I know a few similar places too locally but there are typically a couple caveats:

a. fees - usually 1.5 to 3%; by comparison Bitcoin ATMs are 1 to 4% here and never require KYC;
b. some of them can still ask for KYC randomly, especially if you're sending fiat, although the primary motivation is to avoid criminals monetizing strangers' bank account balances;
c. the higher the transaction value and/or frequency or monthly volume, the higher the likelihood of being asked for docs, transactions below ~$1000 are less problematic

The Bitcoin and the overall cryptocurrency sphere is slowly maturing, and that also means things are becoming more boring, par for the course since finance and other heavily regulated spaces are like that.


That's because of all the scams and unearned hype, people have grown to be naturally suspicious.

One doesn't exclude the other, they may trust a company like Coinbase which performs KYC on its users more than some random person/company.

Also, some banks don't allow their users to send money even to Coinbase or Bitstamp.

suchmoon quoted the main criterion. Community feedback can also be taken into consideration, especially on Local boards.

Other than that don't exhibit any red flags and hope that the stars align in your favour.

Theymos has never made the merit source list public (to non-merit sources) in case the latter wanted to beg from merit sources to give them merits. Of course with time it's easy to figure who most of them are.

Niejeden trader przekonał się na własnej skórze ile wart jest patrzenie na obrót. Nawet jak giełda sama nie oszukuje, to nie opłaca im się penalizować grup osób, które same uprawiają wash trading własnych altcoinów/tokenów, bo zarabiają na prowizjach.

Since they don't allow you to withdraw cryptocurrencies as far as I understand, it wouldn't be surprising if they wanted to prevent people from doing crypto-to-skrill exchanges or if they put barriers to bar most of their customers from these kind of trades, because that would mean one party to the transaction could use cryptocurrencies as they see fit, and a lot of these companies are starting to become nosy how people spend their coins.

I recovered most of the coins I invested in a mining contract in 2011 because I was persistent, almost everyone else who left money with that person didn't get anything, or only a small percentage back.

In the history of bitcointalk there have been a few scammers to return or start returning some of the stolen or defruaded money after a while, I think the most recent one is TradeFortress.

Chodzi o to, że większość osób dobijających do średniej 20 postów na dzień będzie pisać słabej jakości posty. Po rozpoczęciu kampanii zacząłem zauważać sporo słabej jakości postów z sygnaturką cryptotalk.org. Podejrzewam, że tym co więcej piszą bliżej też będzie się przyglądać menedżer kampanii.

https://yobit.net/en/fees/

0.0005 BTC, czyli 16.50 PLN, w innych monetach też 0.0005, więc w Doge byłoby niewiele.

Można też poczekać aż się większa wypłata uzbiera.

There's a Etheroll (DICE), an Ethereum token. The more of these tokens you hold, the greater your share of Etheroll's profits. On etheroll.com only Ethereum is used to gamble, you can cannot gamble using the DICE token itself.

Przesadzili z tą krzywą podaży, jednym z powodów dużego zainteresowania Bitcoinem był jego szybki wzrost wartości.

In light of this, I find it interesting that you'd name your exchange 'aml'.

Your reddit profile linked in the OP doesn't exist: www.reddit.com/user/AML24com

I'd have someone go over the translation of your website because it's so crudely done it makes your site look like a scam :S

This thread can give you an idea how many users in a single signature campaign are posting mostly for money: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188149.0;all

As long as it's on the user's Trust page then I think it's fine. It also wouldn't hurt if we could see how someone has voted (supported/opposed) on flags (others have raised this elsewhere previously).

Making it easier to add other users to a Trust list without visiting said users' Trust pages will result in people adding users without ever having looked into the Trust ratings or flags they post. It's also likely to confuse many users into thinking they're supposed to be adding people they trust (or whose posts they agree with...) to their Trust lists.

I'm not sure if this is the best idea. Users are supposed to be adding to their Trust lists people on whose ratings they can rely on, not whose posts they like or agree with.

Content, as in video content should be fine, only in-person sexual services are prohibited regardless where the exchange would be to take place in due to US laws.

I don't remember theymos saying anything about grown cannabis products, have I missed something?


Not true, maybe they're illegal to be owned or carried somewhere, but there is no such EU-wide law. Germany sets the standard for Germany only. Most EU countries allow for ownership and carrying of pepper spray (and similar stuff) by regular people.


No, there is no EU country where it is illegal to own guns, and in some carrying is also legal. Some EU countries do have inane restrictions, as do some US states/territories/whatever.

"Return to Player (v2 only)" and "Commission" fields on the statistics page need to be updated. Looks like having offsite bankroll is even more attractive.


It's the best cryptocurrency gambling site on the market for both players and investors alike, it's unsurprising that devans would like to capitalize on that.

Clearnet site takes a while to load for me, but eventually it does load. Onion site takes less time to load.