Thanks guys, now i need a moderator to tell me can the topic be returned or i must make a new one ?
You can PM one of the Global Mods, they can investigate and reinstate your topic if it's a false positive. |
|
|
|
Wygląda na to, że może i się myliłem bo projekt Libra po opadnięciu wstępnych ekscytacji zaczyna jak każdy inny walkę z elitami tego świata. Sądząc po wyciekniętej wypowiedzi Zuckerberga raczej nie: https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/1/20892354/mark-zuckerberg-full-transcript-leaked-facebook-meetingsCzęść: "On the plan to launch Libra" But part of what we’re trying to do overall on these big projects now that touch very socially important aspects of society is have a more consultative approach. So not just show up and say, “Alright, here we’re launching this. here’s a product, your app got updated, now you can start buying Libras and sending them around.” We want to make sure. We get that there are real issues. Finance is a very heavily regulated space. There’s a lot of important issues that need to be dealt with in preventing money laundering, preventing financing of terrorists and people who the different governments say you can’t do business with. There are a lot of requirements on knowing who your customers are. We already focus a lot on real identity, across especially Facebook, so there’s even more that we need to do in order to have this kind of a product. And we’re committed to doing that well, and part of doing that well is not just building the internal tools and showing up and saying, “Hey, we think we’ve solved this,” but addressing and meeting with all the regulators up front, hearing their concerns, hearing what they think we should be doing, making sure other folks in the consortium are handling this appropriately. Czyli będą próbowali się wszystkim przypodobać robiąc z Libry Paypal 2.0. Inaczej instytucje finansowe nie będą chciały z nimi robić biznesu, tak jak giełdy kryptowalutowe mają problemy z bankowością, nawet te z ekstensywnym KYC. |
|
|
|
Inna analiza wolumenu giełd, m.in. Binance: https://medium.com/@sylvainartplayribes/chasing-fake-volume-a-crypto-plague-ea1a3c1e0b5eKreacja pieniądza została potwierdzona przy upadku Bitmarketu, który mimo tracenia środków funkcjonował dalej aż do momentu w którym nie mieli z czego wypłacać.
Mt. Gox był pierwszy, jeszcze na początku 2011 80k BTC zostało skradzionych gdy giełda zmieniała właściciela (a potem jeszcze było więcej okazji do utraty środków)  |
|
|
|
Wolf.bet has three Sr. Member positions open.
4) Any stats on how well these perform?
Many campaigns end, some after as little as several weeks, so depending on if you have a well-developed product with high profit margins, such as a cryptocurrency casino or a mixer, it may or may not be worth your time. |
|
|
|
|
No, you are not breaking any rules in doing so.
But if you're posting your site to redirect others there so that they may buy something from your website, your topic will be moved to Service Announcements.
|
|
|
|
Why is it so bad? Do you think it would be better if this industry did not develop? You would see an old slow Bitcoin with a large Commission on transfers. Which would be worth nothing in principle. There would not be so many projects and so many new solutions. New interesting exchanges and new opportunities. I think you're just stuck somewhere in the past.
He complained about high exchange fees, and that's a result of the industry 'maturing', i.e. regulation and enforcement making it harder to do business, means there are higher costs of doing business and there's less competition. |
|
|
|
There are no reason why merit source list should be made public. This is the reasoning: I will not be posting a definitive list of merit sources (so that people don't bug them too much), though you'll soon figure out who they are if you pay attention.
Another reason I can think of against making the list public is it would make it easier to buy merits by contacting every one on the list and hoping at least one of them is willing to profit from their position. |
|
|
|
That opens up a category of users or accounts who are not merit sources which sell their merits, then get merited by sources. Or even two or more hops away. So if a merit source sends the non-merit source 2 merits, that user can sell the 1 sMerit they can send? It boggles the mind. If a merit source sends a non-merit source merits with the knowledge that this user will sell their sMerits, I think that should (and probably would if discovered) be treated the same as selling merits directly. The more hops there are, the less of a concern this is, obviously. |
|
|
|
It is a proven fact that HR sucks up all the available funds of companies. Look at what happened to college tuitions and books. The reason they charge so much coincided with the rise of HR and all the worthless Admins they hire. HR is a crypto wrecking ball. You cannot argue it anymore. I have HR cornered and the argument is closed/. The people in this topic pushing for HR Departments??? Wonder what kind of crypto businesses they are building...?  Think about it long and hard kiddies. Either way yeah, my clarity on this topic of crypto and Bitcoin has reached unprecedented levels. At this point in the game I am like the Lawnmower man of Bitcoin. I need a rest from this stuff. Have fun gambling in these H.R. Crypto Casinos.... have fun being cut short by the HR Departments hiding behind the scenes sucking up all your profits.. Looks like the other poster is right You had a profoundly negative experience with a single company or two, and this is the topic you have fixated on. Move on, the world's woes aren't all due to HR departments. |
|
|
|
Merit sources aren't supposed to be selling their allocated merits, so if someone's old (no problem at all by itself, I also sometimes merit older posts) and average posts no one else would merit are suddenly being merited, to some people this will look like selling merits or self-meriting an alt account (I'm not saying this has to be the case here, just saying how it may be seen). I'll also leave these quotes from theymos: While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.
If you want to be a merit source:
1. Be a somewhat established member.
2. Collect TEN posts written in the last couple of months by other people that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread. The point of this is to demonstrate your ability to give out merit usefully.
3. We will take a look at your history and maybe make you a source.
I am especially eager to have merit sources in sub-communities such as the local sections.
emphasis mine Of course just the act of distributing merits can be useful if the next user now has sMerits of their own to merit useful/constructive posts of low-rank users. post edited to add the 1st quote |
|
|
|
Governments have done enough to dissuade common people from using Bitcoin extensively. Being charged with operating unlicensed money changing businesses is a possibility if you engage in cash-bitcoin conversion. If they could, they would have already done it. But in many countries they're still making it more difficult to exchange fiat money for bitcoins and vice versa, especially if you reach the volume and frequency of transactions that you're seen as a business, even more so if you use a bank account to send or receive transactions. In some oppressive countries you may even need a license if you deal with fiat money, but fortunately that is not the case everywhere. |
|
|
|
As always, I'll recommend this wiki article as an introduction to privacy and anonymity when it comes to using Bitcoin, perhaps it'll help you with your work: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Privacy |
|
|
|
Moim zdaniem za późno nie jest, to że mamy 10 000 różnych coinów teraz, nie znaczy że nie będzie 100 000 za 3 lata i milion za powiedzmy 10 lat. Teraz jest bessa dlatego takie nastroje i tyle. Moim zdaniem kluczem do sukcesu jest maksymalne uproszczenie obsługi portfeli, łatwość w nabyciu i sprzedaży monety, plus budowanie społeczności na co myślę że mam niezły patent  Większa konkurencja nie działa na Twoją korzyść, tylko trudniej się wybić i większa szansa, że nie jesteś pierwsza osobą z dobrym patentem na pozyskanie zainteresowanych. Masz wpływ na UI/UX portfela itp., ale nie bardzo masz wpływ na łatwość nabycia kryptowaluty, poza byciem listowanym na dużej/znanej giełdzie jak np. Binance, co samo w sobie jest już pewną barierą wejścia dla totalnych nowicjuszy. |
|
|
|
|
Airdrop w oryginalnej definicji to darmowe altcoiny/tokeny z nicnierobienie ponad posiadaniem innych kryptowalut w dniu/godzinie airdopa.
Zrzut altcoinów/tokenów za wypełnienie zadań to giveaway lub bounty.
|
|
|
|
Did you know that 80 percent of traffic on Reddit is from the USA and Canada?
Not true, might have been true very long ago About 40% of traffic there is from the US, and 5-6% from Canada. |
|
|
|
|
I don't make the rules of the game, you're whining about something (and your argument might have some substance), so I told you what you can do to go around the problem. Smaller companies might not be able to afford the dead weight that some HR workers may be if they're 'worthless'.
|
|
|
|
But what really bothers people are all the annoying HR women coming to ruin everything. Honestly folks... I think we can do better than this... yeah and the Corporate Shitshow too. All, and I mean All of us who have followed Bitcoin since the beginning are leary of that grouchy HR women inflantrating Crypto Businesses Everywhere. She just heard of Bitcoin like 1 Year ago and now she's got her ass sitting in some secret office and she is getting ready to fire any workers with life left in them.... you know what I saying.. you know.. Then if you don't have the skills/money/perseverance to run your own business, stick to working for companies which are small enough that they don't need to hire HR people, or the HR people wouldn't be as annoying as you're portraying them to be. |
|
|
|
@Pipdips you do not need to quit because of higher fees charged by exchanges simply use Electrum wallet, and set your own fees but don’t set them too low otherwise your transactions won’t confirm.
He was talking about exchange fees, and due to high regulatory barriers of entry and legal risk there is limited competition when it comes to exchanges that won't try to rob or otherwise swindle you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
