variety of games, much better software and more liquidity. I might at some point play on a crypto site, but for regular play there is nothing like fiat sites.

Well, the bright side is at this hour that my transaction has been confirmed, so it is doubly confirmed that those who paid 500 sats/vByte are fools with a lot of money.

Until some morons arrived when the fees were at 30 sats/vByte for confirmation in the next block and dumped about 8-10 transactions paying an average of 500 sats/vByte. How can someone be such a moron?

So I sent a transaction at about 30 sats which was what mempool.space gave for confirmation in the next block, and between that it has taken about 30 minutes to confirm and the next one has also taken a while, I look at mempool.space again and now if you want a quick confirmation you have to spend 553 sat/vB. That is if we don't have more morons overpaying fees. I bet miners are happy because 10k transactions at about 500 sats/vB is about $300K in fees.


Even if they are those assholes you have to be a real asshole to overpay fees like that, although I guess they think they are going to become millionaires and they don't care, but even if they believe that, why such a hurry to have their transaction confirmed and pay so much?

It should be emphasized, in case anyone is confused, that you will win the $40 if you win the lottery. You have to answer in survey and then you enter the lottery, so this is not accurate:


I understand that it is partly marketing and a way to encourage people to complete the survey but it would be more accurate to say "To answer the survey and have a chance to win $40..." or something similar.

I continue with my task of "spying" so to speak, from a distance, of the other forum and it has caught my attention that the last people asking to be teleported, at least some of them, say that they are not allowed to post external links, like Lida93 and Lucius.

Does anyone know if there has been a ban on this? I understand this refers to the requirement that the altcoinstalk admin asked to post a link in the profile here linking to the Altcoinstalk profile. I imagine it helps with SEO. However, he has teleported those members, so if links to Altcoinstalk are banned from here he is going to teleport people anyway.

Second thread I read today, second piece of crap I read. To say that this is a benefit is a bad joke that I would like Leo to be active and as a health professional he will explain it to you, OP. At most we could say that it is a way to avoid a specific health risk that this person has, but talking about the health benefit of online gambling in general because of what happens to this person in his particular case does not make sense.

I don't get it. You open a thread all excited about this guy who made a failed prediction about the price of Bitcoin? You might as well open one about McAfee and his promise that he was going to eat his penis on national TV if the price didn't reach $1M by 2020. And, yes Draper bought Bitcoin which has appreciated in value just as McAfee also had Bitcoin.


Is there any Bitcoin holder that is not bullish this 2024? I don't care if he is bullish or not.


Draper could have promised to eat his dick if that doesn't happen soon.


Of course not, I guess what Draper is doing is propaganda to encourage more people to invest and to increase the value of the Bitcoins he has.

Well, I believe that 2024 will be bullish and it should be if the pattern of previous cycles is repeated, apart from the fact that there are other indicators that help, such as the relaxation of interest rate policies by central banks. What happens is that I don't think they will close absolutely positive, although we would like to. If I have to opt for the month will close with the price higher than now, but not much, perhaps between $45K and $50K, no more. For the following months, before halving, I would expect some dip.

I'm jumping ahead to the update after theymos has reshuffled DT, simply to say that one notices that the system is very improvable when I entered DT the first month I had the opportunity (last December), fulfilling the criteria for the minimum, last month I was in DT2 with only strenght 1 and now I am again in DT1, in this case with strenght 3. I don't know if the lottery is to give more opportunities to everyone, but it has a component of chance that doesn't seem very logical to me.

Before starting any kind of economic activity it is better to do some research, but what the OP says is not a question of research, it is a question of someone who has a problem and there is no research that is worthwhile.


I'm sorry but in those cases I prefer to stay away, unless it's your brother or a case like that. It has to be the person who makes a conscious decision about it, which they usually only do after they have hit rock bottom.

The link doesn't work for me. It says page not found.


What I think is that he smokes some really good shit and that's why he says those things.


It is no longer a matter of precision, it is that if we look at what is happening now, and what has happened the last few years we have that a lot of people buy and sell Bitcoin on CEX, apart from leaving their holdings there or in custodial wallets. In addition, the legislations in place are aiming to control more and more Bitcoin transactions.


Well, that's it. We are heading towards a future with less privacy and less freedom, not the other way around.