Advocating for the genocide of political opposition... quite liberal. No one has explained to me what these kids are guilty of yet, but why let that hinder you using them as a receptacle for your hatred? They are white and conservative after all, so they are "fair game" right? Guilty by virtue of the simple fact they dare exist in YOUR world.

Yeah I was going to originally post there but I was not sure if "iconic" was the most accurate word...

I prefer to describe this forum as 4chan with an extensive research library.

So as we can see the posters here who disagree are having a hard time making any arguments related to the medias lies regarding the Covington students in DC. Due to the fact they have no excuse for their violent mobbing behavior the left has managed to demonstrate itself as consisting of mobs of unhinged people willing to silence, harass, threaten, and violently attack people in order to punish those with whom they disagree. In the case of the forum distraction and selective enforcement of rules seems to be the predominant tactic since none of them can present a valid argument in defense of these actions.

Since Flying Hellfish didn't take a hint last time and separate his personal feelings from his moderation authority in "Politics & Society" I am starting a log here of behavior for public review and documentation. If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

His strategy in the past, but now again increasingly is selective enforcement of what is and is not off topic. There are several examples which I may come back to later and post here, but I will start with this one thread I started for now just as an example.


"Evil MAGA hat kids from Covington School VS Native American"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101007.0;all

This was deemed on topic, and my report marked as "bad":


I bolded the part that might be considered on topic if at all.



Of course the post I made in my own thread was deemed "off topic":


As you can see I am responding directly on topic and commenting on the strategy of using off topic posts to distract from the topic subject matter, which is the strategy to cover up this embarrassing event here and elsewhere.

Of course there are several other off topic posts he refuses to address, even in this thread alone. He has repeatedly demonstrated that he has problems separating his personal opinions from, and he knows he has a certain amount of plausible deniability in enforcing reports.

For example, he had time to remove my post as off topic, but some how all of my reports are still "unhandled", and this is a regular occurrence, the idea being the comments stay up long enough for some one to respond to them so he has an excuse not to remove them while he always seems to have time to remove anything some one reports of my posts right away.

This kind of behavior is not conductive to free discussion, and this is the exact type of behavior we have all over the internet with control freaks abusing arbitrary enforcement of rules to silence those they disagree with. This shouldn't be tolerated here.

Excuse me if I don't take government statements at their face value when you live in a country where it is illegal and considered racist to collect government statistics on race, ethnicity, or religion, but lets address what you have sourced.



The first link: http://www.histoire-immigration.fr/questions-contemporaines/economie-et-immigration/quel-est-l-effet-de-l-immigration-sur-le-marche-du

Starts off calling out the "far right" in the very first sentence, I am sure this is non-biased  The whole thing relies on a single statement from an economist.


https://www.francetvinfo.fr/economie/emploi/metiers/restauration-hotellerie-sports-loisirs/emploi-de-migrants-dans-la-restauration-nous-avons-besoin-de-personnel-que-nous-n-avons-pas-en-france_2884807.html

This one is basically just an affirmation that poor people are more willing to be exploited for shitty pay. This isn't an argument this is just circular logic. The fact that poor people are more easily exploited is not an argument for uncontrolled immigration.


https://www.gisti.org/doc/presse/1999/cerc/synthese.html

More of the same of the above. None of this substantiates your claim that these people do not exploit the welfare system or that locals are lazy.

Source?

Oh I see. So the only explanation is the locals are lazy? You sound rather contradictory from one breath to the next. Funny how all of your assumptions are accurate and what other people assume is automatically invalid because you disagree.

So you are saying it is justified they flood in because they are useful to be exploited instead of just paying locals a fair wage?

Please don't interpret my words to mean they started all of the conflict involved from scratch.

There were existing issues they exacerbated and utilized to achieve the desired effect. This takes less effort and resources but also gives the impression of the event being totally organic. For our western friends here I would compare it to the "Occupy Wallstreet" protests (only resulting  in less violence and war obviously). It had some organic elements but definitely had 3rd party actors driving and manipulating the situation for their own goals.

If he was just some random jamoke I would say go for it, but his hair is practically like his logo. It would be like Coke changing their name to Cola.

Wait... so you are anti-nationalist but claim to be pro-decentralization? WAT? Globalism is inherently centralized. Also a lot of what you said was simply your opinion.

Some times I question if his intent is to decentralize the trust system, or just give the appearance of decentralizing it.

Local rules are only enforceable if made on the original post, not added as an edit later.

Oooh I see, so the conservatives are responsible for all deeds of state now.

"The status quo is conservative by nature", ok let's ignore the horrible fucking syntax here and assume you are trying to say Conservatives are inherently pro-status quo. This is nothing more than an assumption on your part. Also setting fire to a building is changing the status quo. Just because you are changing the status quo does not make it a good change automatically. Your argument is invalid, even IF you could prove it, which you can't.

"This is why calls for "civility" and "tame protest" are being accurately categorized as fascist. "

What... the fuck are you even... is this the kind of shit leftists tell each other behind closed doors to rationalize violence?


"Conservative activists never had to put people in gas chambers and today, they don't have to squash riots in Missouri, or separate families at the border."

Again, you are drifting way off into lefty lala land giving zero substantiation for your quite extreme and irrational statements. So riots should be allowed, and riots only happen justly? What? Children are separated from adults at the border TO PREVENT THEM FROM BEING RAPED by adult migrants. Not that you give a good god damned about any of them. Also what does any of this have to do with the topic? Oh right nothing, this is just yet another desperate attempt to slide the topic off into another direction by embarrassed lefties.

ANTIFA is a terrorist organization, and if anyone doubts me look up the definition of terrorism, then go on Youtube and put in the search phrase "ANTIFA attacks" and see for yourself. This is the kind of lunacy the left uses to justify their mobbing and violence against anyone who dares question them. They sell each other the delusion that they are fighting nazis, so if they imagine REAL HARD that its true, it is ok to use violence to achieve your political goals according to them.

For the third time also, this event itself was meaningless. What offends people and was actually dangerous was how the media lied about it and promoted mob activity against these children. The left frothing at the mouth and insane as ever gleefully lit their torches and started attacking and threatening these kids and no one would correct the story or take ANY accountability whatsoever. In fact when confronted with the truth they made up MORE LIES about these kids to cover up for their own frothing lunacy and baseless attacks.

This is more important because the mob of angry idiots that calls itself the left are creating the conditions for a violent civil war, and they are completely unaware of it or the consequences of this. You are playing revolutionary, you aren't revolutionary. Get violent and watch all of your hipster lefty friends get fucked into the dirt and be too scared to ever show their faces in public again. You retards have been warned, people aren't going to tolerate this violence against them forever.

Cool story Captain Postmodern. There is inherent risk in freedom, and you are advocating trading in freedom for safety. You have made yourself the enemy because you advocate for enslavement whether you know it or not.

Which is precisely the goal of this harassing and mobbing behavior, to intimidate people into going against their beliefs. It is almost as if it precisely fits the definition of terrorism...

Check back with us in 3 weeks Captain Victory.