Website:
Megacrypton.com

Description:
New exchange running multiple coin ICOs for coin project created for the purpose through sock-puppet 'dev' accounts

Exchange [ANN] Thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1565600.0

Website operator's forum username:
megacrypton

Sock-puppet 'dev' accounts operated by megacrypton:
asianrupee
mpaycoin
zlotycoin

Shitcoin scam ICO threads:
asianrupee [ARP] ICO thread posted by megacrypton "We are MegaCrypton got full authorization to handle its whole process" from the brand-new asianrupee 'dev' account

mpaycoin which got panned for having 'paycoin' in the name so was rebranded as 'multipoolcoin' for ICO purposes

zlotycoin [ZLC] yet another scam ICO for a coin dev account created that very day

Evidence that user 'megacrypton' is actually ham-fisted clonecoin creator 'mpaycoin'

1. The domain megacrypton.com was created on 14th July and has not been updated since that day, meaning it is still in the hands of the person who registered it:


2. megacrypton user account was created after the first instance of mpaycoin user advertising megacrypton.com exchange

3. User mpaycoin offers the exchange package for sale on the 21st July

4. User megacrypton account is created 26th July
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881707

5. . . .and immediately sets about creating the megacrypton [ANN] thread promoting the same exchange on the same domain

Notice how the promotional bullshit text is the same for both mpaycoin's post and megacrypton's.

There are some other proofs I can post but this will do for the OP of this scam accusation thread.

Mpaycoin owned the megacrypton.com domain that went with the megacrypton.com exchange script he was selling. He owned it before your account was even created.

Now you own the domain and the exchange, but the domain details were never changed, meaning you are the original owner of that domain, mpaycoin.

Oh, this is just priceless!

Megacrypton just outed himself as mpaycoin:

You fucking idiot, you just pointed out how I can prove you are mpaycoin!

Domain created 14th July 2016

Mpaycoin posts advert for his BTC0.5 megacrypton exchange script which nobody shows interest in on 21st July 2016

Seeing as the domain details haven't been updated since the day it was created we can logically conclude that mpaycoin hasn't sold that exchange package.

This means user 'megacrypton' is user 'mpaycoin' and that he is behind the running of this scam exchange and the creation of these scam ICOs.

You dumb-ass. Walked right into that, didn't you?!

Using a Ukranian bank to take fiat deposits does not qualify as proving this claim:

You state that 'Tier-1 banks' are providing high liquidity, this is nothing to do with your cheap-ass BTC0.5 exchange taking deposits into a Ukrainian bank account of yours.

As for:

Which part of:

Sounds like something other than your shitty scam ICO exchange to host your shitcoin scam ICOs, 'Megacrypton.com'?

All done through brand new 'dev' accounts. No, nothing suspicious about that at all. /s



Explain how shortly after he posts that ad you wind up opening the very same exchange? Please do tell me how the two things aren't connected.

Not exactly the language of a "President and CEO", is it, 'Dave'?

Which jurisdiction did you say your company is incorporated in? You know, the company for which you're the "President and CEO", what with the E and O in CEO standing for Executive Officer. That title denotes a person named on the company's statutory docs as Director.

So where is Zion incorporated?

Avon, Herbalife and Amway at least have a product range they sell. The LEO mlm is simply about recruiting more people to buy in so they can join the pyramid of people recruiting others to buy in, so they can join the pyramid of...

Well this idiot knows a scam ICO when he sees it, 'Dave'.

300 in 48 hours? Bullshit.

So, as I said, Mr 'President and CEO', which jurisdiction is this 'Zion' company you are an executive officer for incorporated in?

Lol



So how's that proof coming along to show that Tier-1 banks are involved in your cheap-ass web script exchange?

Remember, I said I would remove every single negative rating for your scammy exchange and scam ICOs if you could show valid evidence to support your absurd claim.

It isn't much to ask in order to clear your reputation, no?

Oh Bravo, sir!
:applause:
Good find.

But...but... Tier-1 banks!

It is true, I go without washing for weeks while rocking a puff-sleeve blouse and ankle-length skirt.

OP, let's just share the actual details of the reasoning behind your ratings, through the medium of moderated-thread deleted-posts:



Now, seeing as you're busy deleting posts in your scam threads, I've chosen to go about assisting you in that process by rating anybody who supports your fraudulent ICO so we can keep it really really neat and tidy in there.

I'm a fair and mostly reasonable man, though, so if you can provide valid evidence to support your claim about Tier-1 banks supporting your scam-exchange, then I'll remove every single negative rating about you and your numerous scam attempts.

So Zion is an incorporated company then? Which jurisdiction?

Of what?

Says another formerly dormant account.
:facepalm:

Look, I get that the real Tim Olson is a stand-up guy and extremely skilled, I'm not doubting that. My issue concerns long-dead accounts suddenly resuming activity on this forum, talking about a cloud mining site they are setting up. I ask for someone to vouch for this TimOlson account and you send another long-dead forum account to do so!

'Cloud Mining' scams have stolen hundreds of millions of dollars-worth of bitcoin from investors during the time period your two accounts have been inactive. There is *every* motivation for scammers to do the same with ZCash.

Look, just get @zooko to tweet that the bitcointalk 'TimOlson' account is legit and you're good.

Yes, this may be tedious for you and you are probably used to people just appreciating the work you do and not questioning your trustworthiness, but this forum has been widely abused by very intelligent and devious fraudsters in numerous ways to con people out of huge sums of money.

The question is not whether Tim Olson is trustworthy, it is whether the 'TimOlson' bitcointalk account is actually Tim Olson.

That's all.

So you want me to prove you are legit?

No, that's not how this works.

Your account has been inactive for two years. Since then this forum experienced a hack of its passwords. The onus is on you to do the convincing, not require others to.

Quoted for visibility in thread.

And you created that Zcash forum account when?


I'm making an observation which neither concerns how bad a website looks, nor how good. I explained that the term you use to describe your website might mean something entirely benign to you, mining in a 'pond' being compared to fishing, but it also could refer to suckering people in to capitalise on the zcash interest. It is an extremely careless use of language in relation to a potential scam minefield.

Understand this simple fact, the majority of 'cloud mining' operations are and have been nothing more than fractional mining/ponzi scams. Some have been so successful they have managed to steal tens of millions of dollars-worth of bitcoin. The surge of interest surrounding the imminent release of ZCash mainnet is just another opportunity for scammers to invest a little time and money in creating a supposedly legitimate setup of online personae in order to conduct their next scheme.

Add in the fact it involves truly anonymous cryptocurrency and you have the perfect storm for both the operation and ultimate exit for scam services.

That's why you need to accept that before anything else, you have to provide reasonable proof of who you are and that you are trusted by reputable people.

A twitter account which has been inactive since 2015? Plus an equally dead forum account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158050;sa=showPosts

BTW, zeropond.com leads me here:


The term 'ZCash fishing rods' describing the site isn't exactly a good way to convince people you aren't setting up a scam of some kind.

Or even, and I hate to sound quite so melodramatic but these days we have to consider such things, a honeypot by the three-letter agencies.