Na razie brak żadnych przesłanek na spadki, misięczna świeca bardzo popytowa, BTC kosztuję 53 tyś zł a ath było na 60, także dużo nie brakuję.
Rekordowy spadek trudności świadczy, o kapitulacji górników, czy odwrotnie. ?? ATH było $20k, przy kursie trochę poniżej 3.5 to prawie 70k PLN. Spadek poziomu trudności kopania o kilkanaście procent, oraz kolejny podobnej wielkości za dwa tygodnie podczas gdy cena rośnie od jakiegoś czasu sugeruje, że cena prądu musiała dla niemałej liczby kopiących znacznie wzrosnąć. Jedna z teorii mówi o okresowych migracjach związanych z pogodą po zakończeniu sezonu deszczowego w Chinach: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/how-do-seasonal-fluctuations-really-affect-bitcoin-miningNie siedzę szczerze mówiąc w temacie, aby ocenić na ile to prawda, ale ma sens. Innym powodem mogło być ograniczenia dostępu do subsydiowanego prądu w jakimś kraju/niektórych krajach, efekt mógł być podobny jeśli subsydia miały być istotne. |
|
|
|
niestety chyba niedawno obluge kryptowalut porzucilo pyszne.]pl Slyszalem, ze kiedys akceptowali, ostatnio chcialem wyprobowac, przeklikalem chyba z 50razy strone - nie ma juz takiej opcji  Jak kiedyś próbowałem, to za zaszczyt płatności bitcoinami sobie więcej życzyli, ich pośrednik płatności (Bitpay) zachęcał do korzystania z Bitcoin Cash. Z tego co pamiętam nie było możliwości doładowania konta czy czegoś podobnego w razie np. dużego ruchu i związanego z nim wysokich opłat (a tą ekstra opłatę za płatność BTC względem BCH mieli jak był mniejszy ruch). |
|
|
|
czy takich drobnych to nie wiem, jak się trafi dobrą kampanię to, przynajmniej w odniesieniu do polskich płac można całkiem sporą "premię" zgarnąć
Zależy od punktu widzenia, a dopiero od Sr. Member coś więcej można zgarnąć, a osiągnięcie takiej rangi zajmie w najlepszym przypadku większą część roku, dzięki systemowi merit trzeba się trochę bardziej postarać, aby zdobywać merity. Nawet wtedy sama ranga to mało, z tego co widzę konkurencja na nieliczne nienajgorzej płacące kampanie jest duża. |
|
|
|
PS Korzysta ktoś moze z Bitbay? bo slyszalem ze tam jest masakra jesli chodzi o KYC - praktycznie co miesiac kaza dosylac nowe papiery, juz ludzie sporo potracili chcac wyplacic $$ a nie mogac tego zrobic z powodu blokady od razu i zanim ponowili procedure to juz nastepowaly spore wahania kursowe. Nie korzystam od pewnego czasu i nie polecam, chyba że ktoś ma dużo cierpliwości właśnie ze względu na te szukanie problemów, prawie że polski Bitstamp się z tego zrobił pod względem podejścia do klienta. |
|
|
|
Just FYI, we've been around since there were only a handful of prediction markets and other Bitcoin books. We were one of the first to process 1000 BTC worth of total volume as well. We do not use Facebook or Twitter anymore due to privacy reasons as we are very firm believers of the original intent of Bitcoin and its anonymity. If you make one post per year and it seems like elsewhere you're also inactive, it may appear to many that the site has been abandoned. That perception could also lead to a lower bet volume. Good that you have at least updated your twitter and fb. We replied to the email that the user sent us a week ago - sorry for the delay, the user used a strange address that didn't pass our back-end syntax on the payout side even though it passed the front end. We'll get it sorted out and fixed for future.
Any ETA on that? bech32 addresses shouldn't be considered 'strange' anymore. |
|
|
|
What are your thoughts on this? Two weeks of no withdrawals for anyone without really reassuring news is generally a bad sign, if anyone has any money there they should plan accordingly. I'd probably start looking if there're any options to trade okexBTC for BTC. |
|
|
|
It's worrisome how easily they add and remove stuff when someone just asks on Reddit. A bit more due dilligence wouldn't hurt.
Seems to me they thought only ads are ever posted in users' signature area. Since adblocks are supposed to be blocking, well, ads, and ideally nothing else, at least they are consistent. |
|
|
|
but step on a trezor vs step on a yubikey. yeah no contest.
There's also a metallic one (made from aluminium), this might be fine when stepped on but it's expensive compared to every other hardware wallet on the market. |
|
|
|
No custodian is insured as far as I know. No insurer will do it. Certain places like Coinbase have insurance but only for their hot wallets.
Googling 'bitcoin vault insurance' does yield some results, e.g. Ledger Vault with $150M insurance fron Marsh/LLoyd's, crypto.com is insured for $360M, Gemini is insured for $200M and Bittrex is insured $300M. The latter two have the same underwriters as Ledger. Xapo and Elliptic also used to have some sort of insurance but I think that may now be a thing of the past. |
|
|
|
are we talking about the same badusb here? badusb infects the usb chip itself, not the regular firmware of the device. so no approving bad bootloader etc, it just happens without user intervention.. poof the usb controler chip in the trezor is now compromised.. it can make the usb chip into any HID device it wants. it can emulate a keyboard for instance, and send keystrokes. or make itself look like a mass storage device and send a file. all with the trezor otherwise acting fine and with genuine firmware. as its the usb chip thats infected, not the trezor attached to the usb chip. https://www.wired.com/2014/10/code-published-for-unfixable-usb-attack/yubikeys dont have a usb controller chip afaik (according to yubikey anyway, its a custom deal as it doesnt need full usb functionality) so its immune. perhaps my data is out of date? There are several BadUSB attacks and not all controllers are vulnerable, Trezors have been pretty extensively tested/attacked/audited, none of the attacks to date involve BadUSB so I imagine it's safe in this regard. |
|
|
|
I wonder why they don't just use their own custody, and then just take out insurance. Why pay someone else to do the same thing I wonder?
It must have made more sense to them financially or in the long run, buy someone else's solution (maybe IP?), rather than experiment with reinventing the wheel and potentially lose time and/or money. |
|
|
|
Is there a reason why Blockcypher was able to broadcast it in the first place? Normally the broadcast code rejects it on most other websites but Blockcypher seemed to let it through.
They assume that 99.9% of the time someone tries broadcasting a transaction with an extremely high fee does so by mistake. |
|
|
|
also a yubikey doesnt scream "crypto" if you use it in public for 2fa. I don't know, how many yubikeys were sold in total compared with Trezors? another advantage a yubikey has over a trezor -- no bad usb infection possible. which i believe (not entirely sure) a trezor is susceptible to. BadUSB is unlikely, the user would have to be socially engineered to ignore bootloader warnings at every step and even after changing firmware to a malicious one. The warnings about unsigned firmware won't disappear because the bootloader is in a write-protected area. The attack would be easier to conduct if Satoshi Labs was compromised, and afaik multiple people have to sign the firmware. |
|
|
|
Add in the fact that modern browsers sandbox the environment a website's JavaScript runs in (yes, there have been vulnerabilities that allowed said code to escape the sandbox but I highly doubt your antivirus software would be able to detect sophisticated sandbox escape 0days) and nowadays for anyone even a bit more experienced with computers (as in who understands that downloading and running random executables is a bad idea) external antivirus suites provide very little security benefit at best and are a snake-oil-ish mix of bloatware and spyware-lite at worst. Worse even, antivirus programs are complex enough to have many bugs and since they usually run at highest privilege levels their bugs can often be leveraged into exploiting the machine. |
|
|
|
I really don't want to be the party pooper here, but if anyone is expecting a huge amount of money from this one company, then sorry to say that it's really not that much. 10% of their cash reserves are only a total of around Ł72200/$94,365; at least based on their June filings[1]. It's approximately a BTC7.27 at today's prices. It's mostly symbolic but it's also another sign of Bitcoin being increasingly recognized as digital gold, it's less of a hyperbole to refer to it as such nowadays. This will definitely be a factor that didn't exist before and we'd be naive to discount it. Company money arriving now may well feel like a total genius for the next 12-18 months. What happens after is the decider. I see no reason why most wouldn't be headless chickens just like everyone else.
At least most will have arrived via OTC and will depart the same way even if it does add up overall.
Considering the fact that there's more friction involved compared to regular exchanges, there at least might be less thoughtless panic selling contributing to volatility. |
|
|
|
Trezor also supports receiving/sending from bech32 addresses with their new app and web wallet Trezor Suite: https://suite.trezor.io/ |
|
|
|
Manager: Best _ChangeNazwa kampanii: [OPEN] BestChange Signature Campaign Jakie rangi: od Sr. Member wzwyż Ile do zarobienia: Sr. Member $3/post, Hero/Legendary $4/post Dodatkowe informacje: min. 10, max. 25 postów, awatar musi być, min. 200 znaków na post, działy lokalne nie liczą się, bonus $30 za posty wysokiej jakości.
Manager: HhampuzNazwa kampanii: [OPEN] Betcoin.ag | Signature CampaignIle do zarobienia: Hero i Legendary $50/tyg. Jakie rangi: Hero i Legendary Dodatkowe informacje: min. 20 postów/tyg., musi być awatar, min. 5 postów w dziale Gambling
Manager: HhampuzNazwa kampanii: [OPEN] blender.io Signature CampaignJakie rangi: od Sr. wzwyż Ile do zarobienia: Sr. Member $40/tyg., Hero/Legendary $45/tyg. Dodatkowe informacje: awatar musi być, min. 15 postów/tyg., min. 200 znaków/post, działy lokalne nie liczą się |
|
|
|
4.36 million USD on 1 crash bet
how come there isn't 1000's of bustabit video machines in las vegas. yet.... or 1000's of dice machines
Are there any video gambling machines in use by casinos with a house edge as low as 1%? Also, would enough traditional gamblers be even interested in this type of gambling machines to make it worth it? I imagine there's more red tape involved in the traditional casino business. This wangtang dude is doing something else, when I checked it out dude had like 8k+ bets wagered so far, and considering the price of bitcoin, I could easily say that this dude is probably the biggest gambler in the whole world, he has also earned much more than I could ever guess during this period as well, the weirdest one came with his 19.51x bet on a huge wager where he won like 600 bitcoins I think, or 60? Whatever it was, dude is straight up balling right now, it is not even remotely close to each other at all. Max profit is 1% of the total bankroll (online + offline), so 60 BTC is possible (if the bankroll had been a bit smaller), but not 600. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
