I use the AdblockPlus addon on the Chrome browser, and recently, a warning popup appears before every video view. I have the Stands addon installed on another computer but have not tested if the warning appears there as well.

---

You can check out the Ividius project. It is an open-source alternative front-end to YouTube. There are many instances available for free use, both on the clearnet and on the Tor network: https://docs.invidious.io/instances/ Although, For those who want full privacy, I suggest the self-hosted version.

I suggest moving this topic in the Gambling or Scam Accusations board if you want to see any responses to this. Also, 500.casino has an official thread on the forum, so dropping a message there could help you get more exposure.

Username: Stalker22
BTC address: bc1qs0adufrxjn0qhv03260y7eaz7gkcxwlx0kcsns

Thanks 3kpk3!

I totally get that therapy can be helpful for dealing with gambling addiction.  But it can also be expensive for a lot of people. Although I guess gambling costs money too, so if you are willing to drop cash at the casino, you could probably swing some therapy sessions if you really wanted to.   
Another option might be looking into support groups.  There is a bunch online and in-person for gambling addiction and Im sure you could find something that works.   

Really though what matters most is sticking with it and being ready to change, whatever path you take.  You gotta keep at it if you really want your life back.  Thats the key.

You should be a little more careful when sharing links publicly, especially to suspicious sites that could potentially be involved in phishing or host various types of malware. Best to obfuscate it or enclose it in [ code ] tags to prevent accidental clicking.

As for the mentioned website, my anti-virus software has flagged it as infected with a malware, so I strongly recommend avoiding it.


https://www.urlvoid.com/scan/kucoine.net/

Yes, exactly! This means that Murat changed the topic title sometime between December 24, 2022, and May 11, 2023, but definitely after he said the campaign was over on December 24.

And this is what he posted to his followers in the Tokensfund.io TG group last year:

https://t.me/Tokensfund_io/21447

If he enticed bounty participants with a misleading promise about escrowed funds, it implies that he deceived them and shares some responsibility for them not getting paid for their efforts. An even bigger problem is that he had some tokens available in escrow, but for some reason, he chose not to distribute them to the bounty participants. Those tokens are currently worthless, but as Rikafip pointed out, at some point, they were valued at tens of thousands of dollars, which is not an insignificant sum.

From my perspective, a major factor contributing to the mess in the altcoins bounty arena is the lack of responsibility and professionalism among bounty managers who neglect their essential due diligence. This seems to be just one example of that.

The merit system was introduced to put the brakes on shitposters moving up the ranks on here.  It was never meant to be some kind of fact-checking mechanism.  

Take you for instance - before we had merits, you would  probably be on your way to Sr Member already by now!  so I would say the merit system is working just how it should.

Anyway, how much merit did that post even get from the higher-ranked members? None!

Where did you answer? I did not see any updates in the bounty thread. Your last post:


What was the token value after the campaign ended? Why not distribute the tokens then?

Who do you plan to sell them to now that they hold no value? And is that really your decision to make?

And why did you lie in the bounty campaign that the funds were escrowed ($100k)?

That sounds awesome! It is super annoying when sites get clogged with ads and tracking stuff.  FreeTube sounds like a great choice, especially since they focus on privacy and  open source.

I am definitely gonna check out their GitHub! Thanks, @dkbit98!

All private keys should be stored entirely offline. What is the point of geographically distributing keys if they are kept online? The Internet does not respect borders or geographical distances.

Store it offline on my iPhone? Your iPhone is not an offline device. It is safer to use hardware wallets or dedicated offline storage devices.

The private key should remain secret and you should never share it with anyone.  That is an important part for safety of your cryptocurrency. 

What you give out to people is your public address, which is derived from your private key and  when you use your private key to sign transaction on the blockchain, it lets the network know that you signed it with your private key without you having to show the actual private key to anyone.  That is a core thing of how asymmetric encryption works that makes cryptocurrency secure.

So remember, keep that private key private and dont show it to anybody no matter what.


The private key is not used to verify, but to cryptographically sign transactions. Without a private key, you will no longer be able to sign transactions, therefore you will not be able to spend coins from your address.

Hey there! Welcome to bicointalk.org. This forum is just like other ones with people using it daily without issue.  Makes me wonder why you think you need special help getting started.

Why not take a little exploration journey on your own? But yeah, ask away if you really got questions!

Deleting some old posts likely won't get you tagged. But if you erase a ton of stuff you posted, people might wonder why and the internet never forgets. Things you put out there are hard to take back completely.  Here on this forum, we have at least two archives keeping copies of posts even if you delete them from your profile. So once you hit publish, you cannot really hide it after that.

Merit-sources are supposed to look at the quality of a post, not who wrote it.  The whole point of merit is to reward good post that helps the community, even if it comes from someone you do not like.  but let us be real, we all have our preferences and can be hard to be totally fair and unbiased.
I mean there arent any hard rules here. Some merit-sources try harder than others to stay objective.  The important thing is using merit to recognize people who are making this place better, not just your buddies.  Easier said than done though.  We are only human.  

Where can we see a working demo of the market script? And the backend too.
What is the price?

Speaking of shitheads, take a look at this guy:


Did someone hurt you or something? Forgot to take your pills? 

Smart contracts, like any other form of code, can be vulnerable to exploits, and even well-audited contracts have faced challenges in the past. The concept of a "rug pull" may not directly apply in this case, but vulnerabilities can still exist within the contract itself.

Regarding your idea, I do not think the concept of lottery-style games is particularly popular in the crypto world. In fact, not sure if it is even popular among younger generations in the real world. The appeal of such games likely depends on demographics; generally, younger demographics tend to lean towards high-paced games with a significant adrenaline rush involved. That said, there could still be niches or unique features that could make your idea stand out and appeal to a specific group within the crypto community.

I understand that some members have no reason to hide their Bitcoin holdings, but I see no reason to make it public either. For example, I have nothing to hide, but I still want to exercise my right to privacy. No one needs to know how many Bitcoins I have in my possession, just as no one needs to know how much money I have in the bank or in a private safe.

As for the mods and admins, I believe most of them are very well aware of how to keep their Bitcoin holdings safe, and I doubt they have made their cold store addresses public.

@jvanname, I understand that you have a strong viewpoint on Bitcoiners, but I think it is important to acknowledge that people's perspectives and attitudes can vary widely within any group. While there may be individuals who hold strong opinions, it is not fair to generalize and label all Bitcoin enthusiasts in the same way.

Maybe I am in denial, but the impression I have formed from interacting with people here does not align with your perspective. Have you considered the possibility that the issue might not be with people at all? If you continue to use derogatory language like "stupid" and "worthless" when referring to individuals or groups, it is likely to create a hostile and unproductive atmosphere for discussion. While I may not agree with everyone's perspectives, I believe in the value of open and respectful dialogue to better understand each other and potentially find common ground. But that is just me.

Thank you.


Absolutely, I have had the opportunity to communicate with quite a few Bitcoin enthusiasts. However, I usually don't categorize people in such a way. Who are Bitcoiners really? Drawing such conclusions from a few sentences exchanged online, like here, seems unjust and unwise. People have diverse opinions, and it is true that some can be rather passionate about their views. I get that vibe a lot. But aren't we all guilty of similar behavior? In fact, if we take a step back and reflect, we may find that we all, at times, display passionate or strong-willed behavior about topics we deeply care about. Would you not agree?